Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Prema Ramnath Shetty - Suit St. No. 9381 of 2019VsMCGM And Ors

CNR MHCC0100926320198-COURT 08 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--OTHER
Decision Date: 15th October 2019

TrustJury record updated 22 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
103389/2019
Registration Date
11 Sept 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 13-09-2019
    Business: None for plaintiff.
    Adv. Mrs. R.M. Hazare for Deft/MCGM present.
    On oral request of Ld. Adv. for defendant, adjournment is granted.
    Plaintiff is directed to register the suit and NM on or before the next date.
    Adjd to 19/11/2019 for NM reply.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 17-09-2019
    
    Date: 17-09-2019
    Business: N.O.B.T.O.B
    (By precipice)
    Adv. Tanna for plaintiff present.
    Adv. Mrs. R.M. Hazare for Deft/MCGM present.
    On oral request of Ld. Advocate for plaintiff , adjourned date is preponed.
    Adjd to 10-10-2019 for NM Reply.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 07-10-2019
    
    Date: 07-10-2019
    Business: (By precipe)
    N.O.B.T.O.B.
    Adv. N.K. Tanna for plaintiff present and requests  to prepone the date to 09-10-2019. request granted. Plaintiff shall inform to other side about the preponement.
    Adjd to 09-10-2019   for NM reply .
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 09-10-2019
    
    Date: 09-10-2019
    Business: Adv. N.K. Tanna for plaintiff present and tendered Original registered NM No. 3389/19 along with affidavit in support and affidavit of undertaking of the plaintiff. t.o.r.
    None for defendant.
    KB
    LO
    Order
    Ld. Adv. for the plaintiff requested this court on 07-10-2019 to prepone the matter to 09-10-2019, therefore, the matter is taken up today. Ld. Adv. for deft. /MCGM absent though served. Ld. Adv. for plaintiff requests to pass order of temporary injunction restraining deft./MCGM from taking coercive steps against the suit premises as stated in prayer clause (b) of NM No. 3389/19. after careful reading of roznama dated 27-08-2019, this court has already refused any ad-interim relief in favour of the plaintiff. The plaintiff could not bring any new fact on record to interfere in that order. The remedy for the plaintiff was to approach Hon\''ble High Court by filing A.O., if he was aggrieved by the order of this court. Merely because the deft./MCGM\''s officer came for demolition after refusal of ad-interim relief, the plaintiff cannot come to this court to stop the said action when no relief was granted to him earlier. For this reason the prayer in terms of prayer clause (b) of the NM is rejected.
    Authenticated copies be given to the both parties.
    Adjd to  10-10-2019 for NM Reply  .
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 10-10-2019
    
    Date: 10-10-2019
    Business: Adv. N.K. Tanna for plaintiff present.
    Adv. Mrs. R.M. Hazare for Deft 1,2 and 4/MCGM present and tendered reply to NM. Copy served to other side.
    Adv. Sagar Joshi for deft. no.3 present.
    KB
    LO
    Court is busy in hearing old NMs, ad-interim matters. Hence, adjourned.
    Adjd to 11-10-2019  for NM Hearing.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 11-10-2019
    
    Date: 11-10-2019
    Business: Adv. N.K. Tanna for plaintiff present.
    Adv. Mrs. R.M. Hazare for Defts no. 1,2 and 4/MCGM present.
    Adv. Sagar Joshi for deft.no. 3 present.
    KB
    LO
    Heard both side in NM.
    Adjd to 15-10-2019  for  NM Order.
    Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
    Next Hearing Date: 15-10-2019
    
    Date: 15-10-2019
    Business: F.R.S.R. following order on N/M no. 3389/19 is passed
    ORDER
    1. Notice of Motion No. 3389 of 2019 is partly allowed.
    2. The TAC shall convene meeting in presence of structural auditors of both contesting parties and discuss the issues highlighted in the order dated 19.06.2019 in A.O.(St.) No.11348 of 2019 as mentioned in the earlier paragraph of this order.
    3. If the TAC comes to the conclusion that the NDT Tests in the column in foundation are not possible, brief reasons there for be assigned and the TAC will be free to take its decision independently and submit fresh report within a period of four weeks from today.
    4. After the report is submitted by the TAC, defendant no. 1/MCGM will be free to take appropriate action in accordance with the directives and in accordance with the law.
    5. Costs in cause.
    Nature Of Disposal: OTHER
    Disposal Date: 15-10-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 109866/2019
    Filing Date: 11-09-2019
    First Hearing Date: 13th September 2019
    Decision Date: 15th October 2019
    Court Number And Judge: 8-COURT 08 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1Full order available
    15 Oct 2019

    Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: 1 NM no. 3389-19 in ST. no.9381-19 IN THE CITY CIVIL COURT FOR GREATER BOMBAY AT MUMBAI. NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3389 OF 2019 (CNR no. MHCC010092632019) IN STAMP NO. 9381 OF 2019 Prema Ramnath Shetty ] W/o Ramnath Shetty ] Aged : 59 years, Occ. : Business ] Sole Proprietor of Sumeet Bar And Restaurant, ] Tenant in Respect of (I) Shop No.4 (II) Block No.13, ] (III) Blocks No.15 and 16,…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.