Skip to main content
Court Order

Final Order 1

CNR MHCC01004611202015 Dec 2021
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Final Order 1 · 15 Dec 2021 · CNR MHCC010046112020

Order Details: Copy of Judgment
Pdf Text: Filed on :12.10.2020
Registered On :07.12.2020
Decided on :15.12.2021
Duration : Y-01/M-02/D-03
IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY
SUMMARY SUIT NO. 496 OF 2020
Exhibit- 08
CNR NO.- MHCC01-004611-2020
Mahendra Premchandji Jain
Age :58 years
Of Mumbai , an adult Indian Inhabitant,
Residing at 46, Modi Street, Ground Floor,
Fort, Mumbai- 400 001. ... Plaintiff
V/s.
Harishyam Lalta Rajbhar
Age Not known of Mumbai an adult Indian
Inhabitant
Working for gain with National Insurance Co.
Ltd.,
Royal Insurance Building, 4th Floor, Mumbai-
400 020 and residing at Rajawadi,
Jaiprakash Nagar, Vidya Vihar East,
Mumbai-400 047. ... Defendant
Appearance:-
Mr. Ramesh Jain Advocate for the plaintiff.
Exparte against Defendants.
-- 1 of 7 --
Summ. Suit No.496/2020
2
CORAM : HER HONOUR AD-HOC JUDGE
SMT. A.H. KASHIKAR
CITY CIVIL COURT, GR. BOMBAY
(C.R. NO.61).
DATE : 15/12/2021
JUDGMENT
(Dictated and pronounced in Open Court.)
1. This is a summary suit instituted by the plaintiff under
order XXXVII of Code of Civil Procedure 1908 against the defendant.
2. The suit claim of the plaintiff is narrated in nutshell as
under:
The defendant was under liability to pay towards the plaintiff
hence, towards the discharge of said legal liability he drew and
delivered to the plaintiff a cheque dtd.10.8.2020 bearing no.182735
drawn on Union Bank of India, Ghatkoper (E), Mumbai- 400 077 for
valuable consideration of Rs.1,30,000/-. Said cheque on being
presented to the bank has been dishonored vide a memo of dishonor
dtd.12.8.2020 with a remark of ‘funds insufficient’. By virtue of
dishonor of said cheque and pursuant to the provisions of Negotiable
Instrument Act, the plaintiff has become entitled to recover said amount
of cheque alongwith interest at the rate of 18% p.a. from the date of
dishonor of cheque.
3. The plaintiff issued letter/notice through advocate on
19.8.2020 to the defendant calling upon him to pay the amount of
Rs.1,30,000/- alongwith accrued interest but the defendant failed to
comply with said requisition. The plaintiff averred that the defendant is
-- 2 of 7 --
Summ. Suit No.496/2020
3
liable to pay the outstanding amount of Rs.1,32,500.27ps/-with
interest.
4. Thus, the plaintiff has filed the present suit against the
defendant for recovery. It is averred that the defendant is liable to pay a
sum of Rs.1,32,500.27ps/- to the plaintiff and further interest at the
rate of 18% p.a on the principal amount from the date of suit till its
realization. Hence, this suit.
5. The suit summons were duly served on the defendant but
he failed to appear and contest the suit. Hence, suit is posted for
judgment as per order XXXVII Rule 2(3) of Code of Civil Procedure
1908 judgment.
6. The following points arise for my determination and my
findings thereon are as under for the reasons stated there under:-
Sr.
No.
POINTS FINDINGS.
1. Whether the plaintiff entitled for
recovery of amount against the
defendant ?
A] If yes, what would be the rate
of interest?
Amount of
Rs.1,32,500.27ps/-
with interest
@ 18% per annum
on the principal
amount
2. What order and decree? As per final order.
REASONS
7. In order to establish the suit claim, the plaintiff has filed
following documentary evidence below Exh.07 i.e the list of
documents:
-- 3 of 7 --
Summ. Suit No.496/2020
4
Sr.
No.
Description of documents Exhibits
1 Cheque dtd. 10.8.2020 being
Exhibit “A” to the plaint.
Exh. 7/1
2 Memo of Dishonour Dtd.
12.8.2020 being Exhibit “B” to the
Plaint
Exh. 7/2
3 Plaintiff’s Advocates’ letter dated
19.8.2020, being Exhibit “C” to the
plaint, alongwith the postal records
in connection therewith.
Exh. 7/3
AS TO POINT NO.1:
8. This is a summary suit which is not contested by the
defendant. The documents produced on record by the plaintiff shows
that the defendant issued the cheque to the plaintiff for the amount of
Rs. 1,30,000/- and said cheque came to be dishonored for insufficiency
of funds. Said amount is not paid by the defendant to the plaintiff.
Further, it reveals from the record that said transaction for issuance of
cheque took place on dtd.10.8.2020, the notice/letter of demand was
issued to the defendant on dtd.19.8.2020 and the suit is filed on
12.10.2020. As such, the plaintiff’s claim in the suit is well within
limitation.
9. All the documents produced by the plaintiff at list Exhibit-
07 goes to establish that the defendant has issued cheque for
Rs.1,30,000/- towards the legal liability but staid cheque got
dishonored. The legal liability is not discharged by the defendant.
Therefore, the plaintiff is claiming Rs.1,32,500.27ps/- which is the
amount calculated with interest at the rate of 18% p.m from the date of
-- 4 of 7 --
Summ. Suit No.496/2020
5
dishonor of cheque till the filing of suit. Said amount is not repaid by
the defendant. Therefore, the defendant is liable to pay the outstanding
amount of Rs.1,32,500.27ps/- to the plaintiff. In this background, I
have arrived at the conclusion that the plaintiff is entitled to recover
sum of Rs.1,32,500.27ps/- from the defendant.
10. According to the plaintiff the outstanding dues against the
defendant is Rs.1,32,500.27ps/- and said amount is calculated
alongwith with interest at the rate of 18% p.m from the of dishonor of
cheque till the filing of suit. Apart from said amount which is due
against the defendant on the date of filing of the suit, the plaintiff has
claimed interest at the rate of 18% per annum on the principal amount.
The defendant neither appeared nor contested the suit. There is nothing
on record to show that the said translations between the parties was not
the commercial transactions. Therefore, I hold that the plaintiff is
entitled to recover the principal amount alongwith interest at the rate of
18% p.a. till realization of the amount. Therefore, I hold, the rate of
interest at the rate of 18% per annum would be just and proper to be
awarded on the principal sum of Rs.1,30,000/-. Hence, point no.1 is
answered in the affirmative.
AS TO POINT NO.2:
11. In view of discussion and finding on point no.1, it is held
that the plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs.1,32,500.27ps/- from the
defendant with interest at the rate of 18% per annum on the principal
sum of Rs.1,30,000/- from the date of filing of the suit till its
realization. Plaintiff is also entitled to recover cost of the suit from the
defendant. Hence, in answered to point no.2, I proceed to pass the
-- 5 of 7 --
Summ. Suit No.496/2020
6
following order.
ORDER
1. The defendant shall pay Rs.1,32,500.27ps/-(Rs. One
Lac Thirty Two Thousand Five Hundred and Twenty
Seven paise Only) to the plaintiff, with interest at the
rate of 18% per annum on the principal sum of
Rs.1,30,000/- from the date of filing of the suit till its
realization.
2. The defendant do pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
3. Court fee, if any, be refunded as per the rules.
4. Decree be drawn accordingly.
(A.H. Kashikar)
AD-HOC Judge,
City Civil Court,
Date : 15/12/2021 Gr. Bombay
Dictated on : 15/12/2021
Typed on : 15/12/2021
Signed on : 16.12.2021
-- 6 of 7 --
Summ. Suit No.496/2020
7
“CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL
SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.”
16/12/2021 1.00p .m. ( K.M. Rana )
UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER
Name of the Judge (With Court
room No.)
HHJ Smt. A.H. Kashikar (C.R.No.61)
Date of Pronouncement of
JUDGMENT/ORDER
15/12/2021
JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by
P.O.on
16/12/2021
JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on 16/12/2021
-- 7 of 7 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.