Shree Kamakhya Roadlines Pvt LtdVsRetail Space Fitouts And Infra Llp

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 16 CS (COMM) 260/24
SHREE KAMAKHYA ROADLINES PVT LTD
VS.
RETAIL SPACE FITOUTS AND INFRA LLP
17.04.2026
Present: None for the plaintiff.
Sh. Jainuddin, Ld. Proxy Counsel for defendant.
Vide separate judgment, the suit of the plaintiff is decreed in
favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant for a sum of Rs.10,17,950/-
along with pendente lite and future interest @8% p.a. on the principal amount
of Rs. 10,17,950/- w.e.f. 01.05.2024 (date of institution) till its realization. The
cost of the suit is awarded in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant
to the tune of Rs. 50,000/- as litigation cost and also the cost to the extent of
the court fees.
Decree Sheet be drawn accordingly.
File be consigned to Record Room.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi / 17.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 260/24
SHREE KAMAKHYA ROADLINES PVT LTD
VS.
RETAIL SPACE FITOUTS AND INFRA LLP
28.02.2026
Present: Ms. Reeta Yadav, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
None for the defendant.
Order could not be completed as one regular stenographer is on
leave today.
Put up for order on 27.03.2026.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi / 28.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 12 CS (COMM) 260/24
Shree Kamakhya Roadlines Pvt Ltd
Vs.
Retail Space Fitouts And Infra Llp
05.02.2026
Present: Sh. R.K. Sharma, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Jainuddin, Ld. Proxy Counsel for defendant.
Written submissions filed on behalf of defendant. Copy
supplied. Oral submissions also heard.
Put up for orders on 28.02.2026.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi /05.02.2026.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 260/24
SHREE KAMAKHYA ROADLINES PVT. LTD.
VS.
RETAIL SPACE FITOUTS AND INFRA LLP
08.01.2026
Present: Sh. Chaman Sharma and Ms. Reeta Yadav, Ld. Counsel for
plaintiff.
Sh. Vishwas Ahuja and Sh. Jainuddin, Ld. Proxy Counsel for
defendant.
Arguments on behalf of plaintiff heard.
Proxy counsel for defendant submits that main counsel is not
available today and they will file written submissions with advance copy to the
opposite counsel. Let the same be filed.
Put up for further arguments on 05.02.2026.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi / 08.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 260/24
SHREE KAMAKHYA ROADLINES PVT LTD
VS.
RETAIL SPACE FITOUTS AND INFRA LLP
17.12.2025
Present: Sh. Chaman Sharma, Ms. Reeta Yadav and Sh. R.K. Sharma, Ld.
Counsels for plaintiff.
Sh. Vishwas Ahuja and Sh. Gaurav Seth, Ld. Counsels for
defendant.
At joint request of parties, put up for final arguments on
08.01.2026.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi / 17.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 6 CS (COMM) 260/24
Shree Kamakhya Roadlines Pvt Ltd
Vs.
Retail Space Fitouts And Infra Llp
20.11.2025
Present: Sh. Chaman Sharma, Sh. Rakesh Kumar and Ms. Lalita, Ld.
Counsels for plaintiff along with AR of plaintiff Sh. Madan Lal
Sharma.
Sh. Gaurav Seth and Sh. Vishwas Ahuja, Ld. Counsels for
defendant.
PW-1 cross examined and discharged.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff submits that plaintiff does not want to
examine any other witness. Separate statement of AR of plaintiff to this effect
recorded. In view of statement made, PE stands closed.
On the last date of hearing, it was directed that the evidence
affidavit of defendant shall not be taken on record as the same has not been
filed. Even till date, the defendant has not filed any evidence affidavit nor has
moved any application seeking permission to lead DE. Ld. counsel for
defendant, in fact, submits that he does not wish to lead any DE.
Put up for final arguments on 17.12.2025.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi /20.11.2025.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 14 CS (COMM) 260/24
Shree Kamakhya Roadlines Pvt Ltd
Vs.
Retail Space Fitouts And Infra Llp
13.11.2025
Present: Sh. Chaman Sharma, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff physically in
Court.
Sh. Gaurav Seth, Advocate for the defendant through VC.
Sh. Jainuddin, Proxy counsel for the defendant physically in
Court.
Adjourment sought on behalf of plaintiff on the ground that the
witness is not present today due to marriage in the family.
