NEETU RANIVsSTATE AND ANR

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 2
Succ. Court 83/23
NEETU RANI Vs. STATE AND ANR
28.07.2026
Present : None for petitioner.
Mr. Aakash Tiwari Kumar, Ld. Counsel for respondent no.2 alongwith Mr.
Ashok Kumar, Admin Officer and Mr. Manish Tiwari, Leading Fire Fighter,
for respondent no.2.
Ld. proxy counsel for Dalip Yadav i.e. guardian of respondent no.4 and 5
alongiwth Mr. Dalip Yadav.
It has been apprised that the Ld. DJ-01, North, Rohini, in the judgment
dated 01.12.2025 in GP no.11/23 has already passed directions to the department i.e.,
respondent no.2 for release of the dues of the deceased in favour of respondent no.4 and
5.
Ld. Counsel for respondent no.2 submits that the department is in the
process of releasing the money to the beneficiaries as per such order.
Be adjourned for appearance of petitioner by way of last and final
opportunity for 18.09.2026.
(Bharat Aggarwal)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
28.07.2026
Contd...
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
At 11.15 AM
At this stage, Mr. Bilal, Ld. Proxy counsel for petitioner has appeared. He is
apprised of the next date of hearing and purpose fixed.
(Bharat Aggarwal)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
28.07.2026
-- 2 of 2 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 2
Succ. Court 83/23
NEETU RANI Vs. STATE AND ANR
30.05.2026
Present : Mr. Shivam, Ld. Counsel for petitioner. (through VC)
Mr. Ashok Kumar, Admin Officer, for respondent no.2.
Mr. Manish Tiwari, Leading Fire Fighter, for respondent no.2.
Mr. Shubham, Ld. counsel for respondent no.4 and 5.
Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in administrative work.
Be adjourned for purpose already fixed for 28.07.2026.
(Reader)
30.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 1
Succ. Court 83/23
NEETU RANI Vs. STATE AND ANR
21.02.2026
Present : Petitioner in person.
Ld. Counsel for petitioner (through VC)
Ld. Counsel for Mr. Pradeep Yadav.
Mr. Pradeep Yadav in person.
Ld. Counsel for the brother of the deceased namely Mr. Pradeep Yadav
submits that in guardianship petition no.11/23, Ld. DJ-01, North, Delhi has passed an
order appointing other brother of the deceased Mr. Daleep Yadav as the guardian of minor
children of the deceased i.e., Respondent no.4 and 5.
Mr. Pradeep Yadav, upon query submits that his brother Mr. Daleep Yadav
is residing at Rohini.
Let the address of Mr. Daleep Yadav be furnished by Mr. Praveen Yadav
within a week from today. Thereafter, on filing of PF and RC within seven days from
today by the petitioner, issue notice of present petition to Mr. Daleep Yadav with
directions to remain present in person on NDOH.
All the parties along with their main counsels are expected to remain present
in person on the next date of hearing, unless not possible for extremely unavoidable
circumstances.
Be adjourned for 25.04.2026 @ 12.00 noon.
(Bharat Aggarwal)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
21.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 3
Succ. Court 83/23
NEETU RANI Vs. STATE AND ANR
23.12.2025
Present : Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
Mr. Shubham, Ld. Counsel for Mr. Praveen Yadav.
Matter is pending for adjudication of the application filed for appointment
of guardian of respondents no. 4 and 5.
It is the case of the petitioner that such minor children are in the custody of
Mr. Praveen Yadav, stated to be real brother of the deceased. Despite directions, Mr.
Praveen Yadav has not been appearing. Even today, he has failed to appear.
Upon query, it has been apprised that respondents no. 4 and 5 i.e. minor
children of the deceased are in the custody of wife of Mr. Praveen Yadav. Mr. Shubham,
Ld. Counsel for Mr. Praveen Yadav, has failed to apprise the name of such person.
Mr. Praveen Yadav shall remain present in person on the NDOH,
failing which a cost of Rs.10,000/- shall be imposed upon him.
Be adjourned for appearance of Mr. Praveen Yadav for 21.02.2026.
(Bharat Aggarwal)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
23.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 6
Succ. Court 83/23
NEETU RANI Vs. STATE AND ANR
25.10.2025
Present : Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
Mr. Shubham, Ld. Counsel for Mr. Pradeep Yadav / brother of the deceased.
