Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 14 Aug 2025 · CNR MHCC010019762020
Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: ..1.. Sum Suit No.232/2020 MHCC010019762020 Presented on : 13/02/2020 Registered on : 24/02/2020 Decided on : 14/08/2025 Duration : 05Y : 06M : 01D IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT, GREATER MUMBAI AT MAZGAON EXH-12 SUMMARY SUIT NO.232 OF 2020 BABAN DEVAJI JANKAR carrying business of money lending at and from Vijay Niwas, Jivdaya Lane, L.B.S. Marg, Ghatkopar (West), Mumbai – 400 086. ] ] ] ] ..Plaintiff Versus SUDHIR SAHDEV SHINDE working for gain at TLS Vehicle Assist Pvt. Ltd., B-601, Kanara Business Centre, Ghatkopar Andheri Link Road, Designation Support Executive, Department Administration, Ghatkopar (East), Mumbai-400 075. Residing at Sharifabhai Chawl, Sainath Nagar, Near KVK School, Ghatkopar (W), Mumbai 400 086. ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ..Defendant Appearance :- Ld. Adv. Ramesh Jain for plaintiff. None for defendant. (Ex-parte) CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE SACHIN SURYAKANT PATIL COURT ROOM NO.84. DATE : 14/08/2025. J U D G M E N T 1) This summary suit is filed for recovery of amount vide Order XXXVII of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. -- 1 of 5 -- ..2.. Sum Suit No.232/2020 2) The facts in brief are as under - Plaintiff advanced loan of Rs.1,20,000/- to the defendant. Defendant executed a demand promissory note on 05/04/2019, whereby he agreed to repay the amount of Rs.1,20,000/- on demand along with interest at the rate of 18% per annum. However, defendant failed to repay the same as agreed. Amount of Rs.1,36,037.26/- is due from the defendant. The demand notice was issued to defendant. Defendant did not comply the same. Hence, this Suit. 3) The first writ of summons was served upon the defendant. Defendant did not appear. Hence, matter proceeded ex-parte against the defendant. 4) Heard the arguments of plaintiff. In view of aforesaid facts, following points arise for my determination. I have recorded my decisions thereon for the reasons as under : POINTS DECISIONS 1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for recovery of sum of Rs.1,36,037.26/- and further interest on Rs.1,20,000/- at the rate of 18% p.a. from next day of filing of the Suit till payment or realization, as claimed ? ...Partly Yes 2. What order ? ...As per final order. R E A S O N S 5) The plaintiff Baban Devaji Jankar has filed claim affidavit. Plaintiff has relied upon documentary evidence produced at Exh-09, Exh-10 colly and 10A. -- 2 of 5 -- ..3.. Sum Suit No.232/2020 AS TO POINT NOS.1 & 2 :- 6) PW-1 Baban Devaji Jankar has deposed that, plaintiff advanced loan of Rs.1,20,000/- to the defendant. Defendant executed a demand promissory note on 05/04/2019, whereby he agreed to repay the amount of Rs.1,20,000/- on demand along with interest at the rate of 18% per annum. However, defendant failed to repay the same as agreed. Amount of Rs.1,36,037.26/- is due from the defendant. The demand notice was issued to defendant. Defendant did not comply the same. 7) On perusal of documents produced by the plaintiff Exh-09, Exh-10 colly and 10A, it is evident that defendant had obtained loan of Rs.1,20,000/-. He has signed promissory note to that effect in favour of plaintiff. However, he failed to repay the amount of Rs.1,20,000/-. Plaintiff has produced the copy of money lending license at Exh-10A. As per the evidence of plaintiff, amount of Rs.1,36,037.26/- is due from the defendant on the date of suit. Defendant has not appeared in the present suit. Therefore, the case of plaintiff has remained unchallenged. Plaintiff is seeking further interest at the rate of 18% p.a.. In the promissory note at Exh-09, the interest rate is mentioned as 18% p.a. However, said interest rate seems to be excessive. In my view, interest at the rate of 7% p.a. from the date of suit till the date of decree with further interest at the rate of 6% p.a. from the date of decree till its realization would meet ends of justice. Hence, while answering point Nos.1 and 2 in partly affirmative, I pass the following order :- ORDER 1. Summary Suit No.232 of 2020 is partly decreed with costs. -- 3 of 5 -- ..4.. Sum Suit No.232/2020 2. Defendant shall pay an amount of Rs.1,36,037.26/- (Rupees One Lakh Thirty-Six Thousand Thirty-Seven and Twenty-Six Paise Only) to plaintiff with interest at the rate of 7% p.a. from the date of suit till the date of decree with further interest at the rate of 6% p.a. from the date of decree till its realization. 3. Decree be drawn accordingly. (Judgment dictated and pronounced in open Court) ( Sachin Suryakant Patil ) Judge, City Civil & Sessions Court, Mazgaon, Mumbai, Court No.84 Dated : 14/08/2025 Dictated and typed on : 14/08/2025. Signed by HHJ on : 14/08/2025. -- 4 of 5 -- ..5.. Sum Suit No.232/2020 “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” Upload Date Upload Time Sonali S. Naik Name of Stenographer18/08/2025 3.15 p.m. Name of the Judge (With C.R. No.) HHJ SACHIN SURYAKANT PATIL (COURT ROOM NO.84) Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT / ORDER 14/08/2025 JUDGMENT / ORDER signed by P.O. on 14/08/2025 JUDGMENT / ORDER uploaded on 18/08/2025 -- 5 of 5 --
