Skip to main content
EXECUTION APPLN

JYOTI CONSTRUCTIION CO.VsMS. BUILD AGE CORPORATION

CNR MHCC01000826201813-COURT 13 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--WITHDRAWL
Decision Date: 06th August 2019

TrustJury record updated 22 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100008/2018
Registration Date
12 Jan 2018

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec warrant

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 30-01-2018
    Business: Ms. Smita Chunekar, I/b. Mr. Y.B.Yagnik, Advocate for Plaintiff is present.  None for Defendant.
    As the undersigned was busy before Hon\''ble State Information Commissioner, Mumbai, in RTI Appeal matter, board at 12.30 p.m. postponed to 2.00 p.m.  Ms. Chunekar applies for notice u/o. XXI r. 22 of CPC.  Hence, issue notice u/o. XXI r. 22 of CPC and returnable on 12/02/2018.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 12-02-2018
    
    Date: 12-02-2018
    Business: Ms. Smita Chunekar, I/b. Mr. Y.B.Yagnik, Advocate for Plaintiff is present. None for Defendant.  Ms. Chunekar seeks time for issue of notice.  Hence, adjourned to 26/02/2018.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 26-02-2018
    
    Date: 26-02-2018
    Business: Ms. Smita Chunekar, I/b. Mr. Y.P.Yagnik, Advocate for Plaintiff is present.  None for Defendant.  Ms. Chunekar tendered the notice u/o. XXI r. 21 duly served upon Judgment Debtor, same is t.o.r and marked as Exh. 05 and prays for issuance of Warrant of Attachment u/o. XXI r. 43 and 54 of CPC against Judgment Debtor.  Advocate for Plaintiff further states that the Decreetal amount will not be realised unless Warrant of Attachment for both, movable and immovable property u/o. XXI r. 43 and 54 of CPC, are issued.   Hence, upon perusing the Affidavit, issue Warrant of Attachment u/o. XXI. r. 43 and 54 of CPC as prayed, returnable on 26/03/2018.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 26-03-2018
    
    Date: 26-03-2018
    Business: Ms. Smita Chunekar, Advocate for Plaintiff Present. Mr. Lapashiya, Advocate for Defendant present. Ms. Chunekar submits that the warrant has not been executed for want of amendment. Mr. Lapashiya submitted Affidavit of Defendant objecting execution of warrant, the same is taken on record and marked as Exhibit No.8. Copy of the said Affidavit is served upon advocate for decree holder across the bar. Ms.Chunekar seeks time to file reply to the said Affidavit.  As the warrant is objected and is still not executed, the same is kept in abeyance.  Matter stands adjourned to 05/04/2018 for reply of Decree Holder.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 05-04-2018
    
    Date: 05-04-2018
    Business: Ms. Smita Chunekar, I/b. Mr. Y. P. Yagnik, Advocate for Plaintiff is present.  Ms. Ruby Warghat, Advocate for Defendant, present. Vakalatnama of Niranjan and Co., Advocates for Defendant, tendered by Ms. Warghat is t.o.r. and marked as Exh.9.  Ms. Chunekar seeks time to file rejoinder.  Hence, by consent adjourned to 09/04/2018.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 09-04-2018
    
    Date: 09-04-2018
    
    Date: 20-04-2018
    Business: Adv Smita Chulekar for plaintiff informed that there is no stay to the execution proceeding.
    Adv Rubi Varkhad for defendant
    Adjd to 06/07/2018 for E.A
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 06-07-2018
    
    Date: 06-07-2018
    Business: Plff. present Advocate for plff. present
    Adv. for deft. present
    unregistered ch/sum
    Order - Time is extended to register ch/sum
    Suit is adjd to 18.07.2018
    Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 18-07-2018
    
    Date: 18-07-2018
    Business: Court is vacant.
    Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 21-08-2018
    
    Date: 21-08-2018
    Business: Matter pertains to C.R.  No.13.
    Adv. Yagnik for Decree Holder present and filed drafted Ch/sum.is t.o.r. Leave is granted to register to Ch/sum. Returneable on 24.8.18 for tendering Ch/sum.
    Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 24-08-2018
    