Fresh vakalatnama filed on behalf of Mr. Pradeep Yadav. Same be checked
and taken on record.
Notice issued upon Mr. Pradeep Yadav and Mr. Praveen Yadav, brothers of
the deceased, received back served on 21.09.2025. However, none has appeared for Mr.
Praveen Yadav.
Both Mr. Pradeep Yadav and Mr. Praveen Yadav shall remain present in
person on the NDOH, failing which coercive steps shall be taken to ensure their
presence.
Be adjourned for 23.12.2025.
(Bharat Aggarwal)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
25.10.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 4
Succ. Court 83/23
NEETU RANI Vs. STATE AND ANR
26.07.2025
Present : Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
Petitioner has not again complied with the order dated 15.05.2025. No steps
have been taken by the petitioner for issuance of notice for appointment of guardian of
respondents no. 4 and 5.
Request for adjournment is made on behalf of petitioner on the ground that
the file of the counsel has been misplaced.
Petitioner shall remain present in person on the NDOH.
Last and final opportunity is granted to the petitioner for compliance of
the order dated 15.05.2025 within a week from today.
Be put up for further proceedings on 11.09.2025.
(Bharat Aggarwal)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
26.07.2025
25
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 5 Succ. Court 83/23
NEETU RANI Vs. STATE AND ANR
15.05.2025
Present : Ld. Counsel for petitioner alongwith petitioner.
It is submitted that the cost imposed vide order dated 09.12.2024 has been
deposited. Let receipt be filed on record.
On the LDOH, petitioner was directed to disclose the details of brothers and
sisters of the deceased as well as the person with whom minor children of the deceased
i.e. respondents no. 4 and 5, are residing. Details filed today, as per which, respondents
no. 4 and 5 are residing with Mr. Pradeep Yadav and Mr. Praveen Yadav, stated to be
brothers of the deceased.
On filing of PF and RC within seven days from today, issue notice of
present petition as well as the application for appointment of guardian to Mr. Pradeep
Yadav and Mr. Praveen Yadav on the address stated in the details filed today.
Be adjourned for 26.07.2025.
(Bharat Aggarwal)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
15.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 14
Succ. Court 83/23
NEETU RANI Vs. STATE AND ANR
11.03.2025
Present : Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
None for respondents.
Petitioner has not deposited the cost imposed vide order dated 09.12.2024.
Let the same be deposited within three days from today and receipt be filed, failing which
further cost of Rs.2,000/- shall be imposed upon the petitioner.
Petitioner is absent despite directions in terms of last order.
An application has been filed on behalf of petitioner for appointment of
guardian of respondents no. 4 and 5.
Petitioner shall remain present in person on the NDOH.
Petitioner is also directed to file the details of brothers and sisters of the
deceased on the NDOH alongwith the details of the person with whom respondents no. 4
and 5 i.e. the minor children of the deceased, are currently residing.
Be put up for further proceedings on 15.05.2025.
(Bharat Aggarwal)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
11.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 15
Succ. Court 83/23
NEETU RANI Vs. STATE AND ANR
09.12.2024
Present : None for petitioner.
Ld. Counsel for respondent no.3 to 5. (through VC)
Ms. Shivani Yadav, Ld. Counsel for respondents no. 3 to 5 is completely
unaware about the present proceedings.
Petitioner has not deposited the cost imposed vide order dated 17.09.2024.
Petitioner has also not taken any steps for filing of application for
appointment of guardian for respondents no. 4 and 5.
Petitioner has also not file any amended memo of parties.
Matter is adjourned subject to further cost of Rs.1,000/- imposed upon the
petitioner to be deposited in DLSA(Central), THC. Let receipt thereof be filed within two
weeks from today.
Petitioner shall remain present in person on the NDOH.
Petitioner is given last opportunity to comply with the order dated 17.09.2024
for NDOH i.e. 11.03.2025.
(Bharat Aggarwal)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
09.12.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 3
Succ. Court 83/23
NEETU RANI Vs. STATE AND ANR
02.07.2024
Present : Mr. Shivam, Ld. Counsel for petitioner alongwith petitioner.
Ms. Ruby, Ld. Proxy counsel for respondents no. 3 to 5.
Written statement filed by respondents no. 3 to 5. Copy supplied to the
opposite side. Taken on record.
Time sought by the petitioner to file evidence affidavit. Heard. Allowed.
