Subodh GuptaVsMRS. MAMTA AGGARWAL

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No. 233/2023
CNR No.DLET010072752023
Subodh Gupta vs. Mrs. Mamta Aggarwal
01.09.2026
Present: Sh. Hemant Kr. Chaturvedi, advocate for plaintiff in
VC.
Sh. Kartik Garg, advocate for defendant in VC.
Transfer petition is pending in the Hon’ble High Court and
it has not come for hearing so far.
Put up this matter on 16.10.2026 for further proceedings
as well as for awaiting order of the Hon’ble High Court. The last
opportunity is given to the plaintiff with warning that in case, the
matter is not transferred in between, then the case will be fixed
for evidence.
(Ashwani Kumar Sarpal)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
East District, KKD Delhi/01.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No. 233/2023
CNR No. DLET010072752023
Subodh Gupta vs. Mrs. Mamta Aggarwal
06.08.2026
Present: Plaintiff in person in court whereas Sh. Parveen
Maheshwari, advocate in VC.
Dr. Rakesh Gupta, advocate for defendant in VC.
It is stated that transfer petition has been filed in Hon’ble
High Court for transfer of two cases in one court. This case is
pending in East district whereas another connected matter is
pending in Shahdara district. It is stated that transfer petition
may be coming for hearing tomorrow.
Put up this matter on 01.09.2026 for awaiting order of the
Hon’ble High Court.
(Ashwani Kumar Sarpal)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
East District, KKD Delhi/06.08.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No. 233/23
Subodh Gupta vs. Mrs. Mamta Aggarwal
23.05.2026
Present: Sh. Hemant Kr. Chaturvedi, advocate for plaintiff in
VC.
Dr. Rakesh Gupta, advocate for defendant in VC.
Counsel for defendant wants time as he met with an
accident and suffered fracture in his hand. He has also to be
operated upon after few days. Counsel for plaintiff has no
objection for the same as he has already received request from
counsel for defendant and he had also instructed his client not to
come.
At request, put up this matter on 06.08.2026 for cross
examination of PW-1.
(Ashwani Kumar Sarpal)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
East District, KKD Delhi/23.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No. 233/23
Subodh Gupta vs. Mrs. Mamta Aggarwal
23.04.2026
Present: Plaintiff with Sh. Hemant Kumar Chaturvedi,
advocate.
None for defendant.
No one appeared on behalf of the defendant. Even copy of
the affidavit is not collected by the counsel for the defendant
despite directions given on the last date.
Counsel for plaintiff is not ready for pass over the matter
as he has to attend other cases also.
Put up this matter on 23.05.2026 for cross examination of
PW-1.
(Ashwani Kumar Sarpal)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
East District, KKD Delhi/23.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No. 233/23
Subodh Gupta vs. Mrs. Mamta Aggarwal
23.03.2026
Present: Plaintiff with Sh. Hemant Kumar Chaturvedi,
advocate.
Sh. Kartik Garg, counsel for defendant in VC.
Affidavit of evidence of plaintiff filed. Copy kept on
record which can be collected by the counsel for defendant as
and when appears.
Counsel for plaintiff informed that the copy of the affidavit
is already sent on whatsapp of the counsel for defendant who
denied receipt of it. Hence, he can come to the court and can
collect the copy from court record.
Examination in chief of plaintiff recorded as PW-1. Cross
deferred.
Put up this matter on 23.04.2026 for cross examination
of PW-1.
(Ashwani Kumar Sarpal)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
East District, KKD Delhi/23.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS 233/23
SUBODH GUPTA Vs. MRS. MAMTA AGGARWAL
15.01.2026
The court is vacant on account of superannuation of Ld.
Principal District & Sessions Judge, East, on 31.12.2025.
Present : Plaintiff/PW in person.
Sh. Hemant Kumar Chaturvedi, Ld. Counsel for
plaintiff through VC.
Saksham Gupta, Ld. Counsel for defendant through
VC.
Put up for purpose fixed on 23.03.2026.
(Reader)
15.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No.233/23
SUBODH GUPTA Vs. MRS. MAMTA AGGARWAL
04.11.2025
The court is vacant on account of superannuation of Ld.
Principal Distt. & Sessions Judge on 31.10.2025.
Present: Plaintiff in person.
