Date: 17-03-2018
Business: Matter adj. for CS Reply to 18.06.2018.
Next Purpose: CHAMBER SUMMONS
Next Hearing Date: 18-06-2018
Date: 18-06-2018
Business: List the matter in the morning session for Hearing on Documents and CS Hearing to 13.08.2018.
Next Purpose: CHAMBER SUMMONS
Next Hearing Date: 13-08-2018
Date: 13-08-2018
Business: matter adj. for CS Hearing to 12.09.2018 in second session.
Next Purpose: CHAMBER SUMMONS
Next Hearing Date: 12-09-2018
Date: 12-09-2018
Business: Adv. Lokegaonkar for plaintiff present.
Adv. Karan Singh for defendant no.2 present.
Adv. Pahade for proposed defendant present and filed VP on behalf of proposed defendant.
Heard both sides in CS No.196/2018.
The plaintiff has filed this chamber summons to add Woodland Construction as D-3 and to make consequential amendment in the plaint. The proposed defendant was served on 1.2.2018 with the chamber summons but it did not enter appearance. None of the other defendants filed reply to the chamber summons. By order dated 13.8.2018, the chamber summons is ordered to proceed exparte against proposed defendant. On perusal of the proposed amendment, I find that it is necessary for proper adjudication of the suit and it does not change the nature of the suit. Today, the Ld. counsel appearing for proposed defendant is seeking time for filing reply to the chamber summons. However, in view of the order dated 13.8.2018, the question of granting time for reply does not arise. Ld. Counsel for D-2 has not objection to allow the chamber summons. Hence chamber summons no. 196/2018 is allowed. The necessary amendment be carried out within two wees. Amended copy of the plaint be filed in the court with copy to the other side. After the amendment is carried out, the plaintiff is directed to serve the amended coy to the newly added defendant.
Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
Disposal Date: 12-09-2018
