ARANKA INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITEDVsSEDAN ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE +1 more

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 801/23
ARANKA INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED
Vs.
SEDAN ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE
07.05.2025
Present: Sh. Vijay Singh, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Manish Bayala, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
along with DW1.
Cost has been paid by the defendant to the Ld.
Counsel for the plaintiff today in the court.
DW1 Sh. Vikram Singh Bhadoria has been partly
cross examined. His further cross examination is deferred at the
request of Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Put up for further cross examination of DW1 and
RDE on 03.07.2025.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi :07.05.2025
r
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 801/23
ARANKA INDUSTRIES PRIVATE
LIMITED
Vs.
SEDAN ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE
21.02.2025
Present: None for the plaintiff
Ld. Proxy counsel for the counsel for the defendant
(joined through VC)
An application under Order XI Rule 1 (10) CPC rad
with Section 151 DPC to file certain additional documents has
been filed on behalf of defendant.
Further evidence by way of affidavit of Sh Vikram
Singh Bhadoria on behalf of defendant no. 1 and 2 has been
filed.
It is stated that copy has already been supplied to the
other side.
Reply, if any, be filed within a week.
Put up for arguments on this application on
28.03.2025.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi :21.02.2025
r
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 801/23
ARANKA INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. SEDAN
ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE
20.01.2025
Pr: Dr. Vijay Singh, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Manish Biala, Ld. counsel for the defendant.
Evidence affidavit of Sh. Vikram Singh Bhadoria has been
filed on behalf of defendant. Along with affidavit, certain
documents have also been filed which are not on record. It is
settled law that in commercial cases, no document can be filed
along with the affidavit.
Counsel for the defendant seeks time to move appropriate
application in this regard and also to move appropriate certificate
U/O XI Rule 6 CPC in respect of electronic documents.
Let steps in this direction be positively taken within two
weeks subject to cost of Rs.5,000/- payable to the other side. Let
cost be paid today itself.
Accordingly, put up on 21.02.25.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi : 20.01.25
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 801/23
ARANKA INDUSTRIES PRIVATE
LIMITED
Vs.
SEDAN ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE
08.11.2024
Present: Sh. Vijay Singh and Sh. Neetu Singh, Ld. Counsels
for the plaintiff along with plaintiff/PW1.
Sh. Manish Biala, ld.counsel for the defendant along
with AR of defendant Sh. Vikram S. Bhadoria, GM
Sales.
PW1 has been cross examined and discharged.
AR of the plaintiff submits that he does not want to
lead further evidence.
His statement in this regard has been recorded
separately.
In view of statement, PE is closed.
Put up for DE on 18.12.2024.
Defendant is directed to file its affidavit of evidence
and list of witnesses within three weeks with copy to the other
side.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi :08.11.2024
r
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 801/23
ARANKA INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. SEDAN
ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE
02.09.2024
Pr: Sh. Vijay Singh, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff along with
plaintiff in person.
Director of the defendant is present in the court.
Sh. Manish Bayala, Ld. counsel for the defendant has
joined through video conferencing.
It is stated by the counsel for the defendant that defendant
received the notice dated 02.08.24 from the GST department
directing the defendant company to deposit the amount of
Rs.5,30,642/-. This amount has been deposited by them with the
GST on 31.08.24.
It is stated by both the parties that they are exploring the
possibility of settlement. If there is no settlement, the defendant
will move appropriate application seeking leave to place on
record the relevant documents on record. Be done.
Cost has also not been paid in terms of the last order. Time
is sought on behalf of the defendant.
Accordingly, put up on 01.10.24.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi : 02.09.24
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 801/23
ARANKA INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. SEDAN
ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE
29.07.2024
Pr: Sh. Brijesh Singh, Ld. counsel for the defendant.
Sh. Shiwang Sharma, proxy counsel for the counsel for th
defendant has joined through video conferencing.
The matter is listed for cross-examination of PW1 who is
present in the court today. However, adjournment is sought on
behalf of the defendant on the ground that main counsel is not
available today as he is busy in Hon’ble High Court of Delhi.
On the last date, AR of the defendant was directed to
appear in person and even he is not present. Keepin in view the
request, subject to cost of Rs.5,000/- payable to PW1, last & final
opportunity is granted for cross-examination.
