Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 48/24 Bank Of India Vs. Kavita Ghai 19.10.2024 Present: Sh. Deokant Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff through VC. Sh. Rajesh Kumar, Ld. LAC for defendant through VC. Defendant had appeared on the last date of hearing and had submitted that her mobile number is 7827688552. Vide separate judgment, the suit of the plaintiff Bank is hereby decreed in its favour and against the defendant no.1, 2 and 3 for a principal…
BANK OF INDIAVsKavita Ghai
TrustJury record updated 22 Oct 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 48/2024
- Registration Date
- 16 Jan 2024
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 19-01-2024 Business: submissions heard put up for consideration of application Next Purpose: Case Management Hear/Pre--Trial Conference Next Hearing Date: 06-02-2024 Date: 06-02-2024 Business: arguments heard on application U/o 6/17 allowed and disposed put up for service w.s. and issues Next Purpose: Case Management Hear/Pre--Trial Conference Next Hearing Date: 22-03-2024 Date: 22-03-2024 Business: arguments heard on application allowed and disposed off put up for service w.s. and issues Next Purpose: Case Management Hear/Pre--Trial Conference Next Hearing Date: 24-04-2024 Date: 24-04-2024 Business: submissions heard put up for consideration of application Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 13-05-2024 Date: 13-05-2024 Business: none for deft no 2 and 3 hence proceed exparte put up for filing w.s. for deft. no. 1 with app Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 28-05-2024 Date: 28-05-2024 Business: arguments heard on applications allowed and disposed off put up for issues Next Purpose: Issues Next Hearing Date: 10-07-2024 Date: 10-07-2024 Business: admissions denial carried and issues framed put up for PE Next Purpose: Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence Next Hearing Date: 07-08-2024 Date: 07-08-2024 Business: pw1 is examined cross deferred put up for PE Next Purpose: Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence Next Hearing Date: 23-08-2024 Date: 23-08-2024 Business: pw1 is cross examined PE closed put up for DE Next Purpose: Defendant/Respondent Evidence Next Hearing Date: 04-09-2024 Date: 04-09-2024 Reason For Adjournment: Judge on Leave Next Purpose: Defendant/Respondent Evidence Next Hearing Date: 17-09-2024 Date: 17-09-2024 Business: DE closed put up for F/a Next Purpose: Final Arguments Next Hearing Date: 25-09-2024 Date: 25-09-2024 Business: further arguments heard put up for orders Next Purpose: Judgement Next Hearing Date: 09-10-2024 Date: 09-10-2024 Business: order could not completed put up for purpose fixed Next Purpose: Judgement Next Hearing Date: 16-10-2024 Date: 16-10-2024 Business: ld p.o. has gone DLSA to take interview of panel lawyers Next Purpose: Judgement Next Hearing Date: 19-10-2024 Date: 19-10-2024 Business: The suit of the plaintiff is decreed. File consigned to RR Nature Of Disposal: DECREED Disposal Date: 19-10-2024
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 174/2024 Filing Date: 15-01-2024 eFiling Number: ADL20230000823C202400003 eFiling Date: 14-01-2024 First Hearing Date: 19th January 2024 Decision Date: 19th October 2024 Court Number And Judge: 767-District Judge Commercial Court-02
Orders
28Order Details: COPY OF JUDGMENT Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF MS. KIRAN BANSAL: DISTRICT JUDGE (COMMERCIAL COURT) SHAHDARA DISTRICT, KARKARDOOMA COURTS : DELHI CS (COMM) NO. 48/2024 BANK OF INDIA, Gandhi Nagar Branch, Through its Authorized Representative, Branch Office at: X/918, Chand Mohalla, Gandhi Nagar Delhi ….. Plaintiff Versus 1. Mrs. Kavita Ghai …... Defendant no.1 W/o Sh. Harish Kumar And 2. Sh. Harish Kumar …... Defendant no.2 S/o Sh. Mahender Pal Both are: R/o Flat No. 711, Type…
Interim Order 1316 Oct 2024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 16 CS (COMM) 48/24 Bank Of India Vs. Kavita Ghai 16.10.2024 Present: Sh. Deokant Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Sh. Rajesh Kumar, Ld. LAC for defendant. Matter is fixed for judgment today. No time left as undersinged has to take interview of panel lawyers of DLSA after post-lunch. Order could not be completed. Put up for order on 19.10.2024. (Kiran Bansal) District Judge, Commercial Court-02, Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi / 16.10.2024. -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 1209 Oct 2024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 20 CS (COMM) 48/24 Bank Of India Vs. Kavita Ghai 09.10.2024 Present: Sh. Deokant Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. None for defendant. Matter is fixed for judgment today. However, order could not be completed. Put up for orders on 16.10.2024. (Kiran Bansal) District Judge, Commercial Court-02, Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi / 09.10.2024. -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 1125 Sept 2024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 48/24 Bank Of India Vs. Kavita Ghai 25.09.2024 Present: Sh. Deokant Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Sh. Rajesh Kumar, Ld. Legal Aid Counsel for defendant. Part arguments heard. Put up for further arguments on 09.10.2024. (Kiran Bansal) District Judge, Commercial Court-02, Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi / 25.09.