TrustJury record updated 22 Sept 2026
Not available
Date: 17-01-2018 Business: Matter received from Board Department. Adv.Mr.Attar for Plff.present. Adv.Mrs.Tadavi for BMC/Deft.present. Order below draft N/m. Perused N/m which is supported by an affidavit. Also perused the documents on record. Heard Ld.advocate of both the sides. In the main suit the plaintiff has challenged the notice dated 23.05.2017, 12.01.2018 under section 314 of the MMC Act. At this stage, without going into the merits, the plff is ready to place the detail reply along with the additional documents within concerned authority within two weeks. It is also pointed out that there is judgment in suit no.4051/2001. The concerned authority after considering the reply and documents as well as the decree in the suit no.4051/2001 to pass the fresh order with detail reasons. Nature Of Disposal: OTHERWISE Disposal Date: 17-01-2018
Filing Number: 100727/2018 Filing Date: 14-01-2018 First Hearing Date: 17th January 2018 Decision Date: 17th January 2018 Court Number And Judge: 8-COURT 08 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Order Details: Copy of Judgment Pdf Text: Daily Status IN THE COURT OF :COURT 8 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE Case No. :SUIT/0100137/2018 Smt. Sayra Sarfaras Ansari Vs MCGM Date : 17-01-2018 Exhibits : The same shall be communicated to the plff in writing. If the order is adverse to the interest of plff or against the plff. then no coercive action will be taken by the MCGM with regard to the notice structure for the period of two weeks from the…
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
