Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 28 CS SCJ 1014/23 SHREE HANUMAN MANDIR SAMITI WEST ENCLAVE PITAMPURA DELHI Vs. RAM AVTAR BANSAL 07.05.2025 Present: Sh. Arpit Bhalla, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff (through VC). AR of the plaintiff in person alongwith Sh. Tushar, Ld. Proxy counsel. Sh. Chirag Singhal, Ld. Counsel for defendant (through VC). Vide this order, I shall dispose of application u/o 7 Rule 14 CPC filed on behalf of the plaintiff for placing on record certain documents.…
SHREE HANUMAN MANDIR SAMITI WEST ENCLAVE PITAMPURA DELHIVsRam Avtar Bansal +4 more
TrustJury record updated 21 Oct 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 1014/2023
- Registration Date
- 07 Aug 2023
- Next Hearing Date
- 02 Dec 2026
- Case Stage
- Defendant/ Respondent Evidence
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
6Acts & Sections
1Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 07-08-2023 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 17-08-2023 Date: 17-08-2023 Business: FP Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 30-10-2023 Date: 30-10-2023 Business: FP Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 10-11-2023 Date: 10-11-2023 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 28-11-2023 Date: 28-11-2023 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 06-02-2024 Date: 06-02-2024 Business: FP Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 07-05-2024 Date: 07-05-2024 Business: FP Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 30-08-2024 Date: 30-08-2024 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 07-12-2024 Date: 07-12-2024 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 15-02-2025 Date: 15-02-2025 Business: adjourned for fp Next Purpose: Arguments Next Hearing Date: 07-05-2025 Date: 07-05-2025 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 23-08-2025 Date: 23-08-2025 Business: fp Next Purpose: Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence Next Hearing Date: 19-12-2025 Date: 19-12-2025 Business: adjourned for fp Next Purpose: Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence Next Hearing Date: 05-02-2026 Date: 05-02-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence Next Hearing Date: 17-03-2026 Date: 17-03-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence Next Hearing Date: 24-03-2026 Date: 24-03-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence Next Hearing Date: 17-04-2026 Date: 17-04-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence Next Hearing Date: 14-05-2026 Date: 14-05-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence Next Hearing Date: 06-06-2026 Date: 06-06-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence Next Hearing Date: 01-08-2026 Date: 01-08-2026 Business: further proceedings Next Purpose: Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence Next Hearing Date: 16-10-2026 Date: 16-10-2026 Business: further proceedings Next Purpose: Defendant/ Respondent Evidence Next Hearing Date: 02-12-2026
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 2039/2023 Filing Date: 04-08-2023 First Hearing Date: 07th August 2023 Court Number And Judge: 582-Civil Judge
Orders
38Interim Order 1916 Oct 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 31 CS SCJ 1014/23 SHREE HANUMAN MANDIR SAMITI WEST ENCLAVE PITAMPURA DELHI Vs. RAM AVTAR BANSAL 16.10.2026 Present: AR of the plaintiff Sh. Prem Prakash Vashisht. Ld. proxy Counsel for defendant. Memo of appearance filed on behalf of the defendant. Be taken or record. It is stated that cost has not been paid. Ld. proxy Counsel for defendant submits that the main counsel is not available. Perusal reveals that the matter is listed for cross examination of PW 1 which is pending since 05.02.2026. Even today adjournment is being sought on behalf of the defendant. Ld. proxy Counsel for defendant submits that they have been recently engaged. Adjournment is opposed by the plaintiff. Considering the conduct of the defendant and the various opportunities already provided, this court is of the view that the ground being presented before this court is vague and is not sufficient to grant further adjournment. Accordingly, testimony of PW 1 stands concluded. Vide separate statement PE stands closed. Be put up for DE for 02.12.2026. (Vaibhav Kumar) Civil Judge/N-W District 16.10.