Tarsham MittalVsRahul Gupta

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (Comm.) No. 46/24
Tarsham Mittal vs. Rahul Gupta
18.02.2025
Present : Sh. Sumit Nandvani, Advocate, for the plaintiff,
through video-conferencing.
None for the defendant.
Separate judgment has been passed, whereby, the
suit of the plaintiff has been dismissed, being devoid of any
merits.
Parties to bear their own costs.
Decree sheet be prepared accordingly.
File be consigned to record room after due
compliance.
Brijesh Kumar Garg
District Judge
Commercial Court-01
Shahdara Distt, KKD, Delhi
18.02.2025/NR
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (Comm.) No. 46/24
Tarsham Mittal vs. Rahul Gupta
18.02.2025
Present : Sh. Sumit Nandvani, Advocate, for the plaintiff,
through video-conferencing.
None for the defendant.
Separate judgment has been passed, whereby, the
suit of the plaintiff has been dismissed, being devoid of any
merits.
Parties to bear their own costs.
Decree sheet be prepared accordingly.
File be consigned to record room after due
compliance.
Brijesh Kumar Garg
District Judge
Commercial Court-01
Shahdara Distt, KKD, Delhi
18.02.2025/NR
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 15CS (COMM)46/24
Tarsham Mittal Vs. Rahul Gupta
24.01.2025.
Present : Sh. Sumit Nandwani, Advocate for the plaintiff through
video-conferencing.
Sh. Tushar Sharma, Advocate for the defendant through
video-conferencing.
The Ld. Counsels for the parties have concluded their
final arguments.
They are permitted to file their written arguments along
with supporting judgments, if any, within a period of one week from
today, with advance copy to the opposite party.
Adjourned for Judgment on 18.02.2025.
Brijesh Kumar Garg,
District Judge,
Commercial Court – 01,
Shahdara District, KKD Courts,
Delhi/24.01.2025/rs
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 8CS (COMM)46/24
Tarsham Mittal Vs. Rahul Gupta
09.01.2025.
Present : Sh. Sumit Nandwani, Advocate for the plaintiff through
video-conferencing.
Sh. Prashant Rana, Advocate, Enrollment No. D-
11873/23, for the plaintiff, is also present physically in
the court.
Sh. Tushar Sharma, Advocate for the defendant.
The Ld. Counsel for the defendant has paid the previous
cost of Rs.10,000/-, to the Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff in the
court today.
The Ld. Counsel for the defendant has prayed for
adjournment on the ground of sickness of his real brother. The request
is not opposed by the Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
In these circumstances, adjourned for final arguments on
24.01.2025.
Brijesh Kumar Garg,
District Judge,
Commercial Court – 01,
Shahdara District, KKD Courts,
Delhi/09.01.2025/rs
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 11CS (COMM)46/24
Tarsham Mittal Vs. Rahul Gupta
27.11.2024
Present : Sh. Sumit Nandwani, Advocate for the Plaintiff through
video-conferencing.
Sh. Tushar Sharma, Advocate for the defendant through
video-conferencing.
The Ld. Local Commissioner had already filed her report,
along with record of evidence of the parties, in compliance of the
previous orders, on 13.11.2024.
An application has been filed on behalf of the defendant
for waiving the cost imposed on the defendant, vide order dated,
18.10.2024. A copy of the same be supplied to the Ld. Counsel for the
plaintiff, by registered speed post, as well as by electronic modes,
within a period of one week from today. The reply to the said
application, if any, be filed, within a period of one week, thereafter,
with advance copy to the Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
The Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff has prayed for
adjournment on his personal medical grounds.
On his request, adjourned for arguments on the aforesaid
application, and for final arguments on 09.12.2024.
Brijesh Kumar Garg,
District Judge,
Commercial Court – 01,
Shahdara District, KKD Courts,
Delhi/27.11.2024/rs
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (Comm.) No. 46/2024
Tarsham Mittal vs. Rahul Gupta
08.08.2024
Present : Sh. Sumit Nandvani, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Ms. Kismat Chauhan, Advocate, proxy counsel for
the defendant.
Replication has been filed, on behalf of the plaintiff,
in compliance of the previous orders, on 29.07.2024, alongwith
an affidavit of admission & denial and an affidavit under Order
XI Rule 4 CPC, as applicable to the Commercial Courts Act.
Advance copy of the same is reported to have been supplied to
the Ld. Counsel for the defendant, through electronic mode.
Parties are absent despite directions on the last date
of hearing. Therefore, a cost of Rs.2,000/- each is imposed on
the parties. The cost be deposited with the office of the DLSA,
Shahdara District, KKD, Delhi, within two weeks from today.
