STATEVsSHARUKH @SADDAM

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 30
Cr. Case 9224/2023
STATE Vs. SHARUKH @ SADDAM
FIR No. 000462/2023 (Keshav Puram)
20.01.2026
Present: Sh. Nishant Yadav, Ld. APP for the State.
Accused Sharukh not produced from JC.
Accused Sagar absent.
Process u/s 82 Cr.PC issued against the accused Sagar
stands executed.
Let the Process Server qua accused Sagar be sum
moned for the next date of hearing i.e. 03.06.2026.
Let production warrants be issued against the ac
cused Sharukh for next date of hearing.
(SANYAM JAIN)
JMFC04/NorthWest/ Delhi
20.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 35
Cr. Case 9224/2023
STATE Vs. SHARUKH @ SADDAM
FIR No. 000462/2023 (Keshav Puram)
18.11.2025
At 2.20 pm
Present: Sh. Nishant Yadav, Ld. APP for the State.
Accused Sharukh @ Saddam produced from JC
Accused Sagar absent.
Witness Kanhaiya Lal is present.
NBW issued against accused Sagar received back un
executed with report that no such person found.
From the report it appears that the accused Sagar is de
liberately concealing himself to prevent the execution of the warrants
issued against him. Accordingly, proclamation against accused
Sagar be issued u/s. 82 Cr.P.C through the concerned SHO by all
usual modes, returnable on 20.01.2025.
The proclamation be also duly published in a daily
newspaper circulated in a place where the accused Sagar
ordinarily resides.
Fresh notice be also issued to the surety of the accused
Sagar for the NDOH.
(SANYAM JAIN)
JMFC04/NorthWest/ Delhi
18.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 32
Cr. Case 9224/2023
STATE Vs. SHARUKH @ SADDAM
FIR No. 000462/2023 (Keshav Puram)
11.07.2025
Present: Sh. Shrawan Babu, Ld. APP for the State.
Accused Shahrukh produced from JC (on bail in this
case).
Accused Sagar Mishra absent.
Witness Kanhaiya is present.
Production warrants issued against accused Sagar
Mishra received with report that accused Sagar Mishra has been re
leased from Jail on 24.02.2025.
Be awaited for accused Sagar Mishra till 2.00 pm.
(DIVYA ARORA)Shahr
JMFC04/NorthWest/ Delhi
11.07.2025
At 2.10 pm.
Present: Sh. Shrawan Babu, Ld. APP for the State.
Accused Sagar Mishra absent.
Since accused Sagar Mishra is neither present nor any
exemption application is filed on his behalf, NBWs be issued against
the accused Sagar Mishra and notice to his surety be also issued
through SHO concerned for next date of hearing.
Put up for PE on 18.11.2025.
Prosecution witness Kanhaiya be summoned along
with case property if any, for NDOH.
(DIVYA ARORA)
JMFC04/NorthWest/ Delhi
11.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 18
Cr. Case 9224/2023
STATE Vs. SHARUKH @ SADDAM
FIR No. 000462/2023 (Keshav Puram)
21.03.2025
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
Accused Shahrukh @ Saddam produced from JC (on
bail in this case).
Accused Sagar Mishra not produced from JC.
Proxy counsel for accused Shahrukh.
Accused Shahrukh has signed the charge framed on
28.10.2024 as he left the Court Room without signing the charge.
Let production warrants be issued against the ac-
cused Sagar Mishra for next date of hearing.
Notice be issued to Jail Superintendent as to why he
has not produced the accused Sagar Mishra.
Put up for PE on 11.07.2025.
Prosecution witnesses at serial no. 1 be summoned
along with case property if any, for NDOH.
(DIVYA ARORA)
JMFC-04/North-West/ Delhi
21.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 13
Cr. Case 9224/2023
STATE Vs. SHARUKH @ SADDAM
FIR No. 000462 /2023 (Keshav Puram)
24.12.2024
Ld. Presiding Officer is on leave today.
