Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

The Ruki Mahal CHS LtdVsMCGM And Ors

CNR MHCC0100567720185-COURT 05 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 09th January 2019

TrustJury record updated 12 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
101726/2018
Registration Date
26 Apr 2018

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 22-06-2018
    Business: Resumed.
    Adv. Dubey H/f Adv. Mungale tendered registered NM No. 1726 of 2018.   Adv. Patil for MCGM is on leave. Adjd for reply and arguments  on NM No. 1726 of 2018 and W/S to 23.07.2018.  Copy of NM is served.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 23-07-2018
    
    Date: 23-07-2018
    Business: Resumed.
    The P.O. is busy in delivery of judgment in L.C. Suit No. 2181/2011 and NM No. 1015/2017 in Suit No. 673/2017.  For want of time the board is discharged.
    Adjd for NM reply to 10.09.2018.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 10-09-2018
    
    Date: 10-09-2018
    Business: Resumed.
    Adv. Indira Bhushan for plaintiff and Adv. Pradip Patil for MCGM are present.
    Adv. Patil seeks time to file reply to NM .
    Earlier order if any to continue till the next date.
    Adjd for NM reply to 19.10.2018.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 19-10-2018
    
    Date: 19-10-2018
    Business: Resumed.
    The P.O. is busy in hearing arguments in NM No. 1768/2016 in suit No. 1566/2015 and other ad-interim  matters.  For want of time the board is discharged.
    Adjd for NM reply to 09.01.2019.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 09-01-2019
    
    Date: 09-01-2019
    Business: Resumed.
    Adv. Indira Bhushan for plaintiff is present.
    Adv. Pradip Patil for MCGM recorded his reply on NM No. 1726/2018.
    Heard, respective advocates.  Adv. Pradip Patil strongly obejcted to restore the NM No. 173/2011 which was dismissed for default.  On the other hand Adv. Bhushan submits that the original NM be heard on merits by imposing costs on plaintiff.  Considering the submissions and nature of the suit, it is expedient to allow the NM No. 1726/2018 in order to decide the matter on merits.  Thus the following order is passed -
    ORDER
    1.  The Notice of motion No. 1726/2018 is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b) subject to payment of costs Rs. 5000/- to be paid /deposited with the concern ward office of defendant on or before 23.01.2019.
    An ordinary copy of this order duly authenticated by Sheristedar of this Court be supplied to both the parties.
    Adjd for NM reply to 18.01.2019.
    Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
    Disposal Date: 09-01-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 106160/2018
    Filing Date: 26-04-2018
    First Hearing Date: 22nd June 2018
    Decision Date: 09th January 2019
    Court Number And Judge: 5-COURT 05  ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    2
    Final Order 1Full order available
    09 Jan 2019

    Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF :COURT 5 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE Case No. :NOTICE OF MOTION/0101726/2018 The Ruki Mahal CHS Ltd Vs MCGM And Ors Date : 09-01-2019 Business : Resumed. Adv. Indira Bhushan for plaintiff is present. Adv. Pradip Patil for MCGM recorded his reply on NM No. 1726/2018. Heard, respective advocates. Adv. Pradip Patil strongly obejcted to restore the NM No. 173/2011 which was dismissed for default. On the other hand Adv. Bhushan…

    Read Full Order
    Order 1Full order available
    09 Jan 2019

    Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF :COURT 5 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE Case No. :NOTICE OF MOTION/0101726/2018 The Ruki Mahal CHS Ltd Vs MCGM And Ors Date : 09-01-2019 Business : Resumed. Adv. Indira Bhushan for plaintiff is present. Adv. Pradip Patil for MCGM recorded his reply on NM No. 1726/2018. Heard, respective advocates. Adv. Pradip Patil strongly obejcted to restore the NM No. 173/2011 which was dismissed for default. On the other hand Adv. Bhushan…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.