Parties are again directed to appear in person, before
the court, on the next date of hearing, for exploring the
possibilities of settlement, if any.
Adjourned for appearance of the parties, and for first
case management hearing on 04.09.2024.
Brijesh Kumar Garg
District Judge
Commercial Court-01
Shahdara Distt, KKD, Delhi
NR 08.08.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (Comm.) No. 46/24
Tarsham Mittal vs. Rahul Gupta
10.07.2024
Present : Ms. Anchal Jindal, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Sh. Akshay Jain, Advocate, for the defendant.
Previous cost has been paid by the Ld. Counsel for
the defendant, to the Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff, in the court
today by electronic mode.
The Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff seeks some more
time to file the replication. On her request, a period of two weeks
is granted to the plaintiff to file the replication, if any. Advance
copy of the same be supplied to the Ld. Counsel for the
defendant, atleast three days prior to the next date of hearing.
Parties shall appear in person, before the court, on
the next date of hearing, for exploring the possibilities of
settlement, if any.
Adjourned for completion of pleadings and for first
case management hearing on 08.08.2024.
Brijesh Kumar Garg
District Judge
Commercial Court-01
Shahdara Distt, KKD, Delhi
NR 10.07.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 9CS (COMM)46/24
Tarsham Mittal Vs. Rahul Gupta
28.02.2024
Present : None for the plaintiff.
Sh. Prajwal Chaturvedi, Advocate for the defendant
through video-conferencing.
Lawyers are reported to be on strike today.
Deficient Court fee of Rs.4712/- had already been filed
on behalf of the plaintiff on 06.02.2024.
Defendant is reported to have been duly served on
07.02.2024, and again on 08.02.2024.
In the interest of justice, a further period of two weeks is
granted to the defendant to file the Written Statement, along with
statement of truth and affidavit of admission or denial of the
documents, with advance copy to the ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. In
default, a cost of Rs.3,000/- shall be deemed to have been imposed on
the defendant.
The parties shall appear in person, before the court, on
the next date of hearing, for exploring the possibilities of settlement, if
any.
Adjourned for completion of pleadings and for first case
management hearing, on the next date of hearing, on 27.03.2024.
(Brijesh Kumar Garg)
rs District Judge (Commercial Court) - 01
Shahdara, Karkardooma Delhi/28.02.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 7CS (COMM)46/24
Tarsham Mittal Vs. Rahul Gupta
18.01.2024
Fresh commercial suit for recovery is received on assignment
through e-filing portal of the District Court. It be checked and
registered.
Present : None.
None has appeared on behalf of the plaintiff since
morning, despite repeated calls. Even the hard copy of the plaint has
not been filed, till date.
In these circumstances, adjourned for filing the hard copy
of the plaint with documents and for consideration of the present suit
on 31.01.2024.
(Brijesh Kumar Garg)
rs District Judge (Commercial Court) - 01
Shahdara, Karkardooma Delhi/18.01.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 15CS (COMM)46/24
Tarsham Mittal Vs. Rahul Gupta
24.01.2025.
Present : Sh. Sumit Nandwani, Advocate for the plaintiff through
video-conferencing.
Sh. Tushar Sharma, Advocate for the defendant through
video-conferencing.
The Ld. Counsels for the parties have concluded their
final arguments.
They are permitted to file their written arguments along
with supporting judgments, if any, within a period of one week from
today, with advance copy to the opposite party.
Adjourned for Judgment on 18.02.2025.
Brijesh Kumar Garg,
District Judge,
Commercial Court – 01,
Shahdara District, KKD Courts,
Delhi/24.01.2025/rs
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 8CS (COMM)46/24
Tarsham Mittal Vs. Rahul Gupta
09.01.2025.
Present : Sh. Sumit Nandwani, Advocate for the plaintiff through
video-conferencing.
Sh. Prashant Rana, Advocate, Enrollment No. D-
11873/23, for the plaintiff, is also present physically in
the court.
Sh. Tushar Sharma, Advocate for the defendant.
The Ld. Counsel for the defendant has paid the previous
cost of Rs.10,000/-, to the Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff in the
court today.
The Ld. Counsel for the defendant has prayed for
adjournment on the ground of sickness of his real brother. The request
is not opposed by the Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
In these circumstances, adjourned for final arguments on
24.01.2025.
Brijesh Kumar Garg,
District Judge,
Commercial Court – 01,
Shahdara District, KKD Courts,
Delhi/09.01.2025/rs
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 11CS (COMM)46/24
Tarsham Mittal Vs. Rahul Gupta
27.11.2024
Present : Sh. Sumit Nandwani, Advocate for the Plaintiff through
video-conferencing.