If the PW1 is not examined on the next date of hearing, the
court shall be constraint to close the opportunity of cross-
examination and to proceed further in the matter as per law.
Accordingly, put up for cross-examination of PW1 on
07.08.24 at 11.00 am.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi : 29.07.24
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (Comm.) 801/2023
Aranka Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Sedan Engineering Enterprises &
Ans.
12.07.24
Pr. : Sh. Vijay Singh, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Ms. Namita, proxy counsel for Sh. Manish Bayala, Ld.
Counsel for the defendant has joined through video
conferencing.
Affidavit of evidence of Sh. Vinod Kumar filed in support
of plaintiff’s evidence. PW1 Sh. Vinod Kumar partly examined
and his cross-examination is deferred at the requesst of proxy
counsel as main counsel is not available today due to strike of
Advocates.
It is stated by the counsel for the plaintiff that this case
involves issues regarding non payment of GST amount paid by
the plaintiff.
AR of the defendant also to appear in person on the next
date of hearing.
Put up for cross-examination of PW1 on 29.07.24, the date
already fixed.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi : 12.07.24
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM)801/23
ARANKA INDUSTRIES PRIVATE
LIMITED
Vs.
SEDAN ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE
11.07.2024
Present: Sh. Vijay Singh, ld. Counsel for the plaintiff (joined
through VC)
None for the defendant.
It is stated that affidavit of evidence of the plaintiff
has been e.filed but time is sought to file the copy of the same in
the court.
It is stated that due to lawyers’ strike he is not in a
position to come today in the court.
The matter is listed for 12.07.2024 also.
Accordingly, put up for PE on 12.07.2024.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi :11.07.2024
r
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM)801/23
ARANKA INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED
Vs.
SEDAN ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE
12.04.2024
Present: Sh. Jatin Raheja, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Shivang Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
(joined through VC)
Replication has not been filed.
Put up for framing of issues and case management
hearing 22.05.2024.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi :12.04.2024
r
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (Comm.) 801/23
Aranka Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Sedan Engineering Enterprises
22.02.2024
Pr: Sh. Vijay Singh, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Manish Bayala, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
has joined through video conferencing.
Cost on behalf of the defendant paid to the Ld. Counsel for
the plaintiff in the court in terms of the last order.
Let replication be filed within three weeks.
Put up for completion of pleadings, framing of issues and
Case Management Hearing on 12.04.24.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)09,
Central District, THC : Delhi : 22.02.24
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM)801/23
Aranka Industries Private Limited
Vs.
Sedan Engineering Enterprise
15/12/2023
Present: Sh. Vijay Singh, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Shivang Sharma, ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Ahlmad has given his report that written statement
filed by the defendant by e.mode was uploaded on 25/11/2023.
Today Ld. Counsel for the defendant has filed the
physical copy of the written statement, documents and his
vakalatnama.
Further on behalf of the defendant an application
under Order 8 Rule 1 CPC for seeking condonation of delay in
filing the written statement has also been filed.
Let reply to the application under Order 8 Rule 1
CPC be filed within three weeks with copy to the other side.
It is revealed that the defendant has also filed
counter claim along with written statement.
Ahlmad is directed to register the counter claim
separately and prepare separate file in respect of the counter
claim.
Accordingly, put up for arguments on the
application under Order 8 Rule 1 CPC on 09.02.2024.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi :15.12.2023
r
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 801/23
ARANKA INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. SEDAN
ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE
06.12.2023
Pr: Sh. Vijay Singh along with Sh. Pankaj Swaroop, Ld.
Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Shivang Sharma, Advocate has joined through video
conferencing on behalf of the defendant.
There is no Vakalatnama of the counsel for the defendant
on record. The court is not sure about the identity of the person
who is appearing in the name of Sh. Shivang Sharma, Advocate.
The person who is joining through video conferencing
states that written statement has been filed through efiling mode
on 25.11.23. The physical copy of the same shall also be
positively filed in due course.
The Ahlmad is directed to give his report as to whether
any written statement has been filed on behalf of the
defendant.
Accordingly, put up on 15.12.23.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)09,
Central District, THC : Delhi : 06.12.23
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM)801/23
Aranka Industries Private Limited
Vs.
