Full Order Text
Order 19 · 01 Oct 2024 · CNR DLCT010065862023
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 801/23 ARANKA INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. SEDAN ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE 01.10.2024 Pr: Sh. Vijay Singh and Ms. Neetu Singh, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff along with plaintiff in person. Sh. Manish Bayala, Ld. counsel for the defendant has joined through video conferencing. Defendant in person. An application has been moved on behalf of the defendant for seeking waiver of cost imposed by the court vide order dated 07.08.24. It is stated that father of the AR of the defendant had expired and that is why he could not come and since the counsel needed instructions, cross-examination could not be conducted. In my view, if on any material issue, he required instructions, cross-examination could have been deferred but this itself is not any ground not to cross-examine the witness when the matter is listed for cross-examination. However, it totality, this application is disposed off with direction that the cost is reduced to Rs.5,000/-. Cost paid by the defendant to the plaintiff. Application is disposed off accordingly. Further an application has been moved U/O XI Rule 1 (10) r/w Section 151 CPC moved on behalf of the defendant for seeking leave to file certain additional documents stating that on the notice received from the GST, the defendant had deposited a particular amount and they wish to file those documents which are relevant for deciding the controversy. After hearing, this application is allowed. Documents are taken on record. This application is disposed off accordingly. -- 1 of 2 -- Put up for cross-examination of PW1 on 08.11.24. If no cross-examination takes place on the next date of hearing, the court shall close the cross-examination of PW1. (Deepak Garg) Distt. Judge, (Comm. Court)-09, Central District, THC : Delhi : 01.10.24 -- 2 of 2 --
