SHER BAHADURVsHARIOM AND ANR +1 more

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 22 CS DJ/1247/2023
DLCT010161472023
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
05.08.2026
Present: Sh. M.P.S. Kasana with Ms. Preeti Kumari and Sh. Arpit
Gangwar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Rajendra Chhabra with Ms. Pooja Tiwari, Ld. Counsel
for defendant alongwith Sh. Mayank Sharma, son of
defendant.
Previous cost not paid. Today also, adjournment is sought
by Ld. Counsel for defendant on the ground that still he has not received
the original documents from the previous counsel, which is allowed
subject to further cost of Rs.2,000/- to be paid to the plaintiff. One last
opportunity is given to the defendant to address arguments on the pending
application, otherwise the same will be decided on merit.
Put up for arguments as per Order 12 Rule 6 read with
Order 15 Rule 1 and Order 14 Rule 1 (6) CPC on 15.09.2026.
(Priyanka Bhagat)
DJ-07/Central/THC
05.08.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 21 CS DJ 1247/23
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
08.07.2026
Present: Sh. M.P.S. Khanna, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Rajendra Chhabra, New Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Previous cost of Rs.1,000 is paid by defendant.
2. New counsel for defendant states that certain original
documents are lying with the previous advocate and he will be contacted
to hand over the same to the defendant. He further states that he needs
certified copy of judicial file to argue.
3. Ld. Counsel for plaintiff opposed the said adjournment on
the ground that despite giving ample opportunity, the defendant did not
take step earlier. The defendant is further burdened with cost of Rs.1,000
to be paid to the plaintiff for delaying the case.
4. Put up for arguments as per Order 12 Rule 6 read with
Order 15 Rule 1 and Order 14 Rule 1 (6) CPC on 05.08.2026.
(Naresh Kumar Laka)
DJ-07/Central/THC
08.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 20 CS DJ 1247/23
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
15.05.2026
Present: Sh. M.P.S. Khanna, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Mr. Arya, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the defendant through VC.
On the last date, specific direction was given to the Ld. Counsels
appear physically to argue the case but the Ld. Counsel for the defendant did
not appear and even the voice of Ld. Proxy counsel who is appearing through
VC, is not audible at all. Accordingly, the defendant is burdened with cost of
Rs. 1000 to be paid to the plaintiff for delaying the case.
Put up for payment of cost and arguments as per Order 12 Rule 6
CPC on 08.07.2026.
(Naresh Kumar Laka)
DJ-07/Central/THC
15.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 20 CS DJ 1247/23
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
20.04.2026
Present: Sh. M.P.S. Khanna, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff (through VC).
Sh. Hariom, defendant no. 1 in person.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff states that he could not appear
physically on the ground that he is not well. Defendant also states that his
counsel appeared in the morning, but now he has left to Hon’ble High
Court of Delhi to attend some other matter. He has also stated that he is
carrying the cost. Same be paid on the next date.
Both the counsel for parties are directed to appear physically
to argue as per last order. Put up on 15.05.2026.
(Naresh Kumar Laka)
DJ-07/Central/THC
20.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 8 CS DJ 1247/23
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
09.03.2026
Present: Sh. Shubham Kumar (through VC) with Ms. Akansha
Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Abhinav Arya (through VC) with Sh. Aryan Sachdeva,
Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Affidavit of admission/denial of documents on behalf of
defendant no. 1 filed. Copy already supplied.
2. Previous cost be paid within 3 days through online mode and
its proof be filed on record. File perused.
3. Put up for arguments as per Order 12 Rule 6 read with Order
15 Rule 1 and Order 14 Rule 1 (6) CPC on 20.04.2026. Voice of counsel are
not audible through VC and they are directed to appear physically on the
next date or obtain better network connection.
(Naresh Kumar Laka)
DJ-07/Central/THC
09.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 5 CS DJ 1247/23
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
02.02.2026
Present: Ms. Preeti, Ld. Proxy counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Aryan Sachdeva, Ld. Counsel for defendants through VC.
