Skip to main content
Misc Cases - Miscellaneous Cases

Anil Yadu Satpute Prop Of Ms A S Leather WorksVsSudhakar Lahanu Gite

CNR MHMM18002623202458-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS 58TH COURT
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--Allowed Otherwise
Decision Date: 28th June 2024

TrustJury record updated 29 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
5800053/2024
Registration Date
17 Feb 2024

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act · Sec 138

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 06-03-2024
    Business: As per roznama
    Next Purpose: Miscellaneous Cases in Afternoon Session
    Next Hearing Date: 28-06-2024
    
    Date: 28-06-2024
    Business: Order below Exh. 01
    1. The Delay stands condoned in the interest of justice.
    2. The complaint be registered as per rule.
    3. order dictated and pronounced in open court.
    Nature Of Disposal: Allowed Otherwise
    Disposal Date: 28-06-2024

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 261/2024
    Filing Date: 19-01-2024
    eFiling Number: AMH20230036071C202400001
    eFiling Date: 19-01-2024
    First Hearing Date: 06th March 2024
    Decision Date: 28th June 2024
    Court Number And Judge: 58-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS 58TH COURT

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1Full order available
    28 Jun 2024

    Order Details: Order Below EX 1 Pdf Text: MHMM180026232024 Misc Cases/5800053/2024 Anil Yadu Satpute Prop Of Ms A S Leather Works Vs. Sudhakar Lahanu Gite IN THE COURT OF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, 58TH COURT, BANDRA, MUMBAI ORDER BELOW EXH.01 1. This is an application for condonation of delay of 3 days caused to file the complaint under section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act. 2. It is contended that applicant was suffering from kidney stone and he was discharged from the hospital…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.