Present: Ld. substitute APP for the State.
Accused Shahrukh @ Saddam absent.
Accused Sagar Mishra @ Vishal not produced from JC.
Sh. Tarun Sharma, Ld. counsel for accused.
Naib Court prosecution submits that accused Sagar
Mishra has been appearing today in Tis Hazari Courts in another case.
B/W issued against accused Shahrukh @ Saddam re-
ceived back unexecuted with report that the accused is lodged in Tihar
Jail in E-FIR No. 034710/2024 PS Sarai Rohilla since 25.11.2024.
Let production warrants be issued against the ac-
cused Shahrukh @ Saddam and Sagar Mishra @ Vishal for next
date of hearing.
Put up for compliance of order dated 28.10.2024 / fur-
ther proceedings on 21.03.2025.
(GAURAV SINGAL)
Reliever JMFC / North-West/ Delhi
24.12.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 16
Cr. Case 9224/2023
STATE Vs. SHARUKH @ SADDAM
FIR No. 000462 /2023 (Keshav Puram)
28.10.2024
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
Accused Sagar Mishra produced from JC.
Accused Shahrukh @ Saddam with Ld. counsel.
Arguments heard on the point of charge. Record pe-
rused.
Prima facie from the documents on record, it can not be
said that the allegations against the accused is groundless and prima
facie there is sufficient material on record for presuming that the ac-
cused has committed the offence u/s 457/380/34 IPC and 411 IPC.
Accordingly, charge for the offence punishable u/s
457/380/34 IPC and 411 IPC is framed against the accused Sagar
Mishra and Shahrukh @ Saddam, and charge for the offence punish-
able 411 IPC is framed against the accused Shahrukh @ Sad-
dam,wherein the accused did not plead guilty and claim trial.
At this stage, it is noticed that accused Shahrukh @
Saddam has left the court without signing the charge framed to-
day.
Issue B/W in the sum of Rs. 5000/- against the ac-
cused for 24.12.2024.
(DIVYA ARORA)
JMFC-04/North-West/ Delhi
28.10.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 36
Cr. Case 9224/2023
STATE Vs. SHARUKH @ SADDAM
FIR No. 000462 /2023 (Keshav Puram)
12.08.2024
Undersigned is also looking after the work of Ms. Ritika Kansal,
Ld. JMFC, who is stated to be on leave.
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
Accused Sagar Mishra and Shahruk are absent.
Sh. Amit, Ld. counsel for both accused.
Ld. counsel for accused submits that both accused are
lodged in JC in some other FIR. He further submits that accused Sagar
is in JC in FIR No. 332/2024 PS Moti Nagar.
Let production warrants be issued against both the
accused persons for 28.10.2024.
Ahlmad is directed to make endorsement on the pro-
duction warrants that accused are on bail in the present case.
(DIVYA ARORA)
JMFC-04/North-West/ Delhi
12.08.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 35
Cr. Case 9224/2023
STATE Vs. SHARUKH @ SADDAM & ors.
FIR No. 000462 /2023 (Keshav Puram)
13.05.2024
Undersigned is also looking after the work of Ms. Ritika Kansal,
Ld. MM, who is stated to be on leave.
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
Accused Shahrukh @ Saddam and Sagar Mishra are
present.
Sh. Amit Kumar, Ld. counsel for both accused persons.
Ld. counsel for complainant.
Arguments on charge heard.
Put up for framing of charge on 12.08.2024.
(DIVYA ARORA)
MM04 /NorthWest/ Delhi
13.05.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 31
Cr. Case 9224/2023
STATE Vs. SHARUKH @ SADDAM
FIR No. 000462 /2023 (Keshav Puram)
18.08.2023
Present: Ld. substitute APP for the State.
Both accused not produced from JC.
Let production warrants be issued against both
the accused for 14.12.2023.
