Full Order Text
Order 6 · 17 Sept 2025 · CNR DLND010063792024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 19 CS 366-2024 DEVENDRA GUPTA Vs. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED 17.09.2025 Present : Sh. Aashim Malhotra, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through VC. Ms. Sonia Behra, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the defendant. An application under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC seeking condonation of delay in filing the written statement is pending consideration. At the very outset, ld. counsel for the plaintiff submits that for expeditious disposal of the instant case, he has no objection if the written statement is taken on record subject to costs. The delay in filing of the written statement stands condoned subject to cost of Rs.25,000/- to be paid to the plaintiff herein. Pleadings are complete. Affidavit of admission-denial of documents is filed on behalf of the defendant. The defendant has admitted the copy of the reply dated 10.09.2022, order dated 11.09.2023 and has denied the remaining documents. The reply dated 10.09.2022 is accordingly Ex. A1 and order dated 11.09.2023 passed in CM APPL. 46540/2023 is Ex. A2. Based upon the pleadings, following issues are famed in the suit: i. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for relief of mandatory injunction directing the defendant to provide bank statement for the period from 01.04.2020 till date with -- 1 of 2 -- -2- respect to plaintiff no. 1, 2 and 3 and from 01.04.2017 till dated with respect to plaintiff no. 4 ? OPP ii. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to seek damages to the tune of Rs.5,00,000/- from the defendant? OPP iii. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for award of any pendente lite and future interest? If so, at what rate and for what period? OPP iv. Relief. No other issues arises or is being pressed for. Considering the nature of the suit, I deem it appropriate to hear the arguments straightaway on the issue no. 1. Accordingly, put up for arguments on 25.02.2026. (Dharmender Rana) District Judge – 01 PHC/New Delhi/17.09.2025 -- 2 of 2 --