Order Details: COPY OF JUDGMENT Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF MS. GITA, ADMINISTRATIVE CIVIL JUDGE/ADDITIONAL RENT CONTROLLER: NORTH-WEST DISTRICT: ROHINI COURTS: DELHI. Succ. Court 35/26 CNR No. DLNW030004502026 Date of Filing : 07.03.2026 Date of Judgment : 04.08.2026 Final Order : Petition allowed. In the matter of: 1. Sunita Shad (Daughter in Law / Age- 61 years) W/o Late Sri Amrish Kumar House No. C-1A, Satywati Nagar Ashok Vihar Phase -3, North West Delhi Delhi-110052 ...Petitioner VERSUS 1. State,…
SUNITA SHADVsSTATE AND OTHERS +4 more
TrustJury record updated 21 Oct 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 35/2026
- Registration Date
- 06 Mar 2026
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
6Petitioner
Acts & Sections
1Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 07-03-2026 Business: APPEARANCE Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 29-04-2026 Date: 29-04-2026 Business: APPEARANCE Next Purpose: Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence Next Hearing Date: 02-06-2026 Date: 02-06-2026 Business: APPEARANCE Next Purpose: Order/ Judgement Next Hearing Date: 07-07-2026 Date: 07-07-2026 Business: APPEARANCE Next Purpose: Order/ Judgement Next Hearing Date: 04-08-2026 Date: 04-08-2026 Business: APPEARANCE Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 12-08-2026 Date: 12-08-2026 Business: ALLOWED Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED Disposal Date: 12-08-2026
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 455/2026 Filing Date: 28-02-2026 eFiling Number: ADL20240005100C202600004 eFiling Date: 27-02-2026 First Hearing Date: 07th March 2026 Decision Date: 12th August 2026 Court Number And Judge: 533-ACJ CUM ARC
Orders
10Final Order 612 Aug 2026
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 16 Succ. Court 35/26 SUNITA SHAD Vs. STATE AND OTHERS CNR No. DLNW030004502026 12.08.2026 Present : Ld. counsel for the plaintiff. An application under Order VI Rule 17 r/w Section 151 of CPC seeking amendment of petition filed on behalf of petitioner. Same be taken on record. Submissions heard on the application for amendment under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC. Record perused. Considering the submissions and material on record and the fact that the matter is at the initial stage and the amendment as sought do not change the nature of the suit the application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC stands allowed. Amended plaint taken on record. Application stands disposed off. Vide separate judgment of even date announced in the open court, the present petition is allowed. File be consigned to Record Room after due compliance. (Gita) ACJ/CCJ/ARC (North-West) Rohini Courts, Delhi/12.08.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 404 Aug 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 40 Succ. Court 35/26 SUNITA SHAD Vs. STATE AND OTHERS CNR No. DLNW030004502026 04.08.2026 Present : Sh. Sanjay Kumar Gupta , Ld. counsel for the petitioner. Some clarification required. Be put up for clarification for 12.08.2026 (Gita) ACJ/CCJ/ARC (North-West) Rohini Courts, Delhi/04.08.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 302 Jun 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 19 Succ. Court 35/26 SUNITA SHAD Vs. STATE AND OTHERS 02.06.2026 Present : Sh. Sandeep Kumar Gupta, Ld. counsel for the petitioner. Sh. Aarsh Thakkar, Ld. counsel for respondent No. 2. Sh. Satish, Bailiff, SDM Office Model Town in person. RW-1/Sh. Satish examined and discharged. Ld. counsel for respondent No. 2 has filed report. Same be taken on record. Final arguments heard. Be put up for judgment on 07.07.2026. (Gita) ACJ/CCJ/ARC (North-West) Rohini Courts, Delhi/02.06.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 229 Apr 2026
