Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 28 Aug 2019 · CNR MHCC010085152019
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: :1: NM 312219 IN L.C.STAMP 889919 IN THE CITY CIVIL COURT FOR GREATER BOMBAY AT BOMBAY. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3122 OF 2019 IN L.C. STAMP NO.8899 OF 2019 Mr. Bachchalal Jagdamba Sharma ]...Plaintiff Versus 1. The Municipal Corporation ] of Gr. Mumbai. ]...Defendants CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHRI A.N. MARE (C.R. No.11) DATE : 28th AUGUST, 2019. Mr. Rajesh Singh, Advocate for Plaintiff. Mr. Giri, Advocate for defendant/B.M.C. ORAL ORDER 1. The plaintiff has filed present suit to challenge a Notice under Section 354A of the MMC Act in respect of the suit premises i.e. Room No.4, Ground floor, Near RadhaKrishna Mandir, Dargah Road, Khindipada, Bhandup (West), Mumbai 400 078. Considering the submissions advanced before the Court the statusquo was directed to be maintained by the parties in respect of the suit premises as seen in photograph X1. On 21.8.2019, when the matter was taken up, the officers of defendant Corporation Mr. Barwade submitted that the -- 1 of 5 -- : 2 : NM 312219 IN L.C.STAMP 889919 structures in the photographs submitted by the plaintiffs are not being touched. According to him the structures which were being demolished in accordance with the impugned notice were not the suit premises. He undertook to submit a rough sketch map showing exact location of the structures as well as suit premises. 2. Today the defendant has filed a list Exh.5 with a rough sketch map. In said such rough sketch map the suit structure is shown by red lines encircling it. It is submitted by the defendant that the suit structure is not the notice structure mentioned in the impugned notice. 3. Advocate Mr. Giri for defendant Corporation, on instructions, submits that the suit premises are not the notice structures against which the action is already taken. In view of this Advocate Singh for the plaintiff submits that in such circumstances, there is no notice issued to the suit premises. According to him the impugned notices cannot be implemented against the suit premises. 4. Considering above circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that when no notice is issued to the suit premises and no action is being initiated against the suit premises by the defendant, nothing survives in the suit and it can be disposed of at this stage. Hence the order: ORDER 1. In case defendant Corporation has to act against the suit premises it shall follow due process of law. 2. Suit is disposed of in above terms. -- 2 of 5 -- : 3 : NM 312219 IN L.C.STAMP 889919 3. Notice of Motion No.3122 of 2019 is also disposed of. 4. Plaintiff to get the suit registered for statistical purpose. Sd/ (A.N. MARE) Judge, 28.08.2019 City Civil Court, Mumbai. Dictated On : 28.08.2019 Transcribed on : 28.08.2019 HHJ Signed on : 30.08.2019 -- 3 of 5 -- : 4 : NM 312219 IN L.C.STAMP 889919 “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” Upload Date Upload Time Name of Stenographer 31.08.2019 11.20 a.m. V.U. Pawar (H.G.) Name of the Judge (With Court Room No.) HHJ SHRI A.N. MARE (CR 11) Date of Pronouncement of JUDGEMENT /ORDER 28.08.2019 JUDGEMENT /ORDER signed by P.O. on 30.08.2019 JUDGEMENT /ORDER uploaded on 31.08.2019 -- 4 of 5 -- : 5 : NM 312219 IN L.C.STAMP 889919 -- 5 of 5 --