    Date: 24-08-2018
    Business: Matter pertains to C.R. No.13.
    Adv. Yadnik for D/H present and submitted that, J/D present. She filed reply Ch/sum. 1506/18. She also submitted that, she want to settling the matter.
    Short time granted for reply and settling the matter.
    Adjd. to 07/09/18 for reply to Ch/sum. 1506/18.
    Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 07-09-2018
    
    Date: 07-09-2018
    Business: Court is vacant.
    Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 19-12-2018
    
    Date: 19-12-2018
    Business: Adv. Ruby Varkhad  for JD present.
    Adv. Yagnik for DH present.
    Reply filed by Adv. for JD
    Order passed below Chamber summons
    1.   Chamber Summons no. 1506/18 is allowed.
    2.   The D.H. is permitted to add the address of the J.D. for service of notice, warrant of attachment of movable and immovable properties of J.Ds.
    3. D.H. to carryout necessary amendment within the limitation.
    Adjd for compliance to 28/01/2019
    Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 09-01-2019
    
    Date: 09-01-2019
    Business: Adv. Yagnik for decree holder present.
    Heard Adv. Yagnik for the Decree Holder.
    F.R.S.R the following order is passed below CS 1506/18
    ORDER
    1. Chamber Summons No. 1506 of 2018 is allowed.
    2. The Decree Holder is allowed to carry out the typographical error in the Chamber Summons correcting the name as Satosh S. Gupte.
    3. The consequential correction is also carried out in order dtd. 19.12.2018.
    4. D. H. to carry out necessary amendment in Chamber Summons accordingly.
    Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 28-01-2019
    
    Date: 28-01-2019
    Business: DH present.
    Adv. Ruby Warghat for defendants present.
    DH requested the court that he is 78 years old and has gone bypass surgery. Therefore short date be given as the defendant is trying to compromise the dispute.
    The DH is a senior citizen and it is an execution proceeding. The suit was filed in the year 2008. Till date the DH is unable to get the fruits of the decree.
    JD is directed to remain present on next date.
    Adjd for compliance/further orders to 15/02/2019
    Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 15-02-2019
    
    Date: 15-02-2019
    Business: DH and JD present.
    Adv. Yogesh Yagnik for DH present.
    Adv. Ruby Warghat for defendant present.
    Adjd for compliance to  25/02/2019.
    Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 25-02-2019
    
    Date: 25-02-2019
    Business: Plaintiff present.
    Defendant present.
    Adv. Swapna Dhimae h/f Adv. Yogesh Yagnik for plaintiff present.
    Adv. Ruby Warghat for defendant present.
    JD told that he is giving cheque.
    Adjd for compliance to 25/03/2019.
    Later on
    DH appeared and said that JD is giving a post dated cheque of one and half month.
    JD is not ready to pay the amount to the DH.
    The decree is for recovery of Rs. 30,00,000/- along with interest at the rate of 6 percent per annum from October 2008 till its realization.
    The JD has not complied the decree i.e. the said amount was to be paid to DH within six months.
    Now also JD is seeking time.
    The roznama shows that sufficient opportunity is granted to the JD. Then also he is not paying the amount though always saying that he is ready to pay the amount.
    DH is at liberty to take steps to  recover the amount as per the decree.
    Adjd for taking steps to 01/03/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR TAKING STEPS
    Next Hearing Date: 01-03-2019
    
    Date: 01-03-2019
    Business: Adv. Yogesh Yagnik for DH present.
    Adv. Lapazhiya I/b Niranjan and Co. for JD present.
    Adjd for taking steps to 04/03/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR TAKING STEPS
    Next Hearing Date: 04-03-2019
    
