Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS SCJ 772/25 Surekha Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi 06.06.2026 Present : Sh. Deepak Garg, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. Sh. Atul Tanwar, Ld. Counsel for defendant/MCD (through VC). Necessary affidavit of SPA holder of the plaintiff and NOC-cum-affidavits of other LRs of missing person, have been filed in terms of last order. Same are taken on record. Copy supplied. Matter is pending for remaining PE. It transpires that on the LDOH,…
SurekhaVsMunicipal Corporation of Delhi
TrustJury record updated 16 Oct 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 772/2025
- Registration Date
- 01 May 2025
- Next Hearing Date
- 03 Nov 2026
- Case Stage
- Final Arguments
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
0No Act or Section information is available.
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 01-05-2025 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 05-06-2025 Date: 05-06-2025 Business: fp Next Purpose: Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence Next Hearing Date: 23-07-2025 Date: 23-07-2025 Business: fp Next Purpose: Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence Next Hearing Date: 21-08-2025 Date: 21-08-2025 Business: fp Next Purpose: Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence Next Hearing Date: 06-10-2025 Date: 06-10-2025 Business: fp Next Purpose: Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence Next Hearing Date: 27-10-2025 Date: 27-10-2025 Business: fp Next Purpose: Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence Next Hearing Date: 28-11-2025 Date: 28-11-2025 Business: fp Next Purpose: Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence Next Hearing Date: 09-01-2026 Date: 09-01-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence Next Hearing Date: 16-02-2026 Date: 16-02-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence Next Hearing Date: 02-04-2026 Date: 02-04-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence Next Hearing Date: 12-05-2026 Date: 12-05-2026 Business: further proceeding Next Purpose: Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence Next Hearing Date: 06-06-2026 Date: 06-06-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Final Arguments Next Hearing Date: 05-08-2026 Date: 05-08-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Final Arguments Next Hearing Date: 18-09-2026 Date: 18-09-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Final Arguments Next Hearing Date: 03-11-2026
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 2606/2025 Filing Date: 30-04-2025 eFiling Number: ADL20230003688C202500006 eFiling Date: 22-04-2025 First Hearing Date: 01st May 2025 Court Number And Judge: 12-JSCC-cum-Addl. SCJ-cum-Guardian Judge-01
Orders
24Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS SCJ 772/25 Surekha Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi 12.05.2026 Present : SPA of plaintiff with Ld. counsel Sh. Deepak Garg. Sh. Atul Tanwar, Ld. counsel for defendant/MCD (through VC). PW Ms. Taruna, Assistant Ahlmad in the Court of Dr. Neha Kheria, Ld. JMFC-2, North District, Rohini in person. Witness Ms. Taruna, Assistant Ahlmad is present with the summoned record, however, perusal of the summoned record reveals that the same is not…
Interim Order 1002 Apr 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS SCJ 772/25 Surekha Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi 02.04.2026 Present : Plaintiff with Ld. counsel Sh. Deepak Garg and Sh. Siddharth Srivastava. Sh. Atul Tanwar (through VC) and Sh. Vaibhav Sanwal (in person), Ld. Counsels for defendant/MCD. PW1 Surekha examined, cross examined and discharged. Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that plaintiff wishes to examine one more witness, which is not mentioned in the list of witnesses filed by the plaintiff and plaintiff will file revised list of witnesses so as to summon the record from the concerned Court. In view of the submissions, plaintiff is at directed to move appropriate application along with revised list of witnesses for summoning of the relevant witness. Renotify for further PE on 12.05.2026 (Gopal Krishan) ASCJ-01 (Central)/Delhi 02.04.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 916 Feb 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS SCJ 772/25 Surekha Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi 16.02.2026 Present : Plaintiff with Ld. counsel Sh. Deepak Garg. Sh. Atul Tanwar, Ld. Counsel for defendant/MCD (through VC). Matter is at the stage of PE. At this stage, it is submitted by Ld. counsel for plaintiff that plaintiff is feeling well now and she is in a position to depose before the court, therefore, Ld. counsel submits that he will file the evidence affidavit of plaintiff only during course of the day with advance copy of the same to the opposite party. Accordingly, time is granted to the plaintiff to file the evidence affidavit in PE with advance copy of the same to the opposite party. Renotify for PE on 02.04.2026. (Gopal Krishan) ASCJ-01 (Central)/Delhi 16.02.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS SCJ 772/25 Surekha Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi 09.01.2026 Present : Sh. Deepak Garg, Ld. counsel for plaintiff Ms. Anshika, Ld. proxy counsel for defendant/ MCD. Matter is at the stage of PE. Ld. counsel for plaintiff submits that plaintiff has suffered a paralysis attack recently and she is not in a position to depose today. Ld. counsel for the plaintiff further submits that the SPA holder of the plaintiff is…
