Punjab National BankVsRAKESH KUMAR RAY

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 19 CS (COMM) 342/24
Punjab National Bank Vs. Rakesh Kumar Ray
16.01.2026
Present : Sh. B.K. Mishra and Sh. Tushar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for
the Plaintiff through video-conferencing.
None for the defendant who is already proceeded
‘exparte’ vide order dated 05.08.2025.
Written arguments had already been filed on behalf of the
plaintiff on 15.01.2026.
Separate judgment has been passed, whereby, the suit of
the plaintiff bank has been decreed, in its favour and against the
defendant, and a money decree has been passed for a sum of
Rs.7,93,535.36p, alongwith interest @ 9% per annum w.e.f.
01.04.2023, till its realization.
The costs and expenses i.e. the fees of the Ld. counsel for
the plaintiff, as provided under the High Court of Delhi, Rules, are also
awarded in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant.
Decree sheet be prepared accordingly.
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
Sudesh Kumar,
District Judge,
Commercial Court – 01,
Shahdara District, KKD Courts,
Delhi/16.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 10 CS (COMM) 342/24
Punjab National Bank Vs. Rakesh Kumar Ray
14.01.2026
Present : Sh. Tushar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
None for the defendant who is already proceeded
‘exparte’ vide order dated 05.08.2025.
‘Exparte’ final arguments have been addressed by the Ld.
Counsel for the plaintiff.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff is directed to file its Written
arguments within a period of two days from today.
Put up for ‘exparte’ Judgment on 16.01.2025 at 2 p.m.
Sudesh Kumar,
District Judge,
Commercial Court – 01,
Shahdara District, KKD Courts,
Delhi/14.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 12 CS (COMM) 342/24
Punjab National Bank Vs. Rakesh Kumar Ray
24.11.2025.
Present : Sh. B.K. Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through
video-conferencing.
None for the defendant who is already proceeded
‘exparte’ vide order dated 05.08.2025.
Part ‘exparte’ final arguments heard. Ld. Counsel for the
plaintiff seeks some more time to conclude the ‘exparte’ final
arguments and to file written submissions.
On his request, put up for remaining ‘exparte’ final
arguments and for filing written submissions, on 07.01.2026.
Sudesh Kumar,
District Judge,
Commercial Court – 01,
Shahdara District, KKD Courts,
Delhi/24.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 8 CS (COMM) 342/24
Punjab National Bank Vs. Rakesh Kumar Ray
10.09.2025.
Present : Sh. Tushar Mishra, Advocate, for the plaintiff with AR
Sh. Rajeev Kumar Thakur.
None for the defendant who is already ‘exparte’ vide
order dated 05.08.2025.
PW1 Sh. Rajeev Kumar Thakur is examined in ‘exparte’
plaintiff’s evidence and is discharged.
The Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff does not want to
examine any other witness on behalf of the plaintiff and has closed the
‘exparte’ plaintiff’s evidence in the affirmative.
On request, adjourned for ‘exparte’ final arguments on
16.10.2025.
Brijesh Kumar Garg,
District Judge,
Commercial Court – 01,
Shahdara District, KKD Courts,
Delhi/10.09.2025/rs
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (Comm.) No. 342/24
Punjab National Bank vs. Rakesh Kumar Ray
05.08.2025
Present : Sh. B.K. Mishra, Advocate, for the plaintiff, through
video-conferencing.
None for the defendant since morning despite
repeated calls.
It is already 2.45 p.m.
The defendant has been duly served by way of
publication in national newspapers, ‘The Statesman’ and ‘Veer
Arjun’, vide publication dated 16.06.2025. But, none has
appeared on behalf of the defendant and no written statement has
been filed, in compliance of the previous court orders, till date.
It appears that the defendant is deliberately and
intentionally not appearing before the court and is not filing his
written statement. Therefore, the defendant is hereby proceeded
‘exparte’.
The plaintiff is directed to file its’ list of witnesses
and affidavits of all its witnesses, within two weeks from today.
Adjourned for ‘exparte’ plaintiff’s evidence on
10.09.2025.
Brijesh Kumar Garg
District Judge
Commercial Court-01
Shahdara Distt, KKD, Delhi
05.08.2025/NR
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 1CS (COMM)342/24
Punjab National Bank Vs. Rakesh Kumar Ray
09.07.2025.
Present : Sh. Devender Saran Saxena, Advocate for the plaintiff
through video-conferencing.
