Skip to main content
CHAMBER SUMMONS

Mr. Suresh P. Rao- Suit No.581 of 2017VsLife Insurance Corporation Of India +1 more

CNR MHCC01005290201920-COURT 20 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 01st February 2020

TrustJury record updated 20 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
101005/2019
Registration Date
27 May 2019

Advocates

1

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    3

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 14-08-2019
    Business: Adv. Prachi P. for plaintiff present.
    Adv. Ruchika Dave for D-1 and 2 present.
    Ld. counsel for plaintiff filed registered CS No.1005/19 a/w affidavit. TOR. Copy is served on other side.
    Ld. counsel for defendant sought time to file reply.
    Matte adjd for CS reply on 16/09/2019.
    Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 16-09-2019
    
    Date: 16-09-2019
    Business: Adv. Prachi Koli for plaintiff present.
    Adv. Dave for defendant present.
    On the request of Ld. counsel for defendant last chance is granted to file reply.
    Matter adjd for CS reply on 18/10/2019.
    Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 18-10-2019
    
    Date: 18-10-2019
    Business: Plaintiff (In-person) present.
    Adv. Nilkarya for D-1 present.
    As Court is busy in recording evidence, NM hearing and orders this matter is adjourned.
    Matter adjd for CS reply on 04/12/2019.
    Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 04-12-2019
    
    Date: 04-12-2019
    Business: HHJ IS ON TRANING AT UTTAN
    Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 02-01-2020
    
    Date: 04-12-2019
    Business: HHJ IS ON TRANING AT UTTAN
    Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 02-01-2020
    
    Date: 02-01-2020
    Business: Adv. Divya Shrivatav for plaintiff present.
    Adv. Karya for defendant No.1 and 2 present.
    Plaintiff in-person present.
    On the oral request of Ld. Adv for deft matter is adjourned by way of last chance.
    Matter adjd for C/S reply on 15/01/2020 at 02.45 pm.
    Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 15-01-2020
    
    Date: 15-01-2020
    Business: Adv. Divya shrivastav for plaintiff present,
    Adv. Ruchika Dave for deft no. 1 present.
    Adv. Mayura Maru for deft no. 2 present.
    Plff present.
    Defendant no. 2 present.
    Adv. for deft no.2 filed VP on behalf of deft no.2. t.o.r. O-seen and filed.
    The Ld Adv appearing for deft no.1 submits that deft no.1 doesnt want to file reply to the CS. Hence the CS be proceeded without reply against deft no. 1
    The Ld Adv appearing for deft no.2 also submits that deft no.2 doesnt want to file reply to the CS. Hence the CS be proceeded without reply against deft no. 2.
    Both the said Ld advocate submits that they are ready to make oral submissions.
    Heard both side. Matter adj for CS Order.
    Matter adjd for CS Order on 01/02/2020 at 02.45 pm.
    Next Purpose: CH/S ORDERS
    Next Hearing Date: 01-02-2020
    
    Date: 01-02-2020
    Business: Adv. Anagha Tandel  for plaintiff present.
    Adv. Mayura for defendant no.2 present.
    Plaintiff is present.
    Perused CS No.1005/19. In brief, it is contention of the plaintiff that after filing the present suit, the plaintiff on various platforms/ internet searched for review and feedback in respectof the disputed Jeevan Saral Policy (with profits) of LIC and found that there are about 5 crore people across India who have been cheated/ defrauded by the defts, in particulars the deft no.1 and its employees. Plaintiff tried to contact those people to get the status of their claim/ compliant/ suit/ proceeding before various forums. During the said enquiry he found that, various judgements/ orders of various forums in respect of the claim/ compliant/ suit/ proceedings of various investors. He sought the certified copies of the said judgements and orders from the respective investors, some of which have been received by him. Therefore, it is necessary to amend the plaint to that effect. Advocate for deft no.1 submitted that deft no.1 doesn\''t want to file reply. Advocate for deft no.2 also submitted that deft no.2 doesn\''t want to file reply. Therefore the CS is proceeded without reply against deft no.1 and 2 as per order dt. 15/01/2020. Heard both advocates. I am of the opinion that, an opportunity can be given to the plaintiff to amend the plaint. Hence I proceed to pass following order.
    ORDER
    CS No. 1005/2019 is hereby allowed as under.
    1. Plaintiff is permitted to amend the plaint as per schedule of amendment filed with the CS.
    2. Plaintiff is directed to amend the plaint as stated above within 14 days from the date of this order.
    3. Plaintiff is directed to file on record amended copy of the plaint till next date.
    Matter adjd for compliance on 06-03-2020 at 11.00 am.
    Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
    Disposal Date: 01-02-2020
    
    Date: 01-02-2020
    Business: Adv. Anagha Tandel  for plaintiff present.
    Adv. Mayura for defendant no.2 present.
    Plaintiff is present.
    Perused CS No.1005/19. In brief, it is contention of the plaintiff that after filing the present suit, the plaintiff on various platforms/ internet searched for review and feedback in respectof the disputed Jeevan Saral Policy (with profits) of LIC and found that there are about 5 crore people across India who have been cheated/ defrauded by the defts, in particulars the deft no.1 and its employees. Plaintiff tried to contact those people to get the status of their claim/ compliant/ suit/ proceeding before various forums. During the said enquiry he found that, various judgements/ orders of various forums in respect of the claim/ compliant/ suit/ proceedings of various investors. He sought the certified copies of the said judgements and orders from the respective investors, some of which have been received by him. Therefore, it is necessary to amend the plaint to that effect. Advocate for deft no.1 submitted that deft no.1 doesn\''t want to file reply. Advocate for deft no.2 also submitted that deft no.2 doesn\''t want to file reply. Therefore the CS is proceeded without reply against deft no.1 and 2 as per order dt. 15/01/2020. Heard both advocates. I am of the opinion that, an opportunity can be given to the plaintiff to amend the plaint. Hence I proceed to pass following order.
    ORDER
    CS No. 1005/2019 is hereby allowed as under.
    1. Plaintiff is permitted to amend the plaint as per schedule of amendment filed with the CS.
    2. Plaintiff is directed to amend the plaint as stated above within 14 days from the date of this order.
    3. Plaintiff is directed to file on record amended copy of the plaint till next date.
    Matter adjd for compliance on 06-03-2020 at 11.00 am.
    Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
    Disposal Date: 01-02-2020

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 105193/2019
    Filing Date: 27-05-2019
    First Hearing Date: 02nd July 2019
    Decision Date: 01st February 2020
    Court Number And Judge: 20-COURT 20 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1Full order available
    01 Feb 2020

    Order Details: Other Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF :COURT 20 ASST. SESSIONS JUDGE Case No. :CHAMBER SUMMONS/0101005/2019 Mr. Suresh P. Rao- Suit No.581 of 2017 Vs 1.LIfe Insurance Corporation of India 2.Mr. Utpol Roy Date : 01-02-2020 Business : Adv. Anagha Tandel for plaintiff present. Adv. Mayura for defendant no.2 present. Plaintiff is present. Perused CS No.1005/19. In brief, it is contention of the plaintiff that after filing the present suit, the plaintiff on various platforms/ internet searched for…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.