Skip to main content
CS SCJ - CIVIL SUIT FOR CIVIL JUDGE

SH OM PRAKASH TYAGIVsSOM TYAGI

CNR DLNT030021082025530-JSCC-cum-Addl. SCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
Rohini North, Senior Civil Judge cum RC Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
PENDING

TrustJury record updated 18 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
1310/2025
Registration Date
17 Dec 2025
Next Hearing Date
27 Oct 2026
Case Stage
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1SH OM PRAKASH TYAGI

    Respondent

    1. 1SOM TYAGI

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Mandatory Injuction · Sec 3839

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 17-12-2025
Business: pf
Next Purpose: Misc. cases / purpose
Next Hearing Date: 16-01-2026

Date: 16-01-2026
Business: fp
Next Purpose: Misc. cases / purpose
Next Hearing Date: 27-02-2026

Date: 27-02-2026
Reason For Adjournment: Judge on Leave
Next Purpose: Misc. cases / purpose
Next Hearing Date: 27-03-2026

Date: 27-03-2026
Business: ISSUES
Next Purpose: Misc. cases / purpose
Next Hearing Date: 30-04-2026

Date: 30-04-2026
Business: PE
Next Purpose: Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
Next Hearing Date: 30-07-2026

Date: 30-07-2026
Business: pe
Next Purpose: Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
Next Hearing Date: 27-10-2026

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 2117/2025
Filing Date: 15-12-2025
eFiling Number: ADL20230016893C202500028
eFiling Date: 13-12-2025
First Hearing Date: 17th December 2025
Court Number And Judge: 530-JSCC-cum-Addl. SCJ-cum-Guardian Judge

    Orders

    10
    Interim Order 5
    30 Jul 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 12 CS SCJ 1310/25 SH OM PRAKASH TYAGI Vs. SOM
TYAGI
30.07.2026
Present: Sh. V.K. Vashisth and Sh. A.K. Vashisth Ld.
Counsels for plaintiff through VC
Sh. Naresh Sharma Ld. Counsel for defendant
no.8/DDA.
Ms. Nomita Bhardwaj Ld. Counsel for
defendant no.6 and 7 through VC.
Sh. C.S. Dahiya and Sh. Ravinder Khatri Ld.
Counsel for defendant no.1-5.
It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for defendant
no.6 and 7 that WS has already been filed, however, the
ordersheet dated 30.04.2026 records that right of defendant
no.6 and 7 to file WS is closed.
As per record, on 27.03.2026, the defendant
no.6 and 7 were directed to file WS during the course of the
day, however, as per record no such WS was filed on the said
date. It is further notable that no WS has been efiled and thus
the observation made on 30.04.2026 stands.
List of witness along with affidavit of evidence
has been filed on behalf of plaintiff. Copy is supplied to
counsel for defendant no.8. Let the copies be supplied to the
other defendants.
Be put up for PE on 27.10.2026.
(Nitish Kumar Sharma)
JSCC/ASCJ/GUDN. JUDGE
North, Rohini Courts,Delhi/30.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 4Full order available
    30 Apr 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 4 CS SCJ 1310/25 SH OM PRAKASH TYAGI Vs. SOM TYAGI 30.04.2026 Present: Sh. V.K. Vashist Ld. Counsel for plaintiff through VC. Sh. Naresh Sharma Ld. Counsel for defendant no.8 through VC. Sh. C.S. Dahiya Ld. Counsel for defendant no.1-5. Ms. Nomita Bhardwaj, Ld. Counsel for defendant no.6 and 7 through VC. No WS has been filed on behalf of defendant no.6 and 7. Accordingly, right of defendant no.6 and 7 to…