Sh. Hemant Kumar Chaturvedi, Ld. Counsel for plaitiff
through VC.
Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Ld. Counsel for all defendants through
VC.
Plaintiff /witness is present.
Put up on 15.01.2026 for purpose fixed.
(Reader)/04.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS no.233/23
SUBODH GUPTA Vs. MRS. MAMTA AGGARWAL
17.09.2025
Present: Plaintiff in person with Sh. Hemant Kumar,
Advocate.
Sh. Kartik Garg, ld. counsel for the defendant
through VC.
Fresh vakalatnama filed on behalf of the plaintiff.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff stated that earlier
affidavit of PW1 Sh. Ayush Gupta, SPA holder of plaintiff was
filed but now he wants to examine plaintiff. Ld. counsel stated
that he is a newly engage counsel.
This case is pending since 2023 and it has been
adjourned several times. Last opportunity is granted to the
plaintiff to file affidavit of all his witnesses in accordance with
list of witnesses within 15 day. No further opportunity will be
granted to the parties except on written application and that too
on rare and exceptional circumstances.
Put up on 04.11.2025 PE.
(SANJEEV JAIN)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
East District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi/17.09.2025.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS no.233/23
SUBODH GUPTA Vs. MRS. MAMTA AGGARWAL
27.08.2025
Present: Plaintiff in person.
Sh. Kartik Garg, proxy counsel for the defendant.
Bar is abstaining from work.
I have talked to the parties/ld. proxy counsel. Both
the parties requested to refer the matter to the upcoming Lok
Adalat. In my opinion, there is an element of settlement. Let the
matter be referred to Lok Adalat scheduled for 13.09.2025.
Parties and their counsels are to appear before the
Lok Adalat accordingly on 13.09.2025. Record be sent to DLSA,
East District well before the next date.
In case matter is not settled before the Lok Adalat, it
will be taken up for PE in terms of previous order on 17.09.2025.
(SANJEEV JAIN)
Principal District & Sessions Judge,
East District, KKD/Delhi/27.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS 233/23
DLET01-007275-2023
SUBODH GUPTA Vs. MRS. MAMTA AGGARWAL
15.05.2025
Pr. Plaintiff with Sh. Abhishek Aggarwal, Advocate.
Sh. Kartik Garg, Ld. Proxy counsel for Sh. Saksham
Gupta, Advocate for defendant.
The plaintiff submits that Sh. Abhishek Aggarwal,
Advocate would be representing him that Sh. Rahul Chaudhary,
Advocate is not his counsel any more.
Vakalatnama of Sh. Abhishek Aggarwal, Advocate is on
record.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff submits that evidence affidavit
was filed by Sh. Ayush Gupta, the AR of plaintiff. However, he
is not present today. It is submitted that he will consider as to
whether evidence should be led by AR or by the plaintiff himself.
Accordingly, he seeks adjournment. Request is allowed.
Put up for PE on 27.08.2025.
(Vinod Kumar)
Principal District Judge,
East District, KKD Courts, Delhi/15.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS 233/23
SUBODH GUPTA Vs. MRS. MAMTA AGGARWAL
19.03.2025
Pr. None for the plaintiff.
Sh. Kartik Garg, Proxy Counsel for the defendant
appearing through VC.
Case is listed today for plaintiff’s evidence. But neither
the plaintiff nor his counsel is present today. One Mr. Abhishek
Aggarwal, Advocate is appearing through VC and submits that he
is appearing as counsel for the plaintiff.
Perusal of record reveals that although he was earlier
counsel for the plaintiff but on 20.01.2025, fresh vakalatnama of
Sh. Rahul Chaudhary, Advocate was filed on behalf of plaintiff.
When fresh vakalatnama has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff,
the vakalatnama and earlier counsel stand discharged.
Since plaintiff is not present today, it cannot be decided
who is representing the plaintiff. List of witnesses and affidavit
in evidence filed by earlier counsel Sh. Abhishek Aggarwal
cannot be considered and taken on record till the point is clarified
by the plaintiff himself.
Put up on 15.05.2025 for plaintiff’s evidence.
(Shail Jain)
Principal District & Sessions Judge,
East District, KKD Courts, Delhi.