Re-list for PE on 17.09.2024.
(Medha Arya)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
02.07.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 2
Succ. Court 83/23
NEETU RANI Vs. STATE AND ANR
14.03.2024 @ 11.48 AM
Present: None for petitioner.
Mr. Manish Tiwari, Leading Fireman on behalf of respondent no. 2.
Statement of respondent no. 2 recorded as RW-1. He stands discharged.
In view of the non-appearance of petitioner despite repeated calls,
proceedings adjourned.
Re-list for appearance of petitioner and further proceedings on
02.07.2024.
(Medha Arya)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
14.03.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Succ. Court 83/23
NEETU RANI Vs. STATE AND ANR
11.12.2023
Present: Mr. Shivam, Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
Since no one has appeared on behalf of the respondent no. 2 despite
service of bailable warrant, issue fresh bailable warrant for a sum of Rs.10,000/- with
one surety in the like amount against the respondent no. 2.
Put up on 14.03.2024.
(Vivek Beniwal)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
11.12.2023
At this stage, Mr. Manish Tiwari, Leading Fireman (Emp. No. 21183) on
behalf of respondent no. 2 has appeared. He is apprised for NDOH and purpose fixed.
Since, official from respondent no. 2 has appeared, bailable warrant
against respondent no. 2 need not be issued now.
Said Mr. Manish Tiwari is bound down for NDOH.
(Vivek Beniwal)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
11.12.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Succ. Court 83/23
NEETU RANI Vs. STATE AND ANR
04.09.2023
Present: Mr. Shivam, Ld. Counsel for petitioner alongwith petitioner.
Mr. Sumit Yadav, Ld. Counsel for respondents no. 3 to 5.
Fresh vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondents no. 3 to 5. Same is
taken on record.
As per report of the Ahlmad, notice has been served upon respondent no.
2. However, notice sent to respondents no. 3 to 5 received back unserved with report
that “respondent left the address.”
Since no one has appeared on behalf of the respondent no. 2, issue
bailable warrant for a sum of Rs.10,000/- with one surety in the like amount against
respondent no. 2 with direction to disclose the service benefits/dues of the deceased.
Put up on 11.12.2023.
(Vivek Beniwal)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
04.09.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 2
Succ. Court 83/23
NEETU RANI Vs. STATE AND ANR
28.07.2026
Present : None for petitioner.
Mr. Aakash Tiwari Kumar, Ld. Counsel for respondent no.2 alongwith Mr.
Ashok Kumar, Admin Officer and Mr. Manish Tiwari, Leading Fire Fighter,
for respondent no.2.
Ld. proxy counsel for Dalip Yadav i.e. guardian of respondent no.4 and 5
alongiwth Mr. Dalip Yadav.
It has been apprised that the Ld. DJ-01, North, Rohini, in the judgment
dated 01.12.2025 in GP no.11/23 has already passed directions to the department i.e.,
respondent no.2 for release of the dues of the deceased in favour of respondent no.4 and
5.
Ld. Counsel for respondent no.2 submits that the department is in the
process of releasing the money to the beneficiaries as per such order.
Be adjourned for appearance of petitioner by way of last and final
opportunity for 18.09.2026.
(Bharat Aggarwal)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
28.07.2026
Contd...
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
At 11.15 AM
At this stage, Mr. Bilal, Ld. Proxy counsel for petitioner has appeared. He is
apprised of the next date of hearing and purpose fixed.
(Bharat Aggarwal)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
28.07.2026
-- 2 of 2 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 2
Succ. Court 83/23
NEETU RANI Vs. STATE AND ANR
30.05.2026
Present : Mr. Shivam, Ld. Counsel for petitioner. (through VC)
Mr. Ashok Kumar, Admin Officer, for respondent no.2.
Mr. Manish Tiwari, Leading Fire Fighter, for respondent no.2.
Mr. Shubham, Ld. counsel for respondent no.4 and 5.
Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in administrative work.
Be adjourned for purpose already fixed for 28.07.2026.
(Reader)
30.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 1
Succ. Court 83/23
NEETU RANI Vs. STATE AND ANR
21.02.2026
Present : Petitioner in person.
Ld. Counsel for petitioner (through VC)
Ld. Counsel for Mr. Pradeep Yadav.
Mr. Pradeep Yadav in person.