    Date: 04-03-2019
    Business: DH and JD present.
    Adv. Yogesh Yagnik for DH present.
    Adv. Cherim Lapazhiya I/b Niranjan and Co. for JD present.
    Adv. for DH filed consent terms between the parties. O- The D.H and J.D are present. They have arrived at consent terms to pay the amount. Hence Read and recorded. The execution is fixed on  6th August 2019 for order at Exh- 1.
    Adjd for order at Exh-1  to 06/08/2019.
    Adjd for taking steps to 06/08/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR TAKING STEPS
    Next Hearing Date: 06-08-2019
    
    Date: 06-08-2019
    Business: Decree holder Mr. Dinesh Keshavlal Shah present.
    Proprietor of Judgment Debtor Mr. Satish Shankar Gupte present.
    Adv. Mr. Yogesh Yagnik for decree holder present.
    Adv. Mr. Cherin Lapazhiya i/b Niranjan and Co. for defendant present.
    Mr. Dinesh Keshavlal Shah, the Managing Partner present a/w.
    Exh- 2 The plaintiff/Decree Holder by application Exh. 2 seeks to withdraw the suit unconditionally. t.o.r.
    O- Execution application allowed to be withdraw unconditionally without liberty to file fresh. As the execution application is withdrawn it stands disposed of.
    Nature Of Disposal: WITHDRAWL
    Disposal Date: 06-08-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 100977/2018
    Filing Date: 12-01-2018
    First Hearing Date: 30th January 2018
    Decision Date: 06th August 2019
    Court Number And Judge: 13-COURT 13 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    3
    Final Order 2
    06 Aug 2019
    Order Details: Other
    Pdf Text: 1
    Daily Status
    Daily Status
    IN THE COURT OF:COURT 13 ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE
    Case No.:EXECUTION APPLN/0100008/2018
    JYOTI CONSTRUCTIION CO. Vs MS. BUILD AGE CORPORATION
    Date : 06-08-2019
    Business : Decree holder Mr. Dinesh Keshavlal Shah present.
    Proprietor of Judgment Debtor Mr. Satish Shankar Gupte
    present. Adv. Mr. Yogesh Yagnik for decree holder present.
    Adv. Mr. Cherin Lapazhiya i/b Niranjan and Co. for
    defendant present. Mr. Dinesh Keshavlal Shah, the
    Managing Partner present a/w. Exh- 2 The plaintiff/Decree
    Holder by application Exh. 2 seeks to withdraw the suit
    unconditionally. t.o.r. O- Execution application allowed to
    be withdraw unconditionally without liberty to file fresh. As
    the execution application is withdrawn it stands disposed of.
    Nature of Disposal : WITHDRAWL
    Disposal Date : 06-08-2019
    COURT 13 ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE
    -- 1 of 5 --
    2
    -- 2 of 5 --
    3
    -- 3 of 5 --
    4
    -- 4 of 5 --
    5
    11111
    -- 5 of 5 --
    Interim Order 1Full order available
    09 Jan 2019

    Order Details: Chamber summons Pdf Text: : 1 : Ch/s No. 1506 of 2018 CNR No.MHCC010105462018 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1506 OF 2018 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 8 OF 2018 IN SUIT NO. 4837 OF 2008 Jyoti Construction Company .. Plaintiff/D.H. Versus M/s. BuildAge Corporation .. Defendants Appearance : Ld. Advocate Yagnik for the Decree Holder/ Plaintiff. CORAM: SMT. S.S. NAGUR, ADHOC JUDGE & ASST. SESSIONS JUDGE, (C.R. No. 13). DATE : 9th…

    Read Full Order
    Order 1Full order available
    09 Jan 2019

    Order Details: Chamber summons Pdf Text: : 1 : Ch/s No. 1506 of 2018 CNR No.MHCC010105462018 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1506 OF 2018 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 8 OF 2018 IN SUIT NO. 4837 OF 2008 Jyoti Construction Company .. Plaintiff/D.H. Versus M/s. BuildAge Corporation .. Defendants Appearance : Ld. Advocate Yagnik for the Decree Holder/ Plaintiff. CORAM: SMT. S.S. NAGUR, ADHOC JUDGE & ASST. SESSIONS JUDGE, (C.R. No. 13). DATE : 9th…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.