Defendant no.1 in person.
Two weeks time is sought for filing affidavit of admission/
denial of documents on behalf of defendants.
2. On the last date, a cost of Rs. 1,000/- was imposed for the
same purpose, but still the said order has not been complied. Defendants
are further burdened with a cost of Rs. 2,000/- to be paid to plaintiff for
delaying the case.
3. Put up for filing of affidavit of admission/denial of documents
by the defendants with advance copy to the opposite party/counsel,
payment of cost and framing of issues on 09.03.2026. As requested, copy
of the order be given dasti to the defendant.
(Naresh Kumar Laka)
DJ-07/Central/THC
02.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 13 CS DJ 1247/23
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
14.01.2026
Present: Ms. Preeti, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Abhinav, Ld. Counsel for the defendant through VC.
Affidavit of admission/denial of documents filed on behalf of
the plaintiff. Extra copy is kept on record and same be supplied to the
opposite counsel as and when he appears.
2. Defendant did not file affidavit of admission/denial of
documents. Accordingly, the defendant is burdened with cost of Rs. 1000 to
be paid to the plaintiff for delaying the case.
3. Put up for filing the same and framing of issues on 02.02.2026
(Naresh Kumar Laka)
DJ-07/Central/THC
14.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 11 CS DJ 1247/23
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
10.10.2025
Ld. Presiding Officer is on half day leave today (i.e. F/N).
Present: Sh. Shubham Kumar with Ms. Akansha Tripathi, Ld. Counsel
for plaintiff.
Sh. Jatin Kadam, Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 1 through VC.
Defendant no. 1 in person.
Defendant no. 1 has already filed his WS. Copy supplied.
As per direction of Ld. Presiding Officer, put up for purpose
fixed on 24.11.2025.
(Reader)
In the court of Sh. Naresh Kumar Laka,
District Judge-07, Central, THC
10.10.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 3 CS DJ 1247/23
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
28.08.2025
Present: None for parties despite repeated calls.
Defendant no. 1 has already filed his WS. If the defendant
has not paid the previous cost, same be also paid within 7 days through
online mode to the plaintiff, failing which WS will not be read.
Put up for filing of replication, affidavit of
admission/denial of documents with advance copy to opposite counsel
and framing of issues on 10.10.2025.
(Naresh Kumar Laka)
DJ-07, Central, THC
28.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 21 CS DJ 1247/23
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
16.07.2025
Present: Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Jatin Kadam, Ld. Counsel for the defendant through VC.
Vide my separate order announced in the open court today,
the application under Orde 9 Rule 13 CPC filed by the defendant no.1 has
been allowed subject to cost of Rs. 10,000 to be paid to the plaintiff on the
next date for causing inconvenience and delay. The impugned
judgment/decree is set aside qua defendant no.1. The defendant no.1 is
given an opportunity to file WS within 30 days with advance copy to
opposite counsel.
Put up for further proceeding on 28.08.2025. Copy of order
be given dasti.
(Naresh Kumar Laka)
DJ-07, Central, THC
16.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 33 CS DJ 1247/23
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
05.06.2025
Present: None.
Written argument alongwith case laws have been filed in the
meantime. I need time to go through the same.
Put up for order on 16.07.2025.
(Naresh Kumar Laka)
DJ-07, Central, THC
05.06.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 31 CS DJ 1247/23
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
17.05.2025
Present: Sh. Anurag Malik, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Laksh Khanna with Sh. Jatin Kadam and Sh. Abhinav
Kumar, Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 1.
Previous cost of Rs.3,000 paid by the defendant no. 1 to
counsel for plaintiff.
2. Detailed argument under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC filed on
behalf of defendant no. 1 heard.
3. Put up for order on 05.06.2025. Defendant is given liberty to
file the relevant case laws and written argument, if any, in the meantime.
