Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: RC ARC 658/24 Roshan Ara Khan Vs. Mehtab 24.04.2026 Present : Petitioner no.3 in person. Ld. Counsel for respondent. Mr. Virender Singh, Deputy Director (Survey) DUSIB, in person. A report has been filed by Mr. Virender Singh, Deputy Director (Survey) DUSIB, as per which the property in question i.e. half portion of first floor, backside of H. No. 148, Katra Gokul Shah, Bazar Matia Mahal, Jama Masjid, Delhi-110006, Ward No. XI, falls…
ROSHAN ARA KHAN +2 moreVsMEHTAB
TrustJury record updated 16 Oct 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 658/2024
- Registration Date
- 18 Nov 2024
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
4Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 18-11-2024 Business: further proceedings Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 29-01-2025 Date: 29-01-2025 Business: further proceedings Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 26-04-2025 Date: 26-04-2025 Business: further proceedings Next Purpose: Misc./ Arguments Next Hearing Date: 19-08-2025 Date: 19-08-2025 Business: further proceedings Next Purpose: Misc./ Arguments Next Hearing Date: 06-11-2025 Date: 06-11-2025 Business: further proceedings Next Purpose: Misc./ Arguments Next Hearing Date: 16-01-2026 Date: 16-01-2026 Business: further proceedings Next Purpose: Misc./ Arguments Next Hearing Date: 25-03-2026 Date: 25-03-2026 Business: further proceedings Next Purpose: Misc./ Arguments Next Hearing Date: 24-04-2026 Date: 24-04-2026 Business: Plain rejected Nature Of Disposal: REJECT Disposal Date: 24-04-2026
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 8524/2024 Filing Date: 16-11-2024 eFiling Number: ADL20230003389C202400032 eFiling Date: 14-11-2024 First Hearing Date: 18th November 2024 Decision Date: 24th April 2026 Court Number And Judge: 327-ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC
Orders
15Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 18 RC ARC 658/24 Roshan Ara Khan Vs. Mehtab 25.03.2026 Present : Mr. Haji Mohammad Yameen, Ld. Counsel for petitioner. Mr. B. Khan, Ld. Counsel for respondent. It has been submitted by both the sides that the cost of Rs.8000/- has been paid by the respondent to Mr. Haji Mohammad Yameen, Ld. Counsel for petitioner and the same has been acknowledged by Mr. Yameen. Matter is listed for arguments on the application…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 21 RC ARC 658/24 Roshan Ara Khan Vs. Mehtab 16.01.2026 Present : Ld. Counsel for petitioner. Mr. B. Khan, Ld. Counsel for respondent. (through VC) Cost imposed upon the respondent vide order dated 19.08.2025 has not been paid yet to the petitioner. Let it be paid during the course of the day and receipt/proof of payment be filed, failing which cost shall be enhanced to Rs.8000/- to be paid by the respondent.…
Interim Order 506 Nov 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 16 RC ARC 658/24 Roshan Ara Khan Vs. Mehtab 06.11.2025 Present : Mr. SD Ansari, Ld. Proxy counsel for petitioner. Respondent in person. Cost of Rs.3000/- has not been paid by the respondent to the petitioner. As per report of the Ahlmad, WS has been filed alongwith the application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on behalf of respondent on 19.08.2025. Reply has been filed by the petitioner to the aforesaid application and replication on 11.09.2025. Copy is stated to have been supplied in advance. Be adjourned for arguments on the application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC for 16.01.2026. (Bharat Aggarwal) ACJ-cum-ARC, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts 06.11.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 419 Aug 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 15 RC ARC 658/24 Roshan Ara Khan Vs. Mehtab 19.08.2025 Present : Ld. Counsel for petitioner. Ld. Counsel for respondent. Matter is listed for completion of pleadings. An application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC has been filed on behalf of respondent. Copy supplied to the opposite side in court today. Ld. Proxy counsel for respondent is unaware about the present application and no good reason has been stated to non-supply of the application to the opposite side in advance as it was e-filed in the month of May, 2025. this has led to unnecessary delay and wastage of today’s hearing. A cost of Rs.3,000/- is hereby imposed upon the respondent to be paid to the petitioner on the NDOH. Let reply, if any, be filed within two weeks from today with advance copy to the opposite side. Be put up for disposal of the application on 06.11.2025. Both the parties along with their main counsels are expected to remain present in person on the next date of hearing, unless not possible for extremely unavoidable circumstances. (Bharat Aggarwal) ACJ-cum-ARC, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts 19.08.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 326 Apr 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 6 RC ARC 658/24 Roshan Ara Khan Vs. Mehtab 26.04.2025 Regular stenographer is on leave today. Present : Mr. Haji Mohd Yameen, Ld. Counsel for petitioner. Ld. Counsel for respondent (through V/C). Fresh vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondent. Be checked and taken on record. Ld. Counsel for petitioner submits that he has deposited the cost imposed vide last order dated 29.01.2025. Let the receipt be filed during the course of the day. As per report of the ahlmad, notice issued upon the respondent received back served on 28.02.2025, however, no WS has been filed. Ld. Counsel for respondent submits that the petition is not maintainable and he would file appropriate application in this regard. Let the application be filed within two weeks from today with with advance copy to the opposite side. Let reply, if any, be filed within two weeks from today with advance copy to the opposite side. Now to come up for arguments on 19.08.2025. Both parties shall remain present in person on the NDOH. (Bharat Aggarwal) ACJ-cum-ARC, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts 26.04.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 9 RC ARC 658/24 Roshan Ara Khan Vs. Mehtab 29.01.2025 Present : Ld. Counsel for petitioner. Matter is listed for consideration. On the LDOH, petitioner was directed to file legible and translated copies of page no.26 and 27 which appear to be in Urdu language. Thereafter, an application under order XIII Rule 1 CPC has been filed on behalf of petitioners seeking to place on record another rent receipt filed as Annexure-A1…
