SARAOGI SUPER SALES PVT. LTD.VsImran Hussain Prop M/s Imran Trading Company

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 20 CS (COMM) 66/24
SARAOGI SUPER SALES PVT. LTD. Vs. Imran Hussain Prop M/s
Imran Trading Company
19.03.2025
Present : Sh. Varun Bedi, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff (through VC).
Sh. Naveen Gutpa, Ld. Counsel for the defendant (through VC).
The matter is fixed for hearing final arguments. Final arguments have
been heard. Matter is ordered to be listed for judgment.
To come up on 28.03.2025.
(PAWAN KUMAR MATTO)
DISTRICT JUDGE
(COMMERCIAL COURT)-04,
SHAHDARA, KKD,
Delhi/19.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 11 CS (COMM) 66/24
SARAOGI SUPER SALES PVT. LTD. Vs. Imran Hussain Prop M/s
Imran Trading Company
17.02.2025
Present : Ms. Swati Ahlawat, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff (through VC).
None for the defendant.
The matter is fixed for hearing final arguments. But, today only Ld.
Proxy counsel for the plaintiff has appeared through VC and seeks adjournment.
Today despite of repeated calls since monring, no one has appeared on behalf of the
defendant. Since, the advocates are observing strike today, so, in the interest of
justice, last and final opportunity is granted to both the parties to address their final
arguments.
To come up on 19.03.2025.
(PAWAN KUMAR MATTO)
DISTRICT JUDGE
(COMMERCIAL COURT)-04,
SHAHDARA, KKD,
Delhi/17.02.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 11 CS (COMM) 66/24
SARAOGI SUPER SALES PVT. LTD. Vs. Imran Hussain Prop M/s
Imran Trading Company
21.01.2025
Present : Sh. Varun Bedi, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff (through VC).
Sh. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
The matter is fixed for hearing final arguments. But, today the Ld. Counsel
for the defendant has submitted that the main counsel is busy in campaigning of the
Election of the Assembly, so he is unable to appear in the Court and seeks adjournment.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff has not opposed the adjournment sought by the Ld. Counsel
for the defendant. Accordingly, matter stands adjourned for hearing final arguments. It
will be the last and final opportunity for the defendant to argue in the present matter.
To come up on 17.02.2025.
(PAWAN KUMAR MATTO)
DISTRICT JUDGE
(COMMERCIAL COURT)-04,
SHAHDARA, KKD,
Delhi/21.01.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 9 CS (COMM) 66/24
SARAOGI SUPER SALES PVT. LTD. Vs. Imran Hussain Prop
M/s Imran Trading Company
28.11.2024
Present: Sh. Varun Bedi, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Navin Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the defendant along
with defendant Sh. Imran Hussain.
The matter is fixed for evidence of the defendant.
Today, Ld. Counsel for the defendant has filed the afffidavit of
defendant namely Sh. Imran Hussain and submitted that copy
thereof has already been supplied to the Ld. Counsel for the
plaintiff.
Let this witness be examined.
Accordingly, Sh. Imaran Hussain has been examined as
DW-1 and cross examined by the Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. His
cross examination has been concluded. Thereafter, defendant has
given the statement that defendant does not want to examine any
other witness. So, the evidence of the defendant may be closed.
Accordingly, evidence of the defendant stands closed.
Matter stands adjourned for final arguments.
To come up on 21.01.2025.
(Pawan Kumar Matto)
District Judge, Commercial Court-04
Shahdara, Karkardooma
Delhi/28.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 66/24
SARAOGI SUPER SALES PVT. LTD. Vs. Imran Hussain Prop
M/s Imran Trading Company
23.10.2024
Present: Sh. Sanjay Pawar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff along with Sh.
Dharmender PW-1.
Sh. Navin Gupta along with Sh. Sanjay Pandey, Ld.
Counsels for the defendant.
The matter is fixed for further cross examination of
PW-1 namely Dharmender. PW-1 is present. Let this witness be
further cross examined.
Accordingly, PW-1 has been further Cross examined by
ld. Counsel for the defendant. He is discharged. Thereafter PW-1
has given the statement to close the evidence of the plaintiff. So, the
evidence of the plaintiff stands closed.
Matter stands adjourned for evidence of the defendant.
Defendant is directed to file affidavits of all the
witnesses in the court one week prior to the next date of hearing and
to supply advance copies thereof to the plaitniff or it’s counsel in
similar fashion.
To come up on 28.11.2024.