(VAIBHAV CHAURASIA)
MM04 /NorthWest/ Delhi
18.08.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 30
Cr. Case 9224/2023
STATE Vs. SHARUKH @ SADDAM
FIR No. 000462/2023 (Keshav Puram)
20.01.2026
Present: Sh. Nishant Yadav, Ld. APP for the State.
Accused Sharukh not produced from JC.
Accused Sagar absent.
Process u/s 82 Cr.PC issued against the accused Sagar
stands executed.
Let the Process Server qua accused Sagar be sum
moned for the next date of hearing i.e. 03.06.2026.
Let production warrants be issued against the ac
cused Sharukh for next date of hearing.
(SANYAM JAIN)
JMFC04/NorthWest/ Delhi
20.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 35
Cr. Case 9224/2023
STATE Vs. SHARUKH @ SADDAM
FIR No. 000462/2023 (Keshav Puram)
18.11.2025
At 2.20 pm
Present: Sh. Nishant Yadav, Ld. APP for the State.
Accused Sharukh @ Saddam produced from JC
Accused Sagar absent.
Witness Kanhaiya Lal is present.
NBW issued against accused Sagar received back un
executed with report that no such person found.
From the report it appears that the accused Sagar is de
liberately concealing himself to prevent the execution of the warrants
issued against him. Accordingly, proclamation against accused
Sagar be issued u/s. 82 Cr.P.C through the concerned SHO by all
usual modes, returnable on 20.01.2025.
The proclamation be also duly published in a daily
newspaper circulated in a place where the accused Sagar
ordinarily resides.
Fresh notice be also issued to the surety of the accused
Sagar for the NDOH.
(SANYAM JAIN)
JMFC04/NorthWest/ Delhi
18.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 32
Cr. Case 9224/2023
STATE Vs. SHARUKH @ SADDAM
FIR No. 000462/2023 (Keshav Puram)
11.07.2025
Present: Sh. Shrawan Babu, Ld. APP for the State.
Accused Shahrukh produced from JC (on bail in this
case).
Accused Sagar Mishra absent.
Witness Kanhaiya is present.
Production warrants issued against accused Sagar
Mishra received with report that accused Sagar Mishra has been re
leased from Jail on 24.02.2025.
Be awaited for accused Sagar Mishra till 2.00 pm.
(DIVYA ARORA)Shahr
JMFC04/NorthWest/ Delhi
11.07.2025
At 2.10 pm.
Present: Sh. Shrawan Babu, Ld. APP for the State.
Accused Sagar Mishra absent.
Since accused Sagar Mishra is neither present nor any
exemption application is filed on his behalf, NBWs be issued against
the accused Sagar Mishra and notice to his surety be also issued
through SHO concerned for next date of hearing.
Put up for PE on 18.11.2025.
Prosecution witness Kanhaiya be summoned along
with case property if any, for NDOH.
(DIVYA ARORA)
JMFC04/NorthWest/ Delhi
11.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 18
Cr. Case 9224/2023
STATE Vs. SHARUKH @ SADDAM
FIR No. 000462/2023 (Keshav Puram)
21.03.2025
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
Accused Shahrukh @ Saddam produced from JC (on
bail in this case).
Accused Sagar Mishra not produced from JC.
Proxy counsel for accused Shahrukh.
Accused Shahrukh has signed the charge framed on
28.10.2024 as he left the Court Room without signing the charge.
Let production warrants be issued against the ac-
cused Sagar Mishra for next date of hearing.
Notice be issued to Jail Superintendent as to why he
has not produced the accused Sagar Mishra.
Put up for PE on 11.07.2025.
Prosecution witnesses at serial no. 1 be summoned
along with case property if any, for NDOH.
(DIVYA ARORA)
JMFC-04/North-West/ Delhi
21.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 13
Cr. Case 9224/2023
STATE Vs. SHARUKH @ SADDAM
FIR No. 000462 /2023 (Keshav Puram)
24.12.2024
Ld. Presiding Officer is on leave today.