(Naresh Kumar Laka)
DJ-07, Central, THC
17.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 37 CS DJ 1247/23
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
02.05.2025
Present: Sh. Anurag Malik with Sh. Shubham Kumar and Sh.
Abhishek Maheshwari, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Sidharth Kaushik, Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 1
alongwith defendant no. 1.
None for defendant no. 2.
Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 1 seeks adjournment on the
ground that he has been engaged recently. Same is strongly opposed.
2. The defendant no. 1 is burdened with cost of Rs.3,000 to be
paid to the plaintiff for delaying the case.
3. Put up for payment of cost and argument on pending
application on 17.05.2025.
(Naresh Kumar Laka)
DJ-07, Central, THC
02.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 19 CS DJ 1247/23
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
22.02.2025
Present: None for plaintiff.
Defendant no. 1 in person.
Adjournment is sought on the ground that advocates are
abstaining from work today.
Put up for further proceeding on 02.05.2025.
(Naresh Kumar Laka)
DJ-07, Central, THC
22.02.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 26 CS DJ 1247/23
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
18.01.2025
Present: None for the plaintiff.
Ms. Alka Singh and Sh. Vaibhav Tomar, Ld. Counsels for
defendant No. 1.
Part arguments heard on the application under Order 9 Rule
13 CPC.
From the perusal of the record, it is seen that the impugned
judgment was passed as per order 8 Rule 10 CPC because the defendants
failed to file WS.
The provision of Order 9 Rule 13 CPC is not applicable to
the said situation.
Now, Ld. Counsel for defendant No. 1 seeks time to peruse
the relevant provision of law and take appropriate steps.
Put up for further arguments on 22.02.2025.
(Naresh Kumar Laka)
DJ-07, Central, THC
18.01.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 20 CS DJ 1247/23
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
17.01.2025
Present: Sh. Shubham Kumar with Sh. Anurag, Ld. Counsel for
plaintiff.
Ms. Alka Singh, Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 1
(through VC).
Part argument heard. Ld. Counsel for defendant
requested to address the argument physically as VC network is not
working properly.
Accordingly, put up for argument on pending
applications on 18.01.2025 at 11 AM.
(Naresh Kumar Laka)
DJ-07, Central, THC
17.01.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 15 CS DJ 1247/23
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
07.12.2024
Present: Sh. Shubam Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff alongwith
plaintiff.
Ms. Alka Singh with Sh. Vaibhav Tomar, Ms. Ishika
Chauhan & Ms. Pooja Giri, Ld. Counsel for defendant no.1.
Two applications have been filed under Order 9 Rule 13
CPC seeking setting aside of the exparte order/judgment dated
23.09.2024 and under Order 8 Rule 1(a) CPC on behalf of defendant no.
1.
2. Ld. Counsel for plaintiff states that he has not received the
copy. Another physical copy supplied today. Time is sought to file reply.
The same be filed within 15 days with advance copy to opposite counsel.
3. Put up for reply and argument on the said two applications
on 17.01.2025.
(Naresh Kumar Laka)
DJ-07, Central, THC
07.12.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 8CS DJ 1247/23
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
23.09.2024 At 4.15 PM
Present: None.
Vide my separate judgment announced in the open court
today, the suit of the plaintiff is partly decreed for recovery of possession
of the suit property i.e. Shop No.1 on the ground floor, Freehold Built-Up
property bearing Municipal No. B-1390, Built on portion of Old Plot No.
7A, Situated at Shashtri Nagar, Delhi-110052 against both defendants.
Decree sheet be prepared accordingly. However, this court is of the
considered opinion that the matter requires evidence and trial for
remaining reliefs.
Accordingly, put up for ex-parte PE on 07.12.2024.
(Naresh Kumar Laka)
DJ-07, Central, THC
23.09.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 8CS DJ1247/23
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
23.09.2024
Present: Sh. M.P.S. Kasana with Sh. Shubham Kumar, Ld. Counsel
for the plaintiff.
None for the defendants despite repeated calls.