None for the defendant.
It is reported that the defendant has been duly served with
the summons of the suit for settlement of issues, by way of
publications in National Newspaper, “The Statesman” and in “Veer
Arjun”, vide publications dated 16.06.2025. But, none has appeared
on behalf of the defendant, despite due service, by way of publication.
In the interest of justice, a further period of one week is
granted to the defendant to file his Written Statement, along with
statement of truth and affidavit of admission or denial of the
documents. Advance copy of the same be supplied to the Ld. Counsel
for the plaintiff, at least three days prior to the next date of hearing.
Adjourned for completion of pleadings and for first case
management hearing, on the next date of hearing, on 05.08.2025.
Brijesh Kumar Garg,
District Judge,
Commercial Court – 01,
Shahdara District, KKD Courts,
Delhi/09.07.2025/rs
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 1CS (COMM)342/24
Punjab National Bank Vs. Rakesh Kumar Ray
06.05.2025.
Present : Sh. Devender Saran Saxena, Advocate, for the Plaintiff.
Process issued to the defendant is received back un-
served.
The Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff seeks some time to trace
the fresh address of the defendant and, in the alternative, to move an
application u/o V Rule 20 CPC, for service of the defendant by
substituted means.
On his request, adjourned for filing the fresh address of
the defendant, if any, and for filing the application, as aforesaid, if any,
on the next date of hearing on 21.05.2025.
Brijesh Kumar Garg,
District Judge,
Commercial Court – 01,
Shahdara District, KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.05.2025/rs
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 2CS (COMM)342/24
Punjab National Bank Vs. Rakesh Kumar Ray
02.04.2025.
Present : None for the plaintiff.
Process issued to the defendant is received back
unserved.
Steps for service of the defendant, by electronic modes,
are also not taken by the plaintiff bank.
In these circumstances, issue fresh process to the
defendant, by all modes, including the electronic modes, as per
previous Orders, for the next date of hearing on 06.05.2025.
Brijesh Kumar Garg,
District Judge,
Commercial Court – 01,
Shahdara District, KKD Courts,
Delhi/02.04.2025/rs
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 4CS (COMM)342/24
Punjab National Bank Vs. Rakesh Kumar Ray
06.03.2025.
Present : Sh. Devender Saran Saxena, Advocate for the Plaintiff.
The Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff has filed an application
for taking the fresh address of the defendant on record. (I.A. No.
02/25).
Submissions of the Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff are heard
on the said application.
In the interest of justice, the present application is hereby
allowed. The fresh address of the defendant be taken on record. I.A.
No. 02/25 is disposed off accordingly.
The amended memo of parties be filed by the plaintiff,
within a period of one week from today. Thereafter, fresh process be
issued to the defendant, as per previous orders, for the next date of
hearing on 02.04.2025.
Brijesh Kumar Garg,
District Judge,
Commercial Court – 01,
Shahdara District, KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.03.2025/rs
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 2CS (COMM)342/24
Punjab National Bank Vs. Rakesh Kumar Ray
11.02.2025.
Present : Sh. Tushar Mishra, Advocate, Enrollment No. D-6195/24,
Proxy Counsel for the Plaintiff through video-
conferencing.
Process issued to the defendant is received back
unserved.
The Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff seeks some time
to trace the fresh address of the defendant.
On his request, adjourned for filing the fresh address of
the defendant and for further proceedings on 06.03.2025.
Brijesh Kumar Garg,
District Judge,
Commercial Court – 01,
Shahdara District, KKD Courts,
Delhi/11.02.2025/rs
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 2CS (COMM)342/24
Punjab National Bank Vs. Rakesh Kumar Ray
14.01.2025.
Present : Sh. Devender Saran Saxena, Advocate for the plaintiff
through video-conferencing.
Steps have not been taken by the plaintiff for service of
the defendant in compliance of the previous orders.
On request, issue fresh process to the defendant, as per
Order dated 21.12.2024, for the next date of hearing on 11.02.2025.
Brijesh Kumar Garg,
District Judge,
Commercial Court – 01,
Shahdara District, KKD Courts,
Delhi/14.01.2025/rs
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 2 CS (COMM) 342/24
Punjab National Bank Vs. Rakesh Kumar Ray
30.09.2024.
Present : Sh. Devender Saran Saxena, Advocate for the plaintiff
with AR Sh. Balbir Singh Narang.
The Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff seeks some more time to
move an appropriate application for amendment.
