SUSHIL GOELVsNARESH KUMAR +6 more

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 24 CS DJ 180/24 SUSHIL GOEL Vs. NARESH KUMAR
28.07.2026
Present: Sh. Sandeep Jindal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff along
with plaintiff.
Sh. Sunil Chaudhary, Ld. Counsel for D1/Naresh
Kumar and D2/Ramesh Kumar in person.
Sh.Sarthak Gupta, Ld. Counsel for D3 (through
VC).
Sh. Vikas Gupta, Ld. Counsel for D4 along with D4.
Sh. Anirudh Garg, Ld. Counsel for D5.
D6/NDMC already deleted from the array of parties
vide order dated 29.05.2025.
None for D7.
1. Typed copy of the Will dt. 30.05.1991 supplied to Ld.
Counsel for defendant
2. ld. counsel for plaintiff submits that an application u/o 6
Rule 17 CPC is pending consideration. Accordingly, an
adjournment is sought to prefer an appropriate application
under an appropriate provision of law for bringing on
record a Will dt. 30.05.1991. Accordingly, allowed.
3. The needful be done within two weeks from today with an
advance copy to the opposite party
4. Reply if any be filed on or before NDOH with an advance
copy to the opposite party
5. Put up for arguments on 22.09.2026
(Akbar Siddique)
DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/28.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 6 CS DJ 180/24 SUSHIL GOEL Vs. NARESH KUMAR
09.04.2026
Present: Sh. Sandeep Jindal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff along
with plaintiff.
D1/Naresh Kumar in person.
D2/Ramesh Kumar in person.
Sh.Sarthak Gupta, Ld. Counsel for D3 (through
VC).
Ms. Diksha Sain, Ld. Counsel for D4 along with D4.
Sh. Anirudh Garg and Sh. Vinit Kumar Sharma, Ld.
Counsel for D5.
D6/NDMC already deleted from the array of parties
vide order dated 29.05.2025.
None for D7.
1. Legible copy of the will dt. 30.05.1991 annexed with the
application u/o 6 Rule 17 CPC supplied to the opposite
party. Copy received.
2. An opportunity is sought by the Ld. Counsel to file reply
except Ld. Counsel for D3. It is submitted by the Ld.
Counsel for D3 that he does not wish to file any reply to
the application u/o 6 Rule 17 CPC. As a matter of last and
final opportunity, one last opportunity is granted to file the
reply with an advance copy to the opposite party on or
before NDOH.
3. Put up for arguments on application u/o 6 Rule 17 CPC on
28.07.2026
(Akbar Siddique)
DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi-09.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS DJ 180/24
SUSHIL GOEL Vs. NARESH KUMAR
06.01.2026
Present: Sh. Siddharth Jain, Ld. Proxy counsel for the
plaintiff.
Sh Sunil Chaudhary, Ld. counsel for D1 and D2.
None for D3.
Sh.Vikas Gupta, Ld. Counsel for D4 along with D4.
Sh. Anirudh Garg, Ld. Counsel for D5.
D6/NDMC already deleted from the array of parties
vide order dated 29.05.2025.
None for D7.
Today it is submitted by Ld Counsels for D1 and D2
that he has still not received the copy of the documents filed by
the plaintiff I.e Will dated 30.05.1991 filed by the plaintiff along
with the application under order VI Rule 17 CPC.
Ld Counsel for D4 also submits that he has also not
received the legible copy of the said document till date.
Let the same be supplied to the aforesaid counsels
within a period of four weeks from today against due
acknowledgment.
At request, list the matter for reply and arguments on
the aforesaid application of the plaintiff filed under order 6 Rule
17 CPC on 09.04.2026.
(Ravinder Singh II)
DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/06.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS DJ 180/24
SUSHIL GOEL Vs. NARESH KUMAR
06.03.2025
Present: Sh. Sandeep Jindal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Sunil Chaudhary, Ld. Counsel for defendant
no.1&2.
Sh. Sarthak Gupta and Sh. R.K. Gupta, Ld. Counsel
for defendant no.3.
Sh. Anirudh Garg, Sh. Vinit Kumar Sharma and Sh.
Akshat Kumar, Ld. Counsels for DDA.
Sh. Vikas Gupta and Sh. Jitender Goyal, Ld.
Counsels for defendant no.4, through VC.
Put up with connected case, on 02.04.2025.
(Kishor Kumar)
DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/06.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS DJ 180/24
SUSHIL GOEL Vs. NARESH KUMAR
05.11.24
Present: Sh. Saurabh, Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff along
with plaintiff in person.
Sh. Sunil Chaudhary, Ld. Counsel for defendant no.1
and 2.
Sh. Vikas Gupta, Ld. Counsel for defendant no.4.
Sh. R.K. Gupta, Ld. Counsel for defendant no.3,
through VC.
Sh. Anirudh Garg, Ld. Counsel for DDA.
Amended memo of parties filed on behalf of
plaintiff. Copy supplied.
It is submitted by Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff
that today main counsel is not available. Adjournment sought.
Opposed on behalf of defendants. However, in the interest of
justice, put up the case as last and final opportunity to the
plaintiff to address arguments on preliminary issue with regard to
limitation.
At this stage, it is submitted by Ld. Counsels for the
defendants that the point of limitation for which present case is
going on for arguments, is a mixed question of law and fact and
can be decided by leading cogent evidence on behalf of the
plaintiff.
In view of above, put up the case for plaintiff
evidence as well as for consideration of clubbing aspect, for
06.03.2025.
(Kishor Kumar)
DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/05.11.24.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS DJ 180/24
SUSHIL GOEL Vs. NARESH KUMAR
26.09.24
Present: Plaintiff in person.
Sh Sunil Chaudhary, ld counself or defendant no.1
and 2.
Sh R K Gupta, ld counsel for defendant no.3.
None for remaining defendants.
Since ld counsel for defendants no.1 and 2 has been
engaged recently in the present case, he seeks some time to
address arguments on the issue no.4.
Heard.
In the interest of justice, put up the case for
arguments on issue no.4 as well as for filing of amended memo
of parties, for 05.11.24.
(Kishor Kumar)
DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/26.09.24
At this stage, Sh Suarabh ld counsel for plaintiff and Sh
Aniruddh Garg, ld counsel for DDA, have appeared and they
have been apprised about the NDOH.
(Kishor Kumar)
DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/26.09.24
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS DJ 180/24
SUSHIL GOEL Vs. NARESH KUMAR
25.07.24
Present: Sh Sandeep Jindal, ld counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh Vasudev Goswami, ld counsel for the defendant
no.1 and 2, through VC.
Sh R K Gupta and Sh Dhruv Gupta, ld counsel for
defendant no.3.
Sh Vikas Gupta and Ms Pooja Gupta, ld counsel for
the defendant no.4.
Sh Aniruddh Garg, ld counsel for defendant
no.5/DDA, through VC.
Ld counsel for defendant no.1 and 2 seeks time to
appear before the court to address arguments on issue no.4.
Heard.
Put up the case for appearance of ld counsel for
defendant no.1 and 2 for addressing arguments on issue no.4 as
well as for filing amended memo of parties by plaintiff, for
26.09.24.
(Kishor Kumar)
DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/25.07.24.
At this stage, Ms Sarita Aggarwal, ld counsel for DDA has
appeared through VC and she has been apprised about today’s
proceedings and the NDOH.
(Kishor Kumar)
DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/25.07.24.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS DJ 180/24
SUSHIL GOEL Vs. NARESH KUMAR
29.05.24
Present: Sh. Sandeep Jindal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff along
with plaintiff in person.
Sh. Vasudev Goswami, Ld. Counsel for defendant
no.1 & 2.
Sh. R.K. Gupta, Ld. Counsel for defendant no.3.
Sh. Vikas Gupta, Ld. Counsel for defendant no.4.
Ms. Vasu Singh, Ld. Counsel for defendant
no.6/MCD.
Sh. Anirudh Garg, Ld. Counsel for DDA.
Arguments on application filed on behalf of MCD
under Order I Rule 10 CPC heard.
Vide my separate order of even date, the aforesaid
application stands allowed and defendant/MCD is hereby deleted
from the array of defendants, giving an opportunity to the
plaintiff to summon the MCD as witness.
Put up the case for arguments on Issue No.4, on
25.07.2024, which has been treated as preliminary issue vide
order dated 22.08.2023.
(Kishor Kumar)
DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/29.05.24.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS DJ 180/24
SUSHIL GOEL Vs. NARESH KUMAR
22.03.24
Present: Sh Sandeep Jindal, ld counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh Vasudev Goswami, ld counsel for the defendant
no.1 and 2.
Sh Sarthak Gupta, ld counsel for the defendant no.3.
Sh Vikas Gupta, ld counsel for the defendant no.4,
through VC.
Ms Honey Garg, ld counsel for defendant
no.6/MCD.
Sh Anirudh Garg, ld LAC for DDA.
Ld counsel for the plaintiff seeks some time to file
reply to the application moved on behalf of the defendant
no.6/MCD for its deletion from the array of defendants.
Heard.
Put up the case for filing reply to the application by
ld counsel for the plaintiff with advance copy to ld counsel for
the defendant and for arguments on the same, on 29.05.24.
(Kishor Kumar)
ADJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/22.03.24.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS DJ
Sushil Goel Vs Naresh Kumar and Ors.
29.02.24
Suit received by way of transfer from the court of ld SCJ
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi vide order dated 27.02.24 passed
by ld Principal District and Sessions Judge (N), Rohini
Courts, Delhi.
Present: Sh Saurabh, ld proxy counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh Sarthak Gupta, ld counsel for the defendant.
Put up the case with connected case on 22.03.24.
(Kishor Kumar)
ADJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/29.02.24
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 24 CS DJ 180/24 SUSHIL GOEL Vs. NARESH KUMAR
28.07.2026
Present: Sh. Sandeep Jindal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff along
with plaintiff.
Sh. Sunil Chaudhary, Ld. Counsel for D1/Naresh
Kumar and D2/Ramesh Kumar in person.
Sh.Sarthak Gupta, Ld. Counsel for D3 (through
VC).
Sh. Vikas Gupta, Ld. Counsel for D4 along with D4.
Sh. Anirudh Garg, Ld. Counsel for D5.
D6/NDMC already deleted from the array of parties
vide order dated 29.05.2025.
None for D7.
1. Typed copy of the Will dt. 30.05.1991 supplied to Ld.
Counsel for defendant
2. ld. counsel for plaintiff submits that an application u/o 6
Rule 17 CPC is pending consideration. Accordingly, an
adjournment is sought to prefer an appropriate application
under an appropriate provision of law for bringing on
record a Will dt. 30.05.1991. Accordingly, allowed.
3. The needful be done within two weeks from today with an
advance copy to the opposite party
4. Reply if any be filed on or before NDOH with an advance
copy to the opposite party
5. Put up for arguments on 22.09.2026
(Akbar Siddique)
DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/28.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 6 CS DJ 180/24 SUSHIL GOEL Vs. NARESH KUMAR
09.04.2026
Present: Sh. Sandeep Jindal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff along
with plaintiff.
D1/Naresh Kumar in person.
D2/Ramesh Kumar in person.
Sh.Sarthak Gupta, Ld. Counsel for D3 (through
VC).
Ms. Diksha Sain, Ld. Counsel for D4 along with D4.
Sh. Anirudh Garg and Sh. Vinit Kumar Sharma, Ld.
Counsel for D5.
D6/NDMC already deleted from the array of parties
vide order dated 29.05.2025.
None for D7.
1. Legible copy of the will dt. 30.05.1991 annexed with the
application u/o 6 Rule 17 CPC supplied to the opposite
party. Copy received.
2. An opportunity is sought by the Ld. Counsel to file reply
except Ld. Counsel for D3. It is submitted by the Ld.
Counsel for D3 that he does not wish to file any reply to
the application u/o 6 Rule 17 CPC. As a matter of last and
final opportunity, one last opportunity is granted to file the
reply with an advance copy to the opposite party on or
before NDOH.
3. Put up for arguments on application u/o 6 Rule 17 CPC on
28.07.2026
(Akbar Siddique)
DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi-09.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS DJ 180/24
SUSHIL GOEL Vs. NARESH KUMAR
06.01.2026
Present: Sh. Siddharth Jain, Ld. Proxy counsel for the
plaintiff.
Sh Sunil Chaudhary, Ld. counsel for D1 and D2.
None for D3.
Sh.Vikas Gupta, Ld. Counsel for D4 along with D4.
Sh. Anirudh Garg, Ld. Counsel for D5.
D6/NDMC already deleted from the array of parties
vide order dated 29.05.2025.
None for D7.
Today it is submitted by Ld Counsels for D1 and D2
that he has still not received the copy of the documents filed by
the plaintiff I.e Will dated 30.05.1991 filed by the plaintiff along
with the application under order VI Rule 17 CPC.
Ld Counsel for D4 also submits that he has also not
received the legible copy of the said document till date.
Let the same be supplied to the aforesaid counsels
within a period of four weeks from today against due
acknowledgment.
At request, list the matter for reply and arguments on
the aforesaid application of the plaintiff filed under order 6 Rule
17 CPC on 09.04.2026.
(Ravinder Singh II)
DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/06.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS DJ 180/24
SUSHIL GOEL Vs. NARESH KUMAR
06.03.2025
Present: Sh. Sandeep Jindal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Sunil Chaudhary, Ld. Counsel for defendant
no.1&2.
Sh. Sarthak Gupta and Sh. R.K. Gupta, Ld. Counsel
for defendant no.3.
Sh. Anirudh Garg, Sh. Vinit Kumar Sharma and Sh.
Akshat Kumar, Ld. Counsels for DDA.
Sh. Vikas Gupta and Sh. Jitender Goyal, Ld.
Counsels for defendant no.4, through VC.
Put up with connected case, on 02.04.2025.
(Kishor Kumar)
DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/06.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS DJ 180/24
SUSHIL GOEL Vs. NARESH KUMAR
05.11.24
Present: Sh. Saurabh, Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff along
with plaintiff in person.
Sh. Sunil Chaudhary, Ld. Counsel for defendant no.1
and 2.
Sh. Vikas Gupta, Ld. Counsel for defendant no.4.
Sh. R.K. Gupta, Ld. Counsel for defendant no.3,
through VC.
Sh. Anirudh Garg, Ld. Counsel for DDA.
Amended memo of parties filed on behalf of
plaintiff. Copy supplied.
It is submitted by Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff
that today main counsel is not available. Adjournment sought.
Opposed on behalf of defendants. However, in the interest of
justice, put up the case as last and final opportunity to the
plaintiff to address arguments on preliminary issue with regard to
limitation.
At this stage, it is submitted by Ld. Counsels for the
defendants that the point of limitation for which present case is
going on for arguments, is a mixed question of law and fact and
can be decided by leading cogent evidence on behalf of the
plaintiff.
In view of above, put up the case for plaintiff
evidence as well as for consideration of clubbing aspect, for
06.03.2025.
(Kishor Kumar)
DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/05.11.24.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS DJ 180/24
SUSHIL GOEL Vs. NARESH KUMAR
26.09.24
Present: Plaintiff in person.
Sh Sunil Chaudhary, ld counself or defendant no.1
and 2.
Sh R K Gupta, ld counsel for defendant no.3.
None for remaining defendants.
Since ld counsel for defendants no.1 and 2 has been
engaged recently in the present case, he seeks some time to
address arguments on the issue no.4.
Heard.
In the interest of justice, put up the case for
arguments on issue no.4 as well as for filing of amended memo
of parties, for 05.11.24.
(Kishor Kumar)
DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/26.09.24
At this stage, Sh Suarabh ld counsel for plaintiff and Sh
Aniruddh Garg, ld counsel for DDA, have appeared and they
have been apprised about the NDOH.
(Kishor Kumar)
DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/26.09.24
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS DJ 180/24
SUSHIL GOEL Vs. NARESH KUMAR
25.07.24
Present: Sh Sandeep Jindal, ld counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh Vasudev Goswami, ld counsel for the defendant
no.1 and 2, through VC.
Sh R K Gupta and Sh Dhruv Gupta, ld counsel for
defendant no.3.
Sh Vikas Gupta and Ms Pooja Gupta, ld counsel for
the defendant no.4.
Sh Aniruddh Garg, ld counsel for defendant
no.5/DDA, through VC.
Ld counsel for defendant no.1 and 2 seeks time to
appear before the court to address arguments on issue no.4.
Heard.
Put up the case for appearance of ld counsel for
defendant no.1 and 2 for addressing arguments on issue no.4 as
well as for filing amended memo of parties by plaintiff, for
26.09.24.
(Kishor Kumar)
DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/25.07.24.
At this stage, Ms Sarita Aggarwal, ld counsel for DDA has
appeared through VC and she has been apprised about today’s
proceedings and the NDOH.
(Kishor Kumar)
DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/25.07.24.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS DJ 180/24
SUSHIL GOEL Vs. NARESH KUMAR
29.05.24
Present: Sh. Sandeep Jindal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff along
with plaintiff in person.
Sh. Vasudev Goswami, Ld. Counsel for defendant
no.1 & 2.
Sh. R.K. Gupta, Ld. Counsel for defendant no.3.
Sh. Vikas Gupta, Ld. Counsel for defendant no.4.
Ms. Vasu Singh, Ld. Counsel for defendant
no.6/MCD.
Sh. Anirudh Garg, Ld. Counsel for DDA.
Arguments on application filed on behalf of MCD
under Order I Rule 10 CPC heard.
Vide my separate order of even date, the aforesaid
application stands allowed and defendant/MCD is hereby deleted
from the array of defendants, giving an opportunity to the
plaintiff to summon the MCD as witness.
Put up the case for arguments on Issue No.4, on
25.07.2024, which has been treated as preliminary issue vide
order dated 22.08.2023.
(Kishor Kumar)
DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/29.05.24.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS DJ 180/24
SUSHIL GOEL Vs. NARESH KUMAR
22.03.24
Present: Sh Sandeep Jindal, ld counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh Vasudev Goswami, ld counsel for the defendant
no.1 and 2.
Sh Sarthak Gupta, ld counsel for the defendant no.3.
Sh Vikas Gupta, ld counsel for the defendant no.4,
through VC.
Ms Honey Garg, ld counsel for defendant
no.6/MCD.
Sh Anirudh Garg, ld LAC for DDA.
Ld counsel for the plaintiff seeks some time to file
reply to the application moved on behalf of the defendant
no.6/MCD for its deletion from the array of defendants.
Heard.
Put up the case for filing reply to the application by
ld counsel for the plaintiff with advance copy to ld counsel for
the defendant and for arguments on the same, on 29.05.24.
(Kishor Kumar)
ADJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/22.03.24.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS DJ
Sushil Goel Vs Naresh Kumar and Ors.
29.02.24
Suit received by way of transfer from the court of ld SCJ
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi vide order dated 27.02.24 passed
by ld Principal District and Sessions Judge (N), Rohini
Courts, Delhi.
Present: Sh Saurabh, ld proxy counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh Sarthak Gupta, ld counsel for the defendant.
Put up the case with connected case on 22.03.24.
(Kishor Kumar)
ADJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
Delhi/29.02.24
-- 1 of 1 --