TrustJury record updated 27 Sept 2026
Date: 27-02-2020 Business: None present for plaintiff. Adv. Suban Samuel for defendant no. 13 present and filed original NM no. 409/20 along with affidavit. Reply not filed. Matter stands Adj for reply to 18.04.2020. Later on Adv. Gupte for plaintiff present and seeks time to file reply to NM no. 409/20. Time granted. He further submitted that defendant no. 1 to 12 are promoter and defendant no. 3 and 6 have expired and amendment has been carried out deleting their names. Therefore, he submitted that Ld. counsel for defendant no. 1, 2, 4, 5 and 7 to 12 be directed to furnish the information to him whether any new promoter has been appointed. Adv. Saurabh Chitnis for defendant no. 1, 2, 4, 5 and 7 to 12 present and submitted that he has not received the copy of NM 409/20. He further submitted that he will be verify the fact regarding appointment of new promoters in place of defendant no. 3 and 6 and will furnish the information to plaintiff. In view of the above submissions, Ld. counsel for defendant no. 13 is directed to supply copy of NM to Ld. counsel for defendant no. 1, 2, 4, 5 and 7 to 12 before next date. Matter already adjn to 18.04.2020. Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 18-04-2020 Date: 18-04-2020 Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 08-05-2020 Date: 08-05-2020 Business: In view of declaration of Novel Corona Virus (COVID-19) as global pandemic by WHO and Office Order No. 77 of 2020 matter adjourned. Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 29-05-2020 Date: 29-05-2020 Business: In view of Lockdown period pursuant to the declaration of Novel Corona Virus (Covid-19) as global pandemic by WHO and as per Office Order 78 of 2020, matter adjourned Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 16-06-2020 Date: 16-06-2020 Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 16-09-2020 Date: 16-09-2020 Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19 Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 01-12-2020 Date: 01-12-2020 Business: None present for plaintiff. Adv. Saurabh Chitnis for defendant no. 1 to 12(except 3 and 6) present. Matter stands Adj for reply to 25.01.2021. Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 25-01-2021 Date: 25-01-2021 Business: None for Plaintiff. Advocate Saurabh Chitnis for defendants no.1,2,4,5 and 7 to 12 present. The case is adjourned to 11.03.2021 for NM reply. Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 11-03-2021 Date: 11-03-2021 Business: Court is on leave. Hence Board is discharged. Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 06-04-2021 Date: 06-04-2021 Business: In view of guidelines dated 23.02.2021 directed to be implemented from 25.03.2021 limited matters are taken up. Hence, except the daily board, the regular board is discharged. The case is adjourned to 25.06.2021 for reply. Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 25-06-2021 Date: 25-06-2021 Business: In view of office order No. 100/2021 dtd. 04.06.2021 of Hon''ble Principal Judge, City Civil and Sessions Court, Mumbai, pursuant to circular dtd. 16.04.2021 issued by Hon''ble Bombay High Court prescribing Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) in the wake of sharp surge in COVID-19 cases and the views of stakeholders, the matter is adjourned. Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 26-08-2021 Date: 26-08-2021 Business: Matter called out at 3.48 p.m. Adv. Sameer Tendulkar for plaintiff present. Adv. Saurabh R. Chitnis for Deft. No. 1, 2, 4, 5, 7 to 12 present. Deft No. 13 is directed to serve Deft. No. 1 ,2, 4, 5, 7 to 12. Matter stands adjourned to 29.10.2021 for reply. Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 29-10-2021 Date: 29-10-2021 Business: Matter called out at 3.37 p.m. None present. Matter stands adjourned to 13.12.2021 for NM reply. later on at 4.52 p.m. Adv. Saurabh Chitnis for Deft. No.1, 2, 4, 5, 7 to 12 present. Already adjourned to 13.12.2021. Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 13-12-2021 Date: 13-12-2021 Business: None present for plaintiff. Adv. Saurabh Chitnis for Deft. No. 1, 2, 4, 5, 7 to 12 present. As court is busy in recording evidence in SU No.7250/05. Therefore, matter stands adjourned to 20.01.2022 for Reply. Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 20-01-2022 Date: 20-01-2022 Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19 Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 24-02-2022 Date: 24-02-2022 Business: Matter called out at 3.43 p.m. None present for plaintiff. Adv. Saurabh Chitnis I/b Adv. Arun Panicker for Deft. No.1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8 to 12 present. Matter stands adjourned to 13.04.2022 for reply. Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 13-04-2022 Date: 13-04-2022 Business: Matter called out at 3.17 p.m. Adv. Suraj Gupte h/f Sameer Tendulkar for plaintiff present. He is seeking time. Time granted. Adv. Mangesh Sawant I/b Arun Panicker for Deft. no.1 to 12 present. As court is busy in recording evidence in SU no.3756/13, dictating orders in NM No.3233/19, NM no. 1212/22 and CS no.1300/21 as well as in part heard final hearing SU 594/08. Matter stands adjourned to 30.06.2022 for reply. Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 30-06-2022 Date: 30-06-2022 Business: Court is on Leave. Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 01-08-2022 Date: 01-08-2022 Business: None present for plaintiff. Adv. Saurabh Chitnis for Deft. no.1 to 12, except for 3 and 6 present. Matter stands adjourned to 23.09.2022 for reply/NM hearing on NM. Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 23-09-2022 Date: 23-09-2022 Business: Court is on Leave. Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 01-12-2022 Date: 01-12-2022 Business: Adv. Suraj Gupte for plaintiff present. Adv. Saurabh Chitnis for Deft. no.1, 2, 4, 5, 7 to 12 present. K.B. Later on mentioned at 3.29 p.m. Adv. Suraj Gupte for plaintiff present. Adv. Saurabh Chitnis for Deft. no.1, 2, 4, 5, 7 to 12 present. He is seeking time to submit the information of change of promoters on next date, if the change is done. Plaintiff tendered reply on NM No.409/2020 overleaf. Perused the record. Heard the Advocate of plaintiff. He raised the objection that no sufficient reason is mentioned. Deft. no.13 is Asst. Registrar of Co-operative Society appointed under the provision of Maharashtra Co-operative Society Act, 1960. Being, a government office, I am of the view that they should be given an opportunity to represent the office in the suit. Hence, NM deserves to be allowed. ORDER 1. Notice of Motion No.409/2020 is hereby allowed. 2. Delay stands condoned. 3. WS of Deft. no.13 is already taken on record it may be exhibited. 4. Notice of Motion stands disposed off accordingly. WS of Deft. no.13 marked at Exh.05. Matter stands adjourned to 30.01.2023 for NM hearing. Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED Disposal Date: 01-12-2022
Filing Number: 100875/2020 Filing Date: 27-01-2020 First Hearing Date: 27th February 2020 Decision Date: 01st December 2022 Court Number And Judge: 3-COURT 03 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Order Details: Other Pdf Text: 01.12.2022 Sr. No. 60 SU 1266/15 NM 409/20 NM 2226/15 Exh.05 CORAM : H.H.J. SHRI SHAIKH AKBAR SHAIKH JAFAR (CR. 03) Adv. Suraj Gupte for plaintiff present. Adv. Saurabh Chitnis for Deft. no.1, 2, 4, 5, 7 to 12 present. K.B. Later on mentioned at 3.29 p.m. Adv. Suraj Gupte for plaintiff present. Adv. Saurabh Chitnis for Deft. no.1, 2, 4, 5, 7 to 12 present. He is seeking time to submit the information of…
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