Defendant has not filed evidence affidavit till date nor any
advance copy stated to have been supplied despite directions to both the
parties to file their evidence affidavit within two weeks vide order dated
24.07.2025. Hence, it is directed that evidence affidavit of the defendant shall
not be taken on record now.
Put up for cross of PW1 on 20.11.2025, date already fixed.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi /13.11.2025.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 260/24
SHREE KAMAKHYA ROADLINES PVT LTD
VS.
RETAIL SPACE FITOUTS AND INFRA LLP
25.10.2025
Present: Sh. Chaman Sharma, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff physically in the
court.
Sh. Navjot Kwatra, Ld. Counsel for defendant through VC.
Previous cost paid.
Matter has returned back from the Mediation Centre as not
settled.
Put up for PE as well as for DE on 13.11.2025 and for final
arguments on 20.11.2025.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi / 25.10.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 9 CS (COMM) 260/24
Shree Kamakhya Roadlines Pvt. Ltd
vs.
Retail Space Fitouts And infra LLP
16.09.2025
Present: Ms. Lalita, Advocate for the plaintiff along with AR of plaintiff
Sh. Madan Lal Sharma.
None for the defendant.
It is stated that the matter is still pending in the mediation centre
for 06.10.2025.
Put up for awaiting report of the mediation or in the alternative
for cross of PW1 on 25.10.2025.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi /16.09.2025.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 7 CS (COMM) 260/24
Shree Kamakhya Roadlines Pvt Ltd
Vs.
Retail Space Fitouts And Infra Llp
03.09.2025
Present: Sh. Chaman Sharma and Sh. R.K. Sharma, Ld. Counsels for
plaintiff.
Sh. Navjot Kwatra, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Replication along with list of witnesses and evidence by way of
plaintiff filed on behalf of plaintiff. Copy stated to have been supplied.
Affidavit of PW1 tendered in chief and cross examination
deferred at request of ld. counsel for defendant as he submits that the both
parties wish to explore the possibility of amicable settlement.
Accordingly, matter is referred to the Mediation Centre,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi for exploring the possibility of
amicable settlement physically on filling the Mediation Referral Form.
Both the parties are directed to report to the Incharge Mediation
Centre on 08.09.2025 at 2:00 pm.
Put up for awaiting the report from the Mediation Centre or in
the alternative for cross of PW1 on 16.09.2025.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi /03.09.2025.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 14 CS (COMM) 260/24
Shree Kamakhya Roadlines Pvt Ltd
Vs.
Retail Space Fitouts And Infra Llp
22.08.2025
Present: Sh. Madan Lal Sharma, Director of the plaintiff physically in
Court.
Sh. Vaibhav Gupta, Advocate for the defendant through VC.
Evidence affidavit of plaintiff has been e-filed. Time sought to
file the physical copy of the same. Ld. counsel for defendant admits that he
has received the copy of the affidavit and the replication and he also seeks
time to file the evidence affidavit of the defendant.
One more opportunity granted to the defendant to file the
evidence affidavit and let the same be filed within a week with advance copy
to opposite counsel.
Put up for PE as well as DE on 03.09.2025, date already fixed.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi /22.08.2025.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 260/24
SHREE KAMAKHYA ROADLINES PVT LTD
VS.
RETAIL SPACE FITOUTS AND INFRA LLP
04.07.2025
Present: None since morning despite repeated calls.
However, statement of Truth of Sh. Sanjeev Arora as well as
Sh. Sachin Gupta as well as their affidavit of admission/denial has been filed
on 30.05.2025.
Put up for consideration of the application under Order VIII Rule
1 CPC on 24.07.2025.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi / 04.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 3 CS (COMM) 260/24
Shree Kamakhya Roadlines Pvt Ltd
Vs.
Retail Space Fitouts And Infra Llp
24.04.2025
Present: Sh. D.P. Rana, Ld. proxy Counsel for plaintiff physically in
Court.
Sh. Navjot Kwatra, Advocate on behalf of defendant through
VC.
It is stated that though the defendant no.4 was served on
25.02.2025, but the counsel will be appearing on behalf of all the defendants.
Time sought on behalf of defendants to file WS along with statement of truth,
affidavit of admission/denial etc. as well as an application seeking
condonation of delay in filing the same. Let the same be filed with advance
copy to the opposite counsel.
Put up on 13.05.2025.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi /24.04.2025.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 260/24
SHREE KAMAKHYA ROADLINES PVT LTD
VS.
