Skip to main content
RC ARC - RENT CONTROLlER/ADDL. R.C.

ROSHAN ARA KHAN +2 moreVsMEHTAB

CNR DLCT030085532024327-ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--REJECT
Decision Date: 24th April 2026

TrustJury record updated 16 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
658/2024
Registration Date
18 Nov 2024

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    4

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Delhi Rent Control Act,1958 · Sec 14(1)(a)

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 18-11-2024
    Business: further proceedings
    Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose
    Next Hearing Date: 29-01-2025
    
    Date: 29-01-2025
    Business: further proceedings
    Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose
    Next Hearing Date: 26-04-2025
    
    Date: 26-04-2025
    Business: further proceedings
    Next Purpose: Misc./ Arguments
    Next Hearing Date: 19-08-2025
    
    Date: 19-08-2025
    Business: further proceedings
    Next Purpose: Misc./ Arguments
    Next Hearing Date: 06-11-2025
    
    Date: 06-11-2025
    Business: further proceedings
    Next Purpose: Misc./ Arguments
    Next Hearing Date: 16-01-2026
    
    Date: 16-01-2026
    Business: further proceedings
    Next Purpose: Misc./ Arguments
    Next Hearing Date: 25-03-2026
    
    Date: 25-03-2026
    Business: further proceedings
    Next Purpose: Misc./ Arguments
    Next Hearing Date: 24-04-2026
    
    Date: 24-04-2026
    Business: Plain rejected
    Nature Of Disposal: REJECT
    Disposal Date: 24-04-2026

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 8524/2024
    Filing Date: 16-11-2024
    eFiling Number: ADL20230003389C202400032
    eFiling Date: 14-11-2024
    First Hearing Date: 18th November 2024
    Decision Date: 24th April 2026
    Court Number And Judge: 327-ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC

    Orders

    15
    Final Order 8Full order available
    24 Apr 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: RC ARC 658/24 Roshan Ara Khan Vs. Mehtab 24.04.2026 Present : Petitioner no.3 in person. Ld. Counsel for respondent. Mr. Virender Singh, Deputy Director (Survey) DUSIB, in person. A report has been filed by Mr. Virender Singh, Deputy Director (Survey) DUSIB, as per which the property in question i.e. half portion of first floor, backside of H. No. 148, Katra Gokul Shah, Bazar Matia Mahal, Jama Masjid, Delhi-110006, Ward No. XI, falls…

    Read Full Order
    Interim Order 7Full order available
    25 Mar 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 18 RC ARC 658/24 Roshan Ara Khan Vs. Mehtab 25.03.2026 Present : Mr. Haji Mohammad Yameen, Ld. Counsel for petitioner. Mr. B. Khan, Ld. Counsel for respondent. It has been submitted by both the sides that the cost of Rs.8000/- has been paid by the respondent to Mr. Haji Mohammad Yameen, Ld. Counsel for petitioner and the same has been acknowledged by Mr. Yameen. Matter is listed for arguments on the application…

    Read Full Order
    Interim Order 6Full order available
    16 Jan 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 21 RC ARC 658/24 Roshan Ara Khan Vs. Mehtab 16.01.2026 Present : Ld. Counsel for petitioner. Mr. B. Khan, Ld. Counsel for respondent. (through VC) Cost imposed upon the respondent vide order dated 19.08.2025 has not been paid yet to the petitioner. Let it be paid during the course of the day and receipt/proof of payment be filed, failing which cost shall be enhanced to Rs.8000/- to be paid by the respondent.…