Interim Order 728 Nov 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS SCJ 772/25 Surekha Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi 28.11.2025 Present : Sh. Vinay Kumar Sharma and Sh. Siddharth Srivastava, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff. Sh. Atul Tanwar, Ld. Counsel for defendant/MCD. Matter is at the stage of PE. Present suit has been filed by the plaintiff seeking declaration of civil death of her husband by the plaintiff on the ground that he is missing since the year 2012. SPA holder of the plaintiff is present, however, Ld. counsel for defendant/MCD submitted that only the evidence of plaintiff should be recorded and not that of SPA holder. Ld. counsel for the plaintiff seeks adjournment to keep the plaintiff present on the NDOH for the purpose of recording her evidence. Renotify for PE on 09.01.2026. (Gopal Krishan) ASCJ-01 (Central)/Delhi 28.11.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 627 Oct 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS SCJ 772/25 Surekha Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi 27.10.2025 Present : Sh. Deepak Garg & Sh. Vinay Kumar Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through VC. Sh. Atul Tanwar, Ld. Counsel for defendant No.1/MCD. No PW is present. Ld. Counsel for plaintiff seeks one adjournment to lead PE. In the interest on justice, one adjournment is granted. Re-notify for PE on 28.11.2025. (Gopal Krishan) ASCJ-01 (Central)/Delhi 27.10.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 506 Oct 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS SCJ 772/25 Surekha Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi CNR No. DLCT030026062025 06.10.2025 Present : Sh. Deepak Garg, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. Sh. Atul Tanwar, Ld. Counsel for defendant no.1/MCD through VC. An application u/o 7 Rule 14 CPC has been filed on behalf of plaintiff seeking to place on record the copy of untrace report w.r.t. the complaint of missing person namely Sukhbir Singh. Same is taken on record. Copy supplied. Arguments heard. Record perused. In view of the submissions of Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff that the copy of untrace report is necessary for just and complete decision of this case, the application u/o 7 Rule 14 CPC is allowed and disposed of accordingly. Evidence by way of affidavit of witnesses along with list of witnesses filed on behalf of plaintiff. Same are taken on record. Copy supplied. No PW is present today. Put up for PE on 27.10.2025. (Rinku Jain) ASCJ-01 (Central)/Delhi 06.10.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 421 Aug 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS SCJ 772/25 Surekha Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi CNR no. DLCT030026062025 21.08.2025 Present : SPA of plaintiff with Ld. counsel Sh. Deepak Garg. Sh. Atul Tanwar, Ld. Counsel for defendant No.1/MCD through VC. Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff seeks time to file evidence by way of affidavit and list of witnesses as the same could not be prepared due to ill health of the SPA of the plaintiff. Heard. Allowed for today only. Same be filed within two weeks’ from today with advance copy to the opposite party atleast one week prior to the next date of hearing. Put up for PE on 06.10.2025. (Rinku Jain) ASCJ-01 (Central)/Delhi 21.08.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 323 Jul 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS SCJ 772/25 Surekha Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi CNR no. DLCT030026062025 23.07.2025 Present : Sh. Deepak Garg, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through VC. Sh. Atul Tanwar, Ld. Counsel for defendant/MCD through VC. List of witnesses and evidence by way of affidavit not yet filed on behalf of plaintiff. It is submitted on behalf of plaintiff that certain documents have to be obtained before commencement of the evidence, therefore, an adjournment is sought. Heard. Allowed for today only. Last and final opportunity is granted. Same be filed within one week from today with advance copy to the opposite party atleast one week prior to the next date of hearing. Put up for PE on 21.08.2025. (Rinku Jain) ASCJ-01 (Central)/Delhi 23.07.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 205 Jun 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS SCJ 772/25 Surekha Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi CNR no. DLCT030026062025 05.06.2025 Present : Sh. Deepak Garg, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. Sh. Atul Tanwar, Ld. Counsel for defendant/MCD through VC. Sh. S. R. Dabi, ALO for defendant/MCD. Memo of appearance alongwith WS filed on behalf of defendant/MCD. Same is taken on record. Copy of WS supplied. Pleadings are complete. Same are perused. No admission denial is pressed for. From the pleadings of the parties, following issues are framed for trial: 1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to the decree of declaration as prayed in the plaint? OPP 2. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to the decree of mandatory injunction as prayed in the plaint? OPP 3. Relief. No other issue either arises or is pressed for. List of witnesses be filed within 15 days from today. The plaintiff is directed to supply advance copy of affidavits to the opposite party at least 7 days prior to the next date of hearing. Matter be re-listed for Plaintiff Evidence on 23.07.2025. (Rinku Jain) ASCJ-01 (Central)/Delhi 05.06.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 101 May 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS SCJ No.772/25 Surekha Vs. MCD 01.05.2025 Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered. Present : Sh. Deepak Garg, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff. Submissions heard. Let summons for settlement of issues be issued to the defendants on filing PF/RC/electronic modes returnable on 05.06.2025. The plaintiff shall file copies of plaint and documents along with the summons. Copy of order be sent along with the summons. Steps be taken within 7 days from today. Defendant should file his written statement of defence within 30 days from the date of service/receipt of summons. A noting to this effect be made on the summons. (Rinku Jain) ASCJ-01 (Central)/Delhi 01.05.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS SCJ 772/25 Surekha Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi 06.06.2026 Present : Sh. Deepak Garg, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. Sh. Atul Tanwar, Ld. Counsel for defendant/MCD (through VC). Necessary affidavit of SPA holder of the plaintiff and NOC-cum-affidavits of other LRs of missing person, have been filed in terms of last order. Same are taken on record. Copy supplied. Matter is pending for remaining PE. It transpires that on the LDOH,…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS SCJ 772/25 Surekha Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi 12.05.2026 Present : SPA of plaintiff with Ld. counsel Sh. Deepak Garg. Sh. Atul Tanwar, Ld. counsel for defendant/MCD (through VC). PW Ms. Taruna, Assistant Ahlmad in the Court of Dr. Neha Kheria, Ld. JMFC-2, North District, Rohini in person. Witness Ms. Taruna, Assistant Ahlmad is present with the summoned record, however, perusal of the summoned record reveals that the same is not…
Order 1002 Apr 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS SCJ 772/25 Surekha Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi 02.04.2026 Present : Plaintiff with Ld. counsel Sh. Deepak Garg and Sh. Siddharth Srivastava. Sh. Atul Tanwar (through VC) and Sh. Vaibhav Sanwal (in person), Ld. Counsels for defendant/MCD. PW1 Surekha examined, cross examined and discharged. Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that plaintiff wishes to examine one more witness, which is not mentioned in the list of witnesses filed by the plaintiff and plaintiff will file revised list of witnesses so as to summon the record from the concerned Court. In view of the submissions, plaintiff is at directed to move appropriate application along with revised list of witnesses for summoning of the relevant witness. Renotify for further PE on 12.05.2026 (Gopal Krishan) ASCJ-01 (Central)/Delhi 02.04.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 916 Feb 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS SCJ 772/25 Surekha Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi 16.02.2026 Present : Plaintiff with Ld. counsel Sh. Deepak Garg. Sh. Atul Tanwar, Ld. Counsel for defendant/MCD (through VC). Matter is at the stage of PE. At this stage, it is submitted by Ld. counsel for plaintiff that plaintiff is feeling well now and she is in a position to depose before the court, therefore, Ld. counsel submits that he will file the evidence affidavit of plaintiff only during course of the day with advance copy of the same to the opposite party. Accordingly, time is granted to the plaintiff to file the evidence affidavit in PE with advance copy of the same to the opposite party. Renotify for PE on 02.04.2026. (Gopal Krishan) ASCJ-01 (Central)/Delhi 16.02.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS SCJ 772/25 Surekha Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi 09.01.2026 Present : Sh. Deepak Garg, Ld. counsel for plaintiff Ms. Anshika, Ld. proxy counsel for defendant/ MCD. Matter is at the stage of PE. Ld. counsel for plaintiff submits that plaintiff has suffered a paralysis attack recently and she is not in a position to depose today. Ld. counsel for the plaintiff further submits that the SPA holder of the plaintiff is…
Order 728 Nov 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS SCJ 772/25 Surekha Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi 28.11.2025 Present : Sh. Vinay Kumar Sharma and Sh. Siddharth Srivastava, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff. Sh. Atul Tanwar, Ld. Counsel for defendant/MCD. Matter is at the stage of PE. Present suit has been filed by the plaintiff seeking declaration of civil death of her husband by the plaintiff on the ground that he is missing since the year 2012. SPA holder of the plaintiff is present, however, Ld. counsel for defendant/MCD submitted that only the evidence of plaintiff should be recorded and not that of SPA holder. Ld. counsel for the plaintiff seeks adjournment to keep the plaintiff present on the NDOH for the purpose of recording her evidence. Renotify for PE on 09.01.2026. (Gopal Krishan) ASCJ-01 (Central)/Delhi 28.11.