Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 29 Feb 2020 · CNR MHCC010061862018
Order Details: Copy of Judgment Pdf Text: MHCC010061862018 Presented on 05.05.2018 Registered on 21.07.2018 Decided on 29.02.2020 Duration Yrs. M. Days 01 09 24 CNR No. EXH. IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY SHORT CAUSE SUIT NO.1733 OF 2018 COMMERCIAL SUIT NO.317 OF 2020 BANK OF INDIA, a Bank, a body Corporate constituted under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act V of 1970, having their Head Office at Star House, C-5, G-Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai – 400 051, and one of its Branch Office being Cumballa Hill Branch, “Kemps Shoppe”, 1st Floor, Near Hotel “Shalimar”, 141, August Kranti Marg, Kemps Corner, Mumbai – 400 036, through its constituted Attorney Mr. Harikumar S., Senior Manger (Law) of the Plaintiff Bank. ...Plaintiff. V/s. MHCC01-006186-2018 -- 1 of 9 -- S.C. Suit 1733 of 18 .. j/2 .. 1. M/s. Wagh Tours and Travels A Proprietorship concern, having address At Shiv Shakti Chawl, BMK Compound, Behind Datta mandir, Bailbazaar, Kranti Nagar, Kurla (West), Mumbai – 400 070. 2. Mr. Sunil Subhash Wagh Proprietor of M/s. Wagh Tours and Travels Adult, Indian Inhabitant, Residing at Shiv Shakti Chawl, BMK Compound, Behind Datta mandir, Bailbazzar, Kranti Nagar, Kurla (West), Mumbai – 400 070. ...Defendants. Appearances: Ld. Adv Mr. Atul Gupta for plaintiff. None present for defendant. Suit proceeded ex-parte against defendant. CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHRI SHANKAR G.BORLEPWAR (C.R.No.20) DATED : 29th February, 2019 J U D G M E N T (Ex-parte) 1. This is a suit for recovery of loan amount. 2. Plaintiff filed this suit for recovery of loan amount alongwith interest. 3. In brief, it is contention of the plaintiff that plaintiff is a Bank, body corporate, constituted under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act-V of 1970, and having -- 2 of 9 -- S.C. Suit 1733 of 18 .. j/3 .. Head Officer at Star House, C-5, G. Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai – 400 051 and one of its Branch Office amongst others known as Cumballa Hill Branch, situated at “Kemps Shoppe”, 1st floor, Near Hotel “Shalimar”, 141, August Kranti Marg, Kemps Corner, Mumbai – 400 036. 4. The plaintiff inter-alia is carrying on business of Bankers. 5. Defendant No.1 is the Proprietary Concern. Defendant No.2 is the Proprietor of defendant No.1. The suit transaction pertains to and arises out of loan sanctioned and granted by the plaintiff to defendants for purchasing four Wheeler (Car) Maruti Swift Dzire under SRTO Loan Scheme. 6. Defendants had applied to the plaintiff for loan of Rs.5.60 Lacs (Rupees Five Lacs Sixty Thousand only). Plaintiff sanctioned and granted Loan under SRTO Loan Scheme of Rs.5.60 Lacs (Rupees Five Lacs Sixty Thousand only) to the defendants on the terms and conditions mentioned in the Letter of Sanction letter dated 21.04.2014. Defendants acknowledged their debt due to the plaintiff on 27.1.2017 for a sum of Rs.3,62,072.60/- (Rupees Three Lacs Sixty two Thousand Seventy two and sixty paise only). Defendants failed to pay accrued interest alongwith equated monthly installments in the account which resulted in the account classified as Non Performing Asset (NPA) on 30.06.2017. Thereafter, plaintiff issued notice through Advocate on 21.02.2018 and called upon the defendants to pay the said outstanding amount. Defendants agreed to pay the said loan amount with interest at the rate of 1.50% p.a. above base rate and present base rte is 9.45% p.a. Presently base rate is 10.95% p.a. with monthly rest as on date of -- 3 of 9 -- S.C. Suit 1733 of 18 .. j/4 .. filing of the suit. Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay to the plaintiff a sum of Rs.4,06,700.17 (Rupees Four Lacs Six thousand Seven Hundred and Paise Seventeen Only) together with further interest thereon at the rate of 10.95% p.a. with monthly rest plus 2% penal interest from the date of filing of the suit till payment and /or realisation. The said Loan amount is subsisting Hypothecation of Four Wheeler (Car) Maruti Swift Dzire bearing Registration No.MH-03-BC- 1503. Hence, suit be decreed as prayed for. 7. Defendants served with writ of summons. They remained absent therefore suit is proceeded exparte against both the defendants as per Roznama dated 22.02.2019. 8. Plaintiff examined PW 1 Mr. Sanjay Kumar vide Exh.5 who is Chief Manager of the Plaintiff’s Bank. I have heard Learned Advocate appearing for the plaintiff. 9. PW. 1 Sanjay Kumar supported the contention of the plaint. He states that the said loan was sanctioned to the defendants. Defendants did not pay the said loan of Rs.5.60/- Lacs (Rupees Five Lacs Sixty Thousand only). Therefore, he prayed to decreed the suit. 10. Plaintiff relied upon following documents. Ex. Sr.No. Particular 7 1 Letter of authority dt. 16/04/2019. 8 2 Letter of sanction dt. 21/04/2014. 9 3 Demand promissory note for Rs.5,60,000/- dt.22/04/2014. -- 4 of 9 -- S.C. Suit 1733 of 18 .. j/5 .. 10 4 Bearer letter dt.22/04/2014. 11 5 Loan installment letter dt.22/04/2014. 12 6 Non-Relationship Declaration dt. 22/04/2014. 13 7 Hypothecation cum loan agreement dt.22/04/2014. 