(Pawan Kumar Matto)
District Judge, Commercial Court-04
Shahdara, Karkardooma Courts
Delhi/23.10.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM)66/24
SARAOGI SUPER SALES PVT. LTD. Vs. Imran Hussain Prop M/s Imran
Trading Company
05.06.2024
Present : Ms. Payal, proxy Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Sanjay Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Today on putting on appearance, proxy counsel for the plaintiff has
apprised to the Court that the defendant failed to file the affidavit of
admission/denial in the Court so the replication to the written statement of the
defendant could not be prepared. On this, Ld. Counsel for the defendant seeks
another opportunity to file the same. In the interest of justice, last and final
opportunity is granted to the defendant to file the affidavit of admission/denial
at least two days prior of the next date of hearing in the Court and to supply
copy thereof to the plaintiff or its counsel in similar fashion so that replication
may be filed by the plaintiff on the next date of hearing.
To come up for 10.07.2024.
(Pawan Kumar Matto)
District Judge, Commercial Court-04
Shahdara, Karkardooma
Delhi/05.06.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (Comm.) No. 66/2024
Saraogi Super Sales Pvt. Ltd.
vs.
Imran Hussain (Prop of M/s Imran Trading Company)
06.03.2024
Present : Sh. Sanjay Panwar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
None for the defendant.
Summons issued to the defendant by speed post received back
with the report of the Postal Department as “refused”. Plaintiff has filed
tracking report of the Department of Posts from which date the delivery of the
summons is recorded as 17.02.2024. In view of the fact that defendant has
refused to accept the summons, summons are deemed to have been served.
As thirty days from the date of service of summons are yet to
expire, put up for miscellaneous purposes on 22.03.2024.
(REETESH SINGH)
DISTRICT JUDGE (COMMERCIAL COURT)-04
SHAHDARA, KKD, DELHI/06.03.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (Comm.) No. 66/2024
Saraogi Super Sales Pvt. Ltd. vs. Imran Hussain
24.01.2024
Fresh commercial suit received by way of assignment. It be
checked and registered.
Present : Sh. Sanjay Kumar Panwar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Summons of suit be issued to the defendant by all modes
including registered post and speed post on taking steps. Plaintiff to place
on record tracking report on affidavit by the next date.
Further, it be specifically mentioned on the summons that this
is a commercial suit and the defendant is required to file the written
statement along with statement of truth and affidavit of admission and
denial of documents within the prescribed period from the date of service.
Put up for miscellaneous purposes on 16.02.2024.
(REETESH SINGH)
DISTRICT JUDGE (COMMERCIAL COURT)-04
SHAHDARA, KKD, DELHI/24.01.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 20 CS (COMM) 66/24
SARAOGI SUPER SALES PVT. LTD. Vs. Imran Hussain Prop M/s
Imran Trading Company
19.03.2025
Present : Sh. Varun Bedi, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff (through VC).
Sh. Naveen Gutpa, Ld. Counsel for the defendant (through VC).
The matter is fixed for hearing final arguments. Final arguments have
been heard. Matter is ordered to be listed for judgment.
To come up on 28.03.2025.
(PAWAN KUMAR MATTO)
DISTRICT JUDGE
(COMMERCIAL COURT)-04,
SHAHDARA, KKD,
Delhi/19.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 11 CS (COMM) 66/24
SARAOGI SUPER SALES PVT. LTD. Vs. Imran Hussain Prop M/s
Imran Trading Company
17.02.2025
Present : Ms. Swati Ahlawat, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff (through VC).
None for the defendant.
The matter is fixed for hearing final arguments. But, today only Ld.
Proxy counsel for the plaintiff has appeared through VC and seeks adjournment.
Today despite of repeated calls since monring, no one has appeared on behalf of the
defendant. Since, the advocates are observing strike today, so, in the interest of
justice, last and final opportunity is granted to both the parties to address their final
arguments.
To come up on 19.03.2025.
(PAWAN KUMAR MATTO)
DISTRICT JUDGE
(COMMERCIAL COURT)-04,
SHAHDARA, KKD,
Delhi/17.02.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 11 CS (COMM) 66/24
SARAOGI SUPER SALES PVT. LTD. Vs. Imran Hussain Prop M/s
Imran Trading Company
21.01.2025
Present : Sh. Varun Bedi, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff (through VC).
Sh. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
The matter is fixed for hearing final arguments. But, today the Ld. Counsel
for the defendant has submitted that the main counsel is busy in campaigning of the
Election of the Assembly, so he is unable to appear in the Court and seeks adjournment.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff has not opposed the adjournment sought by the Ld. Counsel
for the defendant. Accordingly, matter stands adjourned for hearing final arguments. It
will be the last and final opportunity for the defendant to argue in the present matter.
To come up on 17.02.2025.