19.03.2025 (mk)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS 233/23
SUBODH GUPTA Vs. MRS. MAMTA AGGARWAL
20.01.2025
Pr. Plaintiff in person with counsel Sh. Rahul Chaudhary.
Sh. Kartik Garg, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Fresh vakalatnama has been filed on behalf of plaintiff.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that he has been
engaged today only and thus seeks time for plaintiff evidence.
Considering the same, put up on 19.03.2025 for plaintiff
evidence.
List of witnesses be filed within 15 days from today.
Evidence be filed by way of affidavit and advance copy
of affidavit be supplied to defendant/counsel, one week before
the NDOH.
(Shail Jain)
Principal District & Sessions Judge,
East District, KKD Courts, Delhi.
20.01.2025 (mk)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS 233/23
SUBODH GUPTA Vs. MRS. MAMTA AGGARWAL
14.11.2024
Pr.: Sh. Abhishek Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff,
appearing through VC.
Sh. Kartik Garg, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Ld. Counsels for the parties submit that there is no
document, which requires admission-denial. Hence, on the basis
of pleadings of the parties, following issues are framed:
(1) Whether the plaint is liable to be dismissed, as it contains
fictitious, frivolous and baseless allegations ? OPD
(2) Whether the suit of the plaintiff is barred by limitation ?
OPD
(3) Whether the plaintiff is entitled to decree of Rs.5,00,000/-
(Rupees Five Lakhs) ? OPP
(4) Whether the plaintiff is entitled to interest, if yes, at what
rate and for what period ? OPP
(5) Relief.
No other issue pressed or arises. List of witnesses be
filed within 15 days. Evidence by way of affidavit be filed and
copy thereof be supplied to opposite party/counsel at least one
week in advance before NDOH.
Put up for PE on 20.01.2025.
(Shail Jain)
Principal District & Sessions Judge,
East District, KKD Courts, Delhi.
14.11.2024 (mk)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS 233/23
SUBODH GUPTA Vs. MRS. MAMTA AGGARWAL
05.10.2024
Pr.: Sh. Abhishek Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
appearing through V/C. Ms. Aanchal Aggarwal, Ld.
Counsel for plaintiff appearing physically alongwith AR
Sh. Aayush Gupta.
None for defendant.
No original documents has been filed by the plaintiff for
admission/denial, hence no admission/denial is conducted.
Put up for framing of issues on 14.11.2024.
(Shail Jain)
Principal District & Sessions Judge,
East District, KKD Courts, Delhi.
05.10.2024 (pm)
(At 12.00 p.m.)
At this stage, Sh. Kartik Garg, Ld. Counsel for defendant
has appeared. He has been apprised about the order passed and
next date of hearing.
Put up for purpose fixed on date fixed i.e. 14.11.2024.
(Shail Jain)
Principal District & Sessions Judge,
East District, KKD Courts, Delhi.
05.10.2024 (pm)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS 233/23
SUBODH GUPTA Vs. MRS. MAMTA AGGARWAL
29.08.2024
Ld. Presiding Officer is on leave today.
Pr.: Sh. Abhishek Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
appearing through V/C.
Sh. Kartik Garg, Ld. Counsel for defendant appearing
through V/C.
As directed, put up for purpose already fixed on
05.10.2024.
(Reader)
29.08.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS 233/23
SUBODH GUPTA Vs. MRS. MAMTA AGGARWAL
20.07.2024
Pr. Sh. Abhishek Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
with AR of the plaintiff.
Sh. Saksham Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Cost of Rs.2,000/-has been paid by the defendant to the
plaintiff in terms of last order dated 14.05.2024.
Arguments on application under Order XII Rule 6 CPC,
as filed by the plaintiff, has been heard.
Vide separate order, application under Order XII Rule 6
CPC of the plaintiff has been dismissed.
Put up on 29.08.2024 for filing of documents, admission-
denial of the documents and framing of issues.
Parties are directed to appear in person on next date
of hearing for admission-denial of documents.
(Shail Jain)
Principal District & Sessions Judge,
East District, KKD Courts, Delhi.
20.07.2024 (pm)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS 233/23
SUBODH GUPTA Vs. MRS. MAMTA AGGARWAL
28.03.2024
Pr. Ms. Aanchal Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff,
appearing through VC.
Sh. Saksham Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the defendant,
appearing through VC.