Ld. Counsel for the brother of the deceased namely Mr. Pradeep Yadav
submits that in guardianship petition no.11/23, Ld. DJ-01, North, Delhi has passed an
order appointing other brother of the deceased Mr. Daleep Yadav as the guardian of minor
children of the deceased i.e., Respondent no.4 and 5.
Mr. Pradeep Yadav, upon query submits that his brother Mr. Daleep Yadav
is residing at Rohini.
Let the address of Mr. Daleep Yadav be furnished by Mr. Praveen Yadav
within a week from today. Thereafter, on filing of PF and RC within seven days from
today by the petitioner, issue notice of present petition to Mr. Daleep Yadav with
directions to remain present in person on NDOH.
All the parties along with their main counsels are expected to remain present
in person on the next date of hearing, unless not possible for extremely unavoidable
circumstances.
Be adjourned for 25.04.2026 @ 12.00 noon.
(Bharat Aggarwal)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
21.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 3
Succ. Court 83/23
NEETU RANI Vs. STATE AND ANR
23.12.2025
Present : Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
Mr. Shubham, Ld. Counsel for Mr. Praveen Yadav.
Matter is pending for adjudication of the application filed for appointment
of guardian of respondents no. 4 and 5.
It is the case of the petitioner that such minor children are in the custody of
Mr. Praveen Yadav, stated to be real brother of the deceased. Despite directions, Mr.
Praveen Yadav has not been appearing. Even today, he has failed to appear.
Upon query, it has been apprised that respondents no. 4 and 5 i.e. minor
children of the deceased are in the custody of wife of Mr. Praveen Yadav. Mr. Shubham,
Ld. Counsel for Mr. Praveen Yadav, has failed to apprise the name of such person.
Mr. Praveen Yadav shall remain present in person on the NDOH,
failing which a cost of Rs.10,000/- shall be imposed upon him.
Be adjourned for appearance of Mr. Praveen Yadav for 21.02.2026.
(Bharat Aggarwal)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
23.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 6
Succ. Court 83/23
NEETU RANI Vs. STATE AND ANR
25.10.2025
Present : Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
Mr. Shubham, Ld. Counsel for Mr. Pradeep Yadav / brother of the deceased.
Fresh vakalatnama filed on behalf of Mr. Pradeep Yadav. Same be checked
and taken on record.
Notice issued upon Mr. Pradeep Yadav and Mr. Praveen Yadav, brothers of
the deceased, received back served on 21.09.2025. However, none has appeared for Mr.
Praveen Yadav.
Both Mr. Pradeep Yadav and Mr. Praveen Yadav shall remain present in
person on the NDOH, failing which coercive steps shall be taken to ensure their
presence.
Be adjourned for 23.12.2025.
(Bharat Aggarwal)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
25.10.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 4
Succ. Court 83/23
NEETU RANI Vs. STATE AND ANR
26.07.2025
Present : Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
Petitioner has not again complied with the order dated 15.05.2025. No steps
have been taken by the petitioner for issuance of notice for appointment of guardian of
respondents no. 4 and 5.
Request for adjournment is made on behalf of petitioner on the ground that
the file of the counsel has been misplaced.
Petitioner shall remain present in person on the NDOH.
Last and final opportunity is granted to the petitioner for compliance of
the order dated 15.05.2025 within a week from today.
Be put up for further proceedings on 11.09.2025.
(Bharat Aggarwal)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
26.07.2025
25
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 5 Succ. Court 83/23
NEETU RANI Vs. STATE AND ANR
15.05.2025
Present : Ld. Counsel for petitioner alongwith petitioner.
It is submitted that the cost imposed vide order dated 09.12.2024 has been
deposited. Let receipt be filed on record.
On the LDOH, petitioner was directed to disclose the details of brothers and
sisters of the deceased as well as the person with whom minor children of the deceased
i.e. respondents no. 4 and 5, are residing. Details filed today, as per which, respondents
no. 4 and 5 are residing with Mr. Pradeep Yadav and Mr. Praveen Yadav, stated to be
brothers of the deceased.
On filing of PF and RC within seven days from today, issue notice of
present petition as well as the application for appointment of guardian to Mr. Pradeep
Yadav and Mr. Praveen Yadav on the address stated in the details filed today.
Be adjourned for 26.07.2025.
(Bharat Aggarwal)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
15.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 14
Succ. Court 83/23
NEETU RANI Vs. STATE AND ANR
11.03.2025
Present : Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
None for respondents.