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 1801 Aug 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 28 CS SCJ 1014/23 SHREE HANUMAN MANDIR SAMITI WEST ENCLAVE PITAMPURA DELHI Vs. RAM AVTAR BANSAL 01.08.2026 Present: Sh. Tushar, ld counsel for the AR of the plaintiff along with PW1/witness. Ld. Proxy Counsel for defendant through VC Proxy counsel for the defendant seeks pass over for 12:30 p.m. One last opportunity is granted to the defendant to examine the witness. (Vaibhav Kumar) Civil Judge/N-W District 01.08.2026 At 12:30 p.m. Present: Sh. Tushar, ld counsel for the AR of the plaintiff along with PW1/witness. Sh. Bharat Bagga, Ld. Counsel for defendant through VC. Pass over is being sought again. At request the matter is passed over for 10 minutes. (Vaibhav Kumar) Civil Judge/N-W District 01.08.2026 After 10 minutes Present: Sh. Tushar, ld counsel for the AR of the plaintiff along with PW1/witness. Ld counsel for defendant in person. PW 1 partly cross examined. His further cross examination is deferred. Be put up for further cross examination for 16.10.2026 at 11:30 a.m. (Vaibhav Kumar) Civil Judge/N-W District 01.08.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 1714 May 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 23 CS SCJ 1014/23 SHREE HANUMAN MANDIR SAMITI WEST ENCLAVE PITAMPURA DELHI Vs. RAM AVTAR BANSAL 14.05.2026 Lawyers are abstaining from work today. Present: PW1 in person. Ld counsel for defendant through VC. Cost not paid. Adjournment sought stating that the lawyers are abstaining from work. Be put up for 06.06.2026. (Vaibhav Kumar) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts-14.05.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 1617 Apr 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 33 CS SCJ 1014/23 SHREE HANUMAN MANDIR SAMITI WEST ENCLAVE PITAMPURA DELHI Vs. RAM AVTAR BANSAL 17.04.2026 Present: PW-1 in person None for defendant Last and final opportunity is given to the defendant to examine the witness subject to the cost of Rs 1000/- to be paid to the plaintiff. Be put up for PE on 14.05.2026. (Vaibhav Kumar) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts-17.04.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 1517 Mar 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 33 CS SCJ 1014/23 SHREE HANUMAN MANDIR SAMITI WEST ENCLAVE PITAMPURA DELHI Vs. RAM AVTAR BANSAL 17.03.2026 Present: Sh. Tushar, Ld. Counsel for AR for plaintiff . PW 1 is present. Ld. Counsel for defendant through VC. The matter is listed for Cross examination of PW 1, however, Ld. Counsel for defendant seeks a pass over for 01:00 p.m. PW 1 submits that he is a senior citizen and deliberately the defendant has been trying to harass him by making him wait. Submissions heard. Considering the fact that the witness is a senior citizen, pass over is not allowed. One last and final opportunity is granted to the defendant to cross examine the witness for 24.03.2026 at 11:30 a.m. (Vaibhav Kumar) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts-17.03.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 1405 Feb 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 31 CS SCJ 1014/23 SHREE HANUMAN MANDIR SAMITI WEST ENCLAVE PITAMPURA DELHI Vs. RAM AVTAR BANSAL 05.02.2026 Present: Sh. Arpit Bhalla and Sh. Lakshay Kaushik, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Ld. Counsel for defendant through VC. PW 1 is present. PW 1 examined in chief. His cross examination is deferred at request of Ld. Counsel for defendant. The defendant is granted one last and final opportunity to cross examine the witness. Be put up for cross examination of PW1 for 17.03.2026. (Vaibhav Kumar) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts-05.02.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 1319 Dec 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 26 CS SCJ 1014/23 SHREE HANUMAN MANDIR SAMITI WEST ENCLAVE PITAMPURA DELHI Vs. RAM AVTAR BANSAL 19.12.2025 Present: AR of plaintiff along with ld proxy counsel Sh. Tushar. Sh.Saurabh Rana, Ld. Counsel for defendant through VC. Evindence by way of affidavit has been filed for PW 1 Mr. Prem Prakash Vashisht along with list of witnesses. Extra set has been retained on recdord. The defendant is directed to get the same collected today itself. Be put up for examination of PW 1 for 05.02.2026. (Vaibhav Kumar) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts-19.12.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 1223 Aug 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 3 CS SCJ 1014/23 SHREE HANUMAN MANDIR SAMITI WEST ENCLAVE PITAMPURA DELHI Vs. RAM AVTAR BANSAL 23.08.2025 Lawyers are on strike today. Present: AR of the plaintiff in person. Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff (through VC). Ld. proxy counsel for defendant (through VC). Perusal of record reveals that on the LDOH, application under order 7 rule 14 CPC filed by the plaintiff was allowed and matter was listed for further proceedings. Perusal of record reveals that replication has already been filed on behalf of the plaintiff. Pleadings of the parties are complete. From the pleadings, following issues arise:- 1) Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a decree of declaration, as prayed in clause (a) of the prayer? (OPP) 2) Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a decree of permanent injunction, as prayed in clause (b) of the prayer? (OPP) 3) Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a decree of permanent injunction, as prayed in clause (c) of the prayer? (OPP) 4) Relief. No other issue arises or is pressed for. List the matter for PE on 19.12.2025. (Arjun Kirar) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts-23.08.