    Read Full Order
    Interim Order 5
    06 Nov 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 16
    RC ARC 658/24
    Roshan Ara Khan Vs. Mehtab
    06.11.2025
    Present : Mr. SD Ansari, Ld. Proxy counsel for petitioner.
    Respondent in person.
    Cost of Rs.3000/- has not been paid by the respondent to the petitioner.
    As per report of the Ahlmad, WS has been filed alongwith the application
    under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on behalf of respondent on 19.08.2025.
    Reply has been filed by the petitioner to the aforesaid application and
    replication on 11.09.2025. Copy is stated to have been supplied in advance.
    Be adjourned for arguments on the application under Order VII Rule 11
    CPC for 16.01.2026.
    (Bharat Aggarwal)
    ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
    District, Tis Hazari Courts
    06.11.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 4
    19 Aug 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 15 RC ARC 658/24
    Roshan Ara Khan Vs. Mehtab
    19.08.2025
    Present : Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
    Ld. Counsel for respondent.
    Matter is listed for completion of pleadings.
    An application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC has been filed on behalf of
    respondent. Copy supplied to the opposite side in court today.
    Ld. Proxy counsel for respondent is unaware about the present application
    and no good reason has been stated to non-supply of the application to the opposite side
    in advance as it was e-filed in the month of May, 2025. this has led to unnecessary delay
    and wastage of today’s hearing. A cost of Rs.3,000/- is hereby imposed upon the
    respondent to be paid to the petitioner on the NDOH.
    Let reply, if any, be filed within two weeks from today with advance copy
    to the opposite side.
    Be put up for disposal of the application on 06.11.2025.
    Both the parties along with their main counsels are expected to remain
    present in person on the next date of hearing, unless not possible for extremely
    unavoidable circumstances.
    (Bharat Aggarwal)
    ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
    District, Tis Hazari Courts
    19.08.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 3
    26 Apr 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 6
    RC ARC 658/24
    Roshan Ara Khan Vs. Mehtab
    26.04.2025
    Regular stenographer is on leave today.
    Present : Mr. Haji Mohd Yameen, Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
    Ld. Counsel for respondent (through V/C).
    Fresh vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondent. Be checked and taken on
    record.
    Ld. Counsel for petitioner submits that he has deposited the cost imposed
    vide last order dated 29.01.2025. Let the receipt be filed during the course of the day.
    As per report of the ahlmad, notice issued upon the respondent received back
    served on 28.02.2025, however, no WS has been filed.
    Ld. Counsel for respondent submits that the petition is not maintainable and
    he would file appropriate application in this regard.
    Let the application be filed within two weeks from today with with advance
    copy to the opposite side.
    Let reply, if any, be filed within two weeks from today with advance copy to
    the opposite side.
    Now to come up for arguments on 19.08.2025.
    Both parties shall remain present in person on the NDOH.
    (Bharat Aggarwal)
    ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
    District, Tis Hazari Courts
    26.04.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 2Full order available
    29 Jan 2025

    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 9 RC ARC 658/24 Roshan Ara Khan Vs. Mehtab 29.01.2025 Present : Ld. Counsel for petitioner. Matter is listed for consideration. On the LDOH, petitioner was directed to file legible and translated copies of page no.26 and 27 which appear to be in Urdu language. Thereafter, an application under order XIII Rule 1 CPC has been filed on behalf of petitioners seeking to place on record another rent receipt filed as Annexure-A1…

    Read Full Order
    Interim Order 1
    18 Nov 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: E. No. 658/2024
    Roshan Ara Khan & Ors. Vs. Smt. Mehtab
    18.11.2024
    Fresh petition under Section 14(1)(a) is received by way of assignment. It be
    checked and registered.
    Present : Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
    Record is perused.
    Petitioner is directed to file legible and translated copy of page no. 26 and 27
    of the petition.
    Be put up for consideration on 29.01.2025.
    (Bharat Aggarwal)
    ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
    District, Tis Hazari Courts
    18.11.2024
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 7Full order available
    25 Mar 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 18 RC ARC 658/24 Roshan Ara Khan Vs. Mehtab 25.03.2026 Present : Mr. Haji Mohammad Yameen, Ld. Counsel for petitioner. Mr. B. Khan, Ld. Counsel for respondent. It has been submitted by both the sides that the cost of Rs.8000/- has been paid by the respondent to Mr. Haji Mohammad Yameen, Ld. Counsel for petitioner and the same has been acknowledged by Mr. Yameen. Matter is listed for arguments on the application…

    Read Full Order
    Order 6Full order available
    16 Jan 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 21 RC ARC 658/24 Roshan Ara Khan Vs. Mehtab 16.01.2026 Present : Ld. Counsel for petitioner. Mr. B. Khan, Ld. Counsel for respondent. (through VC) Cost imposed upon the respondent vide order dated 19.08.2025 has not been paid yet to the petitioner. Let it be paid during the course of the day and receipt/proof of payment be filed, failing which cost shall be enhanced to Rs.8000/- to be paid by the respondent.…

