Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, 66TH COURT, ANDHERI, MUMBAI. C.C. NO. 368/DV/2018 Zeenat Firoz Shaikh ..Applicant V/s. Firoz Latif Shaikh ..Respondents COMMON ORDER BELOW CONSENT TERM EXH. 14 AND WITHDRAWL APPLICATION EXH.15 FILED BY APPLICANT The applicant viz. Zeenath Firoz Shaikh and respondent Firoz Latif Shaikh are present before the court. They have filed this consent term. They are identified by their Ld. Counsels Archana Singh and Mr. Kalam Shaikh respectively. The contents of consent terms are…
JEENAT FIROZ SHAIKHVsFIROZ LATIF SHAIKH
TrustJury record updated 27 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 6600368/2018
- Registration Date
- 10 Dec 2018
Advocates
0No advocate information is available in this record.
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 23-01-2019 Business: Resumed today Ld APP is absent Applicant is present with advocate Respondent 1 is present with advocate Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES Next Hearing Date: 08-02-2019 Date: 08-02-2019 Business: Resumed today Ld APP is present Both the parties are present with advocate. Matter is referred for mediation Next Purpose: MEDIATION Next Hearing Date: 20-02-2019 Date: 20-02-2019 Business: Resumed today Ld APP is present, Ld MM is on leave, Board is discharged, Charge with ACMM, 22nd court Next Purpose: MEDIATION Next Hearing Date: 20-03-2019 Date: 20-03-2019 Business: Resumed today Ld APP is present Both the parties are absent Advocates for applicant is present Next Purpose: MEDIATION Next Hearing Date: 18-04-2019 Date: 18-04-2019 Business: Resumed today. Ld MM is on half day leave. Board is discharged. Charge with Rly. Mobile Court Next Purpose: MEDIATION Next Hearing Date: 06-06-2019 Date: 06-06-2019 Business: Applicant absent Ld. Adv. for applicant present (Exh - 12) Application for no say order against the respondents. Respondent absent Ld. Adv. for respondent absent Order below Exh - 12 - today respondent no. 1 and his Ld. Adv. are absent when called. other respondent are also absent, it appears that they are not intersted to submit their say to the application, therefore the application proceed without say of the respondents. Next Purpose: FOR ARGUMENTS Next Hearing Date: 17-06-2019 Date: 17-06-2019 Business: Resumed today Applicant and advocate are absent Respondent and advocate is present Heard argument on Interim. For order on Interim Next Purpose: For order Next Hearing Date: 01-07-2019 Date: 01-07-2019 Business: Applicant absent Ld. Adv. for applicant present Respondent absent Ld. Adv. for respondent absent Order - Interim order passed. 10000/- per month from the date of interim application. Next Purpose: For order Next Hearing Date: 06-08-2019 Date: 06-08-2019 Business: Applicant is absent Ld. Adv. for applicant absent Respondent absent Ld. Adv. for respondent present (Exh - 13) Application for adjournment. Rejected. Order below Exh - 1 Today the applicant and her Ld. Adv. absent when called repeatedly. The matter is listed for evidence. Last opportunity be given to adduce the evidence, failure to do so necessary order in their regard will be passed. Next Purpose: FOR HEARING Next Hearing Date: 26-08-2019 Date: 26-08-2019 Business: Applicant present Ld. Adv. for applicant present Respondent absent Ld. Adv. for respondent absent Next Purpose: FOR HEARING Next Hearing Date: 16-10-2019 Date: 16-10-2019 Business: applicant present, Ld. Adv. for applicant present, Respondent present, Ld. Adv. for respondent present, for evidence. Next Purpose: FOR HEARING Next Hearing Date: 08-11-2019 Date: 08-11-2019 Business: Applicant present, Ld. Adv. for applicant present, Respondent present. Ld. Adv. for respondent present. Consent terms read and recorded. Applicant filed withdrawn application. hence matter is withdrawn. Nature Of Disposal: WITHDRAWN Disposal Date: 08-11-2019
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 815718/2018 Filing Date: 10-12-2018 First Hearing Date: 23rd January 2019 Decision Date: 08th November 2019 Court Number And Judge: 66-Judicial Magistrate (First Class), 66th Court
Orders
3Pdf Text: 1 IN THE COURT OF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE 66TH COURT, ANDHERI MUMBAI C.C. NO. 368/DV/2018 Zeenat Firoz Shaikh ...Applicant v/s. Firoz Latif Shaikh & ors. ...Respondents ORDER BELOW EXH.6 Read the application. No say filed by other side. Heard Ld. Counsel for the applicant at length. Respondents and Ld. Counsel for the respondents are absent when called. 2. It reveals that Ld. Counsel for the applicant has made this application for grant of interim relief. It is her submission…
Pdf Text: 1 IN THE COURT OF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE 66TH COURT, ANDHERI MUMBAI C.C. NO. 368/DV/2018 Zeenat Firoz Shaikh ...Applicant v/s. Firoz Latif Shaikh & ors. ...Respondents ORDER BELOW EXH.6 Read the application. No say filed by other side. Heard Ld. Counsel for the applicant at length. Respondents and Ld. Counsel for the respondents are absent when called. 2. It reveals that Ld. Counsel for the applicant has made this application for grant of interim relief. It is her submission…
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
