Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 6 CT. CASES/584/2023 CNR NO. DLCT020074842023 INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) VS. SUPERCITY DEVELOPERS PVT LTD 25.09.2026 PRESENT: Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for complainant. Ms. Niharika Sharma, Ld. Counsel for A-1 and A-2 (Fresh vakalatnama filed). Ms. Sahiba Singh, AR of A-1through VC. A-3 to A-5 not summoned. A-2 through VC. CW Sh. Data Ram in person. BR placed on record. Copy be supplied for complainant. It is noted that the…
Income Tax Office (ito)VsSUPERCITY DEVELOPERS PVT LTD +4 more
TrustJury record updated 14 Oct 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 584/2023
- Registration Date
- 25 Mar 2023
- Next Hearing Date
- 20 Nov 2026
- Case Stage
- Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
6Acts & Sections
1Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 25-03-2023 Reason For Adjournment: Deferred as requested Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 09-05-2023 Date: 09-05-2023 Date: 11-08-2023 Date: 05-12-2023 Reason For Adjournment: Deferred as requested Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 22-03-2024 Date: 22-03-2024 Reason For Adjournment: Deferred as requested Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 19-07-2024 Date: 19-07-2024 Business: FP Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 25-10-2024 Date: 25-10-2024 Reason For Adjournment: Deferred as requested Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 04-02-2025 Date: 04-02-2025 Business: fp Reason For Adjournment: Deferred as requested Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 29-04-2025 Date: 29-04-2025 Reason For Adjournment: Deferred as requested Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 03-06-2025 Date: 03-06-2025 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 21-11-2025 Date: 21-11-2025 Business: fp Next Purpose: Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence Next Hearing Date: 17-03-2026 Date: 17-03-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence Next Hearing Date: 14-07-2026 Date: 14-07-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence Next Hearing Date: 25-09-2026 Date: 25-09-2026 Business: FP Next Purpose: Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence Next Hearing Date: 20-11-2026
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 7483/2023 Filing Date: 18-03-2023 First Hearing Date: 25th March 2023 Court Number And Judge: 496-ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE (SPECIAL ACTS)
Orders
28Interim Order 1314 Jul 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 18 Ct. Cases 584/2023 INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) Vs. SUPERCITY DEVELOPERS PVT LTD 14.07.2026 PRESENT: Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for the Complainant. Ms. Neharika Sharma, Proxy Counsel for A-1 and A-2. A-3 to A-5 not been summoned. CW Datta Ram in person. Matter is listed for pre-charge evidence. It is noted that despite directions, copy of Board Resolution is not placed on record till date. Accused no.2 has not appeared. Exemption sought on behalf of accused no2, however since no plausible explanation has been put forth for his absence, same is allowed subject to cost of Rs.20,000/- to be deposited in Advocate Welfare Funds by next date. Witness is discharged unexamined today and is bound down for next date. Be listed for purpose fixed on 25.09.2026. (RENU CHAUDHARY) ACJM: (SPECIAL ACTS): CENTRAL THC: DELHI:14.07.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 1217 Mar 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 26 Ct. Cases 584/2023 INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) Vs. SUPERCITY DEVELOPERS PVT LTD 17.03.2026 LD. PO IS ON LEAVE TODAY. PRESENT: Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for complainant through VC. Ms. Niharika Shukla, Ld. Counsel for accused nos. 1 and 2. Be listed for purpose fixed on 14.07.2026. (POOJA SUHAG) RELIEVER, JMFC: CENTRAL THC: DELHI: 17.03.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 1121 Nov 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 11CT. CASES584/2023 INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) VS. SUPERCITY DEVELOPERS PVT LTD 21.11.2025 PRESENT : Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for the complainant. Accused No.2 in person (also representing accused No.1). Accused No.3 to 5 have not been summoned. Sh. Ashwin Kumar, Ld. counsel for accused No.1 and 2. Previous cost imposed upon accused No.2 vide order dated 29.04.2025 deposited. Submissions heard on the point of bail. Considering the nature of offence, accused No.2 is admitted to bail upon furnishing his personal bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/- with a surety in like amount. Bail bond furnished, same are accepted provisionally till next date of hearing. Let same be verified through SHO PS Subzi Mandi for the next date. Be put up for pre-charge evidence on 17.03.2026. (RENU CHAUDHARY) ACJM: (SPECIAL ACTS): CENTRAL THC: DELHI: 21.11.