Sedan Engineering Enterprise
17/11/2023
Present: Sh.Vijay Singh, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
Sh. Shivang Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
(joined through VC)
Written statement has not been filed by the
defendant till date.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant seeks some more time
stating that he will file the WS on NDOH with appropriate
application seeking condonation of delay in filing the WS.
Be filed within stipulated period with copy to the
other side.
Accordingly, put up on 06/12/2023.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi :17.11.2023
r
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 801/23
ARANKA INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. SEDAN
ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE
11.10.2023
Pr: Sh. Vijay Singh, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff along with
AR of the plaintiff.
Sh. Shivang Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Sh. Vijay Singh has already filed his fresh Vakalatnama in
this chase which is on record. It is stated by AR of the plaintiff
that counsel has got changed in this case and now Sh. Vijay
Singh is the counsel for the plaintiff in this case. Hence, the
previous counsel for the plaintiff is discharged.
Memo of appearance has been filed on behalf of the Ld.
Counsel for the defendant and he states that he will file the
Vakalatnama within three days. He further states that he would
file the written statement along with appropriate application for
condonation of delay in filing the written statement.
Accordingly, put up on 17.11.23.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)09,
Central District, THC : Delhi : 11.10.23
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (Comm) 801/2023
Aranka Industries Private Ltd.
vs.
Sedan Engineering Enterprise
10/10/2023
Present: Sh. Asad Rajan, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. (joined
through VC)
Sh. Shivang Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
(joined through VC)
It is stated by Sh. Shivang Sharma, advocate that he
is appearing for defendant in this case. He further states that he
got instructions yesterday in the evening only and today he is
struck in Hon’ble High Court and could not come. He seeks time
to file his vakalatnama and to make appropriate submissions.
At this stage, Sh. Vajay Singh, advocate has also
joined the proceedings through video conferencing and states that
he has filed vakalatnama in this case on behalf of plaintiff.
Let AR appear in person to clarify the situation.
Put up on 11.10.2023.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi : 10.10.23
r
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 801/23
ARANKA INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. SEDAN
ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE
25.09.2023
This case has been received by way of transfer from the
court of Dr. Kamini Lau, Ld. DJ (Comm. Court)02 vide order
No. 41849889/F.3(4)/DJ(Comm. Courts)/Gaz/2023 dated
26.05.23 passed by Ld. Principal District & Sessions Judge
(HQs) : Delhi. It be checked and registered.
Pr. Sh. Asad Rajan, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff has joined
through video conferencing.
The summons were issued to the defendant by
PF/RC/Speed Post, however, no report has been received back.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff seeks some time to file the
affidavit of service.
Accordingly, put up on 10.10.23.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)09,
Central District, THC : Delhi : 25.09.23
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Aranka Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Sedan Engineering Enterprise &
Anr.
CS (Comm.) No. 801/2023
26.05.2023
Present: Sh. Asav Rajan Advocate for plaintiff.
Heard. Issue summons of the suit as well as notice
of the accompanying applications (if any) to the defendants vide
PF, RC/Speed Post, email and dasti as well for 25.09.2023..
The plaintiff is also directed to file the affidavit of service on the
defendant.
Written Statement has to be filed by the defendant
within 30 days (extendable up to 120 days with the leave of the
court and subject to terms) from the date of service of process as
per amendment Proviso of Sub Rule 1 of Order 5 Rule 1 CPC
as applicable to the Commercial Courts Act.
(Dr. Kamini Lau)
District Judge (Commercial Court)02,
Central, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi /26.05.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Aranka Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Sedan Engineering Enterprise
CS (COMM) No. 801/2023
24.05.2023
Present: Sh. Asav Rajan & Sh. Ajay Sharma, Advocate for
plaintiff.
The file in physical form received. Be listed for
scrutiny report and consideration on 26.05.2023 at 2:00 PM.
(Dr. Kamini Lau)
District Judge (Commercial Court)02,
Central, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi /24.05.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Aranka Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Sedan Engineering Enterprises
CS (COMM) No. 801/2023
15.05.2023
Fresh suit for recovery of Rs.6,83,131/ received
today way of efiling. It be checked and registered,
as per rules.
Present: None.
Be listed for appearance, awaiting of physical file
and consideration on 24.05.2023 at 2:00 PM.
(Dr. Kamini Lau)
District Judge (Commercial Court)02,
Central, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi /15.05.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 801/23
ARANKA INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED
Vs.