    Read Full Order
    Order 5
    06 Nov 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 16
    RC ARC 658/24
    Roshan Ara Khan Vs. Mehtab
    06.11.2025
    Present : Mr. SD Ansari, Ld. Proxy counsel for petitioner.
    Respondent in person.
    Cost of Rs.3000/- has not been paid by the respondent to the petitioner.
    As per report of the Ahlmad, WS has been filed alongwith the application
    under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on behalf of respondent on 19.08.2025.
    Reply has been filed by the petitioner to the aforesaid application and
    replication on 11.09.2025. Copy is stated to have been supplied in advance.
    Be adjourned for arguments on the application under Order VII Rule 11
    CPC for 16.01.2026.
    (Bharat Aggarwal)
    ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
    District, Tis Hazari Courts
    06.11.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 4
    19 Aug 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 15 RC ARC 658/24
    Roshan Ara Khan Vs. Mehtab
    19.08.2025
    Present : Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
    Ld. Counsel for respondent.
    Matter is listed for completion of pleadings.
    An application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC has been filed on behalf of
    respondent. Copy supplied to the opposite side in court today.
    Ld. Proxy counsel for respondent is unaware about the present application
    and no good reason has been stated to non-supply of the application to the opposite side
    in advance as it was e-filed in the month of May, 2025. this has led to unnecessary delay
    and wastage of today’s hearing. A cost of Rs.3,000/- is hereby imposed upon the
    respondent to be paid to the petitioner on the NDOH.
    Let reply, if any, be filed within two weeks from today with advance copy
    to the opposite side.
    Be put up for disposal of the application on 06.11.2025.
    Both the parties along with their main counsels are expected to remain
    present in person on the next date of hearing, unless not possible for extremely
    unavoidable circumstances.
    (Bharat Aggarwal)
    ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
    District, Tis Hazari Courts
    19.08.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 3
    26 Apr 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 6
    RC ARC 658/24
    Roshan Ara Khan Vs. Mehtab
    26.04.2025
    Regular stenographer is on leave today.
    Present : Mr. Haji Mohd Yameen, Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
    Ld. Counsel for respondent (through V/C).
    Fresh vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondent. Be checked and taken on
    record.
    Ld. Counsel for petitioner submits that he has deposited the cost imposed
    vide last order dated 29.01.2025. Let the receipt be filed during the course of the day.
    As per report of the ahlmad, notice issued upon the respondent received back
    served on 28.02.2025, however, no WS has been filed.
    Ld. Counsel for respondent submits that the petition is not maintainable and
    he would file appropriate application in this regard.
    Let the application be filed within two weeks from today with with advance
    copy to the opposite side.
    Let reply, if any, be filed within two weeks from today with advance copy to
    the opposite side.
    Now to come up for arguments on 19.08.2025.
    Both parties shall remain present in person on the NDOH.
    (Bharat Aggarwal)
    ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
    District, Tis Hazari Courts
    26.04.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 2Full order available
    29 Jan 2025

    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 9 RC ARC 658/24 Roshan Ara Khan Vs. Mehtab 29.01.2025 Present : Ld. Counsel for petitioner. Matter is listed for consideration. On the LDOH, petitioner was directed to file legible and translated copies of page no.26 and 27 which appear to be in Urdu language. Thereafter, an application under order XIII Rule 1 CPC has been filed on behalf of petitioners seeking to place on record another rent receipt filed as Annexure-A1…

    Read Full Order
    Order 1
    18 Nov 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: E. No. 658/2024
    Roshan Ara Khan & Ors. Vs. Smt. Mehtab
    18.11.2024
    Fresh petition under Section 14(1)(a) is received by way of assignment. It be
    checked and registered.
    Present : Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
    Record is perused.
    Petitioner is directed to file legible and translated copy of page no. 26 and 27
    of the petition.
    Be put up for consideration on 29.01.2025.
    (Bharat Aggarwal)
    ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
    District, Tis Hazari Courts
    18.11.2024
    -- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.