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 17 CS (COMM) 48/24 Bank Of India Vs. Kavita Ghai 17.09.2024 Present: Sh. Deokant Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Sh. Rajesh Kumar, Ld. LAC for defendant. Evidence affidavit of defendant not filed till date nor any advance copy given. Counsel for plaintiff submits that another matter between the parties is pending in the Court of Ld. Civil Judge, Sh. Akash Mohan Singh and it was directed that the defendant be served with the…
Interim Order 923 Aug 2024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 8 CS (COMM) 48/24 Bank Of India Vs. Kavita Ghai 23.08.2024 Present: Sh. Deokant Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff along with AR of plaintiff bank Ms. Deepa Agrawal. Sh. Rajesh Kumar, Ld. LAC for defendant. PW1 cross-examined and discharged. Ld. Counsel for plaintiff submits that plaintiff does not want to examine any other witness. Separate statement of plaintiff to this effect recorded. In view of statement made, PE stands closed. Affidavit of defendant not filed till date. Ld. LAC for defendant submits that he had contacted the defendant 4-5 days back but the defendant is not responding and therefore, he could not prepare the DE. In the interest of justice, one more opportunity is granted to the defendant to lead DE. Put up for DE as well as final arguments on 04.09.2024. (Kiran Bansal) District Judge, Commercial Court-02, Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi / 23.08.2024. -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 807 Aug 2024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 48/24 Bank Of India Vs. Kavita Ghai 07.08.2024 Present: Sh. Deokant Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Sh. Rajesh Kumar, Ld. LAC and Sh. Sushil Kumar Tiwari, Ld. Counsels for defendant. Evidence by way of affidavit of PW-1 tendered and examined. Cross examination is deferred at the request of ld. counsel for defendant as the copy of the affidavit has been supplied yesterday only through email. Original documents filed. Same are taken on record. Date of 14.08.2024 and 20.08.2024 stands cancelled at the request of both respective counsels. Put up for PE as well as DE on 23.08.2024 (Kiran Bansal) District Judge, Commercial Court-02, Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi / 07.08.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 6 CS (COMM) 48/24 Bank Of India Vs. Kavita Ghai 10.07.2024 Present: Sh. Deokant Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Sh. Rajesh Kumar, Ld. LAC for defendant no.1 Kavita Ghai. Defendant no.2 & 3 are already ex parte. Replication on behalf of plaintiff already filed. Copy stated to have been supplied. Affidavit of admission and denial of documents already filed by the defendant. Heard. Perused the record. The defendant in her affidavit of admission/denial…
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 1/4 14 CS (COMM) 48/24 Bank Of India Vs. Kavita Ghai 28.05.2024 Present: Sh. Deokant Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Sh. Rajesh Kumar, Ld. LAC for defendant no.1 along-with defendant no.1. None for defendant no.2 & 3. Defendants no.2 & 3 are already ex parte. WS along-with affidavit, statement of truth, affidavit of admission/denial of documents filed on behalf of defendant. An application under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC also filed on behalf…
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 15CS (COMM)48/24 Bank Of India Vs. Kavita Ghai 13.05.2024 Present: Sh. Deokant Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Sh. Rajesh Kumar, Ld. LAC for defendant no.1. None for defendant no.2 & 3. It is stated that the case has been assigned to the ld. LAC on behalf of defendant no.1 on 03.05.2024 and thereafter, sometime is sought by the ld. LAC to file the WS along with an application under Order VIII Rule 1…
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 10CS (COMM)48/24 Bank Of India Vs. Kavita Ghai 24.04.2024 Present: Sh. Vinay Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. None for defendant. Summons issued to defendant no.1 and 2 through process server not returned back. Summons issued to defendant no.3 through process server returned back unserved. However, tracking report and postal receipt filed, as per the tracking report and postal receipt, summons issued to the defendant nos. 1 and 2 have been served on…