From the previous order sheets, it is revealed that Counsel
for the defendant no.1 had appeared on the previous dates of hearing
which shows that the defendant no.1 was well aware of the present suit
but despite giving ample opportunities, no WS has been filed by him and
the period of limitation already expired. Accordingly, his right to file WS
is closed.
2. Summons issued to the defendant no.2 earlier received with
the report
‘refused’ and it was treated as due service but defendant no.2
did not appear before this court. Accordingly, right of defendant no.2 to
file WS is also closed. Both the defendants are proceeded ex-parte also.
3. Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff states that a judgment can be
passed straightway as per Order 8 Rule 10 CPC. Accordingly, arguments
heard.
4. Put up for order at 4.00 PM.
(Naresh Kumar Laka)
DJ-07, Central, THC
23.09.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 5 CS DJ 1247/23
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
06.05.2024
Present: Sh. Shubham Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Ms. Shweta Panchal and Ms. Aarti, Ld. Counsel for
defendant no. 1.
None for defendant no. 2.
Summons issued to the defendant no. 2 received with
the report ‘refused’. Same is treated as due service as per law.
2. Now, adjournment is sought by Ld. Counsel for
defendant no. 1 to file WS on the ground that counsel has been
engaged recently. Both the defendants are given opportunity to
file WS within 30 days from the date of service with advance
copy to opposite counsel.
3. Put up for completion of pleadings and arguments on
the stay application, if any, on 22.07.2024.
(Naresh Kumar Laka)
DJ-07, Central THC
Delhi/06.05.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 12 CS DJ 1247/23
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
04.04.2024
Present: Sh. Shubham Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
None for defendants.
Summons issued to defendant no. 1 received back
with the report “refused”. Summons issued to defendant no. 2
were not served.
2. There is no report that the said summons were served
by way of affixation on the ground of refusal. Accordingly, there
is a defect in the service.
3. Issue fresh summons for the settlement of issues of
the suit to the defendants on filing of PF/RC to be served
personally or through affixation, returnable on 06.05.2024. The
documents received with the summons be re-used by the Ahlmad.
(Naresh Kumar Laka)
DJ-07, Central, THC
Delhi/04.04.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CNR NO. DLCT01-016147-2023
CS No. 175/23 (ID No. 1247/23)
Sher Bahadur
Vs.
Hariom & Ors.
22.02.2024
Present: Sh. Rohit Parashar, Ld. counsel for plaintiff through
VC.
Ld. Presiding Officer is on leave today. As per the
directions of the Ld. Presiding Officer, put up for further
proceedings on 04.04.2024.
(Reader)
22.02.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CNR NO. DLCT01-016147-2023
CS No. 175/23 (ID No. 1247/23)
Sher Bahadur
Vs.
Hariom & Ors.
18.01.2024
Present: Sh. Pushpak Panchol, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
Ld. Presiding Officer is on leave today. As per directions
of the Ld. Presiding Officer, put for purpose fixed on 22.02.2024.
(READER)
18.01.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CNR NO. DLCT01-016147-2023
CS No. 175/23 (ID No. 1247/23)
Sher Bahadur
Vs.
Hariom & Ors.
09.11.2023
Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be
checked and registered.
Present: Sh. M.P.S. Kasana, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
Heard. Perused.
Issue summons for settlement of issues of the suit to the
defendants on filing of PF/ Speed Post/ Approved Courier for
18.01.2024. Steps be taken within 07 working days.
The plaintiff can also serve the defendants through
Whatsapp and email ID subject to filing of the PDF file and
affidavit that the email ID and mobile number belong to the
defendants.
(Alok Shukla)
ADJ-07, Central, THC
Delhi/09.11.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDGMENT
Pdf Text: 17 CS DJ 1247/2023
DLCT010161472023
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
15.09.2026
Present: Sh. Shubham, Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff (through
VC).
Ms. Pooja Tiwari, Ld. Proxy Counsel for defendants.
