Final Order 1

Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: ..1.. SJ 82/2024 in Sum Suit 1096/2021
MHCC010093302024 SJ filed on : 19/12/2023
Registered on : 12/04/2024
Decided on : 04/07/2025
Duration : 01Y 06M 17D
IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT, GREATER MUMBAI AT
MAZGAON
SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.82 OF 2024
IN
SUMMARY SUIT NO.1096 OF 2021
M/S Precious Transport Service,
Partnership Firm having, registered office at VIII/2065
Gujarati Road, Cochin-682002 & Branch Office at
Unit No.04, Kalaghoda Building Bhadekaru, 1st floor
above Raymond Showroom next to Rytham House,
Kulfi Fort, Mumbai 400023.
]
]
]
]
]
] ..Plaintiff
Versus
1. Gammon Engineers & Contractor Pvt. Ltd.,
2. Mr. Vimal Kishor Kaushik (Director)
3. Mr. Vardhan Vasant Dharkar (Director)
4. Mr. Kirit Shah (Director)
5. Mr. Maruti Siddappa Jambagi (Director)
6. Mr. Kashinathan Laxmi Srinivasan (Director)
All having a registered office at Gammon Building,
Prabhadevi Dadar, Mumbai 25.
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
] ..Defendants
Appearance :-
Ld. Adv. Richa Singh h/f Adv. S. C. Singh for plaintiff.
Ld. Adv. Ramesh Sahu for defendant Nos.1, 2, 5 and 6.
(Defendant Nos.3 and 4 are deleted)
-- 1 of 4 --
..2.. SJ 82/2024 in Sum Suit 1096/2021
CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE
SACHIN SURYAKANT PATIL
COURT ROOM NO.84
DATE : 04/07/2025.
O R D E R
1) This summary suit is filed for recovery of amount,
contending that the plaintiff had rendered services to defendants and
for that amount of Rs.2,20,307/- is due from defendants. Defendants
did not pay the amount inspite of repeated demands. Hence, this
summary suit for recovery of Rs.2,20,307/-.
2) First writ of summons were served upon the defendants.
Accordingly, defendants appeared in the Suit. Plaintiff took out the
summons for judgment against the defendants. Defendant Nos.1, 2, 5
and 6 filed their reply to the summons for judgment. Plaintiff has filed
pursis for deletion of defendant Nos.3 and 4 vide Exh-07. Today both
parties appeared and submitted that the dispute has been settled
amicably. Nothing is remained to be paid by the defendant Nos.1, 2, 5
and 6, therefore, plaintiff has filed application for withdrawal vide
Exh-08. Hence, in view of the withdrawal application, Summary Suit
No.1096/2021 needs to be disposed of. Hence, I pass the following
order :
ORDER
1. Summons for Judgment No.82 of 2024 in Summary
Suit No.1096 of 2021, is disposed of as rejected.
2. Summary Suit No.1096 of 2021, stands withdrawn in
view of withdrawal application (Exh-08) vide Order
XXIII Rule 1 of CPC.
-- 2 of 4 --
..3.. SJ 82/2024 in Sum Suit 1096/2021
3. Parties to bear their own costs.
4. Court fees, if any, be refunded as per rule.
(Order dictated and pronounced in open Court)
( Sachin Suryakant Patil )
Judge, City Civil Court, Mazgaon,
Mumbai, C.R. No.84.
Date: 04/07/2025.
Dictated and typed on : 04/07/2025.
Signed by HHJ on : 04/07/2025.
-- 3 of 4 --
..4.. SJ 82/2024 in Sum Suit 1096/2021
“CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL
SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.”
Upload Date Upload Time Sonali S. Sawant
Name of Stenographer05/07/2025 05.30 p.m.
Name of the Judge (With C.R. No.) HHJ SACHIN SURYAKANT PATIL
(COURT ROOM NO.84)
Date of Pronouncement of
JUDGMENT / ORDER
04/07/2025
JUDGMENT / ORDER signed by P.O.
on
04/07/2025
JUDGMENT / ORDER uploaded on 05/07/2025
-- 4 of 4 --