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 48/24 BANK OF INDIA VS. KAVITA GHAI 22.03.2024 Present: Sh. Deokant Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. None for the defendant. An application under Order XI Rule 5 of Commercial Courts Act 2015 read with Section 151 CPC for taking on record additional documents filed. It is stated by the counsel that wrong provision has been mentioned in the application under Order XI Rule 5 of Commercial Courts Act 2015 and the…
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 18CS (COMM)48/24 Bank Of India Vs. Kavita Ghai 06.02.2024 Present: Sh. Vinay Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff physically in Court. Sh. Deokant Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through VC. An amendment application moved on behalf of plaintiff under Order VI Rule 17 CPC for amendment of the plaint giving bifurcation of the interest and the principal amount as well as to state the amount claimed separately qua two separate loan.…
Interim Order 119 Jan 2024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 9CS (COMM)48/24 Bank Of India Vs. Kavita Ghai 19.01.2024 Fresh suit received on assignment basis. It be checked and registered as per rules. Present: Sh. Vinay Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. The present suit has been filed for recovery of sum of Rs.16,48,507.27/- along with future interest in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant till realization of the suit. However, the plaintiff has not bifurcated the interest and the principal amount as per Order VII Rule 2A CPC. Even, the amount claimed is in respect of the two different loans, one was the Home Loan and the other was the Topup Loan Facility. The amount claimed in both the loans, principal amount as well as interest has not been given separately by the plaintiff. Plaintiff to clarify the amount claimed qua each loan separately as well as bifurcate the interest as per Order VII Rule 2A CPC. At request, put up on 06.02.2024. (Kiran Bansal) District Judge, Commercial Court-02, Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi / 19.01.2024. -- 1 of 1 --
Order 1316 Oct 2024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 16 CS (COMM) 48/24 Bank Of India Vs. Kavita Ghai 16.10.2024 Present: Sh. Deokant Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Sh. Rajesh Kumar, Ld. LAC for defendant. Matter is fixed for judgment today. No time left as undersinged has to take interview of panel lawyers of DLSA after post-lunch. Order could not be completed. Put up for order on 19.10.2024. (Kiran Bansal) District Judge, Commercial Court-02, Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi / 16.10.2024. -- 1 of 1 --
Order 1209 Oct 2024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 20 CS (COMM) 48/24 Bank Of India Vs. Kavita Ghai 09.10.2024 Present: Sh. Deokant Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. None for defendant. Matter is fixed for judgment today. However, order could not be completed. Put up for orders on 16.10.2024. (Kiran Bansal) District Judge, Commercial Court-02, Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi / 09.10.2024. -- 1 of 1 --
Order 1125 Sept 2024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 48/24 Bank Of India Vs. Kavita Ghai 25.09.2024 Present: Sh. Deokant Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Sh. Rajesh Kumar, Ld. Legal Aid Counsel for defendant. Part arguments heard. Put up for further arguments on 09.10.2024. (Kiran Bansal) District Judge, Commercial Court-02, Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi / 25.09.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 17 CS (COMM) 48/24 Bank Of India Vs. Kavita Ghai 17.09.2024 Present: Sh. Deokant Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Sh. Rajesh Kumar, Ld. LAC for defendant. Evidence affidavit of defendant not filed till date nor any advance copy given. Counsel for plaintiff submits that another matter between the parties is pending in the Court of Ld. Civil Judge, Sh. Akash Mohan Singh and it was directed that the defendant be served with the…
Order 923 Aug 2024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 8 CS (COMM) 48/24 Bank Of India Vs. Kavita Ghai 23.08.2024 Present: Sh. Deokant Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff along with AR of plaintiff bank Ms. Deepa Agrawal. Sh. Rajesh Kumar, Ld. LAC for defendant. PW1 cross-examined and discharged. Ld. Counsel for plaintiff submits that plaintiff does not want to examine any other witness. Separate statement of plaintiff to this effect recorded. In view of statement made, PE stands closed. Affidavit of defendant not filed till date. Ld. LAC for defendant submits that he had contacted the defendant 4-5 days back but the defendant is not responding and therefore, he could not prepare the DE. In the interest of justice, one more opportunity is granted to the defendant to lead DE. Put up for DE as well as final arguments on 04.09.2024. (Kiran Bansal) District Judge, Commercial Court-02, Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi / 23.08.2024. -- 1 of 1 --