Reply to application under Order XII Rule 6 CPC has not
been filed by the defendant.
It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for the defendant that he
will not file reply to the application and will straightway argue
the application. It is submitted that cost has been paid by the
defendant to the plaintiff. This fact is admitted by Ld. Counsel
for the plaintiff.
An application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC has been
filed on behalf of defendant for amendment of the written
statement along with proposed written statement. Same is taken
on record. Copy be supplied to the plaintiff/counsel within
course of the day.
Put up for filing of reply to amendment application of the
defendant and arguments on both the applications on 14.05.2024.
Advance copy of the reply be supplied at least 7 days
before next date of hearing.
(Shail Jain)
Principal District & Sessions Judge,
East District, KKD Courts, Delhi.
28.03.2024 (mk)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS 233/23
SUBODH GUPTA Vs. MRS. MAMTA AGGARWAL
28.02.2024
Advocates are abstaining from work today.
Pr. Sh. Abhishek Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff,
appearing through VC.
Sh A.K.Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the defendant, appearing
through VC.
Neither reply to the application under Order XII Rule 6
CPC has been filed by the defendant, nor any cost has been paid
by the defendant to the plaintiff.
Considering the fact that Advocates are abstaining from
work today, case is adjourned to 28.03.2024 for filing reply to
application under Order XII Rule 6 CPC and paying cost by the
defendant.
(Shail Jain)
Principal District & Sessions Judge,
East District, KKD Courts, Delhi.
28.02.2024 (mk)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS 233/23
SUBODH GUPTA Vs. MRS. MAMTA AGGARWAL
03.11.2023
Ld. Presiding Officer is on leave today.
Pr.: Sh. Piyush Sharma, Proxy Counsel for Ms. Anchal
Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Saksham Gupta, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Replication filed. Copy has already been supplied.
Today, an application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC r/w
Section 151 CPC filed on behalf of the defendant for amendment
of written statement alongwith amended written statement. Copy
supplied to Proxy Counsel for plaintiff.
Put up for consideration on the application under Order
VI Rule 17 CPC on 06.12.2023.
(Reader)
03.11.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS 233/23
SUBODH GUPTA Vs. MRS. MAMTA AGGARWAL
27.09.2023
Pr.: Ms. Aanchal Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
None for the defendant.
Written statement has been filed on behalf of defendant
on 22.09.2023.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff seeks to file replication.
At request, be put up for filing of replication on
03.11.2023.
(Shail Jain)
Principal District & Sessions Judge,
East District, KKD Courts, Delhi.
27.09.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS 233/23
SUBODH GUPTA Vs. MRS. MAMTA AGGARWAL
22.08.2023
Pr.: Ms. Aanchal Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Harsh Gupta, Proxy counsel for the defendant.
Copies of plaint and documents supplied to proxy
counsel for defendant.
Put up for filing of written statement on 27.09.2023.
(Shail Jain)
Principal District & Sessions Judge,
East District, KKD Courts, Delhi.
22.08.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS 233/23
SUBODH GUPTA Vs. MRS. MAMTA AGGARWAL
04.07.2023
Pr.: Ms. Aanchal Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Process sent to the defendant received back unserved
with the report that the residential address was found sealed.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that she will file
fresh address.
On filing of fresh address of the defendant and PF/RC,
let fresh summons of the suit be issued to him for 22.08.2023.
(Shail Jain)
Principal District & Sessions Judge,
East District, KKD Courts, Delhi.
04.07.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS 233/23
Subodh Gupta Vs. Mamta Aggarwal
10/05/2023
Fresh suit received by way of e-filing. Let it be checked
and registered.
Pr. Plaintiff in person with counsel Ms. Aanchal Aggawal.
She files hard copy of the suit.
Heard.
Issue summons of the suit to the defendant on filing of PF
and RC for 04.07.2023.
(Sanjay Garg-I)
Principal District & Sessions Judge,
East District, KKD Courts, Delhi.
10/05/2023 (mk)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No. 233/2023
CNR No. DLET010072752023
SUBODH GUPTA vs. MRS. MAMTA AGGARWAL
16.10.2026
Present: Ms. Shruti, proxy advocate appeared in court
whereas Sh. Hemant Kr. Chaturvedi, advocate for
plaintiff in VC.