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 627 Oct 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS SCJ 772/25 Surekha Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi 27.10.2025 Present : Sh. Deepak Garg & Sh. Vinay Kumar Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through VC. Sh. Atul Tanwar, Ld. Counsel for defendant No.1/MCD. No PW is present. Ld. Counsel for plaintiff seeks one adjournment to lead PE. In the interest on justice, one adjournment is granted. Re-notify for PE on 28.11.2025. (Gopal Krishan) ASCJ-01 (Central)/Delhi 27.10.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 506 Oct 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS SCJ 772/25 Surekha Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi CNR No. DLCT030026062025 06.10.2025 Present : Sh. Deepak Garg, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. Sh. Atul Tanwar, Ld. Counsel for defendant no.1/MCD through VC. An application u/o 7 Rule 14 CPC has been filed on behalf of plaintiff seeking to place on record the copy of untrace report w.r.t. the complaint of missing person namely Sukhbir Singh. Same is taken on record. Copy supplied. Arguments heard. Record perused. In view of the submissions of Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff that the copy of untrace report is necessary for just and complete decision of this case, the application u/o 7 Rule 14 CPC is allowed and disposed of accordingly. Evidence by way of affidavit of witnesses along with list of witnesses filed on behalf of plaintiff. Same are taken on record. Copy supplied. No PW is present today. Put up for PE on 27.10.2025. (Rinku Jain) ASCJ-01 (Central)/Delhi 06.10.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 421 Aug 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS SCJ 772/25 Surekha Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi CNR no. DLCT030026062025 21.08.2025 Present : SPA of plaintiff with Ld. counsel Sh. Deepak Garg. Sh. Atul Tanwar, Ld. Counsel for defendant No.1/MCD through VC. Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff seeks time to file evidence by way of affidavit and list of witnesses as the same could not be prepared due to ill health of the SPA of the plaintiff. Heard. Allowed for today only. Same be filed within two weeks’ from today with advance copy to the opposite party atleast one week prior to the next date of hearing. Put up for PE on 06.10.2025. (Rinku Jain) ASCJ-01 (Central)/Delhi 21.08.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 323 Jul 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS SCJ 772/25 Surekha Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi CNR no. DLCT030026062025 23.07.2025 Present : Sh. Deepak Garg, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through VC. Sh. Atul Tanwar, Ld. Counsel for defendant/MCD through VC. List of witnesses and evidence by way of affidavit not yet filed on behalf of plaintiff. It is submitted on behalf of plaintiff that certain documents have to be obtained before commencement of the evidence, therefore, an adjournment is sought. Heard. Allowed for today only. Last and final opportunity is granted. Same be filed within one week from today with advance copy to the opposite party atleast one week prior to the next date of hearing. Put up for PE on 21.08.2025. (Rinku Jain) ASCJ-01 (Central)/Delhi 23.07.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 205 Jun 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS SCJ 772/25 Surekha Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi CNR no. DLCT030026062025 05.06.2025 Present : Sh. Deepak Garg, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. Sh. Atul Tanwar, Ld. Counsel for defendant/MCD through VC. Sh. S. R. Dabi, ALO for defendant/MCD. Memo of appearance alongwith WS filed on behalf of defendant/MCD. Same is taken on record. Copy of WS supplied. Pleadings are complete. Same are perused. No admission denial is pressed for. From the pleadings of the parties, following issues are framed for trial: 1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to the decree of declaration as prayed in the plaint? OPP 2. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to the decree of mandatory injunction as prayed in the plaint? OPP 3. Relief. No other issue either arises or is pressed for. List of witnesses be filed within 15 days from today. The plaintiff is directed to supply advance copy of affidavits to the opposite party at least 7 days prior to the next date of hearing. Matter be re-listed for Plaintiff Evidence on 23.07.2025. (Rinku Jain) ASCJ-01 (Central)/Delhi 05.06.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 101 May 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS SCJ No.772/25 Surekha Vs. MCD 01.05.2025 Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered. Present : Sh. Deepak Garg, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff. Submissions heard. Let summons for settlement of issues be issued to the defendants on filing PF/RC/electronic modes returnable on 05.06.2025. The plaintiff shall file copies of plaint and documents along with the summons. Copy of order be sent along with the summons. Steps be taken within 7 days from today. Defendant should file his written statement of defence within 30 days from the date of service/receipt of summons. A noting to this effect be made on the summons. (Rinku Jain) ASCJ-01 (Central)/Delhi 01.05.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