    Read Full Order
    Interim Order 3
    27 Mar 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 10 CS SCJ 1310/25 SH OM PRAKASH TYAGI VS. SOM
TYAGI
27.03.2026
Present: Sh. V.K. Vashisth Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
through VC.
Sh. C.S. Dahiya and Sh. Ravinder Khatri Ld.
Counsel for defendant No.1-5
Sh. Naresh Sharma Ld. Counsel for defendant
no.8 through VC.
Ms. Nomita Bhardwaj, Ld. Counsel for
defendant no.6 and 7 with AE,
WS has already been filed on behalf of
defendant no.1-5 and defendant no.8. Copies have already
been supplied.
No WS has been filed on behalf of
defendant/MCD. Stipulated period for filing of WS has
already lapsed, however, Ld. Counsel for MCD has
undertaken to file WS during the course of the day itself.
The WS of MCD, if filed during the course of
the day, be taken on record, else the right of the MCD to
file WS shall be deemed to have been closed.
Let replication, if any, be filed with advance
copy to opposite party.
Be put up for consideration on issues/further
proceedings on 30.04.2026.
(Nitish Kumar Sharma)
JSCC/ASCJ/GUDN. JUDGE
North, Rohini Courts,Delhi/27.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 2
    16 Jan 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 21 CS SCJ 1310/25 SH OM PRAKASH TYAGI Vs. SOM
TYAGI
16.01.2026
Present: Sh. V.K. Vashisth and Sh. A.K. Vashisth Ld.
Counsels for plaintiff.
Sh. C.S. Dahiya, Sh. Rajesh and Sh. Ravinder
Khatri Ld. Counsels for defendant no.1-5.
Sh. Naresh Sharma Ld. Counsel for DDA
Ms. Nomita Bhardwaj Ld. Counsel for MCD.
Perusal of record shows that the defendants
have been served on 08.01.2026. Stipulated period for
filing of WS has not lapsed. Defendants are directed to file
WS within stipulated period with advance copy to opposite
party.
Be put up for 27.02.2026.
(Nitish Kumar Sharma)
JSCC/ASCJ/GUDN. JUDGE
North, Rohini Courts,Delhi/16.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 1
    17 Dec 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS SCJ NO.1310/25 OM PRAKASH TYAGI VS SOM
TYAGI
17.12.2025
Fresh suit received by way of assignment through e-mode.
It be checked and registered.
Present: Sh. V.K. Vashisth, Sh. Vicky Rana and Sh.
A.K. Vashisht Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Submissions heard.
Issue summons for settlement of issues and
notice of the application under Order XXXIX rule 1 & 2 CPC
to defendants on filing of PF through all modes for
16.01.2026. Steps be taken within 7 days.
(Nitish Kumar Sharma)
JSCC/ASCJ/GUDN. JUDGE
North, Rohini Courts,Delhi/17.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 5
    30 Jul 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 12 CS SCJ 1310/25 SH OM PRAKASH TYAGI Vs. SOM
TYAGI
30.07.2026
Present: Sh. V.K. Vashisth and Sh. A.K. Vashisth Ld.
Counsels for plaintiff through VC
Sh. Naresh Sharma Ld. Counsel for defendant
no.8/DDA.
Ms. Nomita Bhardwaj Ld. Counsel for
defendant no.6 and 7 through VC.
Sh. C.S. Dahiya and Sh. Ravinder Khatri Ld.
Counsel for defendant no.1-5.
It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for defendant
no.6 and 7 that WS has already been filed, however, the
ordersheet dated 30.04.2026 records that right of defendant
no.6 and 7 to file WS is closed.
As per record, on 27.03.2026, the defendant
no.6 and 7 were directed to file WS during the course of the
day, however, as per record no such WS was filed on the said
date. It is further notable that no WS has been efiled and thus
the observation made on 30.04.2026 stands.
List of witness along with affidavit of evidence
has been filed on behalf of plaintiff. Copy is supplied to
counsel for defendant no.8. Let the copies be supplied to the
other defendants.
Be put up for PE on 27.10.2026.
(Nitish Kumar Sharma)
JSCC/ASCJ/GUDN. JUDGE
North, Rohini Courts,Delhi/30.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 4Full order available
    30 Apr 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 4 CS SCJ 1310/25 SH OM PRAKASH TYAGI Vs. SOM TYAGI 30.04.2026 Present: Sh. V.K. Vashist Ld. Counsel for plaintiff through VC. Sh. Naresh Sharma Ld. Counsel for defendant no.8 through VC. Sh. C.S. Dahiya Ld. Counsel for defendant no.1-5. Ms. Nomita Bhardwaj, Ld. Counsel for defendant no.6 and 7 through VC. No WS has been filed on behalf of defendant no.6 and 7. Accordingly, right of defendant no.6 and 7 to…

    Read Full Order
    Order 3
    27 Mar 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 10 CS SCJ 1310/25 SH OM PRAKASH TYAGI VS. SOM
TYAGI
27.03.2026
Present: Sh. V.K. Vashisth Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
through VC.
Sh. C.S. Dahiya and Sh. Ravinder Khatri Ld.
Counsel for defendant No.1-5
Sh. Naresh Sharma Ld. Counsel for defendant
no.8 through VC.
Ms. Nomita Bhardwaj, Ld. Counsel for
defendant no.6 and 7 with AE,
WS has already been filed on behalf of
defendant no.1-5 and defendant no.8. Copies have already
been supplied.
No WS has been filed on behalf of
defendant/MCD. Stipulated period for filing of WS has
already lapsed, however, Ld. Counsel for MCD has
undertaken to file WS during the course of the day itself.
The WS of MCD, if filed during the course of
the day, be taken on record, else the right of the MCD to
file WS shall be deemed to have been closed.
Let replication, if any, be filed with advance
copy to opposite party.
Be put up for consideration on issues/further
proceedings on 30.04.2026.
(Nitish Kumar Sharma)
JSCC/ASCJ/GUDN. JUDGE
North, Rohini Courts,Delhi/27.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 2
    16 Jan 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 21 CS SCJ 1310/25 SH OM PRAKASH TYAGI Vs. SOM
TYAGI
16.01.2026
Present: Sh. V.K. Vashisth and Sh. A.K. Vashisth Ld.
Counsels for plaintiff.
Sh. C.S. Dahiya, Sh. Rajesh and Sh. Ravinder
Khatri Ld. Counsels for defendant no.1-5.
Sh. Naresh Sharma Ld. Counsel for DDA
Ms. Nomita Bhardwaj Ld. Counsel for MCD.
Perusal of record shows that the defendants
have been served on 08.01.2026. Stipulated period for
filing of WS has not lapsed. Defendants are directed to file
WS within stipulated period with advance copy to opposite
party.
Be put up for 27.02.2026.
(Nitish Kumar Sharma)
JSCC/ASCJ/GUDN. JUDGE
North, Rohini Courts,Delhi/16.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    17 Dec 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS SCJ NO.1310/25 OM PRAKASH TYAGI VS SOM
TYAGI
17.12.2025
Fresh suit received by way of assignment through e-mode.
It be checked and registered.
Present: Sh. V.K. Vashisth, Sh. Vicky Rana and Sh.
A.K. Vashisht Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Submissions heard.
Issue summons for settlement of issues and
notice of the application under Order XXXIX rule 1 & 2 CPC
to defendants on filing of PF through all modes for
16.01.2026. Steps be taken within 7 days.
(Nitish Kumar Sharma)
JSCC/ASCJ/GUDN. JUDGE
North, Rohini Courts,Delhi/17.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.