TrustJury record updated 13 Oct 2026
No advocate information is available in this record.
Date: 04-07-2025 Business: The matter is fixed for service of the parties. Next Purpose: Misc. cases Next Hearing Date: 18-08-2025 Date: 18-08-2025 Business: The matter is fixed for WS Next Purpose: Misc. cases Next Hearing Date: 19-09-2025 Date: 19-09-2025 Business: FURTHER PROCEEDINGS Next Purpose: Misc. cases Next Hearing Date: 06-12-2025 Date: 06-12-2025 Business: The matter is fixed for reply Next Purpose: Misc. cases Next Hearing Date: 21-01-2026 Date: 21-01-2026 Business: FURTHER PROCEEDINGS Next Purpose: Misc. cases Next Hearing Date: 10-04-2026 Date: 10-04-2026 Business: The matter is fixed for FP Next Purpose: Misc. cases Next Hearing Date: 04-06-2026 Date: 04-06-2026 Business: The matter is fixed for reply/argument Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 11-08-2026 Date: 11-08-2026 Business: The matter is fixed for rejoinder to amended WS. Next Purpose: Misc. cases Next Hearing Date: 13-10-2026
Filing Number: 3872/2025 Filing Date: 03-07-2025 First Hearing Date: 04th July 2025 Court Number And Judge: 767-PRESIDING OFFICER LABOUR COURT-08
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: L I R 467/25 Sh. Manoj Kumar Vs. M/S One 97 Communication Ltd. (Paytm) 11.08.2026 Present: AR for workman. Mr. Ankit Bhushan and Mr. Keshav Deep, AR for M-1 and M-2. Mr. Ashish Khatri, AR for M-3 through VC. Mr. Manthan Sukhija, AR for M-4 through VC. At this stage, AR for workman submits that he is not opposing the application u/s 36(4) of I.D. Act filed on behalf of M-1 and…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 3 L I R 467/25 SH. MANOJ KUMAR Vs. M/S ONE 97 COMMUNICATION LTD. (PAYTM) Date:04.06.2026 Present: Sh. Amit Kumar Tripathi, AR for workman. Sh. Ankit Bhushan and Sh. Keshav Deep, AR for M-1 and M-2. Sh. Chandan, AR for M-3. Sh. Manthan Kukhija, AR for M-4. Today matter is listed for filing reply to the application of managements under Section 36(4) of I.D. Act. AR for the workman strongly opposed the application by stating that advocates are barred under Section 36(3) of I.D. Act. He filed one case law titled as ‘Paradip Port Trust Vs. Their Workmen’. Copy supplied. He further submitted that he want some more time to file another case law and reply to the aforesaid application. Allowed. Reply be given in advance to the opposite party on or before the next date of hearing. Put up for reply and arguments on 11.08.2026. (Dr. Surender Mohit Singh) District Judge, POLC-08/RACC New Delhi/04.06.2026(S) -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 4 L I R 467/25 SH. MANOJ KUMAR Vs. M/S ONE 97 COMMUNICATION LTD. (PAYTM) Date:10.04.2026 Present: Sh. Amit Kumar Tripathi, AR for workman. Sh. Ankit Bhushan and Sh. Keshav Deep, AR for M-1 & 2. Sh. Ashish Khatri, AR for M-3 through VC. Sh. Manthan Sukhija, AR for M-4. An application under Section 36(4) of I.D. Act filed on behalf of M-1 & 2. Copy supplied. An application under Section 36(4) of I.D. Act filed separately on behalf of M-3 and M-4 have been received from Filing Section. Copies supplied. Two applications, one under Order VI R.17 CPC and other under Order VIII R.1(A) CPC have been filed on behalf of M-1 & 2. Copy supplied. Workman is directed to file reply to all the aforementioned applications within 15 days with advance copy to opposite party at least a wee before the next date of hearing. Put up for consideration and arguments on the application under Section 36(4) of I.D. Act and for further proceedings on 04.06.2026. (Dr. Surender Mohit Singh) District Judge, POLC-08/RACC New Delhi/10.04.2026(S) -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 8 L I R 467/25 SH. MANOJ KUMAR Vs. M/S ONE 97 COMMUNICATION LTD. (PAYTM) Date:21.01.2026 Present: Sh. Amit