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 1015 Feb 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 11 CS SCJ 1014/23 SHREE HANUMAN MANDIR SAMITI WEST ENCLAVE PITAMPURA DELHI Vs. RAM AVTAR BANSAL 15.02.2025 Present: Sh Arpit Bhlla Ld. Counsel for plaintiff alongwit AR of the plaintiff. Ms Mansi and Sh Akshay Aggarwal and Sh Saurav Rana, Ld. Proxy Counsels for defendant. Matter is at the stage of reply/arguments on the application under order 7 rule 14. Today reply has been filed on behalf of the defendant to the above said application. Same be taken on record. Copy supplied to the opposite party. Arguments heard on behalf of both the parties. List the matter for order/clarification, if any on 07.05.2025. (Arjun Kirar) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts/15.02.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 907 Dec 2024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 15 CS SCJ 1014/23 SHREE HANUMAN MANDIR SAMITI WEST ENCLAVE PITAMPURA DELHI Vs. RAM AVTAR BANSAL 07.12.2024 Present: Sh. Arpit, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff alongwith AR of the plaintiff. Sh. Bharat Bagga, Ms. Manasi and Sh. Akshay, Ld. Counsels for defendant. Matter is at the stage of completion of pleadings / reply/ arguments on application u/O 7 Rule 14 CPC. Ld. Counsel for the defendant seeks time to file reply to the same. Let the same be filed on NDOH with advance copy to the opposite party. List the matter for reply/arguments on the aforesaid application on 15.02.2025. (Arjun Kirar) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts/07.12.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 807 May 2024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 19 CS SCJ 1014-23 SHREE HANUMAN MANDIR SAMITI WEST ENCLAVE PITAMPURA DELHI Vs. RAM AVTAR BANSAL 07.05.2024 Present: AR of plaintiff. Ms. Mansi Hasija, Proxy counsel for defendant (through VC) Today, replication has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff. Extra Copies retained on record to be released to the defendants as and when asked for. AR of plaintiff seeks some time to file appropriate application for placing certain documents on record. Let the same be done on or before the NDOH. Now to come up for further proceedings on 30.08.2024. (Shaina Goyal) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts-07.05.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 706 Feb 2024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 17 CS SCJ 1014-23 SHREE HANUMAN MANDIR SAMITI WEST ENCLAVE PITAMPURA DELHI Vs. RAM AVTAR BANSAL 06.02.2024 Present: AR of plaintiff. Sh. Bharat Bagga, Ld. Counsel for defendants alongwith defendants. AR of plaintiff seeks some time to file replication in the present matter. Last and final opportunity is granted to the plaintiff to file replication failing which right shall be closed. Now to come up for further proceedings on 07.05.2024. Date has been given at the request of AR of plaintiff. (Shaina Goyal) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts-06.02.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 628 Nov 2023
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 26 CS SCJ 1014-23 SHREE HANUMAN MANDIR SAMITI WEST ENCLAVE PITAMPURA DELHI Vs. RAM AVTAR BANSAL 28.11.2023 Present: Sh. Piyush Mittal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff alongwith AR of plaintiff. Sh. Chirag Singhal, Ld. Counsel for defendants. Today, WS has been filed on behalf of the defendants. Copy has been supplied to the opposite party. Replication, if any, be filed within 3 weeks with advance copy to the opposite party. Now to come up for completion of pleadings/admission-denial of documents/framing of issues on 06.02.2024. (Shaina Goyal) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts-28.11.2023 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 510 Nov 2023
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 14 CS SCJ 1014-23 SHREE HANUMAN MANDIR SAMITI WEST ENCLAVE PITAMPURA DELHI Vs. RAM AVTAR BANSAL 10.11.2023 Present: Sh. Piyush Mittal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff alongwith AR of plaintiff. Sh. Bharat Bagga, Ld. Counsel for defendant alongwith defendant no. 2. Ld. Counsel for defendant submits that he has received the complete paper book of the suit on 30.10.2023. WS has not been filed on behalf of the defendants. Be filed within the time prescribed by law. Today, extra Copy of contempt petition retained on record released to the defendants. The Ahlmad of the court is directed to register the application separately and also to put up the main file before the court on the NDOH. Now to come up for further proceedings on 28.11.2023. (Shaina Goyal) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts-10.11.2023 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 430 Oct 2023
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 15 CS SCJ 1014-23 SHREE HANUMAN MANDIR SAMITI WEST ENCLAVE PITAMPURA DELHI Vs. RAM AVTAR BANSAL 30.10.2023 Present: Sh. Piyush Mittal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff alongwith AR of plaintiff. Sh. Chirag Singhal, Ld. Counsel for defendant (through VC) It is informed by the Ahlmad that the case file has been sent for robkar in the court of Ld. Appellate Court. A request letter be sent to the concerned court to send the case file atleast two days before NDOH. It is submitted that defendants have not received the complete paper book of the suit. The plaintiff is directed to supply the same within 7 days whereafter, WS be filed within the time prescribed by law. Today, a contempt petition has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff. Extra Copies retained on record to be released to the defendants as and when asked for. The Ahlmad of the court is directed to register the application separately. Now to come up for further proceedings on 10.11.2023. (Shaina Goyal) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts-30.10.2023 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 16 CS SCJ 1014/23 SHREE HANUMAN MANDIR SAMITI WEST ENCLAVE PITAMPURA DELHI Vs. RAM AVTAR BANSAL 17.08.2023 ORDER 1. Vide this order, I shall dispose off the application u/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC. 2. As per the plaintiff, the plaintiff is a registered society and the present suit has been filed by the plaintiff through its President. That the plaintiff Samiti is looking after the working of Pracheen Sidh Hanuman Mandir…
Interim Order 217 Aug 2023
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 16 CS SCJ 1014-23 SHREE HANUMAN MANDIR SAMITI WEST ENCLAVE PITAMPURA DELHI Vs. RAM AVTAR BANSAL 17.08.2023 Present: Sh. Piyush Mittal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff alongwith AR of plaintiff in person. Sh. Dilip Arya, Ld. Counsel for defendant alongwith defendant. Fresh Vakalatnama filed. Same is taken on record. WS has not been filed on behalf of the defendants. Be filed within the time prescribed by law. Plaintiff has pressed upon his application u/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC and has prayed that the same be adjudicated today itself. Arguments on application u/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC heard on behalf of both the parties. Put up orders at 04.00 pm. At 04.00 pm Present: None. Vide separate order of even date application u/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC stands disposed off. Now to come up for completion of pleadings/admission- denial of documents/framing of issues on 30.10.2023. (Shaina Goyal) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts-17.08.2023 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 107 Aug 2023
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS SCJ 1014-2023 SHREE HANUMAN MANDIR SAMITI VS. RAM AVTAR BANSAL & ORS. 07.08.2023 Fresh suit for declaration and injunction received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered. Present: Sh. Anshul Garg, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff alongwith plaintiff. Heard. Record perused. Issue summons for settlement of issues and notice of application u/o XXXIX rule 1 & 2 CPC to the defendant on filing of PF & RC within three days returnable for 17.08.2023. Copy of the process be given dasti, as prayed for. (Shaina Goyal) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts/07.08.2023 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 1916 Oct 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 31 CS SCJ 1014/23 SHREE HANUMAN MANDIR SAMITI WEST ENCLAVE PITAMPURA DELHI Vs. RAM AVTAR BANSAL 16.10.2026 Present: AR of the plaintiff Sh. Prem Prakash Vashisht. Ld. proxy Counsel for defendant. Memo of appearance filed on behalf of the defendant. Be taken or record. It is stated that cost has not been paid. Ld. proxy Counsel for defendant submits that the main counsel is not available. Perusal reveals that the matter is listed for cross examination of PW 1 which is pending since 05.02.2026. Even today adjournment is being sought on behalf of the defendant. Ld. proxy Counsel for defendant submits that they have been recently engaged. Adjournment is opposed by the plaintiff. Considering the conduct of the defendant and the various opportunities already provided, this court is of the view that the ground being presented before this court is vague and is not sufficient to grant further adjournment. Accordingly, testimony of PW 1 stands concluded. Vide separate statement PE stands closed. Be put up for DE for 02.12.2026. (Vaibhav Kumar) Civil Judge/N-W District 16.10.