Interim Order 118 Nov 2024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: E. No. 658/2024 Roshan Ara Khan & Ors. Vs. Smt. Mehtab 18.11.2024 Fresh petition under Section 14(1)(a) is received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered. Present : Ld. Counsel for petitioner. Record is perused. Petitioner is directed to file legible and translated copy of page no. 26 and 27 of the petition. Be put up for consideration on 29.01.2025. (Bharat Aggarwal) ACJ-cum-ARC, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts 18.11.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 18 RC ARC 658/24 Roshan Ara Khan Vs. Mehtab 25.03.2026 Present : Mr. Haji Mohammad Yameen, Ld. Counsel for petitioner. Mr. B. Khan, Ld. Counsel for respondent. It has been submitted by both the sides that the cost of Rs.8000/- has been paid by the respondent to Mr. Haji Mohammad Yameen, Ld. Counsel for petitioner and the same has been acknowledged by Mr. Yameen. Matter is listed for arguments on the application…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 21 RC ARC 658/24 Roshan Ara Khan Vs. Mehtab 16.01.2026 Present : Ld. Counsel for petitioner. Mr. B. Khan, Ld. Counsel for respondent. (through VC) Cost imposed upon the respondent vide order dated 19.08.2025 has not been paid yet to the petitioner. Let it be paid during the course of the day and receipt/proof of payment be filed, failing which cost shall be enhanced to Rs.8000/- to be paid by the respondent.…
Order 506 Nov 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 16 RC ARC 658/24 Roshan Ara Khan Vs. Mehtab 06.11.2025 Present : Mr. SD Ansari, Ld. Proxy counsel for petitioner. Respondent in person. Cost of Rs.3000/- has not been paid by the respondent to the petitioner. As per report of the Ahlmad, WS has been filed alongwith the application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on behalf of respondent on 19.08.2025. Reply has been filed by the petitioner to the aforesaid application and replication on 11.09.2025. Copy is stated to have been supplied in advance. Be adjourned for arguments on the application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC for 16.01.2026. (Bharat Aggarwal) ACJ-cum-ARC, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts 06.11.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 419 Aug 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 15 RC ARC 658/24 Roshan Ara Khan Vs. Mehtab 19.08.2025 Present : Ld. Counsel for petitioner. Ld. Counsel for respondent. Matter is listed for completion of pleadings. An application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC has been filed on behalf of respondent. Copy supplied to the opposite side in court today. Ld. Proxy counsel for respondent is unaware about the present application and no good reason has been stated to non-supply of the application to the opposite side in advance as it was e-filed in the month of May, 2025. this has led to unnecessary delay and wastage of today’s hearing. A cost of Rs.3,000/- is hereby imposed upon the respondent to be paid to the petitioner on the NDOH. Let reply, if any, be filed within two weeks from today with advance copy to the opposite side. Be put up for disposal of the application on 06.11.2025. Both the parties along with their main counsels are expected to remain present in person on the next date of hearing, unless not possible for extremely unavoidable circumstances. (Bharat Aggarwal) ACJ-cum-ARC, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts 19.08.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 326 Apr 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 6 RC ARC 658/24 Roshan Ara Khan Vs. Mehtab 26.04.2025 Regular stenographer is on leave today. Present : Mr. Haji Mohd Yameen, Ld. Counsel for petitioner. Ld. Counsel for respondent (through V/C). Fresh vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondent. Be checked and taken on record. Ld. Counsel for petitioner submits that he has deposited the cost imposed vide last order dated 29.01.2025. Let the receipt be filed during the course of the day. As per report of the ahlmad, notice issued upon the respondent received back served on 28.02.2025, however, no WS has been filed. Ld. Counsel for respondent submits that the petition is not maintainable and he would file appropriate application in this regard. Let the application be filed within two weeks from today with with advance copy to the opposite side. Let reply, if any, be filed within two weeks from today with advance copy to the opposite side. Now to come up for arguments on 19.08.2025. Both parties shall remain present in person on the NDOH. (Bharat Aggarwal) ACJ-cum-ARC, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts 26.04.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 9 RC ARC 658/24 Roshan Ara Khan Vs. Mehtab 29.01.2025 Present : Ld. Counsel for petitioner. Matter is listed for consideration. On the LDOH, petitioner was directed to file legible and translated copies of page no.26 and 27 which appear to be in Urdu language. Thereafter, an application under order XIII Rule 1 CPC has been filed on behalf of petitioners seeking to place on record another rent receipt filed as Annexure-A1…
Order 118 Nov 2024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: E. No. 658/2024 Roshan Ara Khan & Ors. Vs. Smt. Mehtab 18.11.2024 Fresh petition under Section 14(1)(a) is received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered. Present : Ld. Counsel for petitioner. Record is perused. Petitioner is directed to file legible and translated copy of page no. 26 and 27 of the petition. Be put up for consideration on 29.01.2025. (Bharat Aggarwal) ACJ-cum-ARC, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts 18.11.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
