Chandra Prakash GehlotVsJasdeep Trading Company +1 more

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 3CS (COMM.)6607/24Chandra Prakash Gehlot Vs. Jasdeep
Trading Company
08.06.2026
Present: Sh. Rakesh Tiwari, ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Anoop Singh, counsel for Defendant No. 1.
None for Defendant No. 2.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff has placed on record the
affidavit of 12 of Delhi Court Services of summons by electronic
modes. Since defendant No. 2 has not turned despite service by
electronic mode, this Court proceeds exparte as against defendant
No.2 .
In terms of previous order Ld. Counsel for defendant
has filed statement of truth, admission/denial alongwith the WS.
Same is taken on record. Copy already supplied.
Put up not this case for replication and framing of
issues on 12.08.2026.
(Shailender Malik )
District Judge (Commercial)-02
North District, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/08.06.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 5
CS (COMM.) 6607/24
Chandra Prakash Gehlot
Vs.
Jasdeep Trading Company
14.01.2026
Present: Mr. Aksay Kumar Yadav, Advocate proxy for
plaintiff.
Mr. Anoop Singh, Advocate for defendant no.1.
Summons sent to defendant no.2 received back
unserved.
Issue summons for settlement of issues to the
defendant no.2 on filing of PF, by way of speed post with
registration and proof of delivery addressed to the defendant or
his agent empowered to accept the service and the declaration
referred to in Order V Rule 9 sub-rule 3 & 5 shall be made
notwithstanding the fact that the proof of service, returnable for
11.03.2026, subject to filing of PF and deposit of necessary
charges within 7 working days directing the defendant to file
written statement within statutory period with advance copy to
the opposite party. Dasti summons be also given to the plaintiff.
Put up on 11.03.2026.
( Dr. Rakesh Kumar )
District Judge (Commercial)-02
North District, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/14.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 6607/24
Chandra Prakash Gehlot Vs. Jasdeep Trading Company
03-05-2025
Pr : Sh. Rakesh Tiwari, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Anup Singh, Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 1.
None for defendant no. 2 as it is John Doe.
The defendant no. 1 filed reply to the application of the
plaintiff under Order VI rule 17 CPC and under Order XI rule 1
(5) CPC. Mr. Anup Singh further submitted that he does not want
to file reply to the application of the plaintiff under Order I rule
10 CPC and that reply has already been filed by plaintiff to
defendant’s application under Order 1 rule 10 CPC.
Counsel for plaintiff seeks adjournment for arguments on
the application on the ground that reply has been supplied today
itself.
Put up on 16.07.2025.
(UMED SINGH GREWAL)
District Judge- Commercial Court-02 (North)
03-05-2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 18
CS (COMM.) 6607/24
Chandra Prakash Gehlot
Vs.
Jasdeep Trading Company
19.02.2025
Present: None for plaintiff.
Proxy counsel for defendant with defendant No.1
Shri Jasdeep Singh.
None for defendant No.2.
Previous orders shows that a counsel who was
appearing for defendant no.2. But perusal of memo of parties
shows that defendant no.2 is John Doe/Ashok Kumar. There is
no order on the file vide which any defendant no.2 might have
been impleaded.
Shri Anoop Singh, counsel for defendant no.1
submitted that he has already filed reply to all three pending
applications. As per previous order, following three applications
are pending:
i) U/O 6 Rule 17 CPC;
ii) U/O 1 Rule 10 CPC and
iii) U/O 11 Rule 1 (5) of CPC.
The application of defendant no.1 U/o 1 Rule 10
CPC is also pending. Due to non appearance of any counsel for
plaintiff, the matter is now adjourned for arguments on all above
applications on 03.05.2025.
( Umed Singh Grewal )
District Judge (Commercial)-02
North District, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/19.02.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) 6607/24
Chandra Prakash Gehlot Vs. Jasdeep Trading Company
18.12.2024
Present: Sh. Shiv Kumar, ld. Proxy counsel for main counsel
Sh.Rakesh Tiwari, for plaintiff.
Sh. Anup Singh, ld. Counsel for defendant no.1.
Ld. Proxy counsel for plaintiff is not aware about numbers
of defendants.
Three applications of the plaintiff are pending. First is
under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC, second under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC and
third under Order 11 R 1 (5) CPC. One application of defendant no.1
under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC is also pending.
Ld. Counsel for defendant no.1 submits that reply to his
application has already been filed. Ld. Counsel further submits that he
would file reply to all the pending applications. Let the same be filed by
the next date of hearing with advance copy to the opposite party.
Ld. Proxy counsel seeks adjournment for arguments on the
ground that main counsel is not available today.
In view of the above, matter is adjourned for arguments on
the above said applications on 19.02.2025.
( Umed Singh Grewal )
District Judge (Commercial)-02
North District, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/18.12.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) 6607/24
Chandra Prakash Gehlot
Vs.
Jasdeep Trading Company
23.10.2024
Present: Sh. Rakesh Tiwari, Ld. Counsel for Plaintiff.
Sh. Anup Singh, Ld. Counsel for Defendant No.1.
None for Defendant No.2.
Ld. Counsel for Plaintiff has filed applications i.e. u/o
VI Rule 17, u/o I Rule 10 r/w Section 151 CPC and u/o XI Rule
1 (5) CPC. He has also filed replication to the WS of Defendant
No.1. He has also filed rejoinder to the reply of Defendant No.1
to the application u/o 39 Rule 1 and 2 of Defendant No.1. He has
also filed reply to the application u/o I Rule 10 CPC of the
Defendant No.1.
Copies supplied.
Put up for reply and arguments on the pending
applications on 18.12.2024.
(GORAKH NATH PANDEY)
District Judge (Commercial Court)
North:Rohini:Delhi/23.10.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 3CS (COMM.)6607/24Chandra Prakash Gehlot Vs. Jasdeep
Trading Company
08.06.2026
Present: Sh. Rakesh Tiwari, ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Anoop Singh, counsel for Defendant No. 1.
None for Defendant No. 2.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff has placed on record the
affidavit of 12 of Delhi Court Services of summons by electronic
modes. Since defendant No. 2 has not turned despite service by
electronic mode, this Court proceeds exparte as against defendant
No.2 .
In terms of previous order Ld. Counsel for defendant
has filed statement of truth, admission/denial alongwith the WS.
Same is taken on record. Copy already supplied.
Put up not this case for replication and framing of
issues on 12.08.2026.
(Shailender Malik )
District Judge (Commercial)-02
North District, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/08.06.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 5
CS (COMM.) 6607/24
Chandra Prakash Gehlot
Vs.
Jasdeep Trading Company
14.01.2026
Present: Mr. Aksay Kumar Yadav, Advocate proxy for
plaintiff.
Mr. Anoop Singh, Advocate for defendant no.1.
Summons sent to defendant no.2 received back
unserved.
Issue summons for settlement of issues to the
defendant no.2 on filing of PF, by way of speed post with
registration and proof of delivery addressed to the defendant or
his agent empowered to accept the service and the declaration
referred to in Order V Rule 9 sub-rule 3 & 5 shall be made
notwithstanding the fact that the proof of service, returnable for
11.03.2026, subject to filing of PF and deposit of necessary
charges within 7 working days directing the defendant to file
written statement within statutory period with advance copy to
the opposite party. Dasti summons be also given to the plaintiff.
Put up on 11.03.2026.
( Dr. Rakesh Kumar )
District Judge (Commercial)-02
North District, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/14.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 6607/24
Chandra Prakash Gehlot Vs. Jasdeep Trading Company
03-05-2025
Pr : Sh. Rakesh Tiwari, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Anup Singh, Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 1.
None for defendant no. 2 as it is John Doe.
The defendant no. 1 filed reply to the application of the
plaintiff under Order VI rule 17 CPC and under Order XI rule 1
(5) CPC. Mr. Anup Singh further submitted that he does not want
to file reply to the application of the plaintiff under Order I rule
10 CPC and that reply has already been filed by plaintiff to
defendant’s application under Order 1 rule 10 CPC.
Counsel for plaintiff seeks adjournment for arguments on
the application on the ground that reply has been supplied today
itself.
Put up on 16.07.2025.
(UMED SINGH GREWAL)
District Judge- Commercial Court-02 (North)
03-05-2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 18
CS (COMM.) 6607/24
Chandra Prakash Gehlot
Vs.
Jasdeep Trading Company
19.02.2025
Present: None for plaintiff.
Proxy counsel for defendant with defendant No.1
Shri Jasdeep Singh.
None for defendant No.2.
Previous orders shows that a counsel who was
appearing for defendant no.2. But perusal of memo of parties
shows that defendant no.2 is John Doe/Ashok Kumar. There is
no order on the file vide which any defendant no.2 might have
been impleaded.
Shri Anoop Singh, counsel for defendant no.1
submitted that he has already filed reply to all three pending
applications. As per previous order, following three applications
are pending:
i) U/O 6 Rule 17 CPC;
ii) U/O 1 Rule 10 CPC and
iii) U/O 11 Rule 1 (5) of CPC.
The application of defendant no.1 U/o 1 Rule 10
CPC is also pending. Due to non appearance of any counsel for
plaintiff, the matter is now adjourned for arguments on all above
applications on 03.05.2025.
( Umed Singh Grewal )
District Judge (Commercial)-02
North District, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/19.02.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) 6607/24
Chandra Prakash Gehlot Vs. Jasdeep Trading Company
18.12.2024
Present: Sh. Shiv Kumar, ld. Proxy counsel for main counsel
Sh.Rakesh Tiwari, for plaintiff.
Sh. Anup Singh, ld. Counsel for defendant no.1.
Ld. Proxy counsel for plaintiff is not aware about numbers
of defendants.
Three applications of the plaintiff are pending. First is
under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC, second under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC and
third under Order 11 R 1 (5) CPC. One application of defendant no.1
under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC is also pending.
Ld. Counsel for defendant no.1 submits that reply to his
application has already been filed. Ld. Counsel further submits that he
would file reply to all the pending applications. Let the same be filed by
the next date of hearing with advance copy to the opposite party.
Ld. Proxy counsel seeks adjournment for arguments on the
ground that main counsel is not available today.
In view of the above, matter is adjourned for arguments on
the above said applications on 19.02.2025.
( Umed Singh Grewal )
District Judge (Commercial)-02
North District, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/18.12.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) 6607/24
Chandra Prakash Gehlot
Vs.
Jasdeep Trading Company
23.10.2024
Present: Sh. Rakesh Tiwari, Ld. Counsel for Plaintiff.
Sh. Anup Singh, Ld. Counsel for Defendant No.1.
None for Defendant No.2.
Ld. Counsel for Plaintiff has filed applications i.e. u/o
VI Rule 17, u/o I Rule 10 r/w Section 151 CPC and u/o XI Rule
1 (5) CPC. He has also filed replication to the WS of Defendant
No.1. He has also filed rejoinder to the reply of Defendant No.1
to the application u/o 39 Rule 1 and 2 of Defendant No.1. He has
also filed reply to the application u/o I Rule 10 CPC of the
Defendant No.1.
Copies supplied.
Put up for reply and arguments on the pending
applications on 18.12.2024.
(GORAKH NATH PANDEY)
District Judge (Commercial Court)
North:Rohini:Delhi/23.10.2024
-- 1 of 1 --