SHRIRAM MANDIR SEWA SAMITIVsSatish +4 more

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 12 CS SCJ 496/25
SHRIRAM MANDIR SEWA SAMITI Vs. SATISH
`
20.01.2026
AT 12.30 PM
Present: Sh. Abhishek Rana, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
Sh. Vinod Dahiya, Ld. Counsel for defendant-1 to 5.
None for the defendant-6.
Sh. Narish Sharma, Ld. Counsel for proposed defendant
(Through VC).
Matter is listed for filing of reply to application under Order
VII Rule 11 CPC.
Let copy of application under Order I Rule 10 CPC be
supplied to proposed Defendant by Plaintiff within one week from today
on whatsapp mobile no. 9810305586. Reply by proposed Defendant, if
any, be filed by NDOH
Further, no reply to application under Order VII Rule 11
CPC filed on behalf of the Plaintiff. One again, time sought to file reply
on behalf of the Plaintiff. The same is allowed subject to a cost of Rs.
1000/-, payable to D-1 to 5 failing which appropriate orders will be
passed.
Put up the matter for reply / arguments on application under
Order I Rule 10 CPC and application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on
05.05.2026 at 12 PM.
(RENU)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/20.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 19CS SCJ496/25
SHRIRAM MANDIR SEWA SAMITI Vs. SATISH
`
24.11.2025
Present: Sh. Abhishek Rana and Sh. Neeraj Antil, Ld. Counsels for
plaintiff.
Sh. Vinod Dahiya and Sh. Amit Khatri, Ld. Counsels for
defendant-1 to 5 (through V.C.).
Sh. SK Sanghwan, Ld. Counsel for defendant-6 (Through
VC).
Process received back served qua proposed defendant.
However, perusal of the summons shows that the same was issued
through its chief engineer and the same ought to be issued through its
Vice Chairman.
Accordingly, let court notice be issued against the proposed
defendant through its Vice Chairman for NDOH.
Further, time sought on behalf of plaintiff to file reply to
the application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC filed on behalf of defendant
no. 1 to 5. Heard. Allowed. Final opportunity is given for the same.
Put up for aforesaid purpose on 20.01.2026 at 12:30 p.m.
(RENU)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/24.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 36 CS SCJ 496/25
SHRIRAM MANDIR SEWA SAMITI Vs. SATISH
`
14.10.2025
Present: Sh. Abhishek Rana and Sh. Gaurav Banerjee, Ld. Counsel
for plaintiff
Sh. Vinod Dahiya and Sh. Bhaskar, Ld. Counsel for
defendant-1 to 5.
None for the defendant6.
In compliance of order dated 01.09.2025, the resolution of
the plaintiff is filed. Same is taken on record. Copy of the same has been
supplied to the opposite party.
It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for Defendant-1 to 5 that he
has no objection if application under Order I Rule 10 CPC r/w S. 151
CPC for impleading DDA as D7 is allowed.
Issue fresh notice of the present petition upon the proposed
Defendant on taking sufficient steps within two days for NDOH.
Further, reply, if any, to application under Order VII Rule
11 CPC filed on behalf of the Defendant1 to 5.
Put up the matter for further proceedings on 24.11.2025 at 2
PM.
(RENU)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/14.10.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 6 CS SCJ496/25
SHRIRAM MANDIR SEWA SAMITI Vs. SATISH
`
17.05.2025
Present: Sh. Abhishek Rana, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
Defendants yet to be summoned.
An application under Order I Rule 10 CPC along with
amended memo of parties filed by Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Same is
taken on record. Submissions heard.
Since the Matter is at the stage of summoning, requirement
of notice to Proposed Defendant is dispensed with. In view of the
submissions, it appears to the Court that the impleadment of Proposed
Defendant is necessary for adjudication of the present case. Accordingly,
application is allowed.
Time sought to file application u/S 80 CPC. Heard.
Allowed.
List on 22.05.2025.
(ANKITA BHATIA)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/17.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS SCJ496/25
SHRIRAM MANDIR SEWA SAMITI Vs. SATISH
13.05.2025
Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be checked and
registered.
Present: Sh. Rajiv Tehlan, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
Time is sought by Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff to amend the
plaint. Heard. Allowed.
List on 17.05.2025 at 2 PM.
