Jai Durga Traders Pvt LtdVsSANSKRITI APPARELS PVT LTD

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 186/23
JAI DURGA TRADERS PVT LTD Vs. SANSKRITI APPARELS
PVT LTD
20.09.2024
Present: Sh. Munish Chhokar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
along with Director of the plaintiff Sh. Hans Kumar
Jain.
Sh. Subham Shekhar, Ld. proxy Counsel for the
defendant.
Sh. JP Oberoi, Director of the defendant (through VC)
The matter is fixed for talk of settlement. Both the
parties were directed to remain present in the court for today.
Today, Sh. Hans Kumar Jain, Director of the plaintiff
company has appeared in the court for making talk of settlement.
But Sh. JP Oberoi, Director of the defendant appeared through VC
has submitted that in view of severe back pain, he is unable to
appear in the court and seeks another opportunity to make talk of
settlement.
Accordingly, matter stands adjourned for talk of
settlement, failing which for hearing final arguments. Both the
parties are directed to remain present on the next date of hearing.
To come up on 07.10.2024.
(Pawan Kumar Matto)
District Judge, Commercial Court-04
Shahdara, Karkardooma Court
Delhi/20.09.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 186/23
JAI DURGA TRADERS PVT LTD Vs. SANSKRITI APPARELS
PVT LTD
18.09.2024
Present: Sh. Munish Chokar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
(through VC).
Sh. Hans Kumar Jain, Director of plaintiff in person.
Sh. Shubham Shekhar, Ld. proxy Counsel for the
defendant.
Sh. Jag Pravesh Oberoi, Director of the defendant
(through VC).
The matter is fixed for hearing final arguments. Today,
the Director of the plaintiff has appeared in the person in the Court
and Sh. J.P. Oberoi, director of the defendant has appeared through
VC and both the parties have shown their desire to settle the matter.
Sh. Oberoi submitted that in view of some medical problem, so, he
could not come to the court today and directors of both the parties
seek adjournment for making talk of settlement.
In view of the joint request made by the parites, the
matter is ordered to be listed for talk of settlement, failing which for
hearing final arguments on 20.09.2024.
Both the parties are directed to remain present on the
next date of hearing.
(Pawan Kumar Matto)
District Judge, Commercial Court-04
Shahdara, Karkardooma Court
Delhi/18.09.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 10CS (COMM)186/23
JAI DURGA TRADERS PVT LTD Vs. SANSKRITI APPARELS PVTLTD
14.08.2024
Present: Sh. Munish Chhoker, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff through VC.
Sh. Pradeep Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff along with plaintiff
physically in Court.
Sh. Shubham Shekhar, Ld. proxy Counsel for defendant.
The matter is fixed for hearing final arguments.
Today, ld. proxy counsel for the defendant has submitted that main
counsel for the defendant is busy in the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi and seeks an
adjournment. On the other hand, ld. counsel for plaintiff has opposed the adjournment
sought by the proxy counsel for the defendant. However, in the interest of justice, last
and final opportunity is granted to the defendant to argue on the next date of hearing.
Matter stands adjourned for hearing final arguments.
To come up on 18.09.2024.
(PAWAN KUMAR MATTO)
DISTRICT JUDGE
(COMMERCIAL COURT)-04,
SHAHDARA, KKD,
Delhi/14.08.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM)186/23
JAI DURGA TRADERS PVT LTD Vs. SANSKRITI APPARELS
PVT.LTD
05.07.2024
Present : Sh. Pradeep Kumar, Ld. proxy Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Shubham Shekhar, Ld. proxy Counsel for the defendant.
Matter is fixed for final arguments. Today, the proxy counsel
for the defendant seeks adjournment as he is not ready to argue in the
present matter.
Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff has not opposed the
adjournment sought by the Ld. proxy Counsel for the defendant.
In the interest of justice, last and final opportunity is granted to
the defendant to argue on the present matter.
To come up for final arguments and for personal appearance of
the parties on 14.08.2024.
(Pawan Kumar Matto)
District Judge, Commercial Court-04
Shahdara, Karkardooma
Delhi/05.07.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (Comm.) No. 186/2023
Jai Durga Traders Pvt. Ltd. vs. Sanskriti Apparels Pvt. Ltd.
23.03.2024
Present : Sh. Pradeep Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff in the court.
Sh. Ayush Bhasin, Ld. Counsel for the defendant through VC.
Matter is fixed for arguments. It is submitted that Sh. Shubham
Shekhar, Ld. Counsel for the defendant, is not available today as his grand
father has passed away and he is to attend to his last rites.
Put up for final arguments on 04.04.2024.
(REETESH SINGH)
DISTRICT JUDGE (COMMERCIAL COURT)-04
SHAHDARA, KKD, DELHI/23.03.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (Comm.) No. 186/2023
Jai Durga Traders Pvt. Ltd. vs. Sanskriti Apparels Pvt. Ltd.
06.03.2024
Present : Sh. Munish Chhokar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through VC.
Sh. Shubham Shekhar, Ld. Counsel for the defendant through
VC.
Matter is fixed for arguments. Arguments addressed in part.
Put up for further arguments on 23.03.2024.
(REETESH SINGH)
DISTRICT JUDGE (COMMERCIAL COURT)-04
SHAHDARA, KKD, DELHI/06.03.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (Comm) No.186/23
JAI DURGA TRADERS PVT LTD VS. SANSKRITI APPARELS PVT LTD
23.02.2024
Present: Sh. Manish Chhoker and Ms. Jyoti Verma, Ld. Counsels for the
plaintiff
Sh. Shubham Shekhar (Enol No. D/11625/2023), Ld. Proxy
Counsel for the defendant.
Matter is fixed today for arguments. Arguments addressed in part.
Put up the matter for further arguments on 06.03.2024.
(REETESH SINGH)
DISTRICT JUDGE (COMMERCIAL COURT-04)
SHAHDARA, KKD, COURTS, DELHI/23.02.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (Comm.) No. 186/2023
Jai Durga Traders Pvt. Ltd. vs. Sanskriti Apparels Pvt. Ltd.
06.02.2024
Present : Sh. Manish Chhoker, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Jitender Ratta, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Matter is fixed for final arguments. Arguments addressed in part
by Ld. Counsels for both the parties. Sh. Manish Chhoker, Ld. Counsel for
the plaintiff has filed case laws in his favour. Sh. Jitender Ratta, Ld. Counsel
for the defendant has filed written submissions. Copy supplied.
Put up for further arguments on 23.02.2024.
(REETESH SINGH)
DISTRICT JUDGE (COMMERCIAL COURT)-04
SHAHDARA, KKD, DELHI/06.02.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (Comm.) No. 186/2023
Jai Durga Traders Pvt. Ltd. vs. Sanskriti Apparels Pvt. Ltd.
24.01.2024
Present : Sh. Pradeep Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff in the court.
Sh. Shubham Shukla and Sh. Jitender Ratta, Ld. Counsels for
the defendant through VC.
Sh. Jitender Ratta, Ld. Counsel for the defendant submits that
defence evidence may be closed. Ordered accordingly.
Put up for final arguments on 06.02.2024 at 12 noon.
(REETESH SINGH)
DISTRICT JUDGE (COMMERCIAL COURT)-04
SHAHDARA, KKD, DELHI/24.01.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (Comm) No. 186/23
JAI DURGA TRADERS PVT LTD VS.
SANKRITI APPARELS PVT LTD
16.01.2024
Present: Sh. Munish Chhoker, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Shubham Shekhar (Enol No. D/11625/2023), Ld. Proxy
Counsel for the defendant.
On 05.01.2024 defendant had summoned records of its bank
account through Yes Bank and on that day Sh. Akshay Kumar from Yes
Bank had appeared and he was examined as DW-2. As he had not produced
the entire records, his remaining examination in chief was deferred for
today.
However Sh. Santosh Kumar, Sales Officer has appeared from
Yes Bank in place of Sh. Akshay Kumar and has produced the desired
records. He is examined as DW-3. He is cross-examined and discharged.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant submits that he has instructions to close
defence evidence. However Sh. Shubham Shekar is appearing as proxy
counsel for the defendant and his statement cannot be recorded by this
court as his vakalatnama is not on the record.
Put up the matter for recording of statement of main counsel of
the defendant regarding closing of defence evidence on 24.01.2024.
(REETESH SINGH)
DISTRICT JUDGE (COMMERCIAL COURT-04)
SHAHDARA, KKD, COURTS, DELHI/16.01.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) No.186/23
JAI DURGA TRADERS PVT LTD Vs. SANSKRITI APPARELS PVT LTD
05.01.2024
Present: Sh. Munish Chhoker, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh.Subham Shekar (Enrol No.D/11625/2023), Ld.Proxy
Counsel for the defendant.
Summoned witness Sh. Akshay Kumar from Yes Bank.
Matter is fixed for defence evidence. Sh. Akshay Kumar from
Yes Bank is examined in part as DW-2. His further examination in chief is
deferred for production of request letter of the defendant for closing of his
bank account.
Sh. Akshay Kumar is bound down for 16.01.2024 for his
further examination. Copy of this order be given dasti to Sh. Akshay
Kumar as requested.
(REETESH SINGH)
DISTRICT JUDGE (COMMERCIAL COURT-04)
SHAHDARA, KKD, COURTS, DELHI/05.01.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No.186/2023
Jai Durga Traders Pvt. Ltd. vs. Sanskriti Apparels Pvt. Ltd.
20.12.2023
Present : Sh. Munish Chhokar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through VC.
Sh. Shubham Shekhar, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the defendant.
In terms of the last order, Ld. Local Commissioner has recorded
evidence of the defendant. Report of the Ld. Local Commissioner is on the
record.
Matter is at the stage of defence evidence. An application has
been moved on behalf of the defendant for summoning record of the bank
account from Yes Bank. On filing of PF, record from the said bank be
summoned for 05.01.2024.
(REETESH SINGH)
DISTRICT JUDGE (COMMERCIAL COURT)-04
SHAHDARA, KKD, DELHI/20.12.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (Comm.) No. 186/2023
Jai Durga Traders Pvt. Ltd. vs. Sanskriti Apparels Pvt. Ltd.
06.10.2023
Present : Sh. Manish Chokkar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Subham Shekhar (Enrol No. D/11625/23), Ld. Proxy Counsel
for the defendant.
Matter is fixed today for plaintiff evidence. Plaintiff has moved
an application under Order XI Rule 1 (5) of the CPC to place on record
additional documents. Copy has been supplied.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant seeks time to file reply to the
application of the plaintiff with advance copy to the Ld. Counsel for the
plaintiff.
Put up the matter for arguments on the application of the
plaintiff under Order XI Rule 1 (5) of the CPC on 18.10.2023.
(REETESH SINGH)
DISTRICT JUDGE (COMMERCIAL COURT-04)
SHAHDARA, KKD. COURTS, DELHI/06.10.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM)186/23
JAI DURGA TRADERS PVT LTD Vs. SANSKRITI APPARELS PVTLTD
13.09.2023
Present : Sh. Manish Chokkar, Ld. Counself or the plaintiff.
Sh. Arunabh Chaudhary (Enrol No. D/4855/21), Ld. Proxy
counsel for the plaintiff.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff files replication along with
statement of truth. Copy Supplied. On the pleadings of the parties, following
issues are hereby framed for determination:-
1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to recovery of Rs.
1,59,20,460/- along with pendente lite and future interest
@ 24% p.a. and costs of the suit? OPP.
2. Whether the suit filed by the plaintiff is barred by
limitation?OPD.
3. Relief.
No other issue arises nor is pressed for. Ld. Counsels for the parties
to exchange list of witnesses and to file the same within one week from today.
Ld. Counsels for the parties to exchange copy of evidence by way of affidavit
in advance.
Put up the matter for plaintiff evidence on 06.10.2023. In case any
witness is to be summoned, plaintiff shall take steps to ensure that witness is
summoned for the date fixed.
(REETESH SINGH)
DISTRICT JUDGE (COMMERCIAL COURT-04)
SHAHDARA, KKD, COURTS, DELHI/13.09.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (Comm.) No. 186/2023
Jai Durga Trades Pvt. Ltd. vs. Sanskriti Apparels Pvt. Ltd.
24.08.2023
Present : Sh. Manish Chhokar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff with Sh. Hans
Kumar Director of the plaintiff
Sh. Sanjay Soti, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the defendant.
In terms of the last order, defendant has filed statement of truth
in support of the written statement. Copy supplied. On 22.08.2023 defendant
had filed written statement along with an application for condonation of delay
of 10 days. Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that he does not wish to file
any reply to the said application.
In the application is the stated that due to personal difficulty of
the Counsel, written statement could not be filed in time. The explanation
given is plausible. Accordingly, application is allowed and delay in filing of
written statement is condoned. Written statement is taken on record.
Replication along with affidavit of admission and denial of documents may be
filed by the plaintiff with advance copy to the Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Put up for case management hearing and framing of issues on
13.09.2023.
(REETESH SINGH)
DISTRICT JUDGE (COMMERCIAL COURT-04)
SHAHDARA, KKD COURTS, DELHI/24.08.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (Comm.) No. 186/2023
Jai Durga Traders Pvt. Ltd. vs. Sanskriti Apparels Pvt. Ltd.
22.08.2023
Present : Sh. Manish Chhokar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Abhishek Bhati, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
On 13.07.2023 thirty days time was given to the defendant to file
written statement. However, written statement has been filed today with an
application under Section 151 CPC for condonation of delay of about 10 days
in filing written statement. Along with the written statement, affidavit of
admission and denial of documents has also been filed. Copy supplied.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff points out that no Statement of Truth
as per amended provisions of the CPC in support of the written statement has
been filed. Ld. Counsel for the defendant submits that he may be granted two
days time to file Statement of Truth.
Put up for this purpose on 24.08.2023.
(REETESH SINGH)
DISTRICT JUDGE (COMMERCIAL COURT-04)
SHAHDARA, KKD COURTS, DELHI/22.08.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (Comm.) No. 186/2023
Jai Durga Traders Pvt. Ltd. vs. Sanskriti Apparels Pvt. Ltd.
08.05.2023
Present : Counsel Sh. Munish Chhokar and Ms. Jyoti Verma for plaintiff.
Report has not been received back. Be awaited.
Meantime, summons be issued again in terms of previous order
on furnishing of e-mail and WhatsApp address of defendant and on taking
steps. Affidavit of plaintiff with regard to correctness of e-mail and
WhatsApp address be also filed.
Be put up for further proceedings on 13.07.2023.
(SAVITA RAO)
DISTRICT JUDGE (COMMERCIAL COURT)-04
SHAHDARA, KKD COURTS, DELHI/08.05.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (Comm.) No.186/2023
Jai Durga Traders Pvt. Ltd. vs. Sanskriti Apparels Pvt. Ltd.
06.04.2023
Fresh commercial suit received by way of assignment. It be checked and
registered.
Present : Sh. Hans Kumar Jain, Director on behalf of plaintiff.
Summons of suit be issued to the defendant by all modes on
taking steps within one week.
Further, it be specifically mentioned on the summons that this is
a commercial suit and the defendant is required to file the written statement
along with statement of truth and affidavit of admission and denial of
documents within the prescribed period of 30 days from the date of service.
Be put up the matter on 08.05.2023.
(SAVITA RAO)
DISTRICT JUDGE (COMMERCIAL COURT)-04
SHAHDARA, KKD COURTS, DELHI/06.04.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 186/23
JAI DURGA TRADERS PVT LTD Vs. SANSKRITI APPARELS
PVT LTD
20.09.2024
Present: Sh. Munish Chhokar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
along with Director of the plaintiff Sh. Hans Kumar
Jain.
Sh. Subham Shekhar, Ld. proxy Counsel for the
defendant.
Sh. JP Oberoi, Director of the defendant (through VC)
The matter is fixed for talk of settlement. Both the
parties were directed to remain present in the court for today.
Today, Sh. Hans Kumar Jain, Director of the plaintiff
company has appeared in the court for making talk of settlement.
But Sh. JP Oberoi, Director of the defendant appeared through VC
has submitted that in view of severe back pain, he is unable to
appear in the court and seeks another opportunity to make talk of
settlement.
Accordingly, matter stands adjourned for talk of
settlement, failing which for hearing final arguments. Both the
parties are directed to remain present on the next date of hearing.
To come up on 07.10.2024.
(Pawan Kumar Matto)
District Judge, Commercial Court-04
Shahdara, Karkardooma Court
Delhi/20.09.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 186/23
JAI DURGA TRADERS PVT LTD Vs. SANSKRITI APPARELS
PVT LTD
18.09.2024
Present: Sh. Munish Chokar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
(through VC).
Sh. Hans Kumar Jain, Director of plaintiff in person.
Sh. Shubham Shekhar, Ld. proxy Counsel for the
defendant.
Sh. Jag Pravesh Oberoi, Director of the defendant
(through VC).
The matter is fixed for hearing final arguments. Today,
the Director of the plaintiff has appeared in the person in the Court
and Sh. J.P. Oberoi, director of the defendant has appeared through
VC and both the parties have shown their desire to settle the matter.
Sh. Oberoi submitted that in view of some medical problem, so, he
could not come to the court today and directors of both the parties
seek adjournment for making talk of settlement.
In view of the joint request made by the parites, the
matter is ordered to be listed for talk of settlement, failing which for
hearing final arguments on 20.09.2024.
Both the parties are directed to remain present on the
next date of hearing.
(Pawan Kumar Matto)
District Judge, Commercial Court-04
Shahdara, Karkardooma Court
Delhi/18.09.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 10CS (COMM)186/23
JAI DURGA TRADERS PVT LTD Vs. SANSKRITI APPARELS PVTLTD
14.08.2024
Present: Sh. Munish Chhoker, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff through VC.
Sh. Pradeep Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff along with plaintiff
physically in Court.
Sh. Shubham Shekhar, Ld. proxy Counsel for defendant.
The matter is fixed for hearing final arguments.
Today, ld. proxy counsel for the defendant has submitted that main
counsel for the defendant is busy in the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi and seeks an
adjournment. On the other hand, ld. counsel for plaintiff has opposed the adjournment
sought by the proxy counsel for the defendant. However, in the interest of justice, last
and final opportunity is granted to the defendant to argue on the next date of hearing.
Matter stands adjourned for hearing final arguments.
To come up on 18.09.2024.
(PAWAN KUMAR MATTO)
DISTRICT JUDGE
(COMMERCIAL COURT)-04,
SHAHDARA, KKD,
Delhi/14.08.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM)186/23
JAI DURGA TRADERS PVT LTD Vs. SANSKRITI APPARELS
PVT.LTD
05.07.2024
Present : Sh. Pradeep Kumar, Ld. proxy Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Shubham Shekhar, Ld. proxy Counsel for the defendant.
Matter is fixed for final arguments. Today, the proxy counsel
for the defendant seeks adjournment as he is not ready to argue in the
present matter.
Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff has not opposed the
adjournment sought by the Ld. proxy Counsel for the defendant.
In the interest of justice, last and final opportunity is granted to
the defendant to argue on the present matter.
To come up for final arguments and for personal appearance of
the parties on 14.08.2024.