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 12Ct. Cases584/2023 INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) Vs. SUPERCITY DEVELOPERS PVT LTD 03.06.2025 Present: Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for the complainant. Accused No.3 to 5 have not been summoned. Ms. Neharika, Ld. counsel for accused No.1 and 2. Copy of complaint and annexed documents supplied to learned counsel for accused No.1 and 2 by learned SPP. No vakalatnama filed on behalf of accused No.1 till date. An application moved by learned…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 12Ct. Cases584/2023 INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) Vs. SUPERCITY DEVELOPERS PVT LTD 03.06.2025 Present: Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for the complainant. Accused No.3 to 5 have not been summoned. Ms. Neharika, Ld. counsel for accused No.1 and 2. Copy of complaint and annexed documents supplied to learned counsel for accused No.1 and 2 by learned SPP. No vakalatnama filed on behalf of accused No.1 till date. An application moved by learned…
Interim Order 829 Apr 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: Ct. Cases 584/2023 INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) Vs. SUPERCITY DEVELOPERS PVT LTD 29.04.2025 Present : Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for the complainant. None for accused No.1. Accused No.2 absent. Accused No.3 to 5 have not been summoned. Ms. Niharika, Ld. counsel for accused No.1 and 2 through VC. At the request of learned counsel for accused No.2, accused No.2 is exempted from appearance in court subject to cost of Rs.5,000/- to be paid by accused in the court on the next date. Learned Prosecutor has undertaken to supply copy of complaint and document annexed with it to learned counsel through e-mail ID mentioned in the chat box today itself. Be put up for appearance of accused, bail proceedings and further proceedings on 03.06.2025. (Mayank Mittal) ACJM(Special Acts) : Central District: THC: Delhi: 29.04.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 704 Feb 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: Ct. Cases584/2023 INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) Vs. SUPERCITY DEVELOPERS PVT LTD04.02.2025 Present : Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for the complainant. Accused no. 2 is absent. Accused no. 3 and 5 have not been summoned. Sh. Shiv Prem, Ld. proxy counsel for accused no.1. Summons issued to accused no.2 received back with the report of adjournment from SHO PS Subzi Mandi. Summons issued to accused no. 2 received back served through email. Let fresh summons be issued to accused no. 2 through SHO PS Subzi Mandi. If the summons remain unserved for any reason whatsoever, then the same be served by way of affixation. Complainant is directed to collect dasti copy to serve and report as per rules. Be put up on 29.04.2025. (Mayank Mittal) ACJM(Special Acts) : Central District: THC: Delhi: 04.02.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 625 Oct 2024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: Ct. Cases 584/2023 INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) Vs. SUPERCITY DEVELOPERS PVT LTD CNR DLCT02-007484-2023 25.10.2024 Present : Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for the complainant. Accused No.1 and 2 absent. Accused No.3 to 5 have not been summoned. Ms. Saumya Sharma, Ld. Counsel for accused No.1 (memo of appearance filed). Copy of complaint supplied to learned counsel for accused No.1. Summons issued to accused No.2 has not yet received back. Let fresh summons be issued to accused No.2 through SHO PS Subzi Mandi, returnable for the next date of hearing. If the summons remain unserved for any reason whatsoever, then the same be served by way of affixation. Let copy of additional summons be given dasti to complainant for service upon accused No.2 and to report on the next date of hearing. Complainant is directed to file e-mail ID of accused No.2 within 15 days from today. Ahlmad is directed to issue summons to accused No.2 through e-mail as per rules for the next date of hearing i.e. on 04.02.2025. (Mayank Mittal) ACJM(Special Acts) : Central District: THC: Delhi: 25.10.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 519 Jul 2024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: Ct. Cases584/2023 INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) Vs. SUPERCITY DEVELOPERS PVT LTD CNR No. DLCT02-007484-2023 19.07.2024 Present: Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for the complainant. Accused No.1 and 2 absent. Accused 3 to 5 have not been summoned. Fresh and correct address of accused No.1 and 2 filed on behalf of the complainant. Ahlmad is directed to issue summons afresh to accused No.1 and 2 at the fresh address filed today through ordinary process as well as through e-mail for the next date of hearing. Complainant is directed to collect dasti copy of additional summons and speed post for service upon accused No.1 and 2 and to report on the next date. Be put up on 25.10.2024. (Mayank Mittal) ACJM (Special Acts): Central District: THC: Delhi: 19.07.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 422 Mar 2024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: Ct. Cases 584/2023 INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) Vs. SUPERCITY DEVELOPERS PVT LTD CNR No. DLCT02-007484-2023 22.03.2024 Present: Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for the complainant. Accused no. 1 and 2 absent. Accused no. 3 to 5 have not been summoned. Summons issued to accused no. 1 and 2 received back unserved. Complainant is directed to file fresh and correct address of accused no. 1 and 2 for service of accused no. 1 and 2 within 20 days from today for the next date of hearing i.e. 19.07.2024. Complainant is further directed to file E-mail ID of accused no. 1 and 2 for the next date of hearing. Ahlmad is directed to arrange the file before next date of hearing. (Mayank Mitttal) ACMM (Special Acts): Central District: THC: Delhi: 22.03.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 305 Dec 2023
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: Ct. Cases 584/2023 INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) Vs. SUPERCITY DEVELOPERS PVT LTD CNR No. DLCT02-007484-2023 05.12.2023 Present: Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for the complainant. Accused No.3 to 5 have not been summoned. Summons to accused No.1 and 2 are received back unserved. Report perused. Issue fresh summons to accused No.1 and 2 on the registered office address of accused No.1, returnable for 22.03.2024. Summons be also served to accused No.1 and 2 by the complainant on e-mail ID of accused No.1 and compliance report be filed on the next date of hearing. (Anurag Thakur) ACMM(Special Acts) : Central District: THC: Delhi: 05.12.2023 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: Ct. Cases 584/2023 INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) Vs. M/S SUPERCITY DEVELOPERS PVT LTD & ORS. CNR-DLCT02-007484-2023 11.08.2023 Present:- Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for the complainant. An oral application u/s 91 Cr.P.C for placing on record copy of Master Data of accused no. 1 company as available on the MCA website and details of Directors of accused no. 1 is made on behalf of complainant by the Ld. SPP. The copy…
Interim Order 109 May 2023
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: Ct. Cases 584/2023 INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) Vs. M/S SUPERCITY DEVELOPERS PVT LTD & ORS. CNR-DLCT02-007484-2023 09.05.2023 Present:- Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for the complainant. Ld. SPP for the complainant has submitted that the matter has now been allocated to him and he sought some time to comply with previous order. The request is acceded to. Accordingly, relist the matter for purpose already fixed for 11.08.2023. (Anurag Thakur) ACMM(Special Acts) : Central District: THC: Delhi: 09.05.2023 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 6 CT. CASES/584/2023 CNR NO. DLCT020074842023 INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) VS. SUPERCITY DEVELOPERS PVT LTD 25.09.2026 PRESENT: Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for complainant. Ms. Niharika Sharma, Ld. Counsel for A-1 and A-2 (Fresh vakalatnama filed). Ms. Sahiba Singh, AR of A-1through VC. A-3 to A-5 not summoned. A-2 through VC. CW Sh. Data Ram in person. BR placed on record. Copy be supplied for complainant. It is noted that the…
Order 1314 Jul 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 18 Ct. Cases 584/2023 INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) Vs. SUPERCITY DEVELOPERS PVT LTD 14.07.2026 PRESENT: Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for the Complainant. Ms. Neharika Sharma, Proxy Counsel for A-1 and A-2. A-3 to A-5 not been summoned. CW Datta Ram in person. Matter is listed for pre-charge evidence. It is noted that despite directions, copy of Board Resolution is not placed on record till date. Accused no.2 has not appeared. Exemption sought on behalf of accused no2, however since no plausible explanation has been put forth for his absence, same is allowed subject to cost of Rs.20,000/- to be deposited in Advocate Welfare Funds by next date. Witness is discharged unexamined today and is bound down for next date. Be listed for purpose fixed on 25.09.2026. (RENU CHAUDHARY) ACJM: (SPECIAL ACTS): CENTRAL THC: DELHI:14.07.