Sh. Kartik Garg, advocate for defendant in VC.
It is stated that transfer petition is fixed in the Hon’ble
High Court for 09.12.2026 in which notice has been issued.
Put up this matter on 14.12.2026 for awaiting order of
the Hon’ble High Court.
(Ashwani Kumar Sarpal)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
East District, KKD Delhi/16.10.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No. 233/2023
CNR No.DLET010072752023
Subodh Gupta vs. Mrs. Mamta Aggarwal
01.09.2026
Present: Sh. Hemant Kr. Chaturvedi, advocate for plaintiff in
VC.
Sh. Kartik Garg, advocate for defendant in VC.
Transfer petition is pending in the Hon’ble High Court and
it has not come for hearing so far.
Put up this matter on 16.10.2026 for further proceedings
as well as for awaiting order of the Hon’ble High Court. The last
opportunity is given to the plaintiff with warning that in case, the
matter is not transferred in between, then the case will be fixed
for evidence.
(Ashwani Kumar Sarpal)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
East District, KKD Delhi/01.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No. 233/2023
CNR No. DLET010072752023
Subodh Gupta vs. Mrs. Mamta Aggarwal
06.08.2026
Present: Plaintiff in person in court whereas Sh. Parveen
Maheshwari, advocate in VC.
Dr. Rakesh Gupta, advocate for defendant in VC.
It is stated that transfer petition has been filed in Hon’ble
High Court for transfer of two cases in one court. This case is
pending in East district whereas another connected matter is
pending in Shahdara district. It is stated that transfer petition
may be coming for hearing tomorrow.
Put up this matter on 01.09.2026 for awaiting order of the
Hon’ble High Court.
(Ashwani Kumar Sarpal)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
East District, KKD Delhi/06.08.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No. 233/23
Subodh Gupta vs. Mrs. Mamta Aggarwal
23.05.2026
Present: Sh. Hemant Kr. Chaturvedi, advocate for plaintiff in
VC.
Dr. Rakesh Gupta, advocate for defendant in VC.
Counsel for defendant wants time as he met with an
accident and suffered fracture in his hand. He has also to be
operated upon after few days. Counsel for plaintiff has no
objection for the same as he has already received request from
counsel for defendant and he had also instructed his client not to
come.
At request, put up this matter on 06.08.2026 for cross
examination of PW-1.
(Ashwani Kumar Sarpal)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
East District, KKD Delhi/23.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No. 233/23
Subodh Gupta vs. Mrs. Mamta Aggarwal
23.04.2026
Present: Plaintiff with Sh. Hemant Kumar Chaturvedi,
advocate.
None for defendant.
No one appeared on behalf of the defendant. Even copy of
the affidavit is not collected by the counsel for the defendant
despite directions given on the last date.
Counsel for plaintiff is not ready for pass over the matter
as he has to attend other cases also.
Put up this matter on 23.05.2026 for cross examination of
PW-1.
(Ashwani Kumar Sarpal)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
East District, KKD Delhi/23.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No. 233/23
Subodh Gupta vs. Mrs. Mamta Aggarwal
23.03.2026
Present: Plaintiff with Sh. Hemant Kumar Chaturvedi,
advocate.
Sh. Kartik Garg, counsel for defendant in VC.
Affidavit of evidence of plaintiff filed. Copy kept on
record which can be collected by the counsel for defendant as
and when appears.
Counsel for plaintiff informed that the copy of the affidavit
is already sent on whatsapp of the counsel for defendant who
denied receipt of it. Hence, he can come to the court and can
collect the copy from court record.
Examination in chief of plaintiff recorded as PW-1. Cross
deferred.
Put up this matter on 23.04.2026 for cross examination
of PW-1.
(Ashwani Kumar Sarpal)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
East District, KKD Delhi/23.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS 233/23
SUBODH GUPTA Vs. MRS. MAMTA AGGARWAL
15.01.2026
The court is vacant on account of superannuation of Ld.
Principal District & Sessions Judge, East, on 31.12.2025.
Present : Plaintiff/PW in person.
Sh. Hemant Kumar Chaturvedi, Ld. Counsel for
plaintiff through VC.
Saksham Gupta, Ld. Counsel for defendant through
VC.
Put up for purpose fixed on 23.03.2026.