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 17Succ. Court35/26SUNITA SHAD Vs. STATE AND OTHERS 29.04.2026 Present : Petitioner with Sh. Sandeep Kumar Gupta, Ld. Counsel. Sh. Girish Kumar/Respondent No. 3, Ms. Anita Gauri/Respondent no. 4, Sh. Rohan Shad/Respondent No. 6 in person. Sh. Gaurav Shad/respondent No. 5 present through VC. Sh. Aarsh Thakkar, Ld. Counsel for KFIN Technology/Respondent No. 2 through VC. Publication has been carried out in the newspaper “Viraat Vaibhav” on 06.04.2026. Respondent No. 5/Sh. Gaurav Shad appeared through VC and submitted that he has no objection if the succession certificate in the present case is issued in favour of petitioner. RW-1/Sh. Girish Kumar, RW-2/Smt. Anita Gauri and RW- 3/Sh. Rohan Shad examined and discharged. Evidence by way of affidavit filed on behalf of petitioner. Same be taken on record. PW-1/Smt. Sunita Shad examined and discharged. Petitioner submits that no more witness remains to be examined and she wants to close PE. Statement to this effect has been recorded. Accordingly, PE stands closed. Respondent No. 1 and 2 be summoned afresh on filing of PF of rnext date of hearing. Be put up for further proceedings on 02.06.2026. (GITA) ACJ/CCJ/ARC (North-West) Rohini Courts, Delhi/29.04.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 37 Succ. Court 35/26 SUNITA SHAD Vs. STATE AND OTHERS 07.03.2026 Fresh succession petition received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered as per rules. Present : Sh. Sandeep Kumar Gupta, Ld. counsel for the petitioner through VC. Heard. File perused. Issue notice to the general public by way of publication in any National daily newspaper approved by Hon'ble High Court of Delhi vide publication charges and PF as per rules.…
Order 404 Aug 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 40 Succ. Court 35/26 SUNITA SHAD Vs. STATE AND OTHERS CNR No. DLNW030004502026 04.08.2026 Present : Sh. Sanjay Kumar Gupta , Ld. counsel for the petitioner. Some clarification required. Be put up for clarification for 12.08.2026 (Gita) ACJ/CCJ/ARC (North-West) Rohini Courts, Delhi/04.08.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 302 Jun 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 19 Succ. Court 35/26 SUNITA SHAD Vs. STATE AND OTHERS 02.06.2026 Present : Sh. Sandeep Kumar Gupta, Ld. counsel for the petitioner. Sh. Aarsh Thakkar, Ld. counsel for respondent No. 2. Sh. Satish, Bailiff, SDM Office Model Town in person. RW-1/Sh. Satish examined and discharged. Ld. counsel for respondent No. 2 has filed report. Same be taken on record. Final arguments heard. Be put up for judgment on 07.07.2026. (Gita) ACJ/CCJ/ARC (North-West) Rohini Courts, Delhi/02.06.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 229 Apr 2026
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 17Succ. Court35/26SUNITA SHAD Vs. STATE AND OTHERS 29.04.2026 Present : Petitioner with Sh. Sandeep Kumar Gupta, Ld. Counsel. Sh. Girish Kumar/Respondent No. 3, Ms. Anita Gauri/Respondent no. 4, Sh. Rohan Shad/Respondent No. 6 in person. Sh. Gaurav Shad/respondent No. 5 present through VC. Sh. Aarsh Thakkar, Ld. Counsel for KFIN Technology/Respondent No. 2 through VC. Publication has been carried out in the newspaper “Viraat Vaibhav” on 06.04.2026. Respondent No. 5/Sh. Gaurav Shad appeared through VC and submitted that he has no objection if the succession certificate in the present case is issued in favour of petitioner. RW-1/Sh. Girish Kumar, RW-2/Smt. Anita Gauri and RW- 3/Sh. Rohan Shad examined and discharged. Evidence by way of affidavit filed on behalf of petitioner. Same be taken on record. PW-1/Smt. Sunita Shad examined and discharged. Petitioner submits that no more witness remains to be examined and she wants to close PE. Statement to this effect has been recorded. Accordingly, PE stands closed. Respondent No. 1 and 2 be summoned afresh on filing of PF of rnext date of hearing. Be put up for further proceedings on 02.06.2026. (GITA) ACJ/CCJ/ARC (North-West) Rohini Courts, Delhi/29.04.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 37 Succ. Court 35/26 SUNITA SHAD Vs. STATE AND OTHERS 07.03.2026 Fresh succession petition received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered as per rules. Present : Sh. Sandeep Kumar Gupta, Ld. counsel for the petitioner through VC. Heard. File perused. Issue notice to the general public by way of publication in any National daily newspaper approved by Hon'ble High Court of Delhi vide publication charges and PF as per rules.…
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