Order 807 Aug 2024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 48/24 Bank Of India Vs. Kavita Ghai 07.08.2024 Present: Sh. Deokant Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Sh. Rajesh Kumar, Ld. LAC and Sh. Sushil Kumar Tiwari, Ld. Counsels for defendant. Evidence by way of affidavit of PW-1 tendered and examined. Cross examination is deferred at the request of ld. counsel for defendant as the copy of the affidavit has been supplied yesterday only through email. Original documents filed. Same are taken on record. Date of 14.08.2024 and 20.08.2024 stands cancelled at the request of both respective counsels. Put up for PE as well as DE on 23.08.2024 (Kiran Bansal) District Judge, Commercial Court-02, Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi / 07.08.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 6 CS (COMM) 48/24 Bank Of India Vs. Kavita Ghai 10.07.2024 Present: Sh. Deokant Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Sh. Rajesh Kumar, Ld. LAC for defendant no.1 Kavita Ghai. Defendant no.2 & 3 are already ex parte. Replication on behalf of plaintiff already filed. Copy stated to have been supplied. Affidavit of admission and denial of documents already filed by the defendant. Heard. Perused the record. The defendant in her affidavit of admission/denial…
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 1/4 14 CS (COMM) 48/24 Bank Of India Vs. Kavita Ghai 28.05.2024 Present: Sh. Deokant Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Sh. Rajesh Kumar, Ld. LAC for defendant no.1 along-with defendant no.1. None for defendant no.2 & 3. Defendants no.2 & 3 are already ex parte. WS along-with affidavit, statement of truth, affidavit of admission/denial of documents filed on behalf of defendant. An application under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC also filed on behalf…
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 15CS (COMM)48/24 Bank Of India Vs. Kavita Ghai 13.05.2024 Present: Sh. Deokant Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Sh. Rajesh Kumar, Ld. LAC for defendant no.1. None for defendant no.2 & 3. It is stated that the case has been assigned to the ld. LAC on behalf of defendant no.1 on 03.05.2024 and thereafter, sometime is sought by the ld. LAC to file the WS along with an application under Order VIII Rule 1…
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 10CS (COMM)48/24 Bank Of India Vs. Kavita Ghai 24.04.2024 Present: Sh. Vinay Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. None for defendant. Summons issued to defendant no.1 and 2 through process server not returned back. Summons issued to defendant no.3 through process server returned back unserved. However, tracking report and postal receipt filed, as per the tracking report and postal receipt, summons issued to the defendant nos. 1 and 2 have been served on…
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 48/24 BANK OF INDIA VS. KAVITA GHAI 22.03.2024 Present: Sh. Deokant Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. None for the defendant. An application under Order XI Rule 5 of Commercial Courts Act 2015 read with Section 151 CPC for taking on record additional documents filed. It is stated by the counsel that wrong provision has been mentioned in the application under Order XI Rule 5 of Commercial Courts Act 2015 and the…
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 18CS (COMM)48/24 Bank Of India Vs. Kavita Ghai 06.02.2024 Present: Sh. Vinay Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff physically in Court. Sh. Deokant Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through VC. An amendment application moved on behalf of plaintiff under Order VI Rule 17 CPC for amendment of the plaint giving bifurcation of the interest and the principal amount as well as to state the amount claimed separately qua two separate loan.…
Order 119 Jan 2024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 9CS (COMM)48/24 Bank Of India Vs. Kavita Ghai 19.01.2024 Fresh suit received on assignment basis. It be checked and registered as per rules. Present: Sh. Vinay Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. The present suit has been filed for recovery of sum of Rs.16,48,507.27/- along with future interest in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant till realization of the suit. However, the plaintiff has not bifurcated the interest and the principal amount as per Order VII Rule 2A CPC. Even, the amount claimed is in respect of the two different loans, one was the Home Loan and the other was the Topup Loan Facility. The amount claimed in both the loans, principal amount as well as interest has not been given separately by the plaintiff. Plaintiff to clarify the amount claimed qua each loan separately as well as bifurcate the interest as per Order VII Rule 2A CPC. At request, put up on 06.02.2024. (Kiran Bansal) District Judge, Commercial Court-02, Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi / 19.01.2024. -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
