Skip to main content
CHAMBER SUMMONS

Mrs. Paulomi Chandrakant NagarshethVsDeepali Alias Gita Deepak Kantak +1 more

CNR MHCC01000585202084-COURT 84 ADHOC JUDGE AND ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 20th March 2024

TrustJury record updated 27 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100069/2020
Registration Date
15 Jan 2020

Advocates

1

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    3

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 13-02-2020
    Business: Adv. Swati kapadia for plaintiff filed original Ch/s 69 of 2020 @ affidavit @ Service affidavit.
    Adjd for reply to Ch/s to 09-04-2020
    Next Purpose: REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 09-04-2020
    
    Date: 09-04-2020
    Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
    Next Purpose: REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 21-04-2020
    
    Date: 21-04-2020
    Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
    Next Purpose: REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 01-06-2020
    
    Date: 01-06-2020
    Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
    Next Purpose: REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 11-06-2020
    
    Date: 11-06-2020
    Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
    Next Purpose: REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 09-09-2020
    
    Date: 09-09-2020
    Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
    Next Purpose: REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 11-11-2020
    
    Date: 11-11-2020
    Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
    Next Purpose: REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 08-02-2021
    
    Date: 08-02-2021
    Business: Adv. Kapadia for plaintiff
    Adjd to 16-06-2021
    Next Purpose: REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 16-06-2021
    
    Date: 16-06-2021
    Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
    Next Purpose: REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 28-10-2021
    
    Date: 28-10-2021
    Business: Adv Swati Kapadia present for the plaintiff.
    None present for the defendant.
    Matter is adjd to 27.11.2021 for reply.
    Next Purpose: REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 27-11-2021
    
    Date: 27-11-2021
    Business: Adv. Swati Kapadiya for the plaintiff present.
    None for defendants.
    The plaintiff has filed affidavit of service. From that affidavit it appears that Ch/s is served to defendants. But, they have not given reply. Therefore, Ch/s to proceed without reply of defendants.
    The advocate of plaintiff requested time for argument on Ch/s.
    Matter is adjd. to 10/01/2022 for Ch/s hearing.
    Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 10-01-2022
    
    Date: 10-01-2022
    Business: The suit is posted for CHS  Hearing. In view of S.O.P. Dated 07-01-2022 office order No. 07 of 2022, the concerned advocate and parties are directed to attend proceeding virtually for CHS Argument or filed written notes of argument .
    Matter is adjd. to 10-03-2022 CHS Argument
    Next Purpose: C/S ARGUMENTS
    Next Hearing Date: 10-03-2022
    
    Date: 10-03-2022
    Business: Adv. Kapadia for plaintiff present.
    None for defendant.
    Matter is adjd. for Ch/s argument to 17-06-2022.
    Next Purpose: C/S ARGUMENTS
    Next Hearing Date: 17-06-2022
    
    Date: 17-06-2022
    Business: P.O. is on Leave.
    Next Purpose: C/S ARGUMENTS
    Next Hearing Date: 23-09-2022
    
    Date: 23-09-2022
    Business: As court is vacant
    Next Purpose: C/S ARGUMENTS
    Next Hearing Date: 29-11-2022
    
    Date: 29-11-2022
    Business: As court is vacant
    Next Purpose: C/S ARGUMENTS
    Next Hearing Date: 28-02-2023
    
    Date: 28-02-2023
    Business: As court is vacant
    Next Purpose: C/S ARGUMENTS
    Next Hearing Date: 12-06-2023
    
    Date: 12-06-2023
    Business: Adv. Swati Tapadia present for plaintiff, seeking time. Time is granted.
    None for defendant.
    Matter stands adjourned to  CS hearing on 25-07-2023.
    Next Purpose: C/S ARGUMENTS
    Next Hearing Date: 25-07-2023
    
    Date: 25-07-2023
    Business: Adv.Sourabh present  for plaintiff.
    Adv. for defendant.
    Heard
    It seems that the plaintiff want to bring the Legal heirs of Deepak Kantak who was neither the party the suit nor his name is appearing as a proprietor of a defendant No.2, in the array of defendant, hence, plaintiff to argue how the CS maintainable.
    Matter stands adjourned for CS hearing on 06-09-2023.
    Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 06-09-2023
    
    Date: 06-09-2023
    Business: Adv.Swati Kapadia present for plaintiff. Seeking time. Time is granted.
    None present for defendant.
    Matter stands adjourned CS hearing on 28-11-2023.
    Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 28-11-2023
    
    Date: 28-11-2023
    Business: As Presiding officer is on leave. Hence, matter is adjourned to
    Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 16-01-2024
    
    Date: 16-01-2024
    Business: Adv.Swati Kapadia present for plaintiff, tendered application for appointment of guardian for proposed defendant No.3 and 4 in Chamber Summons  TOR marked as Exh.5.
    None present for defendant.
    Plaintiff to serve the copy of this application to proposed guardian.
    Matter stands adjourned for service on 20-03-2024.
    Next Purpose: SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 20-03-2024
    
    Date: 20-03-2024
    Business: Adv. Swati Kapadia present for plaintiff, tendered service affidavit TOR marked as Exh.6.
    None present for defendant.
    As per the report Exh.6, the application at Exh.5 is served upon the defendant No.1, the defendant No.1 is mother of proposed defendant No.2A and 2B. She failed to appear, hence, considering the submissions, the defendant No.1 is guardian of proposed defendant No.2A and 2B. Application Exh.5 stands disposed off.
    Heard Counsel of plaintiff on Chamber Summons No.69/2020
    It is taken out for implication proposed defendant No2A and 2B contending that the defendant No.2 is a firm, the father of proposed defendant No.2A and 2B was the sole proprietor after his death the proposed defendants are necessary parties along with defendant No.1. Hence, I proceed to pass following order-
    Order
    1. Chamber Summons No.69/2020 stands allowed.
    2. Plaintiff is permitted to implead proposed defendant No.2A and 2B as a party to the suit and to carry out the amendment within stipulated period as prayed for.
    3. Chamber Summons No.69/2020 disposed off accordingly.
    Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
    Disposal Date: 20-03-2024

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 100651/2020
    Filing Date: 15-01-2020
    First Hearing Date: 13th February 2020
    Decision Date: 20th March 2024
    Court Number And Judge: 84-COURT 84 ADHOC JUDGE AND ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1Full order available
    20 Mar 2024

    Order Details: Other Pdf Text: Back Daily Status IN THE COURT OF :COURT 84 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE Case No. :CHAMBER SUMMONS/0100069/2020 1. Mrs. Paulomi Chandrakant Nagarsheth Vs 1. Deepali Alias Gita Deepak Kantak 2. M/s. Devansh Enterprise and Anr. Date : 20-03-2024 Business : Adv. Swati Kapadia present for plaintiff, tendered service affidavit TOR marked as Exh.6. None present for defendant. As per the report Exh.6, the application at Exh.5 is served upon the defendant No.1, the defendant No.1 is…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.