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 1217 Mar 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 26 Ct. Cases 584/2023 INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) Vs. SUPERCITY DEVELOPERS PVT LTD 17.03.2026 LD. PO IS ON LEAVE TODAY. PRESENT: Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for complainant through VC. Ms. Niharika Shukla, Ld. Counsel for accused nos. 1 and 2. Be listed for purpose fixed on 14.07.2026. (POOJA SUHAG) RELIEVER, JMFC: CENTRAL THC: DELHI: 17.03.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 1121 Nov 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 11CT. CASES584/2023 INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) VS. SUPERCITY DEVELOPERS PVT LTD 21.11.2025 PRESENT : Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for the complainant. Accused No.2 in person (also representing accused No.1). Accused No.3 to 5 have not been summoned. Sh. Ashwin Kumar, Ld. counsel for accused No.1 and 2. Previous cost imposed upon accused No.2 vide order dated 29.04.2025 deposited. Submissions heard on the point of bail. Considering the nature of offence, accused No.2 is admitted to bail upon furnishing his personal bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/- with a surety in like amount. Bail bond furnished, same are accepted provisionally till next date of hearing. Let same be verified through SHO PS Subzi Mandi for the next date. Be put up for pre-charge evidence on 17.03.2026. (RENU CHAUDHARY) ACJM: (SPECIAL ACTS): CENTRAL THC: DELHI: 21.11.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 12Ct. Cases584/2023 INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) Vs. SUPERCITY DEVELOPERS PVT LTD 03.06.2025 Present: Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for the complainant. Accused No.3 to 5 have not been summoned. Ms. Neharika, Ld. counsel for accused No.1 and 2. Copy of complaint and annexed documents supplied to learned counsel for accused No.1 and 2 by learned SPP. No vakalatnama filed on behalf of accused No.1 till date. An application moved by learned…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 12Ct. Cases584/2023 INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) Vs. SUPERCITY DEVELOPERS PVT LTD 03.06.2025 Present: Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for the complainant. Accused No.3 to 5 have not been summoned. Ms. Neharika, Ld. counsel for accused No.1 and 2. Copy of complaint and annexed documents supplied to learned counsel for accused No.1 and 2 by learned SPP. No vakalatnama filed on behalf of accused No.1 till date. An application moved by learned…
Order 829 Apr 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: Ct. Cases 584/2023 INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) Vs. SUPERCITY DEVELOPERS PVT LTD 29.04.2025 Present : Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for the complainant. None for accused No.1. Accused No.2 absent. Accused No.3 to 5 have not been summoned. Ms. Niharika, Ld. counsel for accused No.1 and 2 through VC. At the request of learned counsel for accused No.2, accused No.2 is exempted from appearance in court subject to cost of Rs.5,000/- to be paid by accused in the court on the next date. Learned Prosecutor has undertaken to supply copy of complaint and document annexed with it to learned counsel through e-mail ID mentioned in the chat box today itself. Be put up for appearance of accused, bail proceedings and further proceedings on 03.06.2025. (Mayank Mittal) ACJM(Special Acts) : Central District: THC: Delhi: 29.04.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 704 Feb 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: Ct. Cases584/2023 INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) Vs. SUPERCITY DEVELOPERS PVT LTD04.02.2025 Present : Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for the complainant. Accused no. 2 is absent. Accused no. 3 and 5 have not been summoned. Sh. Shiv Prem, Ld. proxy counsel for accused no.1. Summons issued to accused no.2 received back with the report of adjournment from SHO PS Subzi Mandi. Summons issued to accused no. 2 received back served through email. Let fresh summons be issued to accused no. 2 through SHO PS Subzi Mandi. If the summons remain unserved for any reason whatsoever, then the same be served by way of affixation. Complainant is directed to collect dasti copy to serve and report as per rules. Be put up on 29.04.2025. (Mayank Mittal) ACJM(Special Acts) : Central District: THC: Delhi: 04.02.