Ld. Proxy Counsel for defendants seeks adjournment on
the ground that main counsel has met with an accident while coming to
the court.
Put up for arguments as per Order 12 Rule 6 read with
Order 15 Rule 1 and Order 14 Rule 1 (6) CPC on 24.10.2026.
(Priyanka Bhagat)
DJ-07/Central/THC
15.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 22 CS DJ/1247/2023
DLCT010161472023
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
05.08.2026
Present: Sh. M.P.S. Kasana with Ms. Preeti Kumari and Sh. Arpit
Gangwar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Rajendra Chhabra with Ms. Pooja Tiwari, Ld. Counsel
for defendant alongwith Sh. Mayank Sharma, son of
defendant.
Previous cost not paid. Today also, adjournment is sought
by Ld. Counsel for defendant on the ground that still he has not received
the original documents from the previous counsel, which is allowed
subject to further cost of Rs.2,000/- to be paid to the plaintiff. One last
opportunity is given to the defendant to address arguments on the pending
application, otherwise the same will be decided on merit.
Put up for arguments as per Order 12 Rule 6 read with
Order 15 Rule 1 and Order 14 Rule 1 (6) CPC on 15.09.2026.
(Priyanka Bhagat)
DJ-07/Central/THC
05.08.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 21 CS DJ 1247/23
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
08.07.2026
Present: Sh. M.P.S. Khanna, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Rajendra Chhabra, New Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Previous cost of Rs.1,000 is paid by defendant.
2. New counsel for defendant states that certain original
documents are lying with the previous advocate and he will be contacted
to hand over the same to the defendant. He further states that he needs
certified copy of judicial file to argue.
3. Ld. Counsel for plaintiff opposed the said adjournment on
the ground that despite giving ample opportunity, the defendant did not
take step earlier. The defendant is further burdened with cost of Rs.1,000
to be paid to the plaintiff for delaying the case.
4. Put up for arguments as per Order 12 Rule 6 read with
Order 15 Rule 1 and Order 14 Rule 1 (6) CPC on 05.08.2026.
(Naresh Kumar Laka)
DJ-07/Central/THC
08.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 20 CS DJ 1247/23
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
15.05.2026
Present: Sh. M.P.S. Khanna, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Mr. Arya, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the defendant through VC.
On the last date, specific direction was given to the Ld. Counsels
appear physically to argue the case but the Ld. Counsel for the defendant did
not appear and even the voice of Ld. Proxy counsel who is appearing through
VC, is not audible at all. Accordingly, the defendant is burdened with cost of
Rs. 1000 to be paid to the plaintiff for delaying the case.
Put up for payment of cost and arguments as per Order 12 Rule 6
CPC on 08.07.2026.
(Naresh Kumar Laka)
DJ-07/Central/THC
15.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 20 CS DJ 1247/23
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
20.04.2026
Present: Sh. M.P.S. Khanna, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff (through VC).
Sh. Hariom, defendant no. 1 in person.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff states that he could not appear
physically on the ground that he is not well. Defendant also states that his
counsel appeared in the morning, but now he has left to Hon’ble High
Court of Delhi to attend some other matter. He has also stated that he is
carrying the cost. Same be paid on the next date.
Both the counsel for parties are directed to appear physically
to argue as per last order. Put up on 15.05.2026.
(Naresh Kumar Laka)
DJ-07/Central/THC
20.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 8 CS DJ 1247/23
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
09.03.2026
Present: Sh. Shubham Kumar (through VC) with Ms. Akansha
Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Abhinav Arya (through VC) with Sh. Aryan Sachdeva,
Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Affidavit of admission/denial of documents on behalf of
defendant no. 1 filed. Copy already supplied.
2. Previous cost be paid within 3 days through online mode and
its proof be filed on record. File perused.
3. Put up for arguments as per Order 12 Rule 6 read with Order
15 Rule 1 and Order 14 Rule 1 (6) CPC on 20.04.2026. Voice of counsel are
not audible through VC and they are directed to appear physically on the
next date or obtain better network connection.