(Pawan Kumar Matto)
District Judge, Commercial Court-04
Shahdara, Karkardooma
Delhi/05.07.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (Comm.) No. 186/2023
Jai Durga Traders Pvt. Ltd. vs. Sanskriti Apparels Pvt. Ltd.
23.03.2024
Present : Sh. Pradeep Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff in the court.
Sh. Ayush Bhasin, Ld. Counsel for the defendant through VC.
Matter is fixed for arguments. It is submitted that Sh. Shubham
Shekhar, Ld. Counsel for the defendant, is not available today as his grand
father has passed away and he is to attend to his last rites.
Put up for final arguments on 04.04.2024.
(REETESH SINGH)
DISTRICT JUDGE (COMMERCIAL COURT)-04
SHAHDARA, KKD, DELHI/23.03.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (Comm.) No. 186/2023
Jai Durga Traders Pvt. Ltd. vs. Sanskriti Apparels Pvt. Ltd.
06.03.2024
Present : Sh. Munish Chhokar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through VC.
Sh. Shubham Shekhar, Ld. Counsel for the defendant through
VC.
Matter is fixed for arguments. Arguments addressed in part.
Put up for further arguments on 23.03.2024.
(REETESH SINGH)
DISTRICT JUDGE (COMMERCIAL COURT)-04
SHAHDARA, KKD, DELHI/06.03.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (Comm) No.186/23
JAI DURGA TRADERS PVT LTD VS. SANSKRITI APPARELS PVT LTD
23.02.2024
Present: Sh. Manish Chhoker and Ms. Jyoti Verma, Ld. Counsels for the
plaintiff
Sh. Shubham Shekhar (Enol No. D/11625/2023), Ld. Proxy
Counsel for the defendant.
Matter is fixed today for arguments. Arguments addressed in part.
Put up the matter for further arguments on 06.03.2024.
(REETESH SINGH)
DISTRICT JUDGE (COMMERCIAL COURT-04)
SHAHDARA, KKD, COURTS, DELHI/23.02.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (Comm.) No. 186/2023
Jai Durga Traders Pvt. Ltd. vs. Sanskriti Apparels Pvt. Ltd.
06.02.2024
Present : Sh. Manish Chhoker, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Jitender Ratta, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Matter is fixed for final arguments. Arguments addressed in part
by Ld. Counsels for both the parties. Sh. Manish Chhoker, Ld. Counsel for
the plaintiff has filed case laws in his favour. Sh. Jitender Ratta, Ld. Counsel
for the defendant has filed written submissions. Copy supplied.
Put up for further arguments on 23.02.2024.
(REETESH SINGH)
DISTRICT JUDGE (COMMERCIAL COURT)-04
SHAHDARA, KKD, DELHI/06.02.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (Comm.) No. 186/2023
Jai Durga Traders Pvt. Ltd. vs. Sanskriti Apparels Pvt. Ltd.
24.01.2024
Present : Sh. Pradeep Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff in the court.
Sh. Shubham Shukla and Sh. Jitender Ratta, Ld. Counsels for
the defendant through VC.
Sh. Jitender Ratta, Ld. Counsel for the defendant submits that
defence evidence may be closed. Ordered accordingly.
Put up for final arguments on 06.02.2024 at 12 noon.
(REETESH SINGH)
DISTRICT JUDGE (COMMERCIAL COURT)-04
SHAHDARA, KKD, DELHI/24.01.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (Comm) No. 186/23
JAI DURGA TRADERS PVT LTD VS.
SANKRITI APPARELS PVT LTD
16.01.2024
Present: Sh. Munish Chhoker, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Shubham Shekhar (Enol No. D/11625/2023), Ld. Proxy
Counsel for the defendant.
On 05.01.2024 defendant had summoned records of its bank
account through Yes Bank and on that day Sh. Akshay Kumar from Yes
Bank had appeared and he was examined as DW-2. As he had not produced
the entire records, his remaining examination in chief was deferred for
today.
