Order Details: COPY OF JUDGMENT Pdf Text: Cr. Case No. 6609/2023 State vs. Sandeep etc FIR No. 155/2003 PS South Rohini Page 1 of 7 IN COURT OF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE 07, (NORTH-WEST DISTRICT) ROHINI COURTS, DELHI. Presided over by: Sh. Gaurav Katariya, DJS DLNW020190712023 Cr. Case No. : 6609/2023 Case ID No : DLNW020190712023 FIR no. : 155/2003 Police Station : South Rohini U/Section : 323/341/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 In The Matter of : STATE Vs & Sandeep…
STATEVsSANDEEP ETC. +2 more
TrustJury record updated 19 Oct 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 6609/2023
- Registration Date
- 24 May 2023
Advocates
0No advocate information is available in this record.
Parties
4Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Police / FIR Details
- Police Station
- Rohini
- FIR Number / Year
- 155/2003
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 11-10-2023 Business: FOR FP Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 07-02-2024 Date: 07-02-2024 Business: FP Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 05-06-2024 Date: 05-06-2024 Business: Further proceedings Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 12-08-2024 Date: 12-08-2024 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 21-10-2024 Date: 21-10-2024 Business: PUT UP FOR Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 28-11-2024 Date: 28-11-2024 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 12-12-2024 Date: 12-12-2024 Business: fp Next Purpose: Prosecution Evidence Next Hearing Date: 20-12-2024 Date: 20-12-2024 Business: fp Next Purpose: Prosecution Evidence Next Hearing Date: 27-01-2025 Date: 27-01-2025 Business: fp Next Purpose: Final Argument Next Hearing Date: 24-02-2025 Date: 24-02-2025 Business: fp Next Purpose: Final Argument Next Hearing Date: 12-03-2025 Date: 12-03-2025 Business: rr Nature Of Disposal: ACQUITTED Disposal Date: 12-03-2025
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 19070/2023 Filing Date: 24-05-2023 First Hearing Date: 11th October 2023 Decision Date: 12th March 2025 Court Number And Judge: 763-Judicial Magistrate First Class
Orders
16Final Order 912 Mar 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 57 Cr. Case 6609/2023 STATE Vs. SANDEEP ETC. FIR No. 155/2003 (Rohini) 12.03.2025 Present: Ld. APP for State. Accused Vishal appeared through VC. Accused Sandeep in person with Ld. Counsel. Son of accused Susheela in person. Bail bond U/s 437A CrPC furnished on behalf of accused Sandeep. Other accused persons ie Vishal and son of accused Susheela requested for accepting previous bail bonds as against bail bonds U/s 437A Cr.PC. Heard. Accepted. Vide a separate judgment of even date, the accused persons are acquitted for the offence u/s 323/341/34 of IPC. Original documents, if any, be returned to the rightful claimant after cancellation of endorsement, if any. Previous bail bonds of accused is hereby canceled. Previous Surety, if any, stands discharged. Case property be disposed of as per rules. Copy of this order be given dasti to applicant/surety/accused as and when prays for. File be consigned to record room after due compliance. (Gaurav Katariya) JMFC-7(NW)/RC/Delhi 12.03.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 724 Feb 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 53 Cr. Case 6609/2023 STATE Vs. SANDEEP ETC. 155/2003 (Rohini) 24.2.2025 Present: Ld. APP for State. Accused in person with ld counsel Sh Mithilesh Kumar Pathak. Part arguments heard. Put up for further arguments and for furnishing bail bonds U/s 437A Cr.PC on 12.3.2025. (Gaurav Katariya) JMFC-7(NW)/RC/Delhi 24.2.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 49 Cr. Case 6609/2023 STATE Vs. SANDEEP ETC. 155/2003 (Rohini) 27.1.2025 Present: Ld. APP for the State. Accused Vishal Walia in person with ld Counsel Sh `` Madan Kumar Jha Sh Mithilesh Kumar Pathak, ld Counsel for accused Sandeep Accused Sandeep in person. Accused Sheela through VC PW Sumriti Devi unserved through DCP. It is pertinent to mention that that enough opportunities have been granted to secure the presence of PW Sumriti…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 16 Cr. Case 6609/2023 STATE Vs. SANDEEP ETC. 155 /2003 (Rohini) 12.12.2024 The undersigned is having pendency of about 7200 cases. Undersigned is working with only one Steno. Undersigned is also working as Link JMFC. Present: Ld.APP for the State. Accused Vishal and Sandeep in person. Accused Sheela through VC. Sh Mithilesh Kumar Pathak, ld. Counsel for accused Sandeep It is submitted by ld. Counsel that the accused Sheela is physically challenged(paralysed)…