On his request, adjourned for filing the amendment
application, if any, and for consideration of the present suit on
26.10.2024.
Brijesh Kumar Garg,
District Judge,
Commercial Court – 01,
Shahdara District, KKD Courts,
Delhi/30.09.2024/rs
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 3 CS (COMM) 342/24
Punjab National Bank Vs. Rakesh Kumar Ray
10.09.2024.
Present : Sh. Tushar Mishra, Advocate, Enrollment no.
D-6195/2024, Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff through
video-conferencing.
The Ld. Main Counsel for the plaintiff is reported to be
not available today.
No application for amendment, has been filed on behalf
of the plaintiff, till date.
On request of the Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff,
adjourned for filing the amendment application, if any, and for further
proceedings on 30.09.2024.
Brijesh Kumar Garg,
District Judge,
Commercial Court – 01,
Shahdara District, KKD Courts,
Delhi/10.09.2024/rs
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 4 CS (COMM) 342/24
Punjab National Bank Vs. Rakesh Kumar Ray
20.07.2024.
Present : Sh. Devender Saran Saxena, Advocate for the plaintiff.
The Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff seeks some time to
move an appropriate application, for amendment of the plaint, and to
file the original documents.
On his request, adjourned for filing the application in this
regard, if any, and for consideration of the present suit on 14.08.2024.
Brijesh Kumar Garg,
District Judge,
Commercial Court – 01,
rs Shahdara District, KKD Courts,
Delhi/20.07.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 9 CS (COMM) 342/24
Punjab National Bank Vs. Rakesh Kumar Ray
10.07.2024.
Present : Sh. B.K. Mishra, Advocate for the Plaintiff.
The Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff seeks some more time to
make clarifications and to file the additional documents, pertaining to
all the three Loan Accounts of the defendant.
On his request, adjourned for clarifications and for
consideration of the present suit on the next date of hearing, on
20.07.2024.
Brijesh Kumar Garg,
District Judge,
Commercial Court – 01,
rs Shahdara District, KKD Courts,
Delhi/10.07.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 9 CS (COMM) 342/24
Punjab National Bank Vs. Rakesh Kumar Ray
07.06.2024.
Fresh suit for recovery is received on assignment through e-filing
portal of the District Court. It be checked and registered.
Present : Sh. B.K. Mishra, Advocate for the plaintiff.
Submissions of the Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff are
heard.
The Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff seeks some time to
make clarifications, regarding the merger of different loan accounts in
a single ledger account.
On his request, adjourned for clarifications, in this regard,
and for consideration of the present suit on 10.07.2024.
Brijesh Kumar Garg,
District Judge,
Commercial Court – 01,
rs Shahdara District, KKD Courts,
Delhi/07.06.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 10 CS (COMM) 342/24
Punjab National Bank Vs. Rakesh Kumar Ray
14.01.2026
Present : Sh. Tushar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
None for the defendant who is already proceeded
‘exparte’ vide order dated 05.08.2025.
‘Exparte’ final arguments have been addressed by the Ld.
Counsel for the plaintiff.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff is directed to file its Written
arguments within a period of two days from today.
Put up for ‘exparte’ Judgment on 16.01.2025 at 2 p.m.
Sudesh Kumar,
District Judge,
Commercial Court – 01,
Shahdara District, KKD Courts,
Delhi/14.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 12 CS (COMM) 342/24
Punjab National Bank Vs. Rakesh Kumar Ray
24.11.2025.
Present : Sh. B.K. Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through
video-conferencing.
None for the defendant who is already proceeded
‘exparte’ vide order dated 05.08.2025.
Part ‘exparte’ final arguments heard. Ld. Counsel for the
plaintiff seeks some more time to conclude the ‘exparte’ final
arguments and to file written submissions.
On his request, put up for remaining ‘exparte’ final
arguments and for filing written submissions, on 07.01.2026.
Sudesh Kumar,
District Judge,
Commercial Court – 01,
Shahdara District, KKD Courts,
Delhi/24.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 8 CS (COMM) 342/24
Punjab National Bank Vs. Rakesh Kumar Ray
10.09.2025.
Present : Sh. Tushar Mishra, Advocate, for the plaintiff with AR
Sh. Rajeev Kumar Thakur.
None for the defendant who is already ‘exparte’ vide
order dated 05.08.2025.
PW1 Sh. Rajeev Kumar Thakur is examined in ‘exparte’
plaintiff’s evidence and is discharged.
The Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff does not want to
examine any other witness on behalf of the plaintiff and has closed the
‘exparte’ plaintiff’s evidence in the affirmative.
On request, adjourned for ‘exparte’ final arguments on
16.10.2025.
Brijesh Kumar Garg,
District Judge,
Commercial Court – 01,
Shahdara District, KKD Courts,
Delhi/10.09.2025/rs
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (Comm.) No. 342/24
Punjab National Bank vs. Rakesh Kumar Ray
05.08.2025
Present : Sh. B.K. Mishra, Advocate, for the plaintiff, through
video-conferencing.
None for the defendant since morning despite
repeated calls.
It is already 2.45 p.m.
The defendant has been duly served by way of
publication in national newspapers, ‘The Statesman’ and ‘Veer
Arjun’, vide publication dated 16.06.2025. But, none has
appeared on behalf of the defendant and no written statement has
been filed, in compliance of the previous court orders, till date.
It appears that the defendant is deliberately and
intentionally not appearing before the court and is not filing his
written statement. Therefore, the defendant is hereby proceeded
‘exparte’.
The plaintiff is directed to file its’ list of witnesses
and affidavits of all its witnesses, within two weeks from today.
Adjourned for ‘exparte’ plaintiff’s evidence on
10.09.2025.
Brijesh Kumar Garg
District Judge
Commercial Court-01
Shahdara Distt, KKD, Delhi
05.08.2025/NR
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 1CS (COMM)342/24
Punjab National Bank Vs. Rakesh Kumar Ray
09.07.2025.
Present : Sh. Devender Saran Saxena, Advocate for the plaintiff
through video-conferencing.
None for the defendant.
It is reported that the defendant has been duly served with
the summons of the suit for settlement of issues, by way of
publications in National Newspaper, “The Statesman” and in “Veer
Arjun”, vide publications dated 16.06.2025. But, none has appeared
on behalf of the defendant, despite due service, by way of publication.
In the interest of justice, a further period of one week is
granted to the defendant to file his Written Statement, along with
statement of truth and affidavit of admission or denial of the
documents. Advance copy of the same be supplied to the Ld. Counsel
for the plaintiff, at least three days prior to the next date of hearing.
Adjourned for completion of pleadings and for first case
management hearing, on the next date of hearing, on 05.08.2025.
Brijesh Kumar Garg,
District Judge,
Commercial Court – 01,
Shahdara District, KKD Courts,
Delhi/09.07.2025/rs
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 1CS (COMM)342/24
Punjab National Bank Vs. Rakesh Kumar Ray
06.05.2025.
Present : Sh. Devender Saran Saxena, Advocate, for the Plaintiff.
Process issued to the defendant is received back un-
served.
The Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff seeks some time to trace
the fresh address of the defendant and, in the alternative, to move an
application u/o V Rule 20 CPC, for service of the defendant by
substituted means.
On his request, adjourned for filing the fresh address of
the defendant, if any, and for filing the application, as aforesaid, if any,
on the next date of hearing on 21.05.2025.
Brijesh Kumar Garg,
District Judge,
Commercial Court – 01,
Shahdara District, KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.05.2025/rs
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 2CS (COMM)342/24
Punjab National Bank Vs. Rakesh Kumar Ray
02.04.2025.
Present : None for the plaintiff.
Process issued to the defendant is received back
unserved.
Steps for service of the defendant, by electronic modes,
are also not taken by the plaintiff bank.
In these circumstances, issue fresh process to the
defendant, by all modes, including the electronic modes, as per
previous Orders, for the next date of hearing on 06.05.2025.
Brijesh Kumar Garg,
District Judge,
Commercial Court – 01,
Shahdara District, KKD Courts,
Delhi/02.04.2025/rs
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 4CS (COMM)342/24
Punjab National Bank Vs. Rakesh Kumar Ray
06.03.2025.
Present : Sh. Devender Saran Saxena, Advocate for the Plaintiff.
The Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff has filed an application
for taking the fresh address of the defendant on record. (I.A. No.
02/25).
Submissions of the Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff are heard
on the said application.
In the interest of justice, the present application is hereby
allowed. The fresh address of the defendant be taken on record. I.A.
No. 02/25 is disposed off accordingly.
The amended memo of parties be filed by the plaintiff,
within a period of one week from today. Thereafter, fresh process be
issued to the defendant, as per previous orders, for the next date of
hearing on 02.04.2025.