RETAIL SPACE FITOUTS AND INFRA LLP
18.03.2025
Present: Sh. R.K. Sharma, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Summons sent to defendant no. 1 and 2 through Process Server
and speed post returned back unserved.
Summons sent to defendant no. 3 and 4 through Ld. District
Judge has not returned back.
As far as speed post is concerned, summons has been served
upon defendant no. 4 on 25.02.2025, as per Tracking Report.
30 days stipulated for filing WS has yet not expired. Defendant
no. 4 is at liberty to file WS within a stipulated period of 30 days. Meanwhile,
defendant no. 1, 2 and 3 be served afresh. Plaintiff to furnish fresh address, if
any, or phone number or email address of defendant no. 1, 2 and 3 along with
PF.
Put up for further proceedings on 24.04.2025.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi / 18.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 7 CS (COMM) 260/24
Shree Kamakhya Roadlines Pvt Ltd
Vs.
Retail Space Fitouts And Infra Llp
09.01.2025
Present: Sh. R.K. Sharma and Ms. Lalita Ld. proxy Counsels for
plaintiff.
None for defendant.
More time sought to comply with the previous order as it is
stated that they are trying to trace the fresh address of the defendant.
At request, put up as last and final opportunity on 14.02.2025.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi /09.01.2025.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 1 CS (COMM) 260/24
Shree Kamakhya Roadlines Pvt Ltd
Vs.
Retail Space Fitouts And Infra Llp
27.11.2024
Present: Sh. R.K. Sharma, Ld. proxy Counsel for plaintiff.
None for defendant.
More time sought to comply with the previous order.
At request, put up on 09.01.2025.
It is clarified that the plaintiff shall not entitle to interest for the
intervening period as the case is not proceeded further due to lapse on the
part of the plaintiff.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi / 27.11.2024.
Digital signature not appended as the same have expired and renewal of the same has been applied.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 5 CS (COMM) 260/24
Shree Kamakhya Roadlines Pvt Ltd
Vs.
Retail Space Fitouts And Infra Llp
19.10.2024
Present: Sh. Chaman Sharma and Sh. Tarun Kumar, Ld. Counsels for
plaintiff.
None for defendant.
Application under Order XI Rule 1(5) CPC filed on behalf of
plaintiff for taking on record the GST Registration Certificate of the
defendant along with GST Registration Form of the defendant, list of
documents along with documents and the certificate as per Order XI Rule 6
CPC, as applicable to the Commercial Courts in support of the digital
evidence also filed. Though, in the certificate, it is mentioned that the the
same be read with Section 63 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, but
the certificate is not as per the format given in the Schedule-I of the Bharatiya
Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023. Counsel for plaintiff seeks time to do the needful.
Also, as per the GST record of the defendant, the defendant is a
Limited Liability Partnership. Counsel for plaintiff seeks time to take steps in
this regard.
Put up for further proceeding on 27.11.2024.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi / 19.10.2024.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 4 CS (COMM) 260/24
Shree Kamakhya Roadlines Pvt Ltd
Vs.
Retail Space Fitouts And Infra Llp
21.08.2024
Present: Sh. Chaman Sharma, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
None for defendant.
Summons sent to the defendant through process server and
speed post returned back unserved with the report of
‘addressee left’.
Affidavit of service filed as per which the defendant has been
served through whatsApp and e-mail along with the copy of e-mail and
screenshot of whatsApp sent to the defendant filed.
Counsel seeks some more time to trace fresh address of
defendant or in the alternative to move appropriate application for
publication.
Put up for further proceedings on 24.09.2024.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi / 21.08.2024.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 7 CS (COMM) 260/24
Shree Kamakhya Roadlines Pvt Ltd
Vs.
Retail Space Fitouts And Infra Llp
23.07.2024
Present: Sh. Chaman Sharma along with Sh. D.P. Rana and Ms. Bharti,
Ld. Counsels for plaintiff.
Defendant not yet served.
Counsel for plaintiff submits that they do not have any fresh
address of the defendant. However, they have phone numbers and they will
try to get the defendant served electronically.
Let the defendant be served afresh on filing of PF through
process server as well as through speed post, e-mail and whatsApp.
Put up on 21.08.2024.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi / 23.07.2024.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 12 CS (COMM) 260/24
Shree Kamakhya Roadlines Pvt Ltd
Vs.