14 8 Composite agreement dt.22/04/2014. 15 9 Certificate of registration dt.08/05/2014. 16 10 Acknowledgement of debate dt. 27/01/2017. 17 11 Advocates notice dt. 21/02/2018 alongwith acknowledgement cards received from postal authorities. 18 12 Statement of accounts alongwith certificate. 11. Perused Exh.7. It is mentioned therein that the plaintiff authorized P.W. 1 Sanjay Kumar to lead evidence etc. in the suit. 12. Perused letter of sanction dated 21.4.2014 Exh.8. It is mentioned therein that plaintiff Bank sanctioned SRTO Auto Loan of Rs.5,60,000/- with rate of interest1.50% Over Bank Rate i.e. at present (10.20+1.50) 11.70% p.a. with monthly rests or at such other rate as advised by the Bank from time to time. It is mentioned therein the said loan amount is sanctioned in 60 equated EMI monthly installments (emi) of Rs.12,372/- which commencement from three months after disbursement. It is also mentioned the vehicle which will be purchased is hypothecated. 13. Perused last installment letter dated 22.4.2014 Exh.11. It is mentioned therein that defendants to repay the loan amount by 60 installments of Rs.12,372/- per month commencing from 30.07.2014. -- 5 of 9 -- S.C. Suit 1733 of 18 .. j/6 .. 14. Perused hypothecation cum loan agreement Exh.13. It is mentioned therein that the vehicle which will be purchased is hypothecated. 15. Perused copy of Certificate of Registration dated 8.5.2014. It shows vehicle Registration No.MH-03-BC-1503 is stands in the name of defendant No.1 and 2. 16. Perused acknowledgment of debt Exh.16. It is mentioned therein that Rs.3,62,072.60/- is indebted by the defendant is on 26.01.2017. The suit filed in the year 2018. The suit is filed within three years from the date of acknowledgment of debt i.e. from 26.01.2017, therefore the suit is within the law of limitation. 17. Perused Advocate Notice Exh.17. It is dated 21.2.2018 by the said letter it is informed to the defendants that a sum of Rs.3,55,984.60 being outstanding amount against the defendants excluding interest from 30.06.2017 till the date of notice. 18. Perused statement of Account Exh.18. It is mentioned therein that an amount of Rs.3,66,592.60/- (Rupees Three Lacs Sixty Six Thousand Five Hundred Ninety Two and paise Sixty only) is outstanding against the defendant on 03.05.2018. 19. There is nothing on record to disbelieve the plaintiff that defendants availed the said loan facility and to repay the loan amount with interest. 20. It is prayed to direct defendants to jointly and severally to pay to the plaintiffs a sum of Rs.4,06,700.17/- together with further -- 6 of 9 -- S.C. Suit 1733 of 18 .. j/7 .. interest at the rate of 10.95% p.a. with monthly rest plus 2% penal interest p.a. from the date of filing of the suit till its realization. It is also prayed that the said vehicle is sold and net sale proceeds thereof it is handed over to the plaintiff. In / or satisfaction of the claim amount. 21. The contractual rate of interest between the parties is 10.95% p.a. with monthly rest plust 2% penal interest p.a. 22. Perused Section 34 of the Code of Civil Procedure. It states where and in so far as a decree is for the payment of money, the Court may, in the decree, order interest at such rate as the Court deems reasonable to be paid on the principal sum adjudged, from the date of the suit to the date of the decree, in addition to any interest adjudged on such principal sum for any period prior to the institution of the suit, with further interest at such rate not exceeding six percent per annum, as the Court deems reasonable on such principal sum, from the date of the decree to the date of payment, or to such earlier date as the Court thinks fit; 23. Therefore I am of the opinion that plaintiff is entitled to recover the amount of Rs.Rs.4,06,700.17/- alongwith interest as prayed for. Hence, I proceed to pass the following order. ORDER The Suit is decreed with costs as under : 1. The Defendant no. 1 and 2 jointly and severally to pay to the plaintiff amount of Rs.4,06,700.17/- (Four Lacs Six Thousand Seven Hundred and Seventeen Paise Only) with interest at the rate of 10.95% per annum with monthly rest from the date of filing the suit i.e. 05/05/2018 till it's full realisation. -- 7 of 9 -- S.C. Suit 1733 of 18 .. j/8 .. 2. Plaintiff bank is entitled to sell hypothecated Four wheeler (Car) Maruti Swift Dzire bearing registration No. MH-03-BC-1503 as per law to recover the decreetal amount. 3. Decree be drawn-up accordingly. ( SHANKAR G. BORLEPWAR ) Judge, (C.R.No.20) Dt.: 29/02/2020 City Civil Court, Gr. MUMBAI Dictated on : 29/02/2020 Transcribed on : 05/03/2020 Checked on : 20/03/2020 Due to Covid-19 lockdown, the Court was not functioning and therefore Signed on : 12/06/2020. ( SHANKAR G. BORLEPWAR ) Judge, (C.R.No.20) City Civil Court, Gr. MUMBAI -- 8 of 9 -- S.C. Suit 1733 of 18 .. j/9 .. “CERTIFIED TOBE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER” Due to Covid-19 lockdown uploaded on 12.06.2020 at 04.40 p.m. UPLOAD DATE AND TIME (VARSHA U. PAWAR) NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge HHJ SHRI S. G. BORLEPWAR (COURT ROOM NO.20) Date of pronouncement of judgment/order 29.02.2020 Judgment/order signed by P.O. on 12.06.2020 Judgment/order uploaded on 12.06.2020 -- 9 of 9 --
