Date: 07-12-2019
Business: Matter called out(2.51pm)
Adv.Bhagyashri Vishal i/b R.V.Sankpal and Assoc. for plaintiff present registered C/S No.2138/19.T.O.R.
None for defendant.
Hence, matter is adj to 22/01/2020 for C/S reply.
Later on at 2.58pm
Defendant no.1 and 2 in person present.
Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 22-01-2020
Date: 22-01-2020
Business: PO IS ON LEAVE(SECOND HALF)
Matter is adj to 14/02/2020 for C/S reply.
Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 14-02-2020
Date: 14-02-2020
Business: Matter is called out at 2.04pm
Plaintiff and his advocate absent.
Adv.Reena M.Hadapad for defendant no.3 present.
Adv. for defendant no.3 tendered reply on C/S No.2138/19.T.O.R
Later on at 2.51pm
Adv.Shweta Hajare for tendered vakalatnama for defendant no.1 and 2 without NOC of earlier advocate. T.O.R
Adv. Shweta Hajare for def.1 and 2 undertake to file NOC earlier advocate.
Defendant no.1 and 2 seeking time. Time granted.
Matter is adj to 07/03/2020 for C/s reply of def.no.1 and 2
Later on at 3.23pm
Adv.Bhagyashri Vishal a/w Adv.Vidhee Jain i/b R.V.Sankpal and Associates for plaintiff present.(Applicant)
Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 07-03-2020
Date: 07-03-2020
Business: Court is busy hearing on C/S No.1695/19 in SU 264/83.
Adv.R.V.Sankpal a/w Adv.Amit Jalgaonkar i/b R.V.Sankpal and Associates for plaintiff present.
Adv.Shweta Hajare for defendant present.
Matter is adj to 15/04/2020 for C/S reply.
Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 15-04-2020
Date: 15-04-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 22-04-2020
Date: 22-04-2020
Business: NATIONAL LOCKDOWN.
Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 02-06-2020
Date: 02-06-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 19-06-2020
Date: 19-06-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 17-08-2020
Date: 17-08-2020
Business: Due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 29-09-2020
Date: 29-09-2020
Business: Matter called out(1.20pm)
Adv.Shirin Irani i/b R.V.Snakpal and Associates for plaintiff present. She is pressing for C/S No.2138/2019. However, as none present for defendants.
Matter is adj to 23/10/2020 for C/S reply.
Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 23-10-2020
Date: 23-10-2020
Business: Matter called out(11.56am)
Adv.Shirin Irani a/w Adv.Vidhee Jain i/b R.V.Snkpal and Associates for plaintiff present.
Due to Covid-19 Defendant and his advocate absent.
Defendant not filed C/S reply till date. Hence, they are directed to file C/S reply via e-filing on or before next date.
Plaintiff is at liberty to communicate the present order to the defendant or their advocate via email.
Parties to act on authenticated copy.
Matter is adj to 04/11/2020 for C/S reply
Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 04-11-2020
Date: 04-11-2020
Business: Matter called out at 11.30am
Adv.Shirin Irani a/w Adv.Priya Pervi i/b R.V.Sankpal and Associates for plaintiff present.
Adv. Reena Hadapad for Defendant No.3 present.
Adv. for plaintiff seeking time to file scheduled of amendment. Time granted.
Matter is adj for CS reply on 14.12.2020.
Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 14-12-2020
Date: 14-12-2020
Business: Adv.Shirin Irani i/b R.V.Sankpal and Associates for plaintiff present.
Defendant and his advocate absent.
Matter is adj to 15/01/2021 for C/S reply.
Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 15-01-2021
Date: 15-01-2021
Business: Adv Ravindra Vishnu for plaintiff present.
Adv Pratibha Dharmapurkar for defendant no.3 present. She requested adjournment as senior advocate is absent.
Matter adjd for C/s hearing on 25/02/2021.
Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 25-02-2021
Date: 25-02-2021
Business: CORAM : R.M.SADRANI ( C.R. NO.07)
Adv. Ravindra for Applicant present.
Adv. of defendant No. 3 present.
Defendant No. 1 and 2 present in person.
Order below Chamber summons No. 2138 of 2019.
Perused the Chambers summons, heard both sides. Adv. for the plaintiff submitted that plaintiff No.1 was expired on 13.01.2019, thereafter immediately he moved the Chambers summons of bringing the LRs on record while Chambers summons No. 1281 of 2019. It was allowed on 16.09.2019. Thereafter, on the next day plaintiff No. 2 expired. Therefore, amendment as per Chambers summons No. 1281 of 2019 was remained. Meanwhile, he filed Chambers summons for bringing the same LRs on the record. Plaintiff No.1 and 2 were the parents of the present proposed LRs. He submitted that plaintiff be permitted to bring the LRs on record. Adv for the defendant opposed the Chambers summons that defendant No. 1 was the power of attorney holder of both the deceased plaintiffs. Therefore, no need bring the LRs on record.
As power of attorney different from the bringing the LRs on record there is no substance in the argument of defendant. Considering the nature of prayer following order is passed.
Order
1) Chambers summons No. 2138 of 2019 is hereby allowed in terms of prayer clause a and b.
2) Chambers summons disposed of accordingly.
Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
Disposal Date: 25-02-2021