Retail Space Fitouts And Infra Llp
05.06.2024
Present: Sh. R.K. Sharma along with Ms. Bharti Sharma, Ld. Counsels
for plaintiff.
Defendant not yet served till date.
Speed post and envelope have been returned back with the
report that the addressee has left. Similar is report of the process server.
Counsel for the plaintiff seeks time to furnish fresh address or in
the alternative to move appropriate application.
Put up on 23.07.2024.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi / 05.06.2024.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 260/24
SHREE KAMAKHYA ROADLINES PVT LTD
VS.
RETAIL SPACE FITOUTS AND INFRA LLP
28.02.2026
Present: Ms. Reeta Yadav, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
None for the defendant.
Order could not be completed as one regular stenographer is on
leave today.
Put up for order on 27.03.2026.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi / 28.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 12 CS (COMM) 260/24
Shree Kamakhya Roadlines Pvt Ltd
Vs.
Retail Space Fitouts And Infra Llp
05.02.2026
Present: Sh. R.K. Sharma, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Jainuddin, Ld. Proxy Counsel for defendant.
Written submissions filed on behalf of defendant. Copy
supplied. Oral submissions also heard.
Put up for orders on 28.02.2026.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi /05.02.2026.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 260/24
SHREE KAMAKHYA ROADLINES PVT. LTD.
VS.
RETAIL SPACE FITOUTS AND INFRA LLP
08.01.2026
Present: Sh. Chaman Sharma and Ms. Reeta Yadav, Ld. Counsel for
plaintiff.
Sh. Vishwas Ahuja and Sh. Jainuddin, Ld. Proxy Counsel for
defendant.
Arguments on behalf of plaintiff heard.
Proxy counsel for defendant submits that main counsel is not
available today and they will file written submissions with advance copy to the
opposite counsel. Let the same be filed.
Put up for further arguments on 05.02.2026.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi / 08.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 260/24
SHREE KAMAKHYA ROADLINES PVT LTD
VS.
RETAIL SPACE FITOUTS AND INFRA LLP
17.12.2025
Present: Sh. Chaman Sharma, Ms. Reeta Yadav and Sh. R.K. Sharma, Ld.
Counsels for plaintiff.
Sh. Vishwas Ahuja and Sh. Gaurav Seth, Ld. Counsels for
defendant.
At joint request of parties, put up for final arguments on
08.01.2026.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi / 17.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 6 CS (COMM) 260/24
Shree Kamakhya Roadlines Pvt Ltd
Vs.
Retail Space Fitouts And Infra Llp
20.11.2025
Present: Sh. Chaman Sharma, Sh. Rakesh Kumar and Ms. Lalita, Ld.
Counsels for plaintiff along with AR of plaintiff Sh. Madan Lal
Sharma.
Sh. Gaurav Seth and Sh. Vishwas Ahuja, Ld. Counsels for
defendant.
PW-1 cross examined and discharged.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff submits that plaintiff does not want to
examine any other witness. Separate statement of AR of plaintiff to this effect
recorded. In view of statement made, PE stands closed.
On the last date of hearing, it was directed that the evidence
affidavit of defendant shall not be taken on record as the same has not been
filed. Even till date, the defendant has not filed any evidence affidavit nor has
moved any application seeking permission to lead DE. Ld. counsel for
defendant, in fact, submits that he does not wish to lead any DE.
Put up for final arguments on 17.12.2025.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi /20.11.2025.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 14 CS (COMM) 260/24
Shree Kamakhya Roadlines Pvt Ltd
Vs.
Retail Space Fitouts And Infra Llp
13.11.2025
Present: Sh. Chaman Sharma, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff physically in
Court.
Sh. Gaurav Seth, Advocate for the defendant through VC.
Sh. Jainuddin, Proxy counsel for the defendant physically in
Court.
Adjourment sought on behalf of plaintiff on the ground that the
witness is not present today due to marriage in the family.
Defendant has not filed evidence affidavit till date nor any
advance copy stated to have been supplied despite directions to both the
parties to file their evidence affidavit within two weeks vide order dated
24.07.2025. Hence, it is directed that evidence affidavit of the defendant shall
not be taken on record now.
Put up for cross of PW1 on 20.11.2025, date already fixed.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi /13.11.2025.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 260/24
SHREE KAMAKHYA ROADLINES PVT LTD
VS.