Sh. Tushar Sharma, Advocate for the defendant through
video-conferencing.
The Ld. Local Commissioner had already filed her report,
along with record of evidence of the parties, in compliance of the
previous orders, on 13.11.2024.
An application has been filed on behalf of the defendant
for waiving the cost imposed on the defendant, vide order dated,
18.10.2024. A copy of the same be supplied to the Ld. Counsel for the
plaintiff, by registered speed post, as well as by electronic modes,
within a period of one week from today. The reply to the said
application, if any, be filed, within a period of one week, thereafter,
with advance copy to the Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
The Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff has prayed for
adjournment on his personal medical grounds.
On his request, adjourned for arguments on the aforesaid
application, and for final arguments on 09.12.2024.
Brijesh Kumar Garg,
District Judge,
Commercial Court – 01,
Shahdara District, KKD Courts,
Delhi/27.11.2024/rs
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (Comm.) No. 46/2024
Tarsham Mittal vs. Rahul Gupta
08.08.2024
Present : Sh. Sumit Nandvani, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Ms. Kismat Chauhan, Advocate, proxy counsel for
the defendant.
Replication has been filed, on behalf of the plaintiff,
in compliance of the previous orders, on 29.07.2024, alongwith
an affidavit of admission & denial and an affidavit under Order
XI Rule 4 CPC, as applicable to the Commercial Courts Act.
Advance copy of the same is reported to have been supplied to
the Ld. Counsel for the defendant, through electronic mode.
Parties are absent despite directions on the last date
of hearing. Therefore, a cost of Rs.2,000/- each is imposed on
the parties. The cost be deposited with the office of the DLSA,
Shahdara District, KKD, Delhi, within two weeks from today.
Parties are again directed to appear in person, before
the court, on the next date of hearing, for exploring the
possibilities of settlement, if any.
Adjourned for appearance of the parties, and for first
case management hearing on 04.09.2024.
Brijesh Kumar Garg
District Judge
Commercial Court-01
Shahdara Distt, KKD, Delhi
NR 08.08.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (Comm.) No. 46/24
Tarsham Mittal vs. Rahul Gupta
10.07.2024
Present : Ms. Anchal Jindal, Advocate, for the plaintiff.
Sh. Akshay Jain, Advocate, for the defendant.
Previous cost has been paid by the Ld. Counsel for
the defendant, to the Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff, in the court
today by electronic mode.
The Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff seeks some more
time to file the replication. On her request, a period of two weeks
is granted to the plaintiff to file the replication, if any. Advance
copy of the same be supplied to the Ld. Counsel for the
defendant, atleast three days prior to the next date of hearing.
Parties shall appear in person, before the court, on
the next date of hearing, for exploring the possibilities of
settlement, if any.
Adjourned for completion of pleadings and for first
case management hearing on 08.08.2024.
Brijesh Kumar Garg
District Judge
Commercial Court-01
Shahdara Distt, KKD, Delhi
NR 10.07.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 9CS (COMM)46/24
Tarsham Mittal Vs. Rahul Gupta
28.02.2024
Present : None for the plaintiff.
Sh. Prajwal Chaturvedi, Advocate for the defendant
through video-conferencing.
Lawyers are reported to be on strike today.
Deficient Court fee of Rs.4712/- had already been filed
on behalf of the plaintiff on 06.02.2024.
Defendant is reported to have been duly served on
07.02.2024, and again on 08.02.2024.
In the interest of justice, a further period of two weeks is
granted to the defendant to file the Written Statement, along with
statement of truth and affidavit of admission or denial of the
documents, with advance copy to the ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. In
default, a cost of Rs.3,000/- shall be deemed to have been imposed on
the defendant.
The parties shall appear in person, before the court, on
the next date of hearing, for exploring the possibilities of settlement, if
any.
Adjourned for completion of pleadings and for first case
management hearing, on the next date of hearing, on 27.03.2024.
(Brijesh Kumar Garg)
rs District Judge (Commercial Court) - 01
Shahdara, Karkardooma Delhi/28.02.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 7CS (COMM)46/24
Tarsham Mittal Vs. Rahul Gupta
18.01.2024
Fresh commercial suit for recovery is received on assignment
through e-filing portal of the District Court. It be checked and
registered.
Present : None.
None has appeared on behalf of the plaintiff since
morning, despite repeated calls. Even the hard copy of the plaint has
not been filed, till date.
In these circumstances, adjourned for filing the hard copy
of the plaint with documents and for consideration of the present suit
on 31.01.2024.
(Brijesh Kumar Garg)
rs District Judge (Commercial Court) - 01
Shahdara, Karkardooma Delhi/18.01.2024
-- 1 of 1 --