Skip to main content
Court Order

Final Order 1

CNR MHCC01008441201901 Feb 2021
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Final Order 1 · 01 Feb 2021 · CNR MHCC010084412019

Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement
Pdf Text: MHCC010084412019
Filed on :09.08.2019
Registered On:07.10.2019
Decided on :01.02.2021
Duration :Y-01/M-05/D-24
IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY
SUMMARY SUIT NO.973 OF 2019
Exhibit- 14
Jeevandeep Edumedia Pvt. Ltd.
Having registered Office at
Sun Paradise Business Plaza,
First Floor, Senapati Bapat Marg,
Lower Parel, Mumbai – 400 013.
Through its Assistant Manager Legal
Mrs. Neha Nachiket Kulkarni
Age : 28 years. Occupation: Service ...Plaintiff
V/s.
1. Mrs. Pooja Namdevrao Narwade
Age : Not Known, Occup: Not known
Founder of Stardom English School
Opp Dnyandeep Vidhyalay
At & Post Vihamandwa, TQ Paithan
Dist: Aurangabad, Maharashtra
2. Stardom English School
Age: Not applicable, Occ: not applicable
Vihamandwa, TQ Paithan-431 107
Dist: Aurangabad, Maharashtra ... Defendants
-- 1 of 6 --
Summ. Suit No.973/2019
2
SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF RS.96,582/-
Appearance:-
Adv. Mr. Hetal Vakil for the plaintiff.
Exparte against Defendants.
CORAM : HER HONOUR JUDGE
SMT. S.G. SHAIKH.
CITY CIVIL COURT
GR.MUMBAI (C.R. NO.59).
DATE : 01/02/2021
JUDGMENT
(Dictated and pronounced in Open Court.)
1. This is a summary suit under order XXXVII of Code of Civil
Procedure 1908.
The facts of the case are as under :
2. The Plaintiff is a private limited company under the
Companies Act doing business as educational publishers. Pursuant to
defendants purchase orders from time to time, plaintiff sold supplied
and delivered to defendants said goods through delivery challans from
time to time which were acknowledged by defendants without any
protest for quality, quantity till date. In due course of business plaintiff
raised various invoices upon defendants of said goods of sum of
Rs.1,22,696/-. After lot of persuasion and follow up defendants have
made payment of Rs.53,423/-. As per the plaintiff’s statement of
account now a sum of Rs.69,273/- is due and payable by defendants to
plaintiff. Now plaintiff is to receive from defendant the amount of
Rs.96,582/- alongwith interest upto date. The defendants failed to pay
the total sum of Rs.96,582/-. According to the plaintiff defendants are
liable to pay amount of Rs.96,582/- on the date of the filing of the suit.
Hence, plaintiff is constrained to file the suit for recovery of the said
amount. The total suit claim of the plaintiff for Rs.96,582/-.
-- 2 of 6 --
Summ. Suit No.973/2019
3
3. The suit summons were duly served on the defendants but
they failed to appear. Hence, suit is posted for judgment as per order
XXXVII Rule 2(3) of Code of Civil Procedure 1908 judgment.
4. The following points arise for my determination and my
findings thereon are as under for the reasons stated there under:-
Sr.
No.
POINTS FINDINGS.
1. What is due and payable from the
defendants to the plaintiff ?
A] If yes, what would be the rate
of interest?
Amount of
Rs.96,582/- with
interest
@ 18 % per annum
on principal amount
of Rs.69,273/-
2. What order and decree? As per final order.
REASONS
5. In order to prove the case of the plaintiff filed following
documentary evidence.
Exhibit.
No.
Description of documents Date
8 (colly) Copy of Board Resolution 25.02.2019
03.02.2020
9 Original purchase order 19.03.2016
10 (colly) Original L. R. No. 03829027
Original L. R. No. 03829439
13.05.2016
19.05.2016
11 (colly) Office Copy of Invoice
Office copy of Invoice
13.05.2016
20.05.2016
12 Office copy of debit Note 31.03.2017
13 (colly) Office copy of credit note
Office copy of credit note
Office copy of credit note
17.11.2016
03.12.2016
08.12.2017
-- 3 of 6 --
Summ. Suit No.973/2019
4
AS TO POINT NO.1:
6. All the documents produced by the plaintiff at list Exhibit-8
to 13 go to establish that plaintiff has supplied goods to the defendants.
The documents further prove that the amount of Rs.1,22,696/- is due
and payable to the plaintiff company from defendant towards delivered
of goods. After lot of persuasion and follow up defendants have made
payment of Rs.53,423/-. As per the plaintiff’s statement of account now
a sum of Rs.69,273/- is due and payable by defendants to plaintiff. Now
plaintiff is to receive from defendants the amount of Rs.96,582/-
alongwith interest upto date. The documents at list Exhibit 8 to 13 go to
establish that defendants are liable to pay Rs.96,582/- to the plaintiff on
the date of filing of the suit towards the purchase of goods alongwith
interest. In this background, it is held that plaintiff is entitled to recover
sum of Rs.96,582/- from the defendants.
7. The plaintiff has claimed 18% per annum on the principal
amount. As per section 34 of the Code of Civil Procedure the rate of
interest may exceed 6% per annum, if the transaction is commercial and
there is no contract pertaining to the same between the parties. In the
present case the transaction is a commercial one and there is contract
existing between the parties as to the rate of interest which shall be
levied. Therefore, rate of interest at the rate of 18% per annum would
be just and proper to be awarded on the principal sum adjudged i.e.
amount of Rs.96,582/-. Hence, point no.1 is answered in the
affirmative.
AS TO POINT NO.2:
8. In view of discussion and finding on point no.1, it is held
that the plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs.96,582/- from the defendants
with interest on Rs.69,273/- at the rate of 18% per annum from the
-- 4 of 6 --
Summ. Suit No.973/2019
5
date of filing of the suit till its realization. Plaintiff is also entitled to
recover cost of the suit from the defendants. Hence, in answered to
point no.2, I proceed to pass the following order.
ORDER
1. The defendants shall pay Rs.96,582/- (Rs. Ninety Six
Thousand Five Hundred Eighty Two Only) to the
plaintiff and defendants shall also pay with interest
on principal amount of Rs.69,273/- at the rate of 18%
per annum from the date of filing of the suit till its
realization.
2. The defendants do pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
3. Court fee, if any, be refunded as per the rules.
4. Decree be drawn accordingly.
(S. G. Shaikh)
Judge, City Civil Court,
Date :01/02/2021 Gr. Bombay
Dictated on : 01/02/2021
Typed on : 01/02/2021
Signed on :
-- 5 of 6 --
Summ. Suit No.973/2019
6
“CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL
SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.”
01.02.2021 04.25 p.m. ( Mayuresh P. Tathe)
UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER
Name of the Judge (With Court
room No.)
HHJ Smt. S. G. Shaikh (C.R.No.59)
Date of Pronouncement of
JUDGMENT/ORDER
01/02/2021
JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by
P.O.on
01/02/2021
JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on 01/02/2021
-- 6 of 6 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.