RETAIL SPACE FITOUTS AND INFRA LLP
25.10.2025
Present: Sh. Chaman Sharma, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff physically in the
court.
Sh. Navjot Kwatra, Ld. Counsel for defendant through VC.
Previous cost paid.
Matter has returned back from the Mediation Centre as not
settled.
Put up for PE as well as for DE on 13.11.2025 and for final
arguments on 20.11.2025.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi / 25.10.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 9 CS (COMM) 260/24
Shree Kamakhya Roadlines Pvt. Ltd
vs.
Retail Space Fitouts And infra LLP
16.09.2025
Present: Ms. Lalita, Advocate for the plaintiff along with AR of plaintiff
Sh. Madan Lal Sharma.
None for the defendant.
It is stated that the matter is still pending in the mediation centre
for 06.10.2025.
Put up for awaiting report of the mediation or in the alternative
for cross of PW1 on 25.10.2025.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi /16.09.2025.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 7 CS (COMM) 260/24
Shree Kamakhya Roadlines Pvt Ltd
Vs.
Retail Space Fitouts And Infra Llp
03.09.2025
Present: Sh. Chaman Sharma and Sh. R.K. Sharma, Ld. Counsels for
plaintiff.
Sh. Navjot Kwatra, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Replication along with list of witnesses and evidence by way of
plaintiff filed on behalf of plaintiff. Copy stated to have been supplied.
Affidavit of PW1 tendered in chief and cross examination
deferred at request of ld. counsel for defendant as he submits that the both
parties wish to explore the possibility of amicable settlement.
Accordingly, matter is referred to the Mediation Centre,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi for exploring the possibility of
amicable settlement physically on filling the Mediation Referral Form.
Both the parties are directed to report to the Incharge Mediation
Centre on 08.09.2025 at 2:00 pm.
Put up for awaiting the report from the Mediation Centre or in
the alternative for cross of PW1 on 16.09.2025.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi /03.09.2025.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 14 CS (COMM) 260/24
Shree Kamakhya Roadlines Pvt Ltd
Vs.
Retail Space Fitouts And Infra Llp
22.08.2025
Present: Sh. Madan Lal Sharma, Director of the plaintiff physically in
Court.
Sh. Vaibhav Gupta, Advocate for the defendant through VC.
Evidence affidavit of plaintiff has been e-filed. Time sought to
file the physical copy of the same. Ld. counsel for defendant admits that he
has received the copy of the affidavit and the replication and he also seeks
time to file the evidence affidavit of the defendant.
One more opportunity granted to the defendant to file the
evidence affidavit and let the same be filed within a week with advance copy
to opposite counsel.
Put up for PE as well as DE on 03.09.2025, date already fixed.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi /22.08.2025.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 260/24
SHREE KAMAKHYA ROADLINES PVT LTD
VS.
RETAIL SPACE FITOUTS AND INFRA LLP
04.07.2025
Present: None since morning despite repeated calls.
However, statement of Truth of Sh. Sanjeev Arora as well as
Sh. Sachin Gupta as well as their affidavit of admission/denial has been filed
on 30.05.2025.
Put up for consideration of the application under Order VIII Rule
1 CPC on 24.07.2025.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi / 04.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 3 CS (COMM) 260/24
Shree Kamakhya Roadlines Pvt Ltd
Vs.
Retail Space Fitouts And Infra Llp
24.04.2025
Present: Sh. D.P. Rana, Ld. proxy Counsel for plaintiff physically in
Court.
Sh. Navjot Kwatra, Advocate on behalf of defendant through
VC.
It is stated that though the defendant no.4 was served on
25.02.2025, but the counsel will be appearing on behalf of all the defendants.
Time sought on behalf of defendants to file WS along with statement of truth,
affidavit of admission/denial etc. as well as an application seeking
condonation of delay in filing the same. Let the same be filed with advance
copy to the opposite counsel.
Put up on 13.05.2025.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi /24.04.2025.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 260/24
SHREE KAMAKHYA ROADLINES PVT LTD
VS.
RETAIL SPACE FITOUTS AND INFRA LLP
18.03.2025
Present: Sh. R.K. Sharma, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Summons sent to defendant no. 1 and 2 through Process Server
and speed post returned back unserved.
Summons sent to defendant no. 3 and 4 through Ld. District
Judge has not returned back.
As far as speed post is concerned, summons has been served
upon defendant no. 4 on 25.02.2025, as per Tracking Report.