Interim Order 412 Aug 2024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 14 Cr. Case 6609/2023 STATE Vs. SANDEEP ETC. 155 /2003 (Rohini) 12.08.2024 Ld. P.O. is on leave today. Present: Ld. APP for State. Accused Sandeep in person with ld counsel Sh. Mithilesh Kumar Pathak. Accused Sheela absent. Accused Vishal is already PO. Let the previous order be complied. Be put up for purpose fixed on 21.10.2024. (Diya Arora) LJMFC(NW)/RC/Delhi -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 305 Jun 2024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 16 Cr. Case 6609/2023 STATE Vs. SANDEEP ETC. 155 /2003 (Rohini) 05.06.2024 Ld. P.O. is on leave today. Present: Ld. APP for the State. Accused Sandeep in person with ld counsel Sh. Mithilesh Kumar Pathak. Accused Vishal is already PO. Sh. Amarjeet Singh and Sh. Sanjay Kumar, ld counsels for the accused Sheela. Accused Sheela in person through VC. Let the previous order be complied afresh for NDOH. Be put up for purpose already fixed on 12.08.2024. (DIVYA ARORA) LMM(N/W), Rohini Courts 05.06.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 19 Cr. Case 6609/2023 STATE Vs. SANDEEP ETC. FIR No.155 /2003 (Rohini) 07.02.2024 Undersigned is working with one regular Steno. Present: Ld. APP for the State. Accused Vishal is already PO. Accused Sandeep in person. Accused Sheela absent. At request, passover is granted to ensure the presence of accused Sheela through VC. Meanwhile, It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for accused Sandeep that the copy of charge-sheet has not been supplied. Let…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 20 Cr. Case 6609/2023 STATE Vs. SANDEEP ETC. FIR No. 155 /2003 (Rohini) 11.10.2023 Undersigned is working as Duty MM today. Reader is on leave. Present: Ld. APP for the State. Accused Vishal is already PO. Accused Sandeep in person. Accused Sheela absent. Sh. Mohd. Furkan, Ld. Counsel for accused Sheela. Sh. Nikhilesh Kumar Pathak, Ld. Counsel for accused Sandeep. NBWs of accused Sheela received back unexecuted with the report that she…
Order 724 Feb 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 53 Cr. Case 6609/2023 STATE Vs. SANDEEP ETC. 155/2003 (Rohini) 24.2.2025 Present: Ld. APP for State. Accused in person with ld counsel Sh Mithilesh Kumar Pathak. Part arguments heard. Put up for further arguments and for furnishing bail bonds U/s 437A Cr.PC on 12.3.2025. (Gaurav Katariya) JMFC-7(NW)/RC/Delhi 24.2.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 49 Cr. Case 6609/2023 STATE Vs. SANDEEP ETC. 155/2003 (Rohini) 27.1.2025 Present: Ld. APP for the State. Accused Vishal Walia in person with ld Counsel Sh `` Madan Kumar Jha Sh Mithilesh Kumar Pathak, ld Counsel for accused Sandeep Accused Sandeep in person. Accused Sheela through VC PW Sumriti Devi unserved through DCP. It is pertinent to mention that that enough opportunities have been granted to secure the presence of PW Sumriti…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 16 Cr. Case 6609/2023 STATE Vs. SANDEEP ETC. 155 /2003 (Rohini) 12.12.2024 The undersigned is having pendency of about 7200 cases. Undersigned is working with only one Steno. Undersigned is also working as Link JMFC. Present: Ld.APP for the State. Accused Vishal and Sandeep in person. Accused Sheela through VC. Sh Mithilesh Kumar Pathak, ld. Counsel for accused Sandeep It is submitted by ld. Counsel that the accused Sheela is physically challenged(paralysed)…
Order 412 Aug 2024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 14 Cr. Case 6609/2023 STATE Vs. SANDEEP ETC. 155 /2003 (Rohini) 12.08.2024 Ld. P.O. is on leave today. Present: Ld. APP for State. Accused Sandeep in person with ld counsel Sh. Mithilesh Kumar Pathak. Accused Sheela absent. Accused Vishal is already PO. Let the previous order be complied. Be put up for purpose fixed on 21.10.2024. (Diya Arora) LJMFC(NW)/RC/Delhi -- 1 of 1 --
Order 305 Jun 2024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 16 Cr. Case 6609/2023 STATE Vs. SANDEEP ETC. 155 /2003 (Rohini) 05.06.2024 Ld. P.O. is on leave today. Present: Ld. APP for the State. Accused Sandeep in person with ld counsel Sh. Mithilesh Kumar Pathak. Accused Vishal is already PO. Sh. Amarjeet Singh and Sh. Sanjay Kumar, ld counsels for the accused Sheela. Accused Sheela in person through VC. Let the previous order be complied afresh for NDOH. Be put up for purpose already fixed on 12.08.2024. (DIVYA ARORA) LMM(N/W), Rohini Courts 05.06.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 19 Cr. Case 6609/2023 STATE Vs. SANDEEP ETC. FIR No.155 /2003 (Rohini) 07.02.2024 Undersigned is working with one regular Steno. Present: Ld. APP for the State. Accused Vishal is already PO. Accused Sandeep in person. Accused Sheela absent. At request, passover is granted to ensure the presence of accused Sheela through VC. Meanwhile, It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for accused Sandeep that the copy of charge-sheet has not been supplied. Let…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 20 Cr. Case 6609/2023 STATE Vs. SANDEEP ETC. FIR No. 155 /2003 (Rohini) 11.10.2023 Undersigned is working as Duty MM today. Reader is on leave. Present: Ld. APP for the State. Accused Vishal is already PO. Accused Sandeep in person. Accused Sheela absent. Sh. Mohd. Furkan, Ld. Counsel for accused Sheela. Sh. Nikhilesh Kumar Pathak, Ld. Counsel for accused Sandeep. NBWs of accused Sheela received back unexecuted with the report that she…
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
