Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 4 Civ Suit 162/24 Harish Vs. Yag Pratap Gupta 02.09.2025 Present: Sh. A.A. Khan, ld. Counsel for the plaintiff alongwith plaintiff in person. Ms. Deepali Sharma, Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 1 and 2 through V/C. Defendant on. 2 in person. Sh. Rahul Verma, ld. Counsel for defendant no. 3 and 4 through V/C. Ld. Counsels for the defendants submit that the NDOH before the Ld. ATMCD is 15.01.2026. It is further submitted…
HarishVsYag Pratap Gupta +4 more
TrustJury record updated 17 Oct 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 162/2024
- Registration Date
- 24 Feb 2024
- Next Hearing Date
- 12 Jan 2027
- Case Stage
- Misc. Arguments
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
6Acts & Sections
1Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 26-02-2024 Business: Adjourned Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 04-03-2024 Date: 04-03-2024 Business: Adjourned Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 06-03-2024 Date: 06-03-2024 Business: Adjourned Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 23-04-2024 Date: 23-04-2024 Business: Adjourned Next Purpose: Issues Next Hearing Date: 04-07-2024 Date: 04-07-2024 Business: Adjourned Next Purpose: Issues Next Hearing Date: 24-08-2024 Date: 24-08-2024 Business: Adjourned Next Purpose: Issues Next Hearing Date: 09-10-2024 Date: 09-10-2024 Business: Adjourned Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 05-12-2024 Date: 05-12-2024 Business: Adjourned Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 29-01-2025 Date: 29-01-2025 Business: Adjourned Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 05-03-2025 Date: 05-03-2025 Business: Adjourned Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 02-06-2025 Date: 02-06-2025 Business: Adjourned Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 02-09-2025 Date: 02-09-2025 Business: Adjourned Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 15-12-2025 Date: 15-12-2025 Business: Ld. P.O is on leave today Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 18-02-2026 Date: 18-02-2026 Business: adjournment Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 23-03-2026 Date: 23-03-2026 Business: Ld. P.O is on leave today. Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 06-07-2026 Date: 06-07-2026 Business: Ld. P.O. is on leave.today Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 22-09-2026 Date: 22-09-2026 Business: adjournment Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 12-01-2027
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 244/2024 Filing Date: 24-02-2024 eFiling Number: ADL20240001902C202400001 eFiling Date: 24-02-2024 First Hearing Date: 26th February 2024 Court Number And Judge: 76-JSCC/ASCJ/GJ
Orders
26Interim Order 1322 Sept 2026
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 18 Civ Suit 162/24 Harish Vs. Yag Pratap Gupta CNR No.DLET030002452024 22.09.2026 Present: Sh. Mohd. Atif, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff. Sh. Ujjval Sharma, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the defendant No.1 and 2 through VC. Sh. Rahul Verma, Ld. Counsel for defendant No. 3 and 4 through VC. An adjournment is sought on behalf of the plaintiff on the ground that the main counsel is not available today as he is busy in another court in an urgent matter. In view of the submission, the adjournment stands granted. Be put up for arguments on the point of maintainability of the suit in view of the stay order passed by Ld. ATMCD on 12.01.2027. (Dr. Saema Jain) JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge East/KKD Courts/Delhi 22.09.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 1218 Feb 2026
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 3 Civ Suit 162/24 Harish Vs. Yag Pratap Gupta 18.02.2026 Present: Sh. A.A. Khan, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through V/C. Sh. Ujjwal Sharma, Ld. Proxy counsel for defendant no. 1 and 2. Sh. Rahul Verma, Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 3 and 4 /MCD through V/C. The matter has been received back unsettled from the Mediation Cell. Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that he has no information regarding any stay given by Ld. ATMCD with respect to the suit property in favour of defendant no. 1 and 2. Ld. Proxy counsel for defendant no. 1 and 2 submits that he would supply copy of the relevant order of the Ld. ATMCD to him today itself via whatsapp on his mobile number i.e. 9810095705. Be put up for maintainability of the suit in view of the pendency of the appeal filed by defendant no. 1 and 2 before the Ld. ATMCD and the stay order passed by Ld. ATMCD on 23.03.2026. (Dr. Saema Jain) JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge East/KKD Courts/Delhi 18.02.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 1002 Jun 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: Civ Suit 162/24 HARISH VS. YAG PRATAP GUPTA 02.06.2025 Present: Plaintiff in person alongwith Ld. Counsel Sh. A A Khan. Ms. Deepali Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the defendants no. 1 & 2. Sh. Rahul Verma, Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 3 through VC. Ld. Counsel for the defendants no. 1 & 2 submits that they have approached the Ld. ATMCD for challenging the demolition order and have obtained a stay. Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 3 confirms the same. The defendants are directed to file the copy of the order of Ld. ATMCD on NDOH with an advance copy to the opposing side at least a week prior thereto. Be put up for further proceedings on 02.09.2025. (Dr. Saema Jain) JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge East/KKD Courts/Delhi 02.06.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: Civ Suit 162/24 HARISH VS. YAG PRATAP GUPTA 29.01.2025 AT 11:30 AM Present: Plaintiff in person alongwith Ld. Counsel Mr. A A Khan. Defendant no. 1 and 2 in person alongwith Ld. Counsel Mr. Mahesh Kumar Sharma. Mr. Rahul Verma, Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 3 / MCD through VC. In terms of previous order, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff points out that the plaintiff has been running from pillar to…
Interim Order 805 Dec 2024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: Civ Suit 162/24 HARISH VS. YAG PRATAP GUPTA 05.12.2024 Present: Plaintiff in person alongwith Ld. Counsel Mr. A A M Khan. Defendants no. 1 and 2 in person alongwith Ld. Counsels Mr. Mahesh Kumar Sharma and Mr. Rakesh Sharma. Mr. Rahul Verma, Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 3 / MCD through VC. In terms of previous order, reply to the application under O 6 R 17 CPC filed. Taken on record. Copy supplied. Re-list for arguments on 29.01.2025. (Gaurav Sharma) ASCJ-cum-JSCC-cum-Guardian Judge East/KKD Courts/Delhi 05.12.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 15 Civ Suit 162/24 Harish Vs. Yag Pratap Gupta 09.10.2024 Present : Sh. A.A.Khan, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff alongwith plaintiff in person. Sh. Mahesh Kumar Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 1 and 2 alongwith defendant no. 1 and 2 in person. Sh. Rahul Verma, Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 3/MCD. Cost of Rs. 1000/- in terms of order dated 24.08.2024 stands paid by the plaintiff with DLSA, East. Receipt…
Interim Order 624 Aug 2024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 8 Civ Suit 162/24 Harish Vs. Yag Pratap Gupta 24.08.2024 Present : Sh. Vardan Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. Proxy counsel for the defendants alongwith defendants in person. Sh. Rahul Verma, Ld. Counsel for MCD. Matter is fixed for framing of issues in the present case for today. At this stage, counsel for the plaintiff has requested for one opportunity to make necessary changes in the plaint as the plaintiff has also to seek relief of damages against the defendants in the present case. Said request is allowed, subject to cost of Rs.1000/- to be deposited with DLSA, East, Delhi by the NDOH. If any, such application is moved on behalf of the plaintiff in the present case, counsel for plaintiff is directed to supply advance copy of the said application to the counsel for the defendants at least one week before the NDOH. Now, put up for taking appropriate steps by counsel for the plaintiff / further proceedings on 09.10.2024. (Fahad Uddin) ASCJ-cum-JSCC-cum-Guardian Judge East, KKD Courts, Delhi/24.08.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 504 Jul 2024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 24 Civ Suit 162/24 Harish Vs. Yag Pratap Gupta 04.07.2024 Present : Plaintiff in person. Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 1 & 2 alongwith defendant no. 1 & 2. Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 3/ MCD through VC. Today, replication has been filed in the present case on behalf of the plaintiff. Copy of the same supplied to the counsel for defendant no. 1 & 2. Extra copy also filed for counsel for defendant no. 3/ MCD. He may collect the same from the Reader of this court today itself. Now, put up for framing of issues in the present case on 24.08.2024. (Fahad Uddin) ASCJ-cum-JSCC-cum-Guardian Judge East, KKD Courts, Delhi/04.07.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 423 Apr 2024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 16Civ Suit162/24Harish Vs. Yag Pratap Gupta 23.04.2024 Present : Sh. Vardan Gupta, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff along with plaintiff in person. Sh. Mahesh Kumar Sharma, Ld. Counsel for defendants No.1&2 along with defendants No.1&2 in person. Sh. Rahul Verma, Ld. Counsel for defendant No.3/MCD with Sh. Rohit Goel, AE. Fresh vakalatnama has been filed on behalf of the defendant No.3/MCD. Report from the Mediation Centre has been received, as per which, no settlement could be arrived between the parties in the present case. Accordingly, let the present case be proceeded further on merits. Counsel for the plaintiff has requested for one opportunity to file replication in the present case. Said request is allowed. Let replication be filed in the present case on behalf of the plaintiff positively by the NDOH with an advance copy of the same to the Counsel for the defendants No.1&2 atleast one week before the NDOH. Now, put up for filing of replication / framing of issues on the NDOH i.e. 04.07.2024. (Fahad Uddin) ASCJ-cum-JSCC-cum-Guardian Judge, East, KKD Courts, Delhi/23.04.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 16 Civil Suit162/24 Harish Vs. Yag Pratap Gupta 06.03.2024 Present: Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff along with plaintiff. Ld. Counsel for defendant no.1 & 2 along with the defendants. Sh. Rahul Verma, Ld. Counsel for defendant no.3 & 4/MCD along with Sh. Rohit Goel, AE. In terms of last order dated 04.03.2024, status report has been filed on behalf of MCD. Same is taken on record. Copy of the same supplied to…
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CS NO. 162/24 Harish vs. Yag Pratap Gupta 04.03.2024 Present: Sh. Vardan Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff alongwith plaintiff. Sh. Mahesh Kumar Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the defendants no. 1 & 2. Sh. Rahul Verma, Ld. Counsel for the defendants no. 3 & 4/MCD alongwith Sh. Vikash Kumar, JE, MCD. SI Mukesh, PS Shakarpur on behalf of defendant no. 5. Summons directed to be issued have been received duly served on MCD…
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 11 CS No. 162/24 Harish vs. Yag Pratap Gupta 26.02.2024 Fresh case received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered. Present: Plaintiff with Ld. Counsel Sh. Vardan Gupta. Present suit has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff for permanent and mandatory injunction against the defendants no. 1 to 5. Submissions heard on the maintainability of the present suit. Present suit seems to have been filed within the period of limitation…
Order 1322 Sept 2026
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 18 Civ Suit 162/24 Harish Vs. Yag Pratap Gupta CNR No.DLET030002452024 22.09.2026 Present: Sh. Mohd. Atif, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff. Sh. Ujjval Sharma, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the defendant No.1 and 2 through VC. Sh. Rahul Verma, Ld. Counsel for defendant No. 3 and 4 through VC. An adjournment is sought on behalf of the plaintiff on the ground that the main counsel is not available today as he is busy in another court in an urgent matter. In view of the submission, the adjournment stands granted. Be put up for arguments on the point of maintainability of the suit in view of the stay order passed by Ld. ATMCD on 12.01.2027. (Dr. Saema Jain) JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge East/KKD Courts/Delhi 22.09.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 1218 Feb 2026