Brijesh Kumar Garg,
District Judge,
Commercial Court – 01,
Shahdara District, KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.03.2025/rs
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 2CS (COMM)342/24
Punjab National Bank Vs. Rakesh Kumar Ray
11.02.2025.
Present : Sh. Tushar Mishra, Advocate, Enrollment No. D-6195/24,
Proxy Counsel for the Plaintiff through video-
conferencing.
Process issued to the defendant is received back
unserved.
The Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff seeks some time
to trace the fresh address of the defendant.
On his request, adjourned for filing the fresh address of
the defendant and for further proceedings on 06.03.2025.
Brijesh Kumar Garg,
District Judge,
Commercial Court – 01,
Shahdara District, KKD Courts,
Delhi/11.02.2025/rs
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 2CS (COMM)342/24
Punjab National Bank Vs. Rakesh Kumar Ray
14.01.2025.
Present : Sh. Devender Saran Saxena, Advocate for the plaintiff
through video-conferencing.
Steps have not been taken by the plaintiff for service of
the defendant in compliance of the previous orders.
On request, issue fresh process to the defendant, as per
Order dated 21.12.2024, for the next date of hearing on 11.02.2025.
Brijesh Kumar Garg,
District Judge,
Commercial Court – 01,
Shahdara District, KKD Courts,
Delhi/14.01.2025/rs
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 2 CS (COMM) 342/24
Punjab National Bank Vs. Rakesh Kumar Ray
30.09.2024.
Present : Sh. Devender Saran Saxena, Advocate for the plaintiff
with AR Sh. Balbir Singh Narang.
The Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff seeks some more time to
move an appropriate application for amendment.
On his request, adjourned for filing the amendment
application, if any, and for consideration of the present suit on
26.10.2024.
Brijesh Kumar Garg,
District Judge,
Commercial Court – 01,
Shahdara District, KKD Courts,
Delhi/30.09.2024/rs
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 3 CS (COMM) 342/24
Punjab National Bank Vs. Rakesh Kumar Ray
10.09.2024.
Present : Sh. Tushar Mishra, Advocate, Enrollment no.
D-6195/2024, Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff through
video-conferencing.
The Ld. Main Counsel for the plaintiff is reported to be
not available today.
No application for amendment, has been filed on behalf
of the plaintiff, till date.
On request of the Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff,
adjourned for filing the amendment application, if any, and for further
proceedings on 30.09.2024.
Brijesh Kumar Garg,
District Judge,
Commercial Court – 01,
Shahdara District, KKD Courts,
Delhi/10.09.2024/rs
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 4 CS (COMM) 342/24
Punjab National Bank Vs. Rakesh Kumar Ray
20.07.2024.
Present : Sh. Devender Saran Saxena, Advocate for the plaintiff.
The Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff seeks some time to
move an appropriate application, for amendment of the plaint, and to
file the original documents.
On his request, adjourned for filing the application in this
regard, if any, and for consideration of the present suit on 14.08.2024.
Brijesh Kumar Garg,
District Judge,
Commercial Court – 01,
rs Shahdara District, KKD Courts,
Delhi/20.07.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 9 CS (COMM) 342/24
Punjab National Bank Vs. Rakesh Kumar Ray
10.07.2024.
Present : Sh. B.K. Mishra, Advocate for the Plaintiff.
The Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff seeks some more time to
make clarifications and to file the additional documents, pertaining to
all the three Loan Accounts of the defendant.
On his request, adjourned for clarifications and for
consideration of the present suit on the next date of hearing, on
20.07.2024.
Brijesh Kumar Garg,
District Judge,
Commercial Court – 01,
rs Shahdara District, KKD Courts,
Delhi/10.07.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 9 CS (COMM) 342/24
Punjab National Bank Vs. Rakesh Kumar Ray
07.06.2024.
Fresh suit for recovery is received on assignment through e-filing
portal of the District Court. It be checked and registered.
Present : Sh. B.K. Mishra, Advocate for the plaintiff.
Submissions of the Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff are
heard.
The Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff seeks some time to
make clarifications, regarding the merger of different loan accounts in
a single ledger account.
On his request, adjourned for clarifications, in this regard,
and for consideration of the present suit on 10.07.2024.
Brijesh Kumar Garg,
District Judge,
Commercial Court – 01,
rs Shahdara District, KKD Courts,
Delhi/07.06.2024
-- 1 of 1 --