SEDAN ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE
07.05.2025
Present: Sh. Vijay Singh, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Manish Bayala, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
along with DW1.
Cost has been paid by the defendant to the Ld.
Counsel for the plaintiff today in the court.
DW1 Sh. Vikram Singh Bhadoria has been partly
cross examined. His further cross examination is deferred at the
request of Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Put up for further cross examination of DW1 and
RDE on 03.07.2025.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi :07.05.2025
r
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 801/23
ARANKA INDUSTRIES PRIVATE
LIMITED
Vs.
SEDAN ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE
21.02.2025
Present: None for the plaintiff
Ld. Proxy counsel for the counsel for the defendant
(joined through VC)
An application under Order XI Rule 1 (10) CPC rad
with Section 151 DPC to file certain additional documents has
been filed on behalf of defendant.
Further evidence by way of affidavit of Sh Vikram
Singh Bhadoria on behalf of defendant no. 1 and 2 has been
filed.
It is stated that copy has already been supplied to the
other side.
Reply, if any, be filed within a week.
Put up for arguments on this application on
28.03.2025.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi :21.02.2025
r
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 801/23
ARANKA INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. SEDAN
ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE
20.01.2025
Pr: Dr. Vijay Singh, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Manish Biala, Ld. counsel for the defendant.
Evidence affidavit of Sh. Vikram Singh Bhadoria has been
filed on behalf of defendant. Along with affidavit, certain
documents have also been filed which are not on record. It is
settled law that in commercial cases, no document can be filed
along with the affidavit.
Counsel for the defendant seeks time to move appropriate
application in this regard and also to move appropriate certificate
U/O XI Rule 6 CPC in respect of electronic documents.
Let steps in this direction be positively taken within two
weeks subject to cost of Rs.5,000/- payable to the other side. Let
cost be paid today itself.
Accordingly, put up on 21.02.25.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi : 20.01.25
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 801/23
ARANKA INDUSTRIES PRIVATE
LIMITED
Vs.
SEDAN ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE
08.11.2024
Present: Sh. Vijay Singh and Sh. Neetu Singh, Ld. Counsels
for the plaintiff along with plaintiff/PW1.
Sh. Manish Biala, ld.counsel for the defendant along
with AR of defendant Sh. Vikram S. Bhadoria, GM
Sales.
PW1 has been cross examined and discharged.
AR of the plaintiff submits that he does not want to
lead further evidence.
His statement in this regard has been recorded
separately.
In view of statement, PE is closed.
Put up for DE on 18.12.2024.
Defendant is directed to file its affidavit of evidence
and list of witnesses within three weeks with copy to the other
side.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi :08.11.2024
r
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 801/23
ARANKA INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. SEDAN
ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE
02.09.2024
Pr: Sh. Vijay Singh, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff along with
plaintiff in person.
Director of the defendant is present in the court.
Sh. Manish Bayala, Ld. counsel for the defendant has
joined through video conferencing.
It is stated by the counsel for the defendant that defendant
received the notice dated 02.08.24 from the GST department
directing the defendant company to deposit the amount of
Rs.5,30,642/-. This amount has been deposited by them with the
GST on 31.08.24.
It is stated by both the parties that they are exploring the
possibility of settlement. If there is no settlement, the defendant
will move appropriate application seeking leave to place on
record the relevant documents on record. Be done.
Cost has also not been paid in terms of the last order. Time
is sought on behalf of the defendant.
Accordingly, put up on 01.10.24.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi : 02.09.24
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 801/23
ARANKA INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. SEDAN
ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE
29.07.2024
Pr: Sh. Brijesh Singh, Ld. counsel for the defendant.
Sh. Shiwang Sharma, proxy counsel for the counsel for th
defendant has joined through video conferencing.
The matter is listed for cross-examination of PW1 who is
present in the court today. However, adjournment is sought on
behalf of the defendant on the ground that main counsel is not
available today as he is busy in Hon’ble High Court of Delhi.
On the last date, AR of the defendant was directed to
appear in person and even he is not present. Keepin in view the
request, subject to cost of Rs.5,000/- payable to PW1, last & final
opportunity is granted for cross-examination.
If the PW1 is not examined on the next date of hearing, the
court shall be constraint to close the opportunity of cross-
examination and to proceed further in the matter as per law.
Accordingly, put up for cross-examination of PW1 on
07.08.24 at 11.00 am.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi : 29.07.24
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (Comm.) 801/2023
Aranka Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Sedan Engineering Enterprises &
Ans.
12.07.24
Pr. : Sh. Vijay Singh, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Ms. Namita, proxy counsel for Sh. Manish Bayala, Ld.
Counsel for the defendant has joined through video
conferencing.
Affidavit of evidence of Sh. Vinod Kumar filed in support
of plaintiff’s evidence. PW1 Sh. Vinod Kumar partly examined
and his cross-examination is deferred at the requesst of proxy
counsel as main counsel is not available today due to strike of
Advocates.
It is stated by the counsel for the plaintiff that this case
involves issues regarding non payment of GST amount paid by
the plaintiff.
AR of the defendant also to appear in person on the next
date of hearing.
Put up for cross-examination of PW1 on 29.07.24, the date
already fixed.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi : 12.07.24
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM)801/23
ARANKA INDUSTRIES PRIVATE
LIMITED
Vs.
SEDAN ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE
11.07.2024
Present: Sh. Vijay Singh, ld. Counsel for the plaintiff (joined
through VC)
None for the defendant.
It is stated that affidavit of evidence of the plaintiff
has been e.filed but time is sought to file the copy of the same in
the court.
It is stated that due to lawyers’ strike he is not in a
position to come today in the court.
The matter is listed for 12.07.2024 also.
Accordingly, put up for PE on 12.07.2024.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi :11.07.2024
r
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM)801/23
ARANKA INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED
Vs.
SEDAN ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE
12.04.2024
Present: Sh. Jatin Raheja, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Shivang Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
(joined through VC)
Replication has not been filed.
Put up for framing of issues and case management
hearing 22.05.2024.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi :12.04.2024
r
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (Comm.) 801/23
Aranka Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Sedan Engineering Enterprises
22.02.2024
Pr: Sh. Vijay Singh, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Manish Bayala, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
has joined through video conferencing.
Cost on behalf of the defendant paid to the Ld. Counsel for
the plaintiff in the court in terms of the last order.
Let replication be filed within three weeks.
Put up for completion of pleadings, framing of issues and
Case Management Hearing on 12.04.24.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)09,
Central District, THC : Delhi : 22.02.24
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM)801/23
Aranka Industries Private Limited
Vs.
Sedan Engineering Enterprise
15/12/2023
Present: Sh. Vijay Singh, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Shivang Sharma, ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Ahlmad has given his report that written statement
filed by the defendant by e.mode was uploaded on 25/11/2023.
Today Ld. Counsel for the defendant has filed the
physical copy of the written statement, documents and his
vakalatnama.
Further on behalf of the defendant an application
under Order 8 Rule 1 CPC for seeking condonation of delay in
filing the written statement has also been filed.
Let reply to the application under Order 8 Rule 1
CPC be filed within three weeks with copy to the other side.
It is revealed that the defendant has also filed
counter claim along with written statement.
Ahlmad is directed to register the counter claim
separately and prepare separate file in respect of the counter
claim.
Accordingly, put up for arguments on the
application under Order 8 Rule 1 CPC on 09.02.2024.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi :15.12.2023
r
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 801/23
ARANKA INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. SEDAN
ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE
06.12.2023
Pr: Sh. Vijay Singh along with Sh. Pankaj Swaroop, Ld.
Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Shivang Sharma, Advocate has joined through video
conferencing on behalf of the defendant.
There is no Vakalatnama of the counsel for the defendant
on record. The court is not sure about the identity of the person
who is appearing in the name of Sh. Shivang Sharma, Advocate.
The person who is joining through video conferencing
states that written statement has been filed through efiling mode
on 25.11.23. The physical copy of the same shall also be
positively filed in due course.
The Ahlmad is directed to give his report as to whether
any written statement has been filed on behalf of the
defendant.
Accordingly, put up on 15.12.23.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)09,
Central District, THC : Delhi : 06.12.23
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM)801/23
Aranka Industries Private Limited
Vs.
Sedan Engineering Enterprise
17/11/2023
Present: Sh.Vijay Singh, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
Sh. Shivang Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
(joined through VC)
Written statement has not been filed by the
defendant till date.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant seeks some more time
stating that he will file the WS on NDOH with appropriate
application seeking condonation of delay in filing the WS.