30 days stipulated for filing WS has yet not expired. Defendant
no. 4 is at liberty to file WS within a stipulated period of 30 days. Meanwhile,
defendant no. 1, 2 and 3 be served afresh. Plaintiff to furnish fresh address, if
any, or phone number or email address of defendant no. 1, 2 and 3 along with
PF.
Put up for further proceedings on 24.04.2025.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi / 18.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 7 CS (COMM) 260/24
Shree Kamakhya Roadlines Pvt Ltd
Vs.
Retail Space Fitouts And Infra Llp
09.01.2025
Present: Sh. R.K. Sharma and Ms. Lalita Ld. proxy Counsels for
plaintiff.
None for defendant.
More time sought to comply with the previous order as it is
stated that they are trying to trace the fresh address of the defendant.
At request, put up as last and final opportunity on 14.02.2025.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi /09.01.2025.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 1 CS (COMM) 260/24
Shree Kamakhya Roadlines Pvt Ltd
Vs.
Retail Space Fitouts And Infra Llp
27.11.2024
Present: Sh. R.K. Sharma, Ld. proxy Counsel for plaintiff.
None for defendant.
More time sought to comply with the previous order.
At request, put up on 09.01.2025.
It is clarified that the plaintiff shall not entitle to interest for the
intervening period as the case is not proceeded further due to lapse on the
part of the plaintiff.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi / 27.11.2024.
Digital signature not appended as the same have expired and renewal of the same has been applied.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 5 CS (COMM) 260/24
Shree Kamakhya Roadlines Pvt Ltd
Vs.
Retail Space Fitouts And Infra Llp
19.10.2024
Present: Sh. Chaman Sharma and Sh. Tarun Kumar, Ld. Counsels for
plaintiff.
None for defendant.
Application under Order XI Rule 1(5) CPC filed on behalf of
plaintiff for taking on record the GST Registration Certificate of the
defendant along with GST Registration Form of the defendant, list of
documents along with documents and the certificate as per Order XI Rule 6
CPC, as applicable to the Commercial Courts in support of the digital
evidence also filed. Though, in the certificate, it is mentioned that the the
same be read with Section 63 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, but
the certificate is not as per the format given in the Schedule-I of the Bharatiya
Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023. Counsel for plaintiff seeks time to do the needful.
Also, as per the GST record of the defendant, the defendant is a
Limited Liability Partnership. Counsel for plaintiff seeks time to take steps in
this regard.
Put up for further proceeding on 27.11.2024.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi / 19.10.2024.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 4 CS (COMM) 260/24
Shree Kamakhya Roadlines Pvt Ltd
Vs.
Retail Space Fitouts And Infra Llp
21.08.2024
Present: Sh. Chaman Sharma, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
None for defendant.
Summons sent to the defendant through process server and
speed post returned back unserved with the report of
‘addressee left’.
Affidavit of service filed as per which the defendant has been
served through whatsApp and e-mail along with the copy of e-mail and
screenshot of whatsApp sent to the defendant filed.
Counsel seeks some more time to trace fresh address of
defendant or in the alternative to move appropriate application for
publication.
Put up for further proceedings on 24.09.2024.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi / 21.08.2024.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 7 CS (COMM) 260/24
Shree Kamakhya Roadlines Pvt Ltd
Vs.
Retail Space Fitouts And Infra Llp
23.07.2024
Present: Sh. Chaman Sharma along with Sh. D.P. Rana and Ms. Bharti,
Ld. Counsels for plaintiff.
Defendant not yet served.
Counsel for plaintiff submits that they do not have any fresh
address of the defendant. However, they have phone numbers and they will
try to get the defendant served electronically.
Let the defendant be served afresh on filing of PF through
process server as well as through speed post, e-mail and whatsApp.
Put up on 21.08.2024.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi / 23.07.2024.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 12 CS (COMM) 260/24
Shree Kamakhya Roadlines Pvt Ltd
Vs.
Retail Space Fitouts And Infra Llp
05.06.2024
Present: Sh. R.K. Sharma along with Ms. Bharti Sharma, Ld. Counsels
for plaintiff.
Defendant not yet served till date.
Speed post and envelope have been returned back with the
report that the addressee has left. Similar is report of the process server.
Counsel for the plaintiff seeks time to furnish fresh address or in
the alternative to move appropriate application.
Put up on 23.07.2024.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi / 05.06.2024.
-- 1 of 1 --