(Naresh Kumar Laka)
DJ-07/Central/THC
09.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 5 CS DJ 1247/23
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
02.02.2026
Present: Ms. Preeti, Ld. Proxy counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Aryan Sachdeva, Ld. Counsel for defendants through VC.
Defendant no.1 in person.
Two weeks time is sought for filing affidavit of admission/
denial of documents on behalf of defendants.
2. On the last date, a cost of Rs. 1,000/- was imposed for the
same purpose, but still the said order has not been complied. Defendants
are further burdened with a cost of Rs. 2,000/- to be paid to plaintiff for
delaying the case.
3. Put up for filing of affidavit of admission/denial of documents
by the defendants with advance copy to the opposite party/counsel,
payment of cost and framing of issues on 09.03.2026. As requested, copy
of the order be given dasti to the defendant.
(Naresh Kumar Laka)
DJ-07/Central/THC
02.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 13 CS DJ 1247/23
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
14.01.2026
Present: Ms. Preeti, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Abhinav, Ld. Counsel for the defendant through VC.
Affidavit of admission/denial of documents filed on behalf of
the plaintiff. Extra copy is kept on record and same be supplied to the
opposite counsel as and when he appears.
2. Defendant did not file affidavit of admission/denial of
documents. Accordingly, the defendant is burdened with cost of Rs. 1000 to
be paid to the plaintiff for delaying the case.
3. Put up for filing the same and framing of issues on 02.02.2026
(Naresh Kumar Laka)
DJ-07/Central/THC
14.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 11 CS DJ 1247/23
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
10.10.2025
Ld. Presiding Officer is on half day leave today (i.e. F/N).
Present: Sh. Shubham Kumar with Ms. Akansha Tripathi, Ld. Counsel
for plaintiff.
Sh. Jatin Kadam, Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 1 through VC.
Defendant no. 1 in person.
Defendant no. 1 has already filed his WS. Copy supplied.
As per direction of Ld. Presiding Officer, put up for purpose
fixed on 24.11.2025.
(Reader)
In the court of Sh. Naresh Kumar Laka,
District Judge-07, Central, THC
10.10.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 3 CS DJ 1247/23
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
28.08.2025
Present: None for parties despite repeated calls.
Defendant no. 1 has already filed his WS. If the defendant
has not paid the previous cost, same be also paid within 7 days through
online mode to the plaintiff, failing which WS will not be read.
Put up for filing of replication, affidavit of
admission/denial of documents with advance copy to opposite counsel
and framing of issues on 10.10.2025.
(Naresh Kumar Laka)
DJ-07, Central, THC
28.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 21 CS DJ 1247/23
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
16.07.2025
Present: Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Jatin Kadam, Ld. Counsel for the defendant through VC.
Vide my separate order announced in the open court today,
the application under Orde 9 Rule 13 CPC filed by the defendant no.1 has
been allowed subject to cost of Rs. 10,000 to be paid to the plaintiff on the
next date for causing inconvenience and delay. The impugned
judgment/decree is set aside qua defendant no.1. The defendant no.1 is
given an opportunity to file WS within 30 days with advance copy to
opposite counsel.
Put up for further proceeding on 28.08.2025. Copy of order
be given dasti.
(Naresh Kumar Laka)
DJ-07, Central, THC
16.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 33 CS DJ 1247/23
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
05.06.2025
Present: None.
Written argument alongwith case laws have been filed in the
meantime. I need time to go through the same.
Put up for order on 16.07.2025.
(Naresh Kumar Laka)
DJ-07, Central, THC
05.06.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 31 CS DJ 1247/23
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
17.05.2025
Present: Sh. Anurag Malik, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Laksh Khanna with Sh. Jatin Kadam and Sh. Abhinav
Kumar, Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 1.
Previous cost of Rs.3,000 paid by the defendant no. 1 to
counsel for plaintiff.
2. Detailed argument under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC filed on
behalf of defendant no. 1 heard.