Be filed within stipulated period with copy to the
other side.
Accordingly, put up on 06/12/2023.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi :17.11.2023
r
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 801/23
ARANKA INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. SEDAN
ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE
11.10.2023
Pr: Sh. Vijay Singh, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff along with
AR of the plaintiff.
Sh. Shivang Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Sh. Vijay Singh has already filed his fresh Vakalatnama in
this chase which is on record. It is stated by AR of the plaintiff
that counsel has got changed in this case and now Sh. Vijay
Singh is the counsel for the plaintiff in this case. Hence, the
previous counsel for the plaintiff is discharged.
Memo of appearance has been filed on behalf of the Ld.
Counsel for the defendant and he states that he will file the
Vakalatnama within three days. He further states that he would
file the written statement along with appropriate application for
condonation of delay in filing the written statement.
Accordingly, put up on 17.11.23.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)09,
Central District, THC : Delhi : 11.10.23
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (Comm) 801/2023
Aranka Industries Private Ltd.
vs.
Sedan Engineering Enterprise
10/10/2023
Present: Sh. Asad Rajan, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. (joined
through VC)
Sh. Shivang Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
(joined through VC)
It is stated by Sh. Shivang Sharma, advocate that he
is appearing for defendant in this case. He further states that he
got instructions yesterday in the evening only and today he is
struck in Hon’ble High Court and could not come. He seeks time
to file his vakalatnama and to make appropriate submissions.
At this stage, Sh. Vajay Singh, advocate has also
joined the proceedings through video conferencing and states that
he has filed vakalatnama in this case on behalf of plaintiff.
Let AR appear in person to clarify the situation.
Put up on 11.10.2023.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09,
Central District, THC : Delhi : 10.10.23
r
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 801/23
ARANKA INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. SEDAN
ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE
25.09.2023
This case has been received by way of transfer from the
court of Dr. Kamini Lau, Ld. DJ (Comm. Court)02 vide order
No. 41849889/F.3(4)/DJ(Comm. Courts)/Gaz/2023 dated
26.05.23 passed by Ld. Principal District & Sessions Judge
(HQs) : Delhi. It be checked and registered.
Pr. Sh. Asad Rajan, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff has joined
through video conferencing.
The summons were issued to the defendant by
PF/RC/Speed Post, however, no report has been received back.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff seeks some time to file the
affidavit of service.
Accordingly, put up on 10.10.23.
(Deepak Garg)
Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)09,
Central District, THC : Delhi : 25.09.23
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Aranka Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Sedan Engineering Enterprise &
Anr.
CS (Comm.) No. 801/2023
26.05.2023
Present: Sh. Asav Rajan Advocate for plaintiff.
Heard. Issue summons of the suit as well as notice
of the accompanying applications (if any) to the defendants vide
PF, RC/Speed Post, email and dasti as well for 25.09.2023..
The plaintiff is also directed to file the affidavit of service on the
defendant.
Written Statement has to be filed by the defendant
within 30 days (extendable up to 120 days with the leave of the
court and subject to terms) from the date of service of process as
per amendment Proviso of Sub Rule 1 of Order 5 Rule 1 CPC
as applicable to the Commercial Courts Act.
(Dr. Kamini Lau)
District Judge (Commercial Court)02,
Central, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi /26.05.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Aranka Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Sedan Engineering Enterprise
CS (COMM) No. 801/2023
24.05.2023
Present: Sh. Asav Rajan & Sh. Ajay Sharma, Advocate for
plaintiff.
The file in physical form received. Be listed for
scrutiny report and consideration on 26.05.2023 at 2:00 PM.
(Dr. Kamini Lau)
District Judge (Commercial Court)02,
Central, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi /24.05.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Aranka Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Sedan Engineering Enterprises
CS (COMM) No. 801/2023
15.05.2023
Fresh suit for recovery of Rs.6,83,131/ received
today way of efiling. It be checked and registered,
as per rules.
Present: None.
Be listed for appearance, awaiting of physical file
and consideration on 24.05.2023 at 2:00 PM.
(Dr. Kamini Lau)
District Judge (Commercial Court)02,
Central, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi /15.05.2023
-- 1 of 1 --