Kumar Tripathi, AR along with workman. Ms. Charu Roy, AR for M-1 & 2 along with Sh. Krishan Kumar, Senior Manager on behalf of M-1 and Sh. Keshav Deep, Assistant Manager (Legal) on behalf of M-2. Sh. Ashish Khatri, AR for M-3 through VC. Sh. Manthan Sukhija, AR for M-4. Fresh authority letter filed on behalf of M-1. Same is taken on record. AR for workman submitted that he had filed some documents along with an application on the last date of hearing but inadvertently same was not mentioned in the order sheet. Accordingly, the documents filed by AR for workman along with application on the last date of hearing are taken on record. Adjournment sought by ARs for all the managements to file appropriate application under Section 36(4) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Allowed. Same be filed within two weeks with advance copy to opposite party. Put up for consideration/further proceedings on 10.04.2026. (Dr. Surender Mohit Singh) District Judge, POLC-08/RACC New Delhi/21.01.2026(S) -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: L I R 467/25 SH. MANOJ KUMAR Vs. M/S ONE 97 COMMUNICATION LTD. (PAYTM) Date:06.12.2025 Present: AR for Workman alongwith workman in person. Sh. Ankit Bhushan, Ld. Counsel for Management No. 1 and 2. Proxy Counsel for AR for management through VC. AR for management No. 4. WS not filed by AR for management No. 3 despite direction on the last date fo hearing. The spare copy of the claim is alo…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 12 L I R 467/25 SH. MANOJ KUMAR Vs. M/S ONE 97 COMMUNICATION LTD. (PAYTM) Date:18.08.2025 Present: Sh. Amit Kumar Tripathi, AR along with workman. Sh. Krishan Kumar and Sh. Keshav, Ars on behalf of M-1. None for M-3. Sh. Aditya Mishra, AR for M-4 has joined through VC. Authority letter filed on behalf of M-1. Statement of claim filed on behalf of workman with extra copy for opposite party has been…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: LIR NO.467/2025 Manoj Kumar Vs. M/s One 97 Communication Ltd. (Paytm) & Ors. Dated:04.07.2025 Reference under Section 10(1)C read with Section 12 (5) of ID Act, 1947 has been received from the office of Joint Labour Commissioner (South-East District), Delhi. It be checked and registered. Present: None. Notice of reference be issued to claimant as well as Trade Union and also to management returnable on 18.08.2025. (Dr. Surender Mohit Singh) District Judge, POLC-08/RACC New Delhi/04.07.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: L I R 467/25 Sh. Manoj Kumar Vs. M/S One 97 Communication Ltd. (Paytm) 11.08.2026 Present: AR for workman. Mr. Ankit Bhushan and Mr. Keshav Deep, AR for M-1 and M-2. Mr. Ashish Khatri, AR for M-3 through VC. Mr. Manthan Sukhija, AR for M-4 through VC. At this stage, AR for workman submits that he is not opposing the application u/s 36(4) of I.D. Act filed on behalf of M-1 and…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 3 L I R 467/25 SH. MANOJ KUMAR Vs. M/S ONE 97 COMMUNICATION LTD. (PAYTM) Date:04.06.2026 Present: Sh. Amit Kumar Tripathi, AR for workman. Sh. Ankit Bhushan and Sh. Keshav Deep, AR for M-1 and M-2. Sh. Chandan, AR for M-3. Sh. Manthan Kukhija, AR for M-4. Today matter is listed for filing reply to the application of managements under Section 36(4) of I.D. Act. AR for the workman strongly opposed the application by stating that advocates are barred under Section 36(3) of I.D. Act. He filed one case law titled as ‘Paradip Port Trust Vs. Their Workmen’. Copy supplied. He further submitted that he want some more time to file another case law and reply to the aforesaid application. Allowed. Reply be given in advance to the opposite party on or before the next date of hearing. Put up for reply and arguments on 11.08.2026. (Dr. Surender Mohit Singh) District