Interim Order 2

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 29 CC NI ACT / 3333/2024
LOKESHWAR KAPOOR Vs. SARTHAK TANEJA /0 (Maurya Enclave)
Proceedings conducted online through Video Conferencing using CISCO WEBEX Software.
Counsels are directed to appear with Camera open.
Presence of the accused will not be marked if his or her video is off.
22.01.2025
Present: Complainant in person.
Vide order dated 03.10.2024, court notice was issued to the proposed accused.
As per report, premises found locked, on visiting the address of the proposed
accused two times,
As per report, court notice were sent through Whatsapp and the same were
delivered with double white tick.
The proposed accused has not appeared today.
In view of the mandate of Section 223 of the BNSS, one opportunity of being
heard has to be given proposed accused to appear before the court and argue as to why
cognizance should not be taken of the present complaint through all permissible modes
including the e-mode by the Nazarat Branch.
Despite the opportunity given to the proposed accused, he has not appeared
before the court and accordingly his right to be heard on the point of cognizance, is closed.
This is complaint filed for offence punishable under Section 138 NI Act.
Complaint, affidavit of evidence and other annexed documents perused. The original complaint
and documents are placed in the safe custody of the Reader-cum-ahlmad of this court.
I take cognizance of the said offence.
An adjournment has been sought on behalf of the Complainant that gis counsel is
not available today to make argument on the summoning.
Allowed
Put up again on 15.04.2025. (Garima Garg)
Judicial Magistrate First Class
(NI Act) Digital Court-01, North West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi/22.01.2025
-- 1 of 1 --