Present: Ld. substitute APP for the State.
Accused Shahrukh @ Saddam absent.
Accused Sagar Mishra @ Vishal not produced from JC.
Sh. Tarun Sharma, Ld. counsel for accused.
Naib Court prosecution submits that accused Sagar
Mishra has been appearing today in Tis Hazari Courts in another case.
B/W issued against accused Shahrukh @ Saddam re-
ceived back unexecuted with report that the accused is lodged in Tihar
Jail in E-FIR No. 034710/2024 PS Sarai Rohilla since 25.11.2024.
Let production warrants be issued against the ac-
cused Shahrukh @ Saddam and Sagar Mishra @ Vishal for next
date of hearing.
Put up for compliance of order dated 28.10.2024 / fur-
ther proceedings on 21.03.2025.
(GAURAV SINGAL)
Reliever JMFC / North-West/ Delhi
24.12.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 16
Cr. Case 9224/2023
STATE Vs. SHARUKH @ SADDAM
FIR No. 000462 /2023 (Keshav Puram)
28.10.2024
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
Accused Sagar Mishra produced from JC.
Accused Shahrukh @ Saddam with Ld. counsel.
Arguments heard on the point of charge. Record pe-
rused.
Prima facie from the documents on record, it can not be
said that the allegations against the accused is groundless and prima
facie there is sufficient material on record for presuming that the ac-
cused has committed the offence u/s 457/380/34 IPC and 411 IPC.
Accordingly, charge for the offence punishable u/s
457/380/34 IPC and 411 IPC is framed against the accused Sagar
Mishra and Shahrukh @ Saddam, and charge for the offence punish-
able 411 IPC is framed against the accused Shahrukh @ Sad-
dam,wherein the accused did not plead guilty and claim trial.
At this stage, it is noticed that accused Shahrukh @
Saddam has left the court without signing the charge framed to-
day.
Issue B/W in the sum of Rs. 5000/- against the ac-
cused for 24.12.2024.
(DIVYA ARORA)
JMFC-04/North-West/ Delhi
28.10.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 36
Cr. Case 9224/2023
STATE Vs. SHARUKH @ SADDAM
FIR No. 000462 /2023 (Keshav Puram)
12.08.2024
Undersigned is also looking after the work of Ms. Ritika Kansal,
Ld. JMFC, who is stated to be on leave.
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
Accused Sagar Mishra and Shahruk are absent.
Sh. Amit, Ld. counsel for both accused.
Ld. counsel for accused submits that both accused are
lodged in JC in some other FIR. He further submits that accused Sagar
is in JC in FIR No. 332/2024 PS Moti Nagar.
Let production warrants be issued against both the
accused persons for 28.10.2024.
Ahlmad is directed to make endorsement on the pro-
duction warrants that accused are on bail in the present case.
(DIVYA ARORA)
JMFC-04/North-West/ Delhi
12.08.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 35
Cr. Case 9224/2023
STATE Vs. SHARUKH @ SADDAM & ors.
FIR No. 000462 /2023 (Keshav Puram)
13.05.2024
Undersigned is also looking after the work of Ms. Ritika Kansal,
Ld. MM, who is stated to be on leave.
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
Accused Shahrukh @ Saddam and Sagar Mishra are
present.
Sh. Amit Kumar, Ld. counsel for both accused persons.
Ld. counsel for complainant.
Arguments on charge heard.
Put up for framing of charge on 12.08.2024.
(DIVYA ARORA)
MM04 /NorthWest/ Delhi
13.05.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 31
Cr. Case 9224/2023
STATE Vs. SHARUKH @ SADDAM
FIR No. 000462 /2023 (Keshav Puram)
18.08.2023
Present: Ld. substitute APP for the State.
Both accused not produced from JC.
Let production warrants be issued against both
the accused for 14.12.2023.
(VAIBHAV CHAURASIA)
MM04 /NorthWest/ Delhi
18.08.2023
-- 1 of 1 --