Petitioner has not deposited the cost imposed vide order dated 09.12.2024.
Let the same be deposited within three days from today and receipt be filed, failing which
further cost of Rs.2,000/- shall be imposed upon the petitioner.
Petitioner is absent despite directions in terms of last order.
An application has been filed on behalf of petitioner for appointment of
guardian of respondents no. 4 and 5.
Petitioner shall remain present in person on the NDOH.
Petitioner is also directed to file the details of brothers and sisters of the
deceased on the NDOH alongwith the details of the person with whom respondents no. 4
and 5 i.e. the minor children of the deceased, are currently residing.
Be put up for further proceedings on 15.05.2025.
(Bharat Aggarwal)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
11.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 15
Succ. Court 83/23
NEETU RANI Vs. STATE AND ANR
09.12.2024
Present : None for petitioner.
Ld. Counsel for respondent no.3 to 5. (through VC)
Ms. Shivani Yadav, Ld. Counsel for respondents no. 3 to 5 is completely
unaware about the present proceedings.
Petitioner has not deposited the cost imposed vide order dated 17.09.2024.
Petitioner has also not taken any steps for filing of application for
appointment of guardian for respondents no. 4 and 5.
Petitioner has also not file any amended memo of parties.
Matter is adjourned subject to further cost of Rs.1,000/- imposed upon the
petitioner to be deposited in DLSA(Central), THC. Let receipt thereof be filed within two
weeks from today.
Petitioner shall remain present in person on the NDOH.
Petitioner is given last opportunity to comply with the order dated 17.09.2024
for NDOH i.e. 11.03.2025.
(Bharat Aggarwal)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
09.12.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 3
Succ. Court 83/23
NEETU RANI Vs. STATE AND ANR
02.07.2024
Present : Mr. Shivam, Ld. Counsel for petitioner alongwith petitioner.
Ms. Ruby, Ld. Proxy counsel for respondents no. 3 to 5.
Written statement filed by respondents no. 3 to 5. Copy supplied to the
opposite side. Taken on record.
Time sought by the petitioner to file evidence affidavit. Heard. Allowed.
Re-list for PE on 17.09.2024.
(Medha Arya)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
02.07.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 2
Succ. Court 83/23
NEETU RANI Vs. STATE AND ANR
14.03.2024 @ 11.48 AM
Present: None for petitioner.
Mr. Manish Tiwari, Leading Fireman on behalf of respondent no. 2.
Statement of respondent no. 2 recorded as RW-1. He stands discharged.
In view of the non-appearance of petitioner despite repeated calls,
proceedings adjourned.
Re-list for appearance of petitioner and further proceedings on
02.07.2024.
(Medha Arya)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
14.03.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Succ. Court 83/23
NEETU RANI Vs. STATE AND ANR
11.12.2023
Present: Mr. Shivam, Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
Since no one has appeared on behalf of the respondent no. 2 despite
service of bailable warrant, issue fresh bailable warrant for a sum of Rs.10,000/- with
one surety in the like amount against the respondent no. 2.
Put up on 14.03.2024.
(Vivek Beniwal)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
11.12.2023
At this stage, Mr. Manish Tiwari, Leading Fireman (Emp. No. 21183) on
behalf of respondent no. 2 has appeared. He is apprised for NDOH and purpose fixed.
Since, official from respondent no. 2 has appeared, bailable warrant
against respondent no. 2 need not be issued now.
Said Mr. Manish Tiwari is bound down for NDOH.
(Vivek Beniwal)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
11.12.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Succ. Court 83/23
NEETU RANI Vs. STATE AND ANR
04.09.2023
Present: Mr. Shivam, Ld. Counsel for petitioner alongwith petitioner.
Mr. Sumit Yadav, Ld. Counsel for respondents no. 3 to 5.
Fresh vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondents no. 3 to 5. Same is
taken on record.
As per report of the Ahlmad, notice has been served upon respondent no.
2. However, notice sent to respondents no. 3 to 5 received back unserved with report
that “respondent left the address.”
Since no one has appeared on behalf of the respondent no. 2, issue
bailable warrant for a sum of Rs.10,000/- with one surety in the like amount against
respondent no. 2 with direction to disclose the service benefits/dues of the deceased.
Put up on 11.12.2023.
(Vivek Beniwal)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
04.09.2023
-- 1 of 1 --