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 625 Oct 2024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: Ct. Cases 584/2023 INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) Vs. SUPERCITY DEVELOPERS PVT LTD CNR DLCT02-007484-2023 25.10.2024 Present : Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for the complainant. Accused No.1 and 2 absent. Accused No.3 to 5 have not been summoned. Ms. Saumya Sharma, Ld. Counsel for accused No.1 (memo of appearance filed). Copy of complaint supplied to learned counsel for accused No.1. Summons issued to accused No.2 has not yet received back. Let fresh summons be issued to accused No.2 through SHO PS Subzi Mandi, returnable for the next date of hearing. If the summons remain unserved for any reason whatsoever, then the same be served by way of affixation. Let copy of additional summons be given dasti to complainant for service upon accused No.2 and to report on the next date of hearing. Complainant is directed to file e-mail ID of accused No.2 within 15 days from today. Ahlmad is directed to issue summons to accused No.2 through e-mail as per rules for the next date of hearing i.e. on 04.02.2025. (Mayank Mittal) ACJM(Special Acts) : Central District: THC: Delhi: 25.10.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 519 Jul 2024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: Ct. Cases584/2023 INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) Vs. SUPERCITY DEVELOPERS PVT LTD CNR No. DLCT02-007484-2023 19.07.2024 Present: Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for the complainant. Accused No.1 and 2 absent. Accused 3 to 5 have not been summoned. Fresh and correct address of accused No.1 and 2 filed on behalf of the complainant. Ahlmad is directed to issue summons afresh to accused No.1 and 2 at the fresh address filed today through ordinary process as well as through e-mail for the next date of hearing. Complainant is directed to collect dasti copy of additional summons and speed post for service upon accused No.1 and 2 and to report on the next date. Be put up on 25.10.2024. (Mayank Mittal) ACJM (Special Acts): Central District: THC: Delhi: 19.07.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 422 Mar 2024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: Ct. Cases 584/2023 INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) Vs. SUPERCITY DEVELOPERS PVT LTD CNR No. DLCT02-007484-2023 22.03.2024 Present: Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for the complainant. Accused no. 1 and 2 absent. Accused no. 3 to 5 have not been summoned. Summons issued to accused no. 1 and 2 received back unserved. Complainant is directed to file fresh and correct address of accused no. 1 and 2 for service of accused no. 1 and 2 within 20 days from today for the next date of hearing i.e. 19.07.2024. Complainant is further directed to file E-mail ID of accused no. 1 and 2 for the next date of hearing. Ahlmad is directed to arrange the file before next date of hearing. (Mayank Mitttal) ACMM (Special Acts): Central District: THC: Delhi: 22.03.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 305 Dec 2023
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: Ct. Cases 584/2023 INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) Vs. SUPERCITY DEVELOPERS PVT LTD CNR No. DLCT02-007484-2023 05.12.2023 Present: Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for the complainant. Accused No.3 to 5 have not been summoned. Summons to accused No.1 and 2 are received back unserved. Report perused. Issue fresh summons to accused No.1 and 2 on the registered office address of accused No.1, returnable for 22.03.2024. Summons be also served to accused No.1 and 2 by the complainant on e-mail ID of accused No.1 and compliance report be filed on the next date of hearing. (Anurag Thakur) ACMM(Special Acts) : Central District: THC: Delhi: 05.12.2023 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: Ct. Cases 584/2023 INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) Vs. M/S SUPERCITY DEVELOPERS PVT LTD & ORS. CNR-DLCT02-007484-2023 11.08.2023 Present:- Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for the complainant. An oral application u/s 91 Cr.P.C for placing on record copy of Master Data of accused no. 1 company as available on the MCA website and details of Directors of accused no. 1 is made on behalf of complainant by the Ld. SPP. The copy…
Order 109 May 2023
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: Ct. Cases 584/2023 INCOME TAX OFFICE (ITO) Vs. M/S SUPERCITY DEVELOPERS PVT LTD & ORS. CNR-DLCT02-007484-2023 09.05.2023 Present:- Sh. Manmeet Singh Arora, Ld. SPP for the complainant. Ld. SPP for the complainant has submitted that the matter has now been allocated to him and he sought some time to comply with previous order. The request is acceded to. Accordingly, relist the matter for purpose already fixed for 11.08.2023. (Anurag Thakur) ACMM(Special Acts) : Central District: THC: Delhi: 09.05.2023 -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
