Nalini B. Dandekar in Suit No.3976 of 1997VsRustom Ardeshir Gagrat (deleted) +3 more

Date: 03-07-2018
Business: Adv.Mr.Yadav for plaintiff present.
Adjd for directions  on 11.07.2018.
Next Purpose: DIRECTIONS
Next Hearing Date: 11-07-2018

Date: 11-07-2018
Business: Adv.Mr.R.K.Yadav for Plff present
None for defendant.
Order below M.A.No.37/2018.
This speaking to the minutes is taken out the Ld advocate for the plaintiff for correction of typographical mistake in the Judgment dated 30.06.2016 in Suit No.3976/1997.  The said application is consider as per the provisions under Section 152 of the C.P.C.  I have perused the proposed correction as mentioned in the application.  The first is with regard to the typographical correction in the date mentioned in  paras no.2 and 8 of the judgment i.e. the date of death of the husband is mentioned as 22.05.1992 instead of 23.05.1992.  The numerical correction being typographical is done and after correction it be read as 23.05.1992.  The other correction proposed is the surname is typed as Barge instead of Warge.  So where ever the surname is appearing as Barge  it be corrected as  Warge being the typographical mistake.  So also in paragraph no.9, instead of the word prevision  it be read as previous being the clerical mistake.  So also the other proposed correction ie addition of word by between the sentence Sanad issued and  the concerned authority in paragraph no.9 being the clerical mistake is done.  The judgment be corrected accordingly and it be read in the manner after corrections as pointed out in the application. This application is allowed as per the provisions of Section 152 of the C.P.C.  All concerned to act upon accordingly. Misc. Application is disposed of.
Nature Of Disposal: OTHER
Disposal Date: 11-07-2018

Filing Number: 108546/2018
Filing Date: 29-06-2018
First Hearing Date: 03rd July 2018
Decision Date: 11th July 2018
Court Number And Judge: 2-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE