Skip to main content
SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT

Mr. Rajendra Raghunath PatilVsMCGM

CNR MHCC0100030120188-COURT 08 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--OTHER
Decision Date: 16th January 2018

TrustJury record updated 22 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100493/2018
Registration Date
01 Feb 2018

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Mr. Rajendra Raghunath Patil

    Respondent

    1. 1MCGM

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Hindu Marriage Act · Sec 34 · 38

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 16-01-2018
Business: Plff.Adv.Mr.Kudalkar for Plff.present.
Adv.Mrs.Kamble for BMC/Deft.present.
Adv.for Plff.filed rejoinder t.o.r.  Copy served to other side.
Order below N/m No.132/2018
Perused N/m, reply and documents on record.  Heard Ld.Advocates of both the sides.  In the case in hand, it is not the allegations of the MCGM that the shop itself is not unauthorized.  The allegations is that there is unauthorized horizontal extension in front of the existing shop by using bricks masonry wall, wooden and M S material etc.with G.I.Sheet roof.  The MCGM has filed on record the copy of sanctioned plan which prima facie shows about existence of  wall.  In the midst of the argument, the plff has made a statement that for the notice structure he is ready to make an application for regularization of the same.  Hence, at this stage, on the statement made by the plff and his advocate, no purpose would be served in keeping this Notice of Motion and Suit pending.
Nature Of Disposal: OTHER
Disposal Date: 16-01-2018

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 100310/2018
Filing Date: 08-01-2018
First Hearing Date: 16th January 2018
Decision Date: 16th January 2018
Court Number And Judge: 8-COURT 08 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1Full order available
    16 Jan 2018

    Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: Daily Status IN THE COURT OF :COURT 8 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE Case No. :SUIT/0100493/2018 Mr. Rajendra Raghunath Patil Vs MCGM Date : 16-01-2018 Exhibits : The plff is directed to make an application for regularization before the concerned authority as per rules within period of 90 days from today. The concerned authority to decide the regularization proposal as per the Law and communicate to the plaintiff. If the regularization proposal for any reason is…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.