However Sh. Santosh Kumar, Sales Officer has appeared from
Yes Bank in place of Sh. Akshay Kumar and has produced the desired
records. He is examined as DW-3. He is cross-examined and discharged.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant submits that he has instructions to close
defence evidence. However Sh. Shubham Shekar is appearing as proxy
counsel for the defendant and his statement cannot be recorded by this
court as his vakalatnama is not on the record.
Put up the matter for recording of statement of main counsel of
the defendant regarding closing of defence evidence on 24.01.2024.
(REETESH SINGH)
DISTRICT JUDGE (COMMERCIAL COURT-04)
SHAHDARA, KKD, COURTS, DELHI/16.01.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) No.186/23
JAI DURGA TRADERS PVT LTD Vs. SANSKRITI APPARELS PVT LTD
05.01.2024
Present: Sh. Munish Chhoker, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh.Subham Shekar (Enrol No.D/11625/2023), Ld.Proxy
Counsel for the defendant.
Summoned witness Sh. Akshay Kumar from Yes Bank.
Matter is fixed for defence evidence. Sh. Akshay Kumar from
Yes Bank is examined in part as DW-2. His further examination in chief is
deferred for production of request letter of the defendant for closing of his
bank account.
Sh. Akshay Kumar is bound down for 16.01.2024 for his
further examination. Copy of this order be given dasti to Sh. Akshay
Kumar as requested.
(REETESH SINGH)
DISTRICT JUDGE (COMMERCIAL COURT-04)
SHAHDARA, KKD, COURTS, DELHI/05.01.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No.186/2023
Jai Durga Traders Pvt. Ltd. vs. Sanskriti Apparels Pvt. Ltd.
20.12.2023
Present : Sh. Munish Chhokar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through VC.
Sh. Shubham Shekhar, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the defendant.
In terms of the last order, Ld. Local Commissioner has recorded
evidence of the defendant. Report of the Ld. Local Commissioner is on the
record.
Matter is at the stage of defence evidence. An application has
been moved on behalf of the defendant for summoning record of the bank
account from Yes Bank. On filing of PF, record from the said bank be
summoned for 05.01.2024.
(REETESH SINGH)
DISTRICT JUDGE (COMMERCIAL COURT)-04
SHAHDARA, KKD, DELHI/20.12.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (Comm.) No. 186/2023
Jai Durga Traders Pvt. Ltd. vs. Sanskriti Apparels Pvt. Ltd.
06.10.2023
Present : Sh. Manish Chokkar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Subham Shekhar (Enrol No. D/11625/23), Ld. Proxy Counsel
for the defendant.
Matter is fixed today for plaintiff evidence. Plaintiff has moved
an application under Order XI Rule 1 (5) of the CPC to place on record
additional documents. Copy has been supplied.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant seeks time to file reply to the
application of the plaintiff with advance copy to the Ld. Counsel for the
plaintiff.
Put up the matter for arguments on the application of the
plaintiff under Order XI Rule 1 (5) of the CPC on 18.10.2023.
(REETESH SINGH)
DISTRICT JUDGE (COMMERCIAL COURT-04)
SHAHDARA, KKD. COURTS, DELHI/06.10.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM)186/23
JAI DURGA TRADERS PVT LTD Vs. SANSKRITI APPARELS PVTLTD
13.09.2023
Present : Sh. Manish Chokkar, Ld. Counself or the plaintiff.
Sh. Arunabh Chaudhary (Enrol No. D/4855/21), Ld. Proxy
counsel for the plaintiff.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff files replication along with
statement of truth. Copy Supplied. On the pleadings of the parties, following
issues are hereby framed for determination:-
1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to recovery of Rs.
1,59,20,460/- along with pendente lite and future interest
@ 24% p.a. and costs of the suit? OPP.
2. Whether the suit filed by the plaintiff is barred by
limitation?OPD.
3. Relief.
No other issue arises nor is pressed for. Ld. Counsels for the parties
to exchange list of witnesses and to file the same within one week from today.
