M/s Polychem Industries +1 moreVsM/s Chopra Stearates

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) 256/24
M/s. Polychem Industries Vs. M/s. Chopra Stearates & Ors.
01.09.2026
File taken up today on an application bearing no. IA/1/2026 has
been moved on behalf of the defendant under Order 1 Rule 10
r/w Section 151 CPC.
Present: Ld. Proxy Counsel for the applicant/defendant
through VC.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant has moved an
application under Order 1 Rule 10 r/w Section 151 CPC on
behalf of defendant.
Let notice of the application moved on behalf of the
defendant be issued to the opposite party/plaintiff on filing of PF
for NDOH i.e. for 15.09.2026.
Steps be taken within a week from today.
(JAGDISH KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
01.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) 256/24
M/s Polychem Industries Vs. M/s Chopra Stearates
07.03.2026
Present: Sh. Rohan Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Rohit Taneja, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Ld. Counsel for defendant seeks an adjournment by
submitting that some near relative has expired, therefore, he is
unable to argue today. He further submits that he has already
intimated to the Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Ld. Counsel for
plaintiff has also no objection in this regard.
Heard. Considered.
In the given facts and circumstances, at joint request
matter stands adjourned.
Put up for arguments on application moved under
Order 11 Rule 1 (5) CPC on 04.05.2026.
(JAGDISH KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
07.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) 256/24
M/s Polychem Industries Vs. M/s Chopra Stearates
05.02.2026
Present: Sh. Lalit Goel, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Rohit Taneja, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Part arguments heard on the application of the
plaintiff moved under Order 11 Rule 1 (5) CPC.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff sought adjournment to
produce relevant judgment(s) in support of his contentions.
Heard. Considered. In the given facts and
circumstances, put up for further arguments on the above
application on 07.03.2026.
(JAGDISH KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
05.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) 256/24
M/s Polychem Industries
Vs. M/s Chopra Stearates
17.11.2025
Present: Sh. Kunal Saini, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Rohit Taneja, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
through VC.
An application of the plaintiff under Order 11 Rule 1
(5) CPC is pending.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff sought an adjournment by
submitting that he was hospitalized as suffering from Jaundice
and Typhoid and had not resumed his office and still at
recovering mode.
Heard. Considered.
In the given facts and circumstances, matter stands
adjourned
Put up for arguments on application of the plaintiff
moved under Order 11 Rule 1 (5) CPC on 22.12.2025.
(JAGDISH KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
17.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 21 CS (COMM.) 256/24 M/s Polychem Industries Vs. M/s
Chopra Stearates
16.09.2025
Present: Sh. Kunal Saini, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Mayank Goel, Ld. Proxy counsel for the
defendant through VC.
Matter is listed for arguments on the application
under Order XI rule 1 (5) CPC of the plaintiff.
Reply to the said application has already been e-
filed. Copy supplied.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant seeks adjournment on
the ground that main counsel is suffering from jaundice and
typhoid and is hospitalized and same has duly been informed to
the counsel for the plaintiff.
At request, put up for arguments on the aforesaid
application on 17.11.2025.
(AMIT KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
16.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) No. 256/24
M/s Polychem Industries Vs. M/s Chopra Stearates
12.08.2025
Present: Sh. Kunal Saini, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Ms. Kanwaljeet Khurana, Ld. Proxy counsel for the
defendant through VC.
Adjournment sought on behalf of the counsel for the
defendant on the ground that he is not available today due to
some family urgency.
The reply to the application under Order XI rule 1
(5) CPC of the plaintiff has not yet been filed, but the proxy
counsel is not aware about the file.
Defendant is given one last opportunity of a week to
file the reply to this application.
Put up for arguments on this application on
16.09.2025.
(AMIT KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
12.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) No. 256/24
M/s Polychem Industries Vs. M/s Chopra Stearates
08.07.2025
Present: Sh. Yogesh Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Rohit Taneja, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
through VC.
An application under Order XI rule 1 (5) CPC for
placing on record the additional documents along with proposed
documents filed on behalf of the plaintiff. E-copy supplied
yesterday evening.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant seeks time to file the
reply to this application. Let the same be filed within 4 weeks
with advance copy to the other side.
Put up for arguments on the said application on
12.08.2025.
(AMIT KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
08.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) No. 256/24
M/s Polychem Industries Vs. M/s Chopra Stearates
25.03.2025
Present: Sh. Kunal Saini, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff along
with AR.
Sh. Rohit Taneja, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
through VC.
Replication along with affidavit of admission/denial
to the defendant’s documents as well as certain documents along
with list of documents filed on behalf of the plaintiff. Copy
placed on record. The defendant is directed to collect the same.
Plaintiff has not moved any application seeking
permission to place on record the additional documents. Ld.
Counsel for the plaintiff seeks some time to file the same. Let
the same be filed within 2 weeks with advance copy to the other
side, who may file reply to the said application on or before the
next date of hearing.
Put up for further proceedings on 08.07.2025.
(AMIT KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
25.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) No. 256/24
M/s Polychem Industries Vs. M/s Chopra Stearates
14.01.2025
Present: Sh. Yogesh Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Rohit Taneja, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
through VC.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant has already filed the
WS along with an application seeking condonation of delay in
filing of WS.
Submissions on the application heard.
The legible copy was supplied by the plaintiff’s
counsel on 11.12.2024 and the WS has been filed on 09.01.2025.
The WS has been filed within time and same is taken on record.
The application stands disposed of.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff seeks time to file the
replication. Let the same be filed within 4 weeks with advance
copy to the opposite side.
Put up for replication admission/denial, framing of
issues and case management hearing on 25.03.2025.
(AMIT KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
14.01.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) No. 256/24
M/s Polychem Industries Vs. M/s Chopra Stearates
13.11.2024
Present: Sh. Kunal Saini, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Rohit Taneja, Ld. Counsel for the
defendant through VC.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant submits that the copy
of paper-book received with the summons is not complete and he
has already filed an application for supplying the missing pages
and legible copies of the paper-book to the counsel for the
plaintiff.
Record shows that defendant was served on
03.09.2024 and he sent the whats-app and e-mail to the counsel
for the plaintiff on 28.09.2024 for providing the legible and
complete copy.
Infacts, the plaintiff is directed to provide complete
legible copy of the entire paper-book to the ld. Counsel for the
defendant within a week. WS etc. be filed as per law.
Put up for further proceedings on 14.01.2025.
(AMIT KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
13.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) 256/24
M/s. Polychem Industries Vs. M/s. Chopra Stearates & Ors.
01.09.2026
File taken up today on an application bearing no. IA/1/2026 has
been moved on behalf of the defendant under Order 1 Rule 10
r/w Section 151 CPC.
Present: Ld. Proxy Counsel for the applicant/defendant
through VC.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant has moved an
application under Order 1 Rule 10 r/w Section 151 CPC on
behalf of defendant.
Let notice of the application moved on behalf of the
defendant be issued to the opposite party/plaintiff on filing of PF
for NDOH i.e. for 15.09.2026.
Steps be taken within a week from today.
(JAGDISH KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
01.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) 256/24
M/s. Polychem Industries Vs. M/s. Chopra Stearates & Ors.
01.09.2026
File taken up today on an application bearing no. IA/1/2026 has
been moved on behalf of the defendant under Order 1 Rule 10
r/w Section 151 CPC.
Present: Ld. Proxy Counsel for the applicant/defendant
through VC.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant has moved an
application under Order 1 Rule 10 r/w Section 151 CPC on
behalf of defendant.
Let notice of the application moved on behalf of the
defendant be issued to the opposite party/plaintiff on filing of PF
for NDOH i.e. for 15.09.2026.
Steps be taken within a week from today.
(JAGDISH KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
01.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) 256/24
M/s Polychem Industries Vs. M/s Chopra Stearates
07.03.2026
Present: Sh. Rohan Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Rohit Taneja, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Ld. Counsel for defendant seeks an adjournment by
submitting that some near relative has expired, therefore, he is
unable to argue today. He further submits that he has already
intimated to the Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Ld. Counsel for
plaintiff has also no objection in this regard.
Heard. Considered.
In the given facts and circumstances, at joint request
matter stands adjourned.
Put up for arguments on application moved under
Order 11 Rule 1 (5) CPC on 04.05.2026.
(JAGDISH KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
07.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) 256/24
M/s Polychem Industries Vs. M/s Chopra Stearates
05.02.2026
Present: Sh. Lalit Goel, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Rohit Taneja, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Part arguments heard on the application of the
plaintiff moved under Order 11 Rule 1 (5) CPC.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff sought adjournment to
produce relevant judgment(s) in support of his contentions.
Heard. Considered. In the given facts and
circumstances, put up for further arguments on the above
application on 07.03.2026.
(JAGDISH KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
05.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) 256/24
M/s Polychem Industries
Vs. M/s Chopra Stearates
17.11.2025
Present: Sh. Kunal Saini, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Rohit Taneja, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
through VC.
An application of the plaintiff under Order 11 Rule 1
(5) CPC is pending.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff sought an adjournment by
submitting that he was hospitalized as suffering from Jaundice
and Typhoid and had not resumed his office and still at
recovering mode.
Heard. Considered.
In the given facts and circumstances, matter stands
adjourned
Put up for arguments on application of the plaintiff
moved under Order 11 Rule 1 (5) CPC on 22.12.2025.
(JAGDISH KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
17.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 21 CS (COMM.) 256/24 M/s Polychem Industries Vs. M/s
Chopra Stearates
16.09.2025
Present: Sh. Kunal Saini, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Mayank Goel, Ld. Proxy counsel for the
defendant through VC.
Matter is listed for arguments on the application
under Order XI rule 1 (5) CPC of the plaintiff.
Reply to the said application has already been e-
filed. Copy supplied.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant seeks adjournment on
the ground that main counsel is suffering from jaundice and
typhoid and is hospitalized and same has duly been informed to
the counsel for the plaintiff.
At request, put up for arguments on the aforesaid
application on 17.11.2025.
(AMIT KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
16.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) No. 256/24
M/s Polychem Industries Vs. M/s Chopra Stearates
12.08.2025
Present: Sh. Kunal Saini, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Ms. Kanwaljeet Khurana, Ld. Proxy counsel for the
defendant through VC.
Adjournment sought on behalf of the counsel for the
defendant on the ground that he is not available today due to
some family urgency.
The reply to the application under Order XI rule 1
(5) CPC of the plaintiff has not yet been filed, but the proxy
counsel is not aware about the file.
Defendant is given one last opportunity of a week to
file the reply to this application.
Put up for arguments on this application on
16.09.2025.
(AMIT KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
12.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) No. 256/24
M/s Polychem Industries Vs. M/s Chopra Stearates
08.07.2025
Present: Sh. Yogesh Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Rohit Taneja, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
through VC.
An application under Order XI rule 1 (5) CPC for
placing on record the additional documents along with proposed
documents filed on behalf of the plaintiff. E-copy supplied
yesterday evening.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant seeks time to file the
reply to this application. Let the same be filed within 4 weeks
with advance copy to the other side.
Put up for arguments on the said application on
12.08.2025.
(AMIT KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
08.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) No. 256/24
M/s Polychem Industries Vs. M/s Chopra Stearates
25.03.2025
Present: Sh. Kunal Saini, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff along
with AR.
Sh. Rohit Taneja, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
through VC.
Replication along with affidavit of admission/denial
to the defendant’s documents as well as certain documents along
with list of documents filed on behalf of the plaintiff. Copy
placed on record. The defendant is directed to collect the same.
Plaintiff has not moved any application seeking
permission to place on record the additional documents. Ld.
Counsel for the plaintiff seeks some time to file the same. Let
the same be filed within 2 weeks with advance copy to the other
side, who may file reply to the said application on or before the
next date of hearing.
Put up for further proceedings on 08.07.2025.
(AMIT KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
25.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) No. 256/24
M/s Polychem Industries Vs. M/s Chopra Stearates
14.01.2025
Present: Sh. Yogesh Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Rohit Taneja, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
through VC.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant has already filed the
WS along with an application seeking condonation of delay in
filing of WS.
Submissions on the application heard.
The legible copy was supplied by the plaintiff’s
counsel on 11.12.2024 and the WS has been filed on 09.01.2025.
The WS has been filed within time and same is taken on record.
The application stands disposed of.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff seeks time to file the
replication. Let the same be filed within 4 weeks with advance
copy to the opposite side.
Put up for replication admission/denial, framing of
issues and case management hearing on 25.03.2025.
(AMIT KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
14.01.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) No. 256/24
M/s Polychem Industries Vs. M/s Chopra Stearates
13.11.2024
Present: Sh. Kunal Saini, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Rohit Taneja, Ld. Counsel for the
defendant through VC.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant submits that the copy
of paper-book received with the summons is not complete and he
has already filed an application for supplying the missing pages
and legible copies of the paper-book to the counsel for the
plaintiff.
Record shows that defendant was served on
03.09.2024 and he sent the whats-app and e-mail to the counsel
for the plaintiff on 28.09.2024 for providing the legible and
complete copy.
Infacts, the plaintiff is directed to provide complete
legible copy of the entire paper-book to the ld. Counsel for the
defendant within a week. WS etc. be filed as per law.
Put up for further proceedings on 14.01.2025.
(AMIT KUMAR)
District Judge, Comm. Court-01
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi
13.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --