Devendra Gupta +3 moreVsKotak Mahindra Bank Limited

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 13
CS 366/24
DEVENDRA GUPTA Vs.
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED
04.05.2026
Present: Ms. Deeksha Mehrotra, Proxy Counsel for Plaintiff
(through VC).
Ms. Charu Sachdev, Ld. Counsel for Defendant
(through VC).
Counsel for the defendant has informed the Court
that previous cost has been paid, which is fairly endorsed by
proxy counsel for the plaintiff.
Proxy counsel for plaintiff seeks a short
adjournment submitting that main counsel is in some personal
difficulty.
Adjournment plea is not opposed.
Accordingly, to come up for arguments on
preliminary issue no.1 in the matter on 10.09.2026.
(Dharmender Rana)
District Judge – 01
PHC/New Delhi/04.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 15
CS 366/24
DEVENDRA GUPTA Vs.
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED
25.02.2026
Present: Sh. Aseem Mehrotra and Ms. Deeksha Mehrotra,
Ld. Counsel for Plaintiff.
Ms. Charu Sachdev, Ld. Counsel for Defendant.
An application for waiver of cost has been moved on
behalf of defendant.
Counsel for the plaintiff graciously submits that
considering the personal difficulty of counsel for the defendant,
the cost may be reduced to 50%.
In view of the gracious concession made by counsel
for the plaintiff, cost imposed upon the defendant on 17.09.2025
is reduced to Rs.12,500/-. Application for waiver of cost stands
disposed of.
At joint request, to come up for arguments on issue
no.1 in the matter on 04.05.2026.
(Dharmender Rana)
District Judge – 01
PHC/New Delhi/25.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS 366-24
DEVENDRA GUPTA Vs. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED
22.05.2025
Present : Ms. Diksha Malhotra, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff (through
VC).
Ms. Charu Sachdev, Ld. Counsel for the defendant (through
VC).
Ld. Counsel for the defendant seeks a short adjournment
submitting that the main counsel is not available today.
Adjournment not opposed.
In the interest of justice, one last and final opportunity is
granted to the plaintiff to file reply of application under Order VIII Rule 1
CPC.
Affidavit of document admission/denial has already been filed
on behalf the defendant.
Plaintiff is directed to file affidavit of documents admission/
denial and replication well before the next date of hearing with advance
copy to the defendant.
Now to come up for arguments on the application under Order
VIII Rule 1 CPC, replication, documents admission/ denial and framing of
issues on 17.09.2025.
(Dharmender Rana)
District Judge – 01
PHC/New Delhi/22.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS 366-24
Devendra Gupta Vs. Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited
07.11.2024
Present : Ms. Richa, Ld. Proxy counsel for the plaintiff.
Ms. Charu Sachdev, Ld. Counsel for the defendant (through
VC).
Summons issued to defendant through ordinary process
received back served.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant seeks some time to file the
written statement within the statutory period and also undertakes to file her
vakalatnama within 2 days.
At request, written statement be filed prior to next date of
hearing with copy to be furnished to the plaintiff prior to next date of
hearing against acknowledgment.
On receipt of written statement, the plaintiff is at liberty to file
replication if any, with copy to be furnished to the defendant prior to next
date of hearing against acknowledgment.
Matter be listed for filing of replication, if any, affidavit of
admission and denial of documents and framing of issues on 10.02.2025.
Affidavit of admission and denial of documents be be
exchanged between the parties prior to the next date of hearing.
(Dharmender Rana)
District Judge – 01
PHC/New Delhi/07.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS 366-24
DEVENDRA GUPTA Vs. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED
17.09.2024 at 10.25 AM
Present : Sh. Aseem Mehrotra, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff (through
VC).
Previous order not complied with.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff seeks time for compliance of
previous order. Heard
PF be filed within a week for compliance of previous order,
returnable on 07.11.2014.
(Vijeta Singh Rawat)
District Judge – 01
PHC/New Delhi/17.09.2024(R)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS 366-24
Devendra Gupta and Ors. Vs. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.
13.08.2024 at 02.11 p.m.
Fresh suit for mandatory injunction and damages received by way
of assignment. It be checked and registered.
Present : Sh. Aseem Mehrotra, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Heard. Record Perused.
Report of the Reader qua Court fees perused.
Let summons of the suit be issued to the defendant on
filing of PF/RC-AD/Speed post/Courier as well as through all
approval electronic mode, returnable on 17.09.2024.
(Vijeta Singh Rawat)
District Judge – 01
PHC/New Delhi/13.08.2024(k)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 11
CS 366/24
DEVENDRA GUPTA Vs.
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED
10.09.2026
Present: Sh. Aseem Mehrotra, Ld. Counsel for Plaintiff
(through VC).
Ms. Charu Sachdev, Ld. Counsel for Defendant.
Part submissions heard. Counsel for the defendant
seeks a passover to file RBI circular in support of her
submissions.
Put up again at 02:00 p.m.
(Dharmender Rana)
District Judge – 01
PHC/New Delhi/10.09.2026
At 02:50 p.m.
Present: Sh. Aseem Mehrotra, Ld. Counsel for Plaintiff
(through VC).
Ms. Charu Sachdev, Ld. Counsel for Defendant
(through VC).
Counsel for the defendant seeks a short adjournment
to place on record the relevant RBI Circular.
To come up for remaining arguments on preliminary
issue no.1 in the matter on 17.11.2026.
(Dharmender Rana)
District Judge – 01
PHC/New Delhi/10.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 13
CS 366/24
DEVENDRA GUPTA Vs.
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED
04.05.2026
Present: Ms. Deeksha Mehrotra, Proxy Counsel for Plaintiff
(through VC).
Ms. Charu Sachdev, Ld. Counsel for Defendant
(through VC).
Counsel for the defendant has informed the Court
that previous cost has been paid, which is fairly endorsed by
proxy counsel for the plaintiff.
Proxy counsel for plaintiff seeks a short
adjournment submitting that main counsel is in some personal
difficulty.
Adjournment plea is not opposed.
Accordingly, to come up for arguments on
preliminary issue no.1 in the matter on 10.09.2026.
(Dharmender Rana)
District Judge – 01
PHC/New Delhi/04.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 15
CS 366/24
DEVENDRA GUPTA Vs.
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED
25.02.2026
Present: Sh. Aseem Mehrotra and Ms. Deeksha Mehrotra,
Ld. Counsel for Plaintiff.
Ms. Charu Sachdev, Ld. Counsel for Defendant.
An application for waiver of cost has been moved on
behalf of defendant.
Counsel for the plaintiff graciously submits that
considering the personal difficulty of counsel for the defendant,
the cost may be reduced to 50%.
In view of the gracious concession made by counsel
for the plaintiff, cost imposed upon the defendant on 17.09.2025
is reduced to Rs.12,500/-. Application for waiver of cost stands
disposed of.
At joint request, to come up for arguments on issue
no.1 in the matter on 04.05.2026.
(Dharmender Rana)
District Judge – 01
PHC/New Delhi/25.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS 366-24
DEVENDRA GUPTA Vs. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED
22.05.2025
Present : Ms. Diksha Malhotra, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff (through
VC).
Ms. Charu Sachdev, Ld. Counsel for the defendant (through
VC).
Ld. Counsel for the defendant seeks a short adjournment
submitting that the main counsel is not available today.
Adjournment not opposed.
In the interest of justice, one last and final opportunity is
granted to the plaintiff to file reply of application under Order VIII Rule 1
CPC.
Affidavit of document admission/denial has already been filed
on behalf the defendant.
Plaintiff is directed to file affidavit of documents admission/
denial and replication well before the next date of hearing with advance
copy to the defendant.
Now to come up for arguments on the application under Order
VIII Rule 1 CPC, replication, documents admission/ denial and framing of
issues on 17.09.2025.
(Dharmender Rana)
District Judge – 01
PHC/New Delhi/22.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS 366-24
Devendra Gupta Vs. Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited
07.11.2024
Present : Ms. Richa, Ld. Proxy counsel for the plaintiff.
Ms. Charu Sachdev, Ld. Counsel for the defendant (through
VC).
Summons issued to defendant through ordinary process
received back served.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant seeks some time to file the
written statement within the statutory period and also undertakes to file her
vakalatnama within 2 days.
At request, written statement be filed prior to next date of
hearing with copy to be furnished to the plaintiff prior to next date of
hearing against acknowledgment.
On receipt of written statement, the plaintiff is at liberty to file
replication if any, with copy to be furnished to the defendant prior to next
date of hearing against acknowledgment.
Matter be listed for filing of replication, if any, affidavit of
admission and denial of documents and framing of issues on 10.02.2025.
Affidavit of admission and denial of documents be be
exchanged between the parties prior to the next date of hearing.
(Dharmender Rana)
District Judge – 01
PHC/New Delhi/07.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS 366-24
DEVENDRA GUPTA Vs. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED
17.09.2024 at 10.25 AM
Present : Sh. Aseem Mehrotra, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff (through
VC).
Previous order not complied with.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff seeks time for compliance of
previous order. Heard
PF be filed within a week for compliance of previous order,
returnable on 07.11.2014.
(Vijeta Singh Rawat)
District Judge – 01
PHC/New Delhi/17.09.2024(R)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS 366-24
Devendra Gupta and Ors. Vs. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.
13.08.2024 at 02.11 p.m.
Fresh suit for mandatory injunction and damages received by way
of assignment. It be checked and registered.
Present : Sh. Aseem Mehrotra, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Heard. Record Perused.
Report of the Reader qua Court fees perused.
Let summons of the suit be issued to the defendant on
filing of PF/RC-AD/Speed post/Courier as well as through all
approval electronic mode, returnable on 17.09.2024.
(Vijeta Singh Rawat)
District Judge – 01
PHC/New Delhi/13.08.2024(k)
-- 1 of 1 --