(Reader)
15.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No.233/23
SUBODH GUPTA Vs. MRS. MAMTA AGGARWAL
04.11.2025
The court is vacant on account of superannuation of Ld.
Principal Distt. & Sessions Judge on 31.10.2025.
Present: Plaintiff in person.
Sh. Hemant Kumar Chaturvedi, Ld. Counsel for plaitiff
through VC.
Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Ld. Counsel for all defendants through
VC.
Plaintiff /witness is present.
Put up on 15.01.2026 for purpose fixed.
(Reader)/04.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS no.233/23
SUBODH GUPTA Vs. MRS. MAMTA AGGARWAL
17.09.2025
Present: Plaintiff in person with Sh. Hemant Kumar,
Advocate.
Sh. Kartik Garg, ld. counsel for the defendant
through VC.
Fresh vakalatnama filed on behalf of the plaintiff.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff stated that earlier
affidavit of PW1 Sh. Ayush Gupta, SPA holder of plaintiff was
filed but now he wants to examine plaintiff. Ld. counsel stated
that he is a newly engage counsel.
This case is pending since 2023 and it has been
adjourned several times. Last opportunity is granted to the
plaintiff to file affidavit of all his witnesses in accordance with
list of witnesses within 15 day. No further opportunity will be
granted to the parties except on written application and that too
on rare and exceptional circumstances.
Put up on 04.11.2025 PE.
(SANJEEV JAIN)
Principal District & Sessions Judge
East District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi/17.09.2025.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS no.233/23
SUBODH GUPTA Vs. MRS. MAMTA AGGARWAL
27.08.2025
Present: Plaintiff in person.
Sh. Kartik Garg, proxy counsel for the defendant.
Bar is abstaining from work.
I have talked to the parties/ld. proxy counsel. Both
the parties requested to refer the matter to the upcoming Lok
Adalat. In my opinion, there is an element of settlement. Let the
matter be referred to Lok Adalat scheduled for 13.09.2025.
Parties and their counsels are to appear before the
Lok Adalat accordingly on 13.09.2025. Record be sent to DLSA,
East District well before the next date.
In case matter is not settled before the Lok Adalat, it
will be taken up for PE in terms of previous order on 17.09.2025.
(SANJEEV JAIN)
Principal District & Sessions Judge,
East District, KKD/Delhi/27.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS 233/23
DLET01-007275-2023
SUBODH GUPTA Vs. MRS. MAMTA AGGARWAL
15.05.2025
Pr. Plaintiff with Sh. Abhishek Aggarwal, Advocate.
Sh. Kartik Garg, Ld. Proxy counsel for Sh. Saksham
Gupta, Advocate for defendant.
The plaintiff submits that Sh. Abhishek Aggarwal,
Advocate would be representing him that Sh. Rahul Chaudhary,
Advocate is not his counsel any more.
Vakalatnama of Sh. Abhishek Aggarwal, Advocate is on
record.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff submits that evidence affidavit
was filed by Sh. Ayush Gupta, the AR of plaintiff. However, he
is not present today. It is submitted that he will consider as to
whether evidence should be led by AR or by the plaintiff himself.
Accordingly, he seeks adjournment. Request is allowed.
Put up for PE on 27.08.2025.
(Vinod Kumar)
Principal District Judge,
East District, KKD Courts, Delhi/15.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS 233/23
SUBODH GUPTA Vs. MRS. MAMTA AGGARWAL
19.03.2025
Pr. None for the plaintiff.
Sh. Kartik Garg, Proxy Counsel for the defendant
appearing through VC.
Case is listed today for plaintiff’s evidence. But neither
the plaintiff nor his counsel is present today. One Mr. Abhishek
Aggarwal, Advocate is appearing through VC and submits that he
is appearing as counsel for the plaintiff.
Perusal of record reveals that although he was earlier
counsel for the plaintiff but on 20.01.2025, fresh vakalatnama of
Sh. Rahul Chaudhary, Advocate was filed on behalf of plaintiff.
When fresh vakalatnama has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff,
the vakalatnama and earlier counsel stand discharged.
Since plaintiff is not present today, it cannot be decided
who is representing the plaintiff. List of witnesses and affidavit
in evidence filed by earlier counsel Sh. Abhishek Aggarwal
cannot be considered and taken on record till the point is clarified
by the plaintiff himself.
Put up on 15.05.2025 for plaintiff’s evidence.
(Shail Jain)
Principal District & Sessions Judge,
East District, KKD Courts, Delhi.
19.03.2025 (mk)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS 233/23
SUBODH GUPTA Vs. MRS. MAMTA AGGARWAL
20.01.2025
Pr. Plaintiff in person with counsel Sh. Rahul Chaudhary.
Sh. Kartik Garg, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Fresh vakalatnama has been filed on behalf of plaintiff.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that he has been
engaged today only and thus seeks time for plaintiff evidence.
Considering the same, put up on 19.03.2025 for plaintiff
evidence.
List of witnesses be filed within 15 days from today.
Evidence be filed by way of affidavit and advance copy
of affidavit be supplied to defendant/counsel, one week before
the NDOH.
(Shail Jain)
Principal District & Sessions Judge,
East District, KKD Courts, Delhi.
20.01.2025 (mk)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS 233/23
SUBODH GUPTA Vs. MRS. MAMTA AGGARWAL
14.11.2024
Pr.: Sh. Abhishek Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff,
appearing through VC.
Sh. Kartik Garg, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Ld. Counsels for the parties submit that there is no
document, which requires admission-denial. Hence, on the basis
of pleadings of the parties, following issues are framed:
(1) Whether the plaint is liable to be dismissed, as it contains
fictitious, frivolous and baseless allegations ? OPD
(2) Whether the suit of the plaintiff is barred by limitation ?
OPD
(3) Whether the plaintiff is entitled to decree of Rs.5,00,000/-
(Rupees Five Lakhs) ? OPP
(4) Whether the plaintiff is entitled to interest, if yes, at what
rate and for what period ? OPP
(5) Relief.
No other issue pressed or arises. List of witnesses be
filed within 15 days. Evidence by way of affidavit be filed and
copy thereof be supplied to opposite party/counsel at least one
week in advance before NDOH.
Put up for PE on 20.01.2025.
(Shail Jain)
Principal District & Sessions Judge,
East District, KKD Courts, Delhi.
14.11.2024 (mk)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS 233/23
SUBODH GUPTA Vs. MRS. MAMTA AGGARWAL
05.10.2024
Pr.: Sh. Abhishek Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
appearing through V/C. Ms. Aanchal Aggarwal, Ld.
Counsel for plaintiff appearing physically alongwith AR
Sh. Aayush Gupta.
None for defendant.
No original documents has been filed by the plaintiff for
admission/denial, hence no admission/denial is conducted.
Put up for framing of issues on 14.11.2024.
(Shail Jain)
Principal District & Sessions Judge,
East District, KKD Courts, Delhi.
05.10.2024 (pm)
(At 12.00 p.m.)
At this stage, Sh. Kartik Garg, Ld. Counsel for defendant
has appeared. He has been apprised about the order passed and
next date of hearing.
Put up for purpose fixed on date fixed i.e. 14.11.2024.
(Shail Jain)
Principal District & Sessions Judge,
East District, KKD Courts, Delhi.
05.10.2024 (pm)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS 233/23
SUBODH GUPTA Vs. MRS. MAMTA AGGARWAL
29.08.2024
Ld. Presiding Officer is on leave today.
Pr.: Sh. Abhishek Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
appearing through V/C.
Sh. Kartik Garg, Ld. Counsel for defendant appearing
through V/C.
As directed, put up for purpose already fixed on
05.10.2024.
(Reader)
29.08.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS 233/23
SUBODH GUPTA Vs. MRS. MAMTA AGGARWAL
20.07.2024
Pr. Sh. Abhishek Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
with AR of the plaintiff.
Sh. Saksham Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Cost of Rs.2,000/-has been paid by the defendant to the
plaintiff in terms of last order dated 14.05.2024.
Arguments on application under Order XII Rule 6 CPC,
as filed by the plaintiff, has been heard.
Vide separate order, application under Order XII Rule 6
CPC of the plaintiff has been dismissed.
Put up on 29.08.2024 for filing of documents, admission-
denial of the documents and framing of issues.
Parties are directed to appear in person on next date
of hearing for admission-denial of documents.
(Shail Jain)
Principal District & Sessions Judge,
East District, KKD Courts, Delhi.