Judge, POLC-08/RACC New Delhi/04.06.2026(S) -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 4 L I R 467/25 SH. MANOJ KUMAR Vs. M/S ONE 97 COMMUNICATION LTD. (PAYTM) Date:10.04.2026 Present: Sh. Amit Kumar Tripathi, AR for workman. Sh. Ankit Bhushan and Sh. Keshav Deep, AR for M-1 & 2. Sh. Ashish Khatri, AR for M-3 through VC. Sh. Manthan Sukhija, AR for M-4. An application under Section 36(4) of I.D. Act filed on behalf of M-1 & 2. Copy supplied. An application under Section 36(4) of I.D. Act filed separately on behalf of M-3 and M-4 have been received from Filing Section. Copies supplied. Two applications, one under Order VI R.17 CPC and other under Order VIII R.1(A) CPC have been filed on behalf of M-1 & 2. Copy supplied. Workman is directed to file reply to all the aforementioned applications within 15 days with advance copy to opposite party at least a wee before the next date of hearing. Put up for consideration and arguments on the application under Section 36(4) of I.D. Act and for further proceedings on 04.06.2026. (Dr. Surender Mohit Singh) District Judge, POLC-08/RACC New Delhi/10.04.2026(S) -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 8 L I R 467/25 SH. MANOJ KUMAR Vs. M/S ONE 97 COMMUNICATION LTD. (PAYTM) Date:21.01.2026 Present: Sh. Amit Kumar Tripathi, AR along with workman. Ms. Charu Roy, AR for M-1 & 2 along with Sh. Krishan Kumar, Senior Manager on behalf of M-1 and Sh. Keshav Deep, Assistant Manager (Legal) on behalf of M-2. Sh. Ashish Khatri, AR for M-3 through VC. Sh. Manthan Sukhija, AR for M-4. Fresh authority letter filed on behalf of M-1. Same is taken on record. AR for workman submitted that he had filed some documents along with an application on the last date of hearing but inadvertently same was not mentioned in the order sheet. Accordingly, the documents filed by AR for workman along with application on the last date of hearing are taken on record. Adjournment sought by ARs for all the managements to file appropriate application under Section 36(4) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Allowed. Same be filed within two weeks with advance copy to opposite party. Put up for consideration/further proceedings on 10.04.2026. (Dr. Surender Mohit Singh) District Judge, POLC-08/RACC New Delhi/21.01.2026(S) -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: L I R 467/25 SH. MANOJ KUMAR Vs. M/S ONE 97 COMMUNICATION LTD. (PAYTM) Date:06.12.2025 Present: AR for Workman alongwith workman in person. Sh. Ankit Bhushan, Ld. Counsel for Management No. 1 and 2. Proxy Counsel for AR for management through VC. AR for management No. 4. WS not filed by AR for management No. 3 despite direction on the last date fo hearing. The spare copy of the claim is alo…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 12 L I R 467/25 SH. MANOJ KUMAR Vs. M/S ONE 97 COMMUNICATION LTD. (PAYTM) Date:18.08.2025 Present: Sh. Amit Kumar Tripathi, AR along with workman. Sh. Krishan Kumar and Sh. Keshav, Ars on behalf of M-1. None for M-3. Sh. Aditya Mishra, AR for M-4 has joined through VC. Authority letter filed on behalf of M-1. Statement of claim filed on behalf of workman with extra copy for opposite party has been…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: LIR NO.467/2025 Manoj Kumar Vs. M/s One 97 Communication Ltd. (Paytm) & Ors. Dated:04.07.2025 Reference under Section 10(1)C read with Section 12 (5) of ID Act, 1947 has been received from the office of Joint Labour Commissioner (South-East District), Delhi. It be checked and registered. Present: None. Notice of reference be issued to claimant as well as Trade Union and also to management returnable on 18.08.2025. (Dr. Surender Mohit Singh) District Judge, POLC-08/RACC New Delhi/04.07.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