3. Put up for order on 05.06.2025. Defendant is given liberty to
file the relevant case laws and written argument, if any, in the meantime.
(Naresh Kumar Laka)
DJ-07, Central, THC
17.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 37 CS DJ 1247/23
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
02.05.2025
Present: Sh. Anurag Malik with Sh. Shubham Kumar and Sh.
Abhishek Maheshwari, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Sidharth Kaushik, Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 1
alongwith defendant no. 1.
None for defendant no. 2.
Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 1 seeks adjournment on the
ground that he has been engaged recently. Same is strongly opposed.
2. The defendant no. 1 is burdened with cost of Rs.3,000 to be
paid to the plaintiff for delaying the case.
3. Put up for payment of cost and argument on pending
application on 17.05.2025.
(Naresh Kumar Laka)
DJ-07, Central, THC
02.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 19 CS DJ 1247/23
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
22.02.2025
Present: None for plaintiff.
Defendant no. 1 in person.
Adjournment is sought on the ground that advocates are
abstaining from work today.
Put up for further proceeding on 02.05.2025.
(Naresh Kumar Laka)
DJ-07, Central, THC
22.02.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 26 CS DJ 1247/23
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
18.01.2025
Present: None for the plaintiff.
Ms. Alka Singh and Sh. Vaibhav Tomar, Ld. Counsels for
defendant No. 1.
Part arguments heard on the application under Order 9 Rule
13 CPC.
From the perusal of the record, it is seen that the impugned
judgment was passed as per order 8 Rule 10 CPC because the defendants
failed to file WS.
The provision of Order 9 Rule 13 CPC is not applicable to
the said situation.
Now, Ld. Counsel for defendant No. 1 seeks time to peruse
the relevant provision of law and take appropriate steps.
Put up for further arguments on 22.02.2025.
(Naresh Kumar Laka)
DJ-07, Central, THC
18.01.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 20 CS DJ 1247/23
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
17.01.2025
Present: Sh. Shubham Kumar with Sh. Anurag, Ld. Counsel for
plaintiff.
Ms. Alka Singh, Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 1
(through VC).
Part argument heard. Ld. Counsel for defendant
requested to address the argument physically as VC network is not
working properly.
Accordingly, put up for argument on pending
applications on 18.01.2025 at 11 AM.
(Naresh Kumar Laka)
DJ-07, Central, THC
17.01.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 15 CS DJ 1247/23
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
07.12.2024
Present: Sh. Shubam Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff alongwith
plaintiff.
Ms. Alka Singh with Sh. Vaibhav Tomar, Ms. Ishika
Chauhan & Ms. Pooja Giri, Ld. Counsel for defendant no.1.
Two applications have been filed under Order 9 Rule 13
CPC seeking setting aside of the exparte order/judgment dated
23.09.2024 and under Order 8 Rule 1(a) CPC on behalf of defendant no.
1.
2. Ld. Counsel for plaintiff states that he has not received the
copy. Another physical copy supplied today. Time is sought to file reply.
The same be filed within 15 days with advance copy to opposite counsel.
3. Put up for reply and argument on the said two applications
on 17.01.2025.
(Naresh Kumar Laka)
DJ-07, Central, THC
07.12.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 8CS DJ 1247/23
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
23.09.2024 At 4.15 PM
Present: None.
Vide my separate judgment announced in the open court
today, the suit of the plaintiff is partly decreed for recovery of possession
of the suit property i.e. Shop No.1 on the ground floor, Freehold Built-Up
property bearing Municipal No. B-1390, Built on portion of Old Plot No.
7A, Situated at Shashtri Nagar, Delhi-110052 against both defendants.
Decree sheet be prepared accordingly. However, this court is of the
considered opinion that the matter requires evidence and trial for
remaining reliefs.
Accordingly, put up for ex-parte PE on 07.12.2024.