Ld. Counsels for the parties to exchange copy of evidence by way of affidavit
in advance.
Put up the matter for plaintiff evidence on 06.10.2023. In case any
witness is to be summoned, plaintiff shall take steps to ensure that witness is
summoned for the date fixed.
(REETESH SINGH)
DISTRICT JUDGE (COMMERCIAL COURT-04)
SHAHDARA, KKD, COURTS, DELHI/13.09.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (Comm.) No. 186/2023
Jai Durga Trades Pvt. Ltd. vs. Sanskriti Apparels Pvt. Ltd.
24.08.2023
Present : Sh. Manish Chhokar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff with Sh. Hans
Kumar Director of the plaintiff
Sh. Sanjay Soti, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the defendant.
In terms of the last order, defendant has filed statement of truth
in support of the written statement. Copy supplied. On 22.08.2023 defendant
had filed written statement along with an application for condonation of delay
of 10 days. Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that he does not wish to file
any reply to the said application.
In the application is the stated that due to personal difficulty of
the Counsel, written statement could not be filed in time. The explanation
given is plausible. Accordingly, application is allowed and delay in filing of
written statement is condoned. Written statement is taken on record.
Replication along with affidavit of admission and denial of documents may be
filed by the plaintiff with advance copy to the Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Put up for case management hearing and framing of issues on
13.09.2023.
(REETESH SINGH)
DISTRICT JUDGE (COMMERCIAL COURT-04)
SHAHDARA, KKD COURTS, DELHI/24.08.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (Comm.) No. 186/2023
Jai Durga Traders Pvt. Ltd. vs. Sanskriti Apparels Pvt. Ltd.
22.08.2023
Present : Sh. Manish Chhokar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Abhishek Bhati, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
On 13.07.2023 thirty days time was given to the defendant to file
written statement. However, written statement has been filed today with an
application under Section 151 CPC for condonation of delay of about 10 days
in filing written statement. Along with the written statement, affidavit of
admission and denial of documents has also been filed. Copy supplied.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff points out that no Statement of Truth
as per amended provisions of the CPC in support of the written statement has
been filed. Ld. Counsel for the defendant submits that he may be granted two
days time to file Statement of Truth.
Put up for this purpose on 24.08.2023.
(REETESH SINGH)
DISTRICT JUDGE (COMMERCIAL COURT-04)
SHAHDARA, KKD COURTS, DELHI/22.08.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (Comm.) No. 186/2023
Jai Durga Traders Pvt. Ltd. vs. Sanskriti Apparels Pvt. Ltd.
08.05.2023
Present : Counsel Sh. Munish Chhokar and Ms. Jyoti Verma for plaintiff.
Report has not been received back. Be awaited.
Meantime, summons be issued again in terms of previous order
on furnishing of e-mail and WhatsApp address of defendant and on taking
steps. Affidavit of plaintiff with regard to correctness of e-mail and
WhatsApp address be also filed.
Be put up for further proceedings on 13.07.2023.
(SAVITA RAO)
DISTRICT JUDGE (COMMERCIAL COURT)-04
SHAHDARA, KKD COURTS, DELHI/08.05.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (Comm.) No.186/2023
Jai Durga Traders Pvt. Ltd. vs. Sanskriti Apparels Pvt. Ltd.
06.04.2023
Fresh commercial suit received by way of assignment. It be checked and
registered.
Present : Sh. Hans Kumar Jain, Director on behalf of plaintiff.
Summons of suit be issued to the defendant by all modes on
taking steps within one week.
Further, it be specifically mentioned on the summons that this is
a commercial suit and the defendant is required to file the written statement
along with statement of truth and affidavit of admission and denial of
documents within the prescribed period of 30 days from the date of service.
Be put up the matter on 08.05.2023.
(SAVITA RAO)
DISTRICT JUDGE (COMMERCIAL COURT)-04
SHAHDARA, KKD COURTS, DELHI/06.04.2023
-- 1 of 1 --