20.07.2024 (pm)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS 233/23
SUBODH GUPTA Vs. MRS. MAMTA AGGARWAL
28.03.2024
Pr. Ms. Aanchal Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff,
appearing through VC.
Sh. Saksham Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the defendant,
appearing through VC.
Reply to application under Order XII Rule 6 CPC has not
been filed by the defendant.
It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for the defendant that he
will not file reply to the application and will straightway argue
the application. It is submitted that cost has been paid by the
defendant to the plaintiff. This fact is admitted by Ld. Counsel
for the plaintiff.
An application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC has been
filed on behalf of defendant for amendment of the written
statement along with proposed written statement. Same is taken
on record. Copy be supplied to the plaintiff/counsel within
course of the day.
Put up for filing of reply to amendment application of the
defendant and arguments on both the applications on 14.05.2024.
Advance copy of the reply be supplied at least 7 days
before next date of hearing.
(Shail Jain)
Principal District & Sessions Judge,
East District, KKD Courts, Delhi.
28.03.2024 (mk)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS 233/23
SUBODH GUPTA Vs. MRS. MAMTA AGGARWAL
28.02.2024
Advocates are abstaining from work today.
Pr. Sh. Abhishek Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff,
appearing through VC.
Sh A.K.Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the defendant, appearing
through VC.
Neither reply to the application under Order XII Rule 6
CPC has been filed by the defendant, nor any cost has been paid
by the defendant to the plaintiff.
Considering the fact that Advocates are abstaining from
work today, case is adjourned to 28.03.2024 for filing reply to
application under Order XII Rule 6 CPC and paying cost by the
defendant.
(Shail Jain)
Principal District & Sessions Judge,
East District, KKD Courts, Delhi.
28.02.2024 (mk)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS 233/23
SUBODH GUPTA Vs. MRS. MAMTA AGGARWAL
03.11.2023
Ld. Presiding Officer is on leave today.
Pr.: Sh. Piyush Sharma, Proxy Counsel for Ms. Anchal
Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Saksham Gupta, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Replication filed. Copy has already been supplied.
Today, an application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC r/w
Section 151 CPC filed on behalf of the defendant for amendment
of written statement alongwith amended written statement. Copy
supplied to Proxy Counsel for plaintiff.
Put up for consideration on the application under Order
VI Rule 17 CPC on 06.12.2023.
(Reader)
03.11.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS 233/23
SUBODH GUPTA Vs. MRS. MAMTA AGGARWAL
27.09.2023
Pr.: Ms. Aanchal Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
None for the defendant.
Written statement has been filed on behalf of defendant
on 22.09.2023.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff seeks to file replication.
At request, be put up for filing of replication on
03.11.2023.
(Shail Jain)
Principal District & Sessions Judge,
East District, KKD Courts, Delhi.
27.09.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS 233/23
SUBODH GUPTA Vs. MRS. MAMTA AGGARWAL
22.08.2023
Pr.: Ms. Aanchal Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Harsh Gupta, Proxy counsel for the defendant.
Copies of plaint and documents supplied to proxy
counsel for defendant.
Put up for filing of written statement on 27.09.2023.
(Shail Jain)
Principal District & Sessions Judge,
East District, KKD Courts, Delhi.
22.08.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS 233/23
SUBODH GUPTA Vs. MRS. MAMTA AGGARWAL
04.07.2023
Pr.: Ms. Aanchal Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Process sent to the defendant received back unserved
with the report that the residential address was found sealed.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that she will file
fresh address.
On filing of fresh address of the defendant and PF/RC,
let fresh summons of the suit be issued to him for 22.08.2023.
(Shail Jain)
Principal District & Sessions Judge,
East District, KKD Courts, Delhi.
04.07.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS 233/23
Subodh Gupta Vs. Mamta Aggarwal
10/05/2023
Fresh suit received by way of e-filing. Let it be checked
and registered.
Pr. Plaintiff in person with counsel Ms. Aanchal Aggawal.
She files hard copy of the suit.
Heard.
Issue summons of the suit to the defendant on filing of PF
and RC for 04.07.2023.
(Sanjay Garg-I)
Principal District & Sessions Judge,
East District, KKD Courts, Delhi.
10/05/2023 (mk)
-- 1 of 1 --