(Naresh Kumar Laka)
DJ-07, Central, THC
23.09.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 8CS DJ1247/23
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
23.09.2024
Present: Sh. M.P.S. Kasana with Sh. Shubham Kumar, Ld. Counsel
for the plaintiff.
None for the defendants despite repeated calls.
From the previous order sheets, it is revealed that Counsel
for the defendant no.1 had appeared on the previous dates of hearing
which shows that the defendant no.1 was well aware of the present suit
but despite giving ample opportunities, no WS has been filed by him and
the period of limitation already expired. Accordingly, his right to file WS
is closed.
2. Summons issued to the defendant no.2 earlier received with
the report
‘refused’ and it was treated as due service but defendant no.2
did not appear before this court. Accordingly, right of defendant no.2 to
file WS is also closed. Both the defendants are proceeded ex-parte also.
3. Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff states that a judgment can be
passed straightway as per Order 8 Rule 10 CPC. Accordingly, arguments
heard.
4. Put up for order at 4.00 PM.
(Naresh Kumar Laka)
DJ-07, Central, THC
23.09.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 5 CS DJ 1247/23
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
06.05.2024
Present: Sh. Shubham Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Ms. Shweta Panchal and Ms. Aarti, Ld. Counsel for
defendant no. 1.
None for defendant no. 2.
Summons issued to the defendant no. 2 received with
the report ‘refused’. Same is treated as due service as per law.
2. Now, adjournment is sought by Ld. Counsel for
defendant no. 1 to file WS on the ground that counsel has been
engaged recently. Both the defendants are given opportunity to
file WS within 30 days from the date of service with advance
copy to opposite counsel.
3. Put up for completion of pleadings and arguments on
the stay application, if any, on 22.07.2024.
(Naresh Kumar Laka)
DJ-07, Central THC
Delhi/06.05.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 12 CS DJ 1247/23
SHER BAHADUR Vs. HARIOM AND ANR
04.04.2024
Present: Sh. Shubham Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
None for defendants.
Summons issued to defendant no. 1 received back
with the report “refused”. Summons issued to defendant no. 2
were not served.
2. There is no report that the said summons were served
by way of affixation on the ground of refusal. Accordingly, there
is a defect in the service.
3. Issue fresh summons for the settlement of issues of
the suit to the defendants on filing of PF/RC to be served
personally or through affixation, returnable on 06.05.2024. The
documents received with the summons be re-used by the Ahlmad.
(Naresh Kumar Laka)
DJ-07, Central, THC
Delhi/04.04.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CNR NO. DLCT01-016147-2023
CS No. 175/23 (ID No. 1247/23)
Sher Bahadur
Vs.
Hariom & Ors.
22.02.2024
Present: Sh. Rohit Parashar, Ld. counsel for plaintiff through
VC.
Ld. Presiding Officer is on leave today. As per the
directions of the Ld. Presiding Officer, put up for further
proceedings on 04.04.2024.
(Reader)
22.02.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CNR NO. DLCT01-016147-2023
CS No. 175/23 (ID No. 1247/23)
Sher Bahadur
Vs.
Hariom & Ors.
18.01.2024
Present: Sh. Pushpak Panchol, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
Ld. Presiding Officer is on leave today. As per directions
of the Ld. Presiding Officer, put for purpose fixed on 22.02.2024.
(READER)
18.01.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CNR NO. DLCT01-016147-2023
CS No. 175/23 (ID No. 1247/23)
Sher Bahadur
Vs.
Hariom & Ors.
09.11.2023
Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be
checked and registered.
Present: Sh. M.P.S. Kasana, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
Heard. Perused.
Issue summons for settlement of issues of the suit to the
defendants on filing of PF/ Speed Post/ Approved Courier for
18.01.2024. Steps be taken within 07 working days.
The plaintiff can also serve the defendants through
Whatsapp and email ID subject to filing of the PDF file and
affidavit that the email ID and mobile number belong to the
defendants.
(Alok Shukla)
ADJ-07, Central, THC
Delhi/09.11.2023
-- 1 of 1 --