(PAWAN KUMAR MATTO)
DISTRICT JUDGE
(COMMERCIAL COURT)-04,
SHAHDARA, KKD,
Delhi/21.01.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 9 CS (COMM) 66/24
SARAOGI SUPER SALES PVT. LTD. Vs. Imran Hussain Prop
M/s Imran Trading Company
28.11.2024
Present: Sh. Varun Bedi, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Navin Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the defendant along
with defendant Sh. Imran Hussain.
The matter is fixed for evidence of the defendant.
Today, Ld. Counsel for the defendant has filed the afffidavit of
defendant namely Sh. Imran Hussain and submitted that copy
thereof has already been supplied to the Ld. Counsel for the
plaintiff.
Let this witness be examined.
Accordingly, Sh. Imaran Hussain has been examined as
DW-1 and cross examined by the Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. His
cross examination has been concluded. Thereafter, defendant has
given the statement that defendant does not want to examine any
other witness. So, the evidence of the defendant may be closed.
Accordingly, evidence of the defendant stands closed.
Matter stands adjourned for final arguments.
To come up on 21.01.2025.
(Pawan Kumar Matto)
District Judge, Commercial Court-04
Shahdara, Karkardooma
Delhi/28.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 66/24
SARAOGI SUPER SALES PVT. LTD. Vs. Imran Hussain Prop
M/s Imran Trading Company
23.10.2024
Present: Sh. Sanjay Pawar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff along with Sh.
Dharmender PW-1.
Sh. Navin Gupta along with Sh. Sanjay Pandey, Ld.
Counsels for the defendant.
The matter is fixed for further cross examination of
PW-1 namely Dharmender. PW-1 is present. Let this witness be
further cross examined.
Accordingly, PW-1 has been further Cross examined by
ld. Counsel for the defendant. He is discharged. Thereafter PW-1
has given the statement to close the evidence of the plaintiff. So, the
evidence of the plaintiff stands closed.
Matter stands adjourned for evidence of the defendant.
Defendant is directed to file affidavits of all the
witnesses in the court one week prior to the next date of hearing and
to supply advance copies thereof to the plaitniff or it’s counsel in
similar fashion.
To come up on 28.11.2024.
(Pawan Kumar Matto)
District Judge, Commercial Court-04
Shahdara, Karkardooma Courts
Delhi/23.10.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM)66/24
SARAOGI SUPER SALES PVT. LTD. Vs. Imran Hussain Prop M/s Imran
Trading Company
05.06.2024
Present : Ms. Payal, proxy Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Sanjay Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Today on putting on appearance, proxy counsel for the plaintiff has
apprised to the Court that the defendant failed to file the affidavit of
admission/denial in the Court so the replication to the written statement of the
defendant could not be prepared. On this, Ld. Counsel for the defendant seeks
another opportunity to file the same. In the interest of justice, last and final
opportunity is granted to the defendant to file the affidavit of admission/denial
at least two days prior of the next date of hearing in the Court and to supply
copy thereof to the plaintiff or its counsel in similar fashion so that replication
may be filed by the plaintiff on the next date of hearing.
To come up for 10.07.2024.
(Pawan Kumar Matto)
District Judge, Commercial Court-04
Shahdara, Karkardooma
Delhi/05.06.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (Comm.) No. 66/2024
Saraogi Super Sales Pvt. Ltd.
vs.
Imran Hussain (Prop of M/s Imran Trading Company)
06.03.2024
Present : Sh. Sanjay Panwar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
None for the defendant.
Summons issued to the defendant by speed post received back
with the report of the Postal Department as “refused”. Plaintiff has filed
tracking report of the Department of Posts from which date the delivery of the
summons is recorded as 17.02.2024. In view of the fact that defendant has
refused to accept the summons, summons are deemed to have been served.
As thirty days from the date of service of summons are yet to
expire, put up for miscellaneous purposes on 22.03.2024.
(REETESH SINGH)
DISTRICT JUDGE (COMMERCIAL COURT)-04
SHAHDARA, KKD, DELHI/06.03.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (Comm.) No. 66/2024
Saraogi Super Sales Pvt. Ltd. vs. Imran Hussain
24.01.2024
Fresh commercial suit received by way of assignment. It be
checked and registered.
Present : Sh. Sanjay Kumar Panwar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Summons of suit be issued to the defendant by all modes
including registered post and speed post on taking steps. Plaintiff to place
on record tracking report on affidavit by the next date.
Further, it be specifically mentioned on the summons that this
is a commercial suit and the defendant is required to file the written
statement along with statement of truth and affidavit of admission and
denial of documents within the prescribed period from the date of service.
Put up for miscellaneous purposes on 16.02.2024.
(REETESH SINGH)
DISTRICT JUDGE (COMMERCIAL COURT)-04
SHAHDARA, KKD, DELHI/24.01.2024
-- 1 of 1 --