Date: 15-04-2019
Business: NOB TOB
Adv. for pltff present.
Adv. for D1 present.
Adv. for D/3 and 4 present.
Adv. of D/2 absent.
The parties present submit that todays date was given to them. However in the roznama of last date it is shown that scheduled date is 16.04.2019. IN view of this, on request of all the parties present the,Matter is adjd. to.11.06.2019 for reply on Ch/s.
Next Purpose: CHAMBER SUMMONS
Next Hearing Date: 11-06-2019
Date: 11-06-2019
Business: Matter is adjd. to. 05/08/2019 for NM Hearing.
Next Purpose: CHAMBER SUMMONS
Next Hearing Date: 05-08-2019
Date: 05-08-2019
Date: 27-08-2019
Business: Advocate Ms. Monika Naik for Plaintiff present and submitted that advocate Mr. Vaze is out of city hence matter may be adjourned. Considering submissions adjourned.
Advocate Mr. P. V. Shah for Defendant no.1 present.
Case is adjourned to 11/10/2019 for Chamber Summons hearing.
Next Purpose: C/S HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 11-10-2019
Date: 11-10-2019
Business: Court is busy in hearing final arguments in suit no.8472/86 (first session) and in afternoon session, court is relieved for attending mediation conference at Nashik to be held on 12/10/2019, hence adjourned to 04/11/2019.
Next Purpose: C/S HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 04-11-2019
Date: 04-11-2019
Business: Advocate for Plaintiff present
Advocate for Defendant no.1 present
Advocate for Defendant no.3 and 4 present
Court is busy in dictating Judgment in suit no.785/08, hence case is adjourned to 21/01/2020.
Next Purpose: C/S HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 21-01-2020
Date: 21-01-2020
Business: None present for Plaintiff.
Advocate Mr. P. V. Shah for Defendant no.1 present
Advocate Mr. Arun for Defendant no.2 and 3 present
Record shows that reply to Chamber Summons no.642/19 is not filed on behalf of Plaintiff. This Chamber Summons is taken out for recording cross-examination of Plaintiff by Video Conference and for directions to that effect to already appointed Court Commissioner advocate Ms. Puja Narvekar. It is pointed out that Plaintiff is of 85 years old and she has submitted at the time of appointment of Court Commissioner that she is unable to come to Mumbai for her cross-examination. Considering those submissions, I find that either Plaintiff will have to appear before Court Commissioner for cross-examination or to get connected Court Commissioner by Video Conference, hence I proceed to pass following order-
ORDER
1. Chamber Summons no.642/19 is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
2. Plaintiff is directed to get connected by Video Conference to Court Commissioner who will record Plaintiff\''s cross-examination from Video Conference room of City Civil Court, Mumbai.
Parties to act on authenticated copy of this Roznama.
Case is adjourned to 30/03/2020 for Report of court commissioner.
Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
Disposal Date: 21-01-2020