Smt. H. R. IraniVsHonble Estate Officer +1 more

Date: 09-01-2019
Business: Adv. Vidya Seth for appellant present.
Adv. Omprakash Jha for respondent present.
Appellant files draft NM for leading addl. evidence.
Kept back.
Later on.
Adv. Vaid for appellant present.
Adv. Omprakash Jha for respondent present.
Appellant tenders registered NM No.117/19.
Heard both sides on NM.
By way of this NM, the appellant sought to bring on record documents as per list Exh.5. Ld. Counsel for the respondent recorded his say below NM and resisted the NM as the documents has no bearing on the matter in hand.
At the stage of the arguments, this NM came to be filed.
The proposed documents the documents relating to the attempts made by the appellant through RTA for getting information about the creation of tenancy right in favour of appellant. No prejudice would be caused to the respondent, if these documents are take on record. I am incline to allow the NM in terms of prayer clause (a) and pass the following order.
ORDER
Notice of Motion No.117/19 is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
Disposal Date: 09-01-2019

Main Case No: MISC  APPEAL/0100042/2017
Main Cnr: MHCC010016012017
Main Filing No: -

Filing Number: 100385/2019
Filing Date: 09-01-2019
First Hearing Date: 09th January 2019
Decision Date: 09th January 2019
Court Number And Judge: 19-COURT 19 PRINCIPAL JUDGE CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS COURT