(ANKITA BHATIA)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/13.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 12 CS SCJ 496/25
SHRIRAM MANDIR SEWA SAMITI Vs. SATISH
`
20.01.2026
AT 12.30 PM
Present: Sh. Abhishek Rana, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
Sh. Vinod Dahiya, Ld. Counsel for defendant-1 to 5.
None for the defendant-6.
Sh. Narish Sharma, Ld. Counsel for proposed defendant
(Through VC).
Matter is listed for filing of reply to application under Order
VII Rule 11 CPC.
Let copy of application under Order I Rule 10 CPC be
supplied to proposed Defendant by Plaintiff within one week from today
on whatsapp mobile no. 9810305586. Reply by proposed Defendant, if
any, be filed by NDOH
Further, no reply to application under Order VII Rule 11
CPC filed on behalf of the Plaintiff. One again, time sought to file reply
on behalf of the Plaintiff. The same is allowed subject to a cost of Rs.
1000/-, payable to D-1 to 5 failing which appropriate orders will be
passed.
Put up the matter for reply / arguments on application under
Order I Rule 10 CPC and application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on
05.05.2026 at 12 PM.
(RENU)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/20.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 19CS SCJ496/25
SHRIRAM MANDIR SEWA SAMITI Vs. SATISH
`
24.11.2025
Present: Sh. Abhishek Rana and Sh. Neeraj Antil, Ld. Counsels for
plaintiff.
Sh. Vinod Dahiya and Sh. Amit Khatri, Ld. Counsels for
defendant-1 to 5 (through V.C.).
Sh. SK Sanghwan, Ld. Counsel for defendant-6 (Through
VC).
Process received back served qua proposed defendant.
However, perusal of the summons shows that the same was issued
through its chief engineer and the same ought to be issued through its
Vice Chairman.
Accordingly, let court notice be issued against the proposed
defendant through its Vice Chairman for NDOH.
Further, time sought on behalf of plaintiff to file reply to
the application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC filed on behalf of defendant
no. 1 to 5. Heard. Allowed. Final opportunity is given for the same.
Put up for aforesaid purpose on 20.01.2026 at 12:30 p.m.
(RENU)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/24.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 36 CS SCJ 496/25
SHRIRAM MANDIR SEWA SAMITI Vs. SATISH
`
14.10.2025
Present: Sh. Abhishek Rana and Sh. Gaurav Banerjee, Ld. Counsel
for plaintiff
Sh. Vinod Dahiya and Sh. Bhaskar, Ld. Counsel for
defendant-1 to 5.
None for the defendant6.
In compliance of order dated 01.09.2025, the resolution of
the plaintiff is filed. Same is taken on record. Copy of the same has been
supplied to the opposite party.
It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for Defendant-1 to 5 that he
has no objection if application under Order I Rule 10 CPC r/w S. 151
CPC for impleading DDA as D7 is allowed.
Issue fresh notice of the present petition upon the proposed
Defendant on taking sufficient steps within two days for NDOH.
Further, reply, if any, to application under Order VII Rule
11 CPC filed on behalf of the Defendant1 to 5.
Put up the matter for further proceedings on 24.11.2025 at 2
PM.
(RENU)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/14.10.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 6 CS SCJ496/25
SHRIRAM MANDIR SEWA SAMITI Vs. SATISH
`
17.05.2025
Present: Sh. Abhishek Rana, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
Defendants yet to be summoned.
An application under Order I Rule 10 CPC along with
amended memo of parties filed by Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Same is
taken on record. Submissions heard.
Since the Matter is at the stage of summoning, requirement
of notice to Proposed Defendant is dispensed with. In view of the
submissions, it appears to the Court that the impleadment of Proposed
Defendant is necessary for adjudication of the present case. Accordingly,
application is allowed.
Time sought to file application u/S 80 CPC. Heard.
Allowed.
List on 22.05.2025.
(ANKITA BHATIA)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/17.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS SCJ496/25
SHRIRAM MANDIR SEWA SAMITI Vs. SATISH
13.05.2025
Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be checked and
registered.
Present: Sh. Rajiv Tehlan, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
Time is sought by Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff to amend the
plaint. Heard. Allowed.
List on 17.05.2025 at 2 PM.
(ANKITA BHATIA)
CIVIL JUDGE (NORTH)
ROHINI/DELHI/13.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --