Public Court Records
Search and explore case information using CNR, parties, Courts, Acts, case types and other public-record attributes.
About TrustJury
TrustJury brings together public court records, lawyer information and reputation signals to help people make more informed legal decisions.
Why TrustJury Exists
Court records contain valuable information about cases, lawyers, courts and legal activity. But that information is often fragmented, difficult to search and hard to connect.
TrustJury was created to organize these public records into a clearer legal-information layer — connecting cases with advocates, courts, police stations, Acts and other relevant public-record information.
What TrustJury Does
Public-record evidence, TrustJury verification and user reviews are separate information layers — they should not be treated as the same thing.
Search and explore case information using CNR, parties, Courts, Acts, case types and other public-record attributes.
Understand publicly observed advocate case activity across Courts, Acts and case types alongside separate verification and reputation information.
Move between a case, its Court, linked advocates and Police Station records instead of treating each public record as an isolated document.
TrustJury adds separate verification and review layers while keeping them distinct from the underlying public court record.

Founder
Founder, TrustJury · Founder, Lawzapo
Manisha Chavan is the founder of TrustJury and Lawzapo. A Chartered Accountant by professional background, her career has included professional-services experience with BMR, KPMG and Ernst & Young, alongside work spanning tax, business, technology and entrepreneurship.
Building Lawzapo, a marketplace connecting clients with legal professionals, highlighted a broader challenge: discovering a lawyer is only one part of the decision. People also need better ways to understand publicly available legal experience, court activity and reputation.
TrustJury was conceived as that evidence layer: a platform that organizes public legal information before the hiring decision.
Our Approach
We distinguish what public court records show from what a profile owner, reviewer or third party says.
Verification indicators should tell users what was actually checked rather than create a vague badge of approval.
Paying TrustJury should not buy a lawyer a higher position in objective search results.
Public records can contain delays, variations and errors. TrustJury should make it straightforward to flag information that needs review.
TrustJury + Lawzapo
TrustJury and Lawzapo serve different parts of the legal-services journey. TrustJury is designed around research, public records and reputation. Lawzapo is a separate marketplace through which clients can hire legal professionals and transact for legal services.
Our Data Approach
TrustJury organizes information derived from publicly available court records and combines it with separately sourced TrustJury information such as verification status, reviews and profile information.
Case · CNR · Parties · Court · Acts · Orders
Search · Connections · Context
TrustJury does not turn a public-record association into a claim that a lawyer specializes in a matter, maintains an office in a location, or is endorsed by a Court or Police Station.
Learn more about our data sources →Corrections & Transparency
Public records change. Names may appear in different forms. Cases may be updated, transferred or corrected. TrustJury is designed to maintain a distinction between source data and platform-generated information and to provide a route for corrections.
Report Incorrect Information →Explore TrustJury
For Lawyers
Claim your TrustJury profile and review the public-record information associated with your professional identity.
Claim Your Profile →