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 3 Civ Suit 162/24 Harish Vs. Yag Pratap Gupta 18.02.2026 Present: Sh. A.A. Khan, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through V/C. Sh. Ujjwal Sharma, Ld. Proxy counsel for defendant no. 1 and 2. Sh. Rahul Verma, Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 3 and 4 /MCD through V/C. The matter has been received back unsettled from the Mediation Cell. Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that he has no information regarding any stay given by Ld. ATMCD with respect to the suit property in favour of defendant no. 1 and 2. Ld. Proxy counsel for defendant no. 1 and 2 submits that he would supply copy of the relevant order of the Ld. ATMCD to him today itself via whatsapp on his mobile number i.e. 9810095705. Be put up for maintainability of the suit in view of the pendency of the appeal filed by defendant no. 1 and 2 before the Ld. ATMCD and the stay order passed by Ld. ATMCD on 23.03.2026. (Dr. Saema Jain) JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge East/KKD Courts/Delhi 18.02.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 4 Civ Suit 162/24 Harish Vs. Yag Pratap Gupta 02.09.2025 Present: Sh. A.A. Khan, ld. Counsel for the plaintiff alongwith plaintiff in person. Ms. Deepali Sharma, Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 1 and 2 through V/C. Defendant on. 2 in person. Sh. Rahul Verma, ld. Counsel for defendant no. 3 and 4 through V/C. Ld. Counsels for the defendants submit that the NDOH before the Ld. ATMCD is 15.01.2026. It is further submitted…
Order 1002 Jun 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: Civ Suit 162/24 HARISH VS. YAG PRATAP GUPTA 02.06.2025 Present: Plaintiff in person alongwith Ld. Counsel Sh. A A Khan. Ms. Deepali Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the defendants no. 1 & 2. Sh. Rahul Verma, Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 3 through VC. Ld. Counsel for the defendants no. 1 & 2 submits that they have approached the Ld. ATMCD for challenging the demolition order and have obtained a stay. Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 3 confirms the same. The defendants are directed to file the copy of the order of Ld. ATMCD on NDOH with an advance copy to the opposing side at least a week prior thereto. Be put up for further proceedings on 02.09.2025. (Dr. Saema Jain) JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge East/KKD Courts/Delhi 02.06.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: Civ Suit 162/24 HARISH VS. YAG PRATAP GUPTA 29.01.2025 AT 11:30 AM Present: Plaintiff in person alongwith Ld. Counsel Mr. A A Khan. Defendant no. 1 and 2 in person alongwith Ld. Counsel Mr. Mahesh Kumar Sharma. Mr. Rahul Verma, Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 3 / MCD through VC. In terms of previous order, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff points out that the plaintiff has been running from pillar to…
Order 805 Dec 2024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: Civ Suit 162/24 HARISH VS. YAG PRATAP GUPTA 05.12.2024 Present: Plaintiff in person alongwith Ld. Counsel Mr. A A M Khan. Defendants no. 1 and 2 in person alongwith Ld. Counsels Mr. Mahesh Kumar Sharma and Mr. Rakesh Sharma. Mr. Rahul Verma, Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 3 / MCD through VC. In terms of previous order, reply to the application under O 6 R 17 CPC filed. Taken on record. Copy supplied. Re-list for arguments on 29.01.2025. (Gaurav Sharma) ASCJ-cum-JSCC-cum-Guardian Judge East/KKD Courts/Delhi 05.12.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 15 Civ Suit 162/24 Harish Vs. Yag Pratap Gupta 09.10.2024 Present : Sh. A.A.Khan, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff alongwith plaintiff in person. Sh. Mahesh Kumar Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 1 and 2 alongwith defendant no. 1 and 2 in person. Sh. Rahul Verma, Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 3/MCD. Cost of Rs. 1000/- in terms of order dated 24.08.2024 stands paid by the plaintiff with DLSA, East. Receipt…
Order 624 Aug 2024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 8 Civ Suit 162/24 Harish Vs. Yag Pratap Gupta 24.08.2024 Present : Sh. Vardan Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. Proxy counsel for the defendants alongwith defendants in person. Sh. Rahul Verma, Ld. Counsel for MCD. Matter is fixed for framing of issues in the present case for today. At this stage, counsel for the plaintiff has requested for one opportunity to make necessary changes in the plaint as the plaintiff has also to seek relief of damages against the defendants in the present case. Said request is allowed, subject to cost of Rs.1000/- to be deposited with DLSA, East, Delhi by the NDOH. If any, such application is moved on behalf of the plaintiff in the present case, counsel for plaintiff is directed to supply advance copy of the said application to the counsel for the defendants at least one week before the NDOH. Now, put up for taking appropriate steps by counsel for the plaintiff / further proceedings on 09.10.2024. (Fahad Uddin) ASCJ-cum-JSCC-cum-Guardian Judge East, KKD Courts, Delhi/24.08.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 504 Jul 2024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 24 Civ Suit 162/24 Harish Vs. Yag Pratap Gupta 04.07.2024 Present : Plaintiff in person. Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 1 & 2 alongwith defendant no. 1 & 2. Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 3/ MCD through VC. Today, replication has been filed in the present case on behalf of the plaintiff. Copy of the same supplied to the counsel for defendant no. 1 & 2. Extra copy also filed for counsel for defendant no. 3/ MCD. He may collect the same from the Reader of this court today itself. Now, put up for framing of issues in the present case on 24.08.2024. (Fahad Uddin) ASCJ-cum-JSCC-cum-Guardian Judge East, KKD Courts, Delhi/04.07.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 423 Apr 2024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 16Civ Suit162/24Harish Vs. Yag Pratap Gupta 23.04.2024 Present : Sh. Vardan Gupta, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff along with plaintiff in person. Sh. Mahesh Kumar Sharma, Ld. Counsel for defendants No.1&2 along with defendants No.1&2 in person. Sh. Rahul Verma, Ld. Counsel for defendant No.3/MCD with Sh. Rohit Goel, AE. Fresh vakalatnama has been filed on behalf of the defendant No.3/MCD. Report from the Mediation Centre has been received, as per which, no settlement could be arrived between the parties in the present case. Accordingly, let the present case be proceeded further on merits. Counsel for the plaintiff has requested for one opportunity to file replication in the present case. Said request is allowed. Let replication be filed in the present case on behalf of the plaintiff positively by the NDOH with an advance copy of the same to the Counsel for the defendants No.1&2 atleast one week before the NDOH. Now, put up for filing of replication / framing of issues on the NDOH i.e. 04.07.2024. (Fahad Uddin) ASCJ-cum-JSCC-cum-Guardian Judge, East, KKD Courts, Delhi/23.04.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 16 Civil Suit162/24 Harish Vs. Yag Pratap Gupta 06.03.2024 Present: Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff along with plaintiff. Ld. Counsel for defendant no.1 & 2 along with the defendants. Sh. Rahul Verma, Ld. Counsel for defendant no.3 & 4/MCD along with Sh. Rohit Goel, AE. In terms of last order dated 04.03.2024, status report has been filed on behalf of MCD. Same is taken on record. Copy of the same supplied to…
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CS NO. 162/24 Harish vs. Yag Pratap Gupta 04.03.2024 Present: Sh. Vardan Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff alongwith plaintiff. Sh. Mahesh Kumar Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the defendants no. 1 & 2. Sh. Rahul Verma, Ld. Counsel for the defendants no. 3 & 4/MCD alongwith Sh. Vikash Kumar, JE, MCD. SI Mukesh, PS Shakarpur on behalf of defendant no. 5. Summons directed to be issued have been received duly served on MCD…
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 11 CS No. 162/24 Harish vs. Yag Pratap Gupta 26.02.2024 Fresh case received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered. Present: Plaintiff with Ld. Counsel Sh. Vardan Gupta. Present suit has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff for permanent and mandatory injunction against the defendants no. 1 to 5. Submissions heard on the maintainability of the present suit. Present suit seems to have been filed within the period of limitation…
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