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 1801 Aug 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 28 CS SCJ 1014/23 SHREE HANUMAN MANDIR SAMITI WEST ENCLAVE PITAMPURA DELHI Vs. RAM AVTAR BANSAL 01.08.2026 Present: Sh. Tushar, ld counsel for the AR of the plaintiff along with PW1/witness. Ld. Proxy Counsel for defendant through VC Proxy counsel for the defendant seeks pass over for 12:30 p.m. One last opportunity is granted to the defendant to examine the witness. (Vaibhav Kumar) Civil Judge/N-W District 01.08.2026 At 12:30 p.m. Present: Sh. Tushar, ld counsel for the AR of the plaintiff along with PW1/witness. Sh. Bharat Bagga, Ld. Counsel for defendant through VC. Pass over is being sought again. At request the matter is passed over for 10 minutes. (Vaibhav Kumar) Civil Judge/N-W District 01.08.2026 After 10 minutes Present: Sh. Tushar, ld counsel for the AR of the plaintiff along with PW1/witness. Ld counsel for defendant in person. PW 1 partly cross examined. His further cross examination is deferred. Be put up for further cross examination for 16.10.2026 at 11:30 a.m. (Vaibhav Kumar) Civil Judge/N-W District 01.08.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 1714 May 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 23 CS SCJ 1014/23 SHREE HANUMAN MANDIR SAMITI WEST ENCLAVE PITAMPURA DELHI Vs. RAM AVTAR BANSAL 14.05.2026 Lawyers are abstaining from work today. Present: PW1 in person. Ld counsel for defendant through VC. Cost not paid. Adjournment sought stating that the lawyers are abstaining from work. Be put up for 06.06.2026. (Vaibhav Kumar) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts-14.05.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 1617 Apr 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 33 CS SCJ 1014/23 SHREE HANUMAN MANDIR SAMITI WEST ENCLAVE PITAMPURA DELHI Vs. RAM AVTAR BANSAL 17.04.2026 Present: PW-1 in person None for defendant Last and final opportunity is given to the defendant to examine the witness subject to the cost of Rs 1000/- to be paid to the plaintiff. Be put up for PE on 14.05.2026. (Vaibhav Kumar) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts-17.04.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 1517 Mar 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 33 CS SCJ 1014/23 SHREE HANUMAN MANDIR SAMITI WEST ENCLAVE PITAMPURA DELHI Vs. RAM AVTAR BANSAL 17.03.2026 Present: Sh. Tushar, Ld. Counsel for AR for plaintiff . PW 1 is present. Ld. Counsel for defendant through VC. The matter is listed for Cross examination of PW 1, however, Ld. Counsel for defendant seeks a pass over for 01:00 p.m. PW 1 submits that he is a senior citizen and deliberately the defendant has been trying to harass him by making him wait. Submissions heard. Considering the fact that the witness is a senior citizen, pass over is not allowed. One last and final opportunity is granted to the defendant to cross examine the witness for 24.03.2026 at 11:30 a.m. (Vaibhav Kumar) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts-17.03.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 1405 Feb 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 31 CS SCJ 1014/23 SHREE HANUMAN MANDIR SAMITI WEST ENCLAVE PITAMPURA DELHI Vs. RAM AVTAR BANSAL 05.02.2026 Present: Sh. Arpit Bhalla and Sh. Lakshay Kaushik, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Ld. Counsel for defendant through VC. PW 1 is present. PW 1 examined in chief. His cross examination is deferred at request of Ld. Counsel for defendant. The defendant is granted one last and final opportunity to cross examine the witness. Be put up for cross examination of PW1 for 17.03.2026. (Vaibhav Kumar) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts-05.02.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 1319 Dec 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 26 CS SCJ 1014/23 SHREE HANUMAN MANDIR SAMITI WEST ENCLAVE PITAMPURA DELHI Vs. RAM AVTAR BANSAL 19.12.2025 Present: AR of plaintiff along with ld proxy counsel Sh. Tushar. Sh.Saurabh Rana, Ld. Counsel for defendant through VC. Evindence by way of affidavit has been filed for PW 1 Mr. Prem Prakash Vashisht along with list of witnesses. Extra set has been retained on recdord. The defendant is directed to get the same collected today itself. Be put up for examination of PW 1 for 05.02.2026. (Vaibhav Kumar) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts-19.12.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 1223 Aug 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 3 CS SCJ 1014/23 SHREE HANUMAN MANDIR SAMITI WEST ENCLAVE PITAMPURA DELHI Vs. RAM AVTAR BANSAL 23.08.2025 Lawyers are on strike today. Present: AR of the plaintiff in person. Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff (through VC). Ld. proxy counsel for defendant (through VC). Perusal of record reveals that on the LDOH, application under order 7 rule 14 CPC filed by the plaintiff was allowed and matter was listed for further proceedings. Perusal of record reveals that replication has already been filed on behalf of the plaintiff. Pleadings of the parties are complete. From the pleadings, following issues arise:- 1) Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a decree of declaration, as prayed in clause (a) of the prayer? (OPP) 2) Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a decree of permanent injunction, as prayed in clause (b) of the prayer? (OPP) 3) Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a decree of permanent injunction, as prayed in clause (c) of the prayer? (OPP) 4) Relief. No other issue arises or is pressed for. List the matter for PE on 19.12.2025. (Arjun Kirar) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts-23.08.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 28 CS SCJ 1014/23 SHREE HANUMAN MANDIR SAMITI WEST ENCLAVE PITAMPURA DELHI Vs. RAM AVTAR BANSAL 07.05.2025 Present: Sh. Arpit Bhalla, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff (through VC). AR of the plaintiff in person alongwith Sh. Tushar, Ld. Proxy counsel. Sh. Chirag Singhal, Ld. Counsel for defendant (through VC). Vide this order, I shall dispose of application u/o 7 Rule 14 CPC filed on behalf of the plaintiff for placing on record certain documents.…
Order 1015 Feb 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 11 CS SCJ 1014/23 SHREE HANUMAN MANDIR SAMITI WEST ENCLAVE PITAMPURA DELHI Vs. RAM AVTAR BANSAL 15.02.2025 Present: Sh Arpit Bhlla Ld. Counsel for plaintiff alongwit AR of the plaintiff. Ms Mansi and Sh Akshay Aggarwal and Sh Saurav Rana, Ld. Proxy Counsels for defendant. Matter is at the stage of reply/arguments on the application under order 7 rule 14. Today reply has been filed on behalf of the defendant to the above said application. Same be taken on record. Copy supplied to the opposite party. Arguments heard on behalf of both the parties. List the matter for order/clarification, if any on 07.05.2025. (Arjun Kirar) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts/15.02.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 907 Dec 2024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 15 CS SCJ 1014/23 SHREE HANUMAN MANDIR SAMITI WEST ENCLAVE PITAMPURA DELHI Vs. RAM AVTAR BANSAL 07.12.2024 Present: Sh. Arpit, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff alongwith AR of the plaintiff. Sh. Bharat Bagga, Ms. Manasi and Sh. Akshay, Ld. Counsels for defendant. Matter is at the stage of completion of pleadings / reply/ arguments on application u/O 7 Rule 14 CPC. Ld. Counsel for the defendant seeks time to file reply to the same. Let the same be filed on NDOH with advance copy to the opposite party. List the matter for reply/arguments on the aforesaid application on 15.02.2025. (Arjun Kirar) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts/07.12.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 807 May 2024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 19 CS SCJ 1014-23 SHREE HANUMAN MANDIR SAMITI WEST ENCLAVE PITAMPURA DELHI Vs. RAM AVTAR BANSAL 07.05.2024 Present: AR of plaintiff. Ms. Mansi Hasija, Proxy counsel for defendant (through VC) Today, replication has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff. Extra Copies retained on record to be released to the defendants as and when asked for. AR of plaintiff seeks some time to file appropriate application for placing certain documents on record. Let the same be done on or before the NDOH. Now to come up for further proceedings on 30.08.2024. (Shaina Goyal) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts-07.05.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 706 Feb 2024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 17 CS SCJ 1014-23 SHREE HANUMAN MANDIR SAMITI WEST ENCLAVE PITAMPURA DELHI Vs. RAM AVTAR BANSAL 06.02.2024 Present: AR of plaintiff. Sh. Bharat Bagga, Ld. Counsel for defendants alongwith defendants. AR of plaintiff seeks some time to file replication in the present matter. Last and final opportunity is granted to the plaintiff to file replication failing which right shall be closed. Now to come up for further proceedings on 07.05.2024. Date has been given at the request of AR of plaintiff. (Shaina Goyal) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts-06.02.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 628 Nov 2023
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 26 CS SCJ 1014-23 SHREE HANUMAN MANDIR SAMITI WEST ENCLAVE PITAMPURA DELHI Vs. RAM AVTAR BANSAL 28.11.2023 Present: Sh. Piyush Mittal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff alongwith AR of plaintiff. Sh. Chirag Singhal, Ld. Counsel for defendants. Today, WS has been filed on behalf of the defendants. Copy has been supplied to the opposite party. Replication, if any, be filed within 3 weeks with advance copy to the opposite party. Now to come up for completion of pleadings/admission-denial of documents/framing of issues on 06.02.2024. (Shaina Goyal) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts-28.11.2023 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 510 Nov 2023
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 14 CS SCJ 1014-23 SHREE HANUMAN MANDIR SAMITI WEST ENCLAVE PITAMPURA DELHI Vs. RAM AVTAR BANSAL 10.11.2023 Present: Sh. Piyush Mittal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff alongwith AR of plaintiff. Sh. Bharat Bagga, Ld. Counsel for defendant alongwith defendant no. 2. Ld. Counsel for defendant submits that he has received the complete paper book of the suit on 30.10.2023. WS has not been filed on behalf of the defendants. Be filed within the time prescribed by law. Today, extra Copy of contempt petition retained on record released to the defendants. The Ahlmad of the court is directed to register the application separately and also to put up the main file before the court on the NDOH. Now to come up for further proceedings on 28.11.2023. (Shaina Goyal) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts-10.11.2023 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 430 Oct 2023
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 15 CS SCJ 1014-23 SHREE HANUMAN MANDIR SAMITI WEST ENCLAVE PITAMPURA DELHI Vs. RAM AVTAR BANSAL 30.10.2023 Present: Sh. Piyush Mittal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff alongwith AR of plaintiff. Sh. Chirag Singhal, Ld. Counsel for defendant (through VC) It is informed by the Ahlmad that the case file has been sent for robkar in the court of Ld. Appellate Court. A request letter be sent to the concerned court to send the case file atleast two days before NDOH. It is submitted that defendants have not received the complete paper book of the suit. The plaintiff is directed to supply the same within 7 days whereafter, WS be filed within the time prescribed by law. Today, a contempt petition has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff. Extra Copies retained on record to be released to the defendants as and when asked for. The Ahlmad of the court is directed to register the application separately. Now to come up for further proceedings on 10.11.2023. (Shaina Goyal) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts-30.10.2023 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 16 CS SCJ 1014/23 SHREE HANUMAN MANDIR SAMITI WEST ENCLAVE PITAMPURA DELHI Vs. RAM AVTAR BANSAL 17.08.2023 ORDER 1. Vide this order, I shall dispose off the application u/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC. 2. As per the plaintiff, the plaintiff is a registered society and the present suit has been filed by the plaintiff through its President. That the plaintiff Samiti is looking after the working of Pracheen Sidh Hanuman Mandir…
Order 217 Aug 2023
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 16 CS SCJ 1014-23 SHREE HANUMAN MANDIR SAMITI WEST ENCLAVE PITAMPURA DELHI Vs. RAM AVTAR BANSAL 17.08.2023 Present: Sh. Piyush Mittal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff alongwith AR of plaintiff in person. Sh. Dilip Arya, Ld. Counsel for defendant alongwith defendant. Fresh Vakalatnama filed. Same is taken on record. WS has not been filed on behalf of the defendants. Be filed within the time prescribed by law. Plaintiff has pressed upon his application u/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC and has prayed that the same be adjudicated today itself. Arguments on application u/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC heard on behalf of both the parties. Put up orders at 04.00 pm. At 04.00 pm Present: None. Vide separate order of even date application u/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC stands disposed off. Now to come up for completion of pleadings/admission- denial of documents/framing of issues on 30.10.2023. (Shaina Goyal) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts-17.08.2023 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 107 Aug 2023
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS SCJ 1014-2023 SHREE HANUMAN MANDIR SAMITI VS. RAM AVTAR BANSAL & ORS. 07.08.2023 Fresh suit for declaration and injunction received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered. Present: Sh. Anshul Garg, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff alongwith plaintiff. Heard. Record perused. Issue summons for settlement of issues and notice of application u/o XXXIX rule 1 & 2 CPC to the defendant on filing of PF & RC within three days returnable for 17.08.2023. Copy of the process be given dasti, as